Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
appreciate the humor and think you're pretty much on target w/excitement of some
....maybe they saw an opportunity for a nickel or two
your opinion or meant to be funny?
...think the run had more to do w/news found wrt Kisco/QMC; timing of Q, (expectations/hope) and decrease of sp w/profit taking by some
...looked like csti may have been surprised w/chunk taken off the ask,....regardless, csti's ask was moved up
normal droll comment or your opinion?
...if your opinion, do you have any supportive data?
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QTMM/quote
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=qtmm
...contested zone today seemed more like .13 or above
like the way you think
honest and thoughtful post imo.
not about prowess; rather civility or lack thereof impacts information flow
....or maybe just a question mark like in #48384 ;)
Thanks Bill, fantastic job through the years.
...also validates the discernment of some ;)
QDX tm
Looking Forward
LOL, thing about a causitic environment to positive opinions and science, part of the picture gets missed sometimes.
Thought, you'd have links I posted a few years back to QMC/Solterra tweets.
Oh well, Q and Display Week coming up
..there is a cultural aspect to China, even as there is with Japan
GL
think most are on that page
....and of course, corresponding sp move(s)
QDX tm
QMA
QMC
....just bring it home ;)
Good, then you know about peeps enquiring about you.
Hope you made contact.
Think they may be getting a bit anxious ;)
On that page, Welcome back
who cares?
already known, if some others pointed out the specific words, they'd have been whacked.
QMC will get things going soon enough imo.
exactamundo, already public knowledge
Kudos for the find btw
bear, check the time of the tweets,.....after info was already posted in public domain on msg bds.
Art? has done that in the past after some info became public knowledge.
.....imagine case of cyoa wrt information and agreements
Good work, Kinnaree.
Agree w/Hawk wrt sticky
....always appreciate links to data
LOL, "Now for the rest of the story"
Glad he's here; shoots straight wrt chart from what I've seen.
....Q & show w/Kisco coming soon ; )
it seems when whales show up some see it a as a sell signal and an opportunity to buy back later at a discount.
...I'll keep my tax advantage and turn some loose after revenues
Quarterly coming and should verify one way or the other
wrt " Mr. Liu, Dr. Liu Peng, Mr. Liu Xiao Who is who? I guess it's just safe to trust those with hotlines to QMC."
Do you have proof that implied person(s) talked to QMC or is that an assumption?
Could the issue which you call attention to have been an opinion?
DK, but I'd say direct from the horse's mouth is about as close as one could get...if you have proof that indeed was the case.
wrt information released; wouldn't you think the peeps putting up the $$ had the most say in that decision?
Why would they invest in QMC when QMA is already @ 50/50? Were they interested in QMC, don't you think they would have made an offer to buy QMC?
If they did offer, it seems terms were settled w/status quo of QMA.
Did you noticed that the meeting was only 28 min from Beijing?
It seems in Chinese economy all business leads to Beijing in one form or another.
Way to go, Jamis
...fractals going macro
So change isn't coming from news or filings, but rather a shift in perception and attitude, cool.
....appreciate the change
thought(s) are the foundation of reality yet to be. Your article reminded me of what I'd read about China's work w/computerss and
quantum entanglement.
Some seem to only focus on $$
On target
glad it was just a thought and not a terrorist bomb.
....imagine your thought came as a relief to some ;)
lol, maybe a little makers mark to celebrate with ;)
...next 25 years should be interesting, (if I'm around to see it)
QDX tm
DK, but imagine some may wonder why I haven't sold any QTMM shares, (even w/shooting star peak @ .45).
There are several reasons actually:
1. I did not want there to be any incongruency between word and action nor any appearance of taking advantage of members here.
2. I did not want to take part in possibly breaking QMC sp down, (while I may have made $$, the resulting dilutive impact
for future financial needs didn't seem helpful for QMC's future success or sh here).
So yes, maybe I have been a steadfast beacon of light to a few and glad to have been protective of new investors.
That said; I expect QMC to announce a contract for revenues sometime this year. At that time, I plan to sell a few shares
into the resulting run.
QDX tm
Looking Forward
either confident in the company or their skill, (maybe both)
....another day, another step. Though it may be questioned whether forward or back; Time will tell. ;)
QDX tm
too funny, perceptions are pretty well set based on bias shown
if peeps are still here now or later, it's only by choice.
argue w/time
MMs made adjustments ;)
in line for mine ;)
lol, more than one way to skin a cat
...reason, some stuff is left out of orig pat
imag peeps are just ready to see da'money now ; )
A "continuation-in-part" application ("CIP" or "CIP application") is one in which the applicant adds subject matter not disclosed in the parent, but repeats substantial portion of the parent's specification, and shares at least one inventor with the parent application.
Thanks Jamis,...indication of QMC progress & intent, imo
lol, science and studies before new game changers, but easy enough to ignore.
w/everything Nanosys thought about and all that help from MIT and CAL what makes you think they don't have a pat
covering that too? ...maybe they're just waiting for $$$ incentive to file suit. Quick, head for the Hills, (just kidding)
I would like to know "all the other far-fetched academic ideas that are posted on here." that you are referencing.
Would that be any opinion that differs from your own, those you consider too positive, or do you have specifics in mind?
Clarification would help and give others a chance to respond.
Personally, I see it as a win for QMC regardless of the outcome between Nanosys/QDV
....When the need is great enough; they will come. The difference between a lab cubicle vs thousands of sq ft for mass production
is telling...as price/kilogram comes down, (even more so)
effective at it, guess some would call it winning.
....at least sets the stage,(one way or the other)
snooze
Thanks, Ted
CJ, the expired options speak louder to me faith wise. Without $$ or exercising the options, that seems to imply the shares already owned will be sufficient.
....of course, one could be short of funds or too busy and just forgot.
Regardless, the Steady Step of Progress is a good sign, imo.
QDX tm
The Future Beckons
CJ, can just imagine when contract(s) hit the fan
QDX tm
Looking Forward