Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes we are going to get rich with more empty PR'S talking about how IPWG is entering into global relationships to sell nonexistent synergistic green technologies.Then we will be more rich with IPWG using these new relationships to gain more global users to enter into more MOU'S that will go unfufilled because of the immenent funding was not timely exploited.
imo
Power says,
Most used lie in business use to be. The check is in the mail.
New big lie. Funds will be wired imminently.
Yes IPWG is up today. But, no money. No projects. The only cutting edge technology here is the internet we are using to access this MB and our brokers.
IMO
Yeah right. The 'check is in the mail" line is getting stale. Kind of like IPWG.
IMO
Good questions. Replayed the message. JB stated that they do not fly on "peters airline". Stated that he(JB) fly Delta or Polish air. That they do not fly business class, but fly in the back of the plane for the 9 hour trip. JB stated he is doing what has never been done before. Whatever that means I don't know. JB mentioned the preferred shares. JB stated he would discuss those at a later day as he or IPWG was dealing with attornies regarding those.
Also, in regards to the financials he stated that they would be signed and certified. They would be done in a professional way. JB mentioned that IPWG was not a revenue generating company. IPWG needed to sell stock or close the doors.
JB mentioned in a voice mail he left me that IPWG is a company that is not producing revenue. ALso, JB stated that they will be doing the other financials when there is money to do them.
If you go to the authorities which ones would you go to? SEC? Since IPWG is not a reporting company I doubt anyone could go there. What agency or government body could we go to in Delaware? The only one that comes to mind is the Chancery Court. Could there be a class action suit against IPWG?
I admit something needs to be done. So far the mysterious Irish group along with some investors who have posted on several of the message boards are taking on IPWG.
I myself would like to know what is going on with IPWG, but not being a part of a group it is difficult to find out what is really going on.
I think that the present situation regarding IPWG should be taken to the Chancery Court in Delaware. The question seems to be by whom and how to take it.
IMO
Sounds like a good idea. How about the representative making a report available to other shareholders not part of the much talked about Irish group or any particular group of IPWG shareholders?
It seems to me that the shareholders who wish to see the books in person reside on the east coast. It's kind of time and money consuming for those of us out here on the "left coast" to go to Celebration. Especially when IPWG does not want to show us the books.
IMO
It's good not to trust what one reades on a MB. Especially one for a company like IPWG.
I've noticed that the MB's for IPWG (EG & IHUB) is a "club". The "club" mentality seems to be the order of the day regarding IPWG. Both in regards to being an investor in IPWG and posting regarding issues regarding IPWG.
IMO
Doc # 2 Sec 3 Voting. it states "The holders of shares of Class D prefferred shall be entitled to twenty five (25,000) votes per share".
That makes two of us
Thanks for the post. Gives us shareholders who are "outsiders" some very good info.
IPWG owes all of us shareholders show us some accountability.
IMO
Your answer gives a different perspective on the topic.
True companies have proprietary/inside information that should not be disclosed. My understanding is that certian stockholders/shareholders should not have access or be in knowledge of inside information that others do not have.
Private/Public compamies from my understanding is ownership. For example a company that issues stock is a public company. A company that has investors that invest, but no stock issued is a private company.
IMO
As IPWG is a DE corp why has no one taken there issues to the DE court of Chancellory? Maybe IPWG and those with issues against IPWG should "tell it to the judge". Maybe get a resolution that way?
IMO
A company can not be a private company and a public company at the same time. Your either private or public.
Who are these people who want to look at IPWG'S books. By reading ipwginvestor's message at EG one would think there is a group of people who want to examine IPWG'S Books.
Pesronally I have not received any communication to support or become a part of any group wanting to examine IPWG'S books or remove any member of IPWG management.
I tend not to believe what I hear/see on message boards.
If there is a group who have a beef with IPWG make it public.
IMO
What about incorporating in Nevada? As I recall IPWG was going to incorporate in Nevada. The Nevada Secretary Of State shows a filing for IPWG. What about Peter Toscano retiring and going after those who are/have done IPWG harm? Mentioned in the September 03, 2009 Press release regarding Peter Toscano's retirement.
Never heard about the alleged meeting either. Still have not received any return calls from John Benvengo to some voice mails I left. IMO we have some irate IPWG investors.
Called IPWG and left a message late yesterday (03-12) with JB with a question regarding Poland. As of this posting no reply yet.
IPWG'S phone is 407-566-0318
Talked to vanya 3 1/2 weeks ago she mentioned John Benvengo was out of the country. Left a voice mail with JB a few days earlier. Got no response
With support maybe we will be hearing something soon. Called IPWG and was told John B was "out of the country" Perhaps Poland? Italy?
Against the company? Foolish to set a date? I own shares in IPWG so I am not against the company. It's foolish to state when IPWG is going to do something when there is no information from IPWG regarding dates.
With IPWG one does not know when or if something will be done.
IMO
Surely you joust. Heard date setting before. Solara who I mentioned in my last post has been around less than IPWG and has private funding. Loans from the US Government. Next is Initial Public Offering (IPO)) Let's not forget they have a product too.
What does IPWG have? Fulfilled contracts? A product? Cash in the bank? That would be a two letter answer to those questions. NO.
What IPWG have had is Peter Toscano doing his version of the movie UP In The Air while doing his version of Where's Waldo. Followed with LOI'S and other agreeements that magically disappeared.
With John Benvengo we have a poland project that is moving slower than a snail. At least we have a new board member as promised. But, still no money, Plans or construction on the project. Also, let's not forget Indiana.
So date setting is foolish since us shareholders do not have complete info on IPWG activities. Just what is put out from IPWG.
IMO
US may be geared for alternate energy, but IPWG is not geared up for providing it. The speech by pres Obama that you linked was made when he was out here at a company called Solyndra. The company has received federal money and is building a second manufacturing plant. So far they are doing more than IPWG has.
IPWG website you can go under press and at the top there are links going back to 2004
How about those "plants" and other "projects that IPWG issued PR'S going back to 2006. Are those "projects" getting done?
I've had IPWG stock since 2006. All I have seen is a whole bunch of nothing from IPWG and that's what I expect to come from IPWG. Maybe I am wrong I hope I am, but with IPWG one can not have high expectations.
IMO
Another investment opportunity would be Garbage Truck manufacturers. In Livermore, CA. the garbage trucks use methane instead of gas.
You're best response is pathetic? Mr Benvengo doing his job? hardly.
Investigating merger option(s) is showing to me that John Benvengo is looking for an easy out.
What happened to incorporating in Nevada? Name change? Cusip # change? same as usual. Not followed thru on as usual.
Now we are talking about merger and assumptions.
IMO
What are those solutions. Investigating merger options with a mystery company. Let's not forget that board seat for John Benvengo who seems tho be throwing in the towel. Could this be John Benvengo's way of saying he can't do the job?
Why can't IPWG do the name change? How about incorporating in Nevada? Where is our Peter Toscano? He supposedly was going after those that are doing or have done IPWG harm.
Let's not forget what is in it for our Italian Financiers. Will they have a seat on the new board? That's if IPWG decides to "merg".
IMO
Ames Whoever he is I am sure has something in it for himself. The question is why is IPWG looking at a merger? IPWG was talking about name change and new cusip number. Now IPWG is exploring a merger. John Benvengo would get a seat on the board. What's up with that? Sounds like John Benvengo is throwing in the towel.
IMO
IPWG is not a success story. John Benvengo has not kept us up on Poland. Whetever happened to what was discussed at the shareholders meeting. The latest pr still gives no solid news. Only more if's, ands, maybe's & but's.
IMO
Great job for what? Looking to take the easy way out is what IPWG seems to be considering. What ever happened to incorporating in Nevada? Cusip change?
IMO
Hopefully IPWG can get Poland project going too.
I do not see where DTC accepted.
Right now my reading is that IPWG does not have enough evidence to make there case.
I too am a shareholder who would like to see the chill lifted, I think the best thing now is for IPWG to change state of incorporation to Nevada and cusip #
Going through legal manueverings would be a waste of time and resources.
IMO
Hey investor go to IPWG'S website and look at the documents posted there. Might find out something that you did not hear about at the meeting.
IMO
Does anyone absolutly know what IPWG is doing with the unregistered shares right now? ipwginvestor claims to know, but I do not trus what investor posts.
IMO
I have gone over quite a few of them. Don't like what I see. A couple of things that I have mentioned bother me.
One is IPWG being told by the DTC that IPWG needs to deal with the unregistered shares. IPWG not doing anything about the unregistered shares that were dumped on the market.
TWO. IPWG making a case from 3 shareholders who could not trade the stock and a posting from a message board
What bothers me the most is a posting from a message board being presented. Especially in a conversation back in January 2010 John Benvengo stated to me "don't believe what you read on a message board". If us shareholders are not to believe what is posted on a message board why is IPWG using a posted message in a compliant to the SEC?
So far my take on the documents is that IPWG seems to be putting emphasis on going to the SEC first than working out the issue(s) with DTC.
IMO