Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Its pretty simple why Burton had to remain unavailable,
he would not have been able to finish the job he was
hired for if he had to spend all day on the phone being
harassed and worrying about his efforts being
sabotaged as was the case in the past. He knew perfectly
well what was going on and the circumstances gave him
no choice. He just avoided the problem and completed
his job, and as I have pointed out, everyone will come
to realize over the next few months.
As this unfolds, everyone will find out the truth. Pawson
and Fisher, not involved and Micheal Burton does exist
and did what he was hired to do over the last seven months.
Burton had a job to do and he did it. If he would
have made himself available over the last seven months,
all that would have happened is what occurred in the
past a constant barrage of harassing phone calls and
just more attempts to sabotage his efforts to get all
the problems left behind by the old board. It makes
perfect sense why he had no choice but to remain un-
available.
Fisher and Pawson are not involved with ECO WASTE.
Let me direct you to proving your claim that Burton does
not exist. That should be a simple task if in fact you
actually have the proof.
Their is a Michael Burton and he did exactly what he was hired to
do, clean up Behl. ECO WASTE was just waiting for that to happen and then they purchased the company. Those are the facts as to
what ocured during the past seven months. If you have some proof
that Burton does not exist, please show the supporting evidence.
holycroc, again, I am on Behl's dime and if they succeed,
fine and if they don't, I will break even.
During the seven months that Burton was in charge, a new
company came along and offered to buy Behl. So at that
point, their was no need to put a new board in place. I
don't see what is so hard to understand about that. You
might want to wait until the end of this month and see
what news comes from ECO before you cast judgement on
the new venture.
If the same people are involved, you may be right. However,
with the departure of Berry, Shen and Rawson, and with no
proof that Fisher is involved in any way, that analogy may
not apply. Time will tell and the only real issue is the
possibility that investors can recoup their investment.
Not really enjoying anything at this time as it pertains
to the Behl drama. My hope is for the existing shareholders
to get their money back. I have never seen the point in
wanting a stock to fail and enjoy the idea of people losing
their money. Since no one knows what the outcome will be
here, it might be nice to give ECO WASTE an opportunity to
prove themselves rather than hanging them while the jury is
still out.
avaritia1949, you might have missed the pr but Behl was sold.
Michael Burton took over in December 2010 after Berry, Rawson
and Shen tried to ruin the company. He spent the last seven
months cleaning up the mess they left behind and sold it to
ECO WASTE. Dennis Fisher resigned and all the rumors about
Roger Pawson being involved are not true. Looks like things
are moving along now and you can expect the new company to
to emerge with their new ticker symbol within the next ninety
days or so. These are exiting times for all Behl shareholders
as the new company will be in the business of converting
trash into usable energy, as this industry is becoming a very
profitable venture,so ECO WASTE could become a nice investment.
Fisher had nothing to do with this. He resigned back in Dec. 2010.
In that seven month period of time there has not been one shred
of evidence to back up that assumption. Just opinion.
We will wait for the new company to issue the financials.
Burton did what he was hired to do and the company was
sold. What happened before Burton is history and now the
last seven months is history. Behl has been sold. Period.
I will wait until the new company issues statements that
pertain to their business plan before I condemn anything.
I am still waiting for the proof that Pawson and Fisher are
involved with Behl. No proof, just speculation and assumption.
As far as the shares for Burton goes, I heard that he decided
to opt for a cash payment for his services. Considering all
the legal problems that were left by Berry, Shen and Rawson,
that makes a lot of sense. He was hired, cleaned up the mess
and sold to eco, period. Now we will see what happens next.
One fact here, no one knows how this will play out, and I
mean no one.
What I do know is that Burton was real and was hired as a
turn around specialist. Another company has bought Behl
and we will have to wait to see what prs the new company
issues. This is not a matter of relief for me as I knew
something would develop that for the time being keeps
the success possibility alive and well.
Almost 184 million shares traded today. Looks like a lot
of renewed interest in this dead company.
Does Richard have a last name? Who confirmed this? Just
trying to get some facts here, so please if anyone can
prove this, with the complete story, please do. The
other thing is that if Fisher and Pawson were seen at
DVJ, they could be planning a new venture that has
absolutely nothing to do with Behl. I will believe
what can be proven not hearsay statements designed
to do damage to the efforts of the new management team
that is involved with Behl.
Who exactly saw Fisher and Pawson at DVJ?
If none of the things that are supposed to happen, don't then
the references could have some validity but since there has been
no absolute statement from Behl alluding to anything but the
hopeful profitability by the end of the year, and the use of
the term soon and in the near future, everyone who has an
interest in Behl must determine for themselves as to when a
falsehood has actually taken place. Last post today.
All that the new management team at Behl has stated so far
is the original post in December letting the shareholders
know that the old board left Behl in a shamble and that
they are working on several fronts to correct the problems
and make Behl profitable by the end of this year. Since
Berry, Shen, Rawson and Fisher are no longer associated with
the company, I would say there is a good chance that is what
will happen.
Their is nothing unusual about Behl remaining quite at
this time considering all the past attempts to sabotage
this company.
Another assumption that Behl has no capital. We won't know that
for sure and until we get the next financial report. No way to
determine if Behl has lined up new business partners or for
that matter, new investors. Considering the past attempts
to sabotage Behl, its stands to reason why they are keeping
things under wraps for the time being. So again, as you have
pointed out, the is all conversation and that's all it is.
Well, why don't you call Roger Pawson and ask him what
his involvement in Behl is? Let me know what he says.
Or Behl become successful.
There is nothing that has been proven about what is or is
not going on with Behl at this time. All that is a fact, is
what happened with the old board. Just because Behl has not
announced anything since March, only means that. It does not
in anyway prove that the new group has lied about anything
and it certainly does not prove that they are trying to do
anything but put Behl back on its feet and that is what has
been stated.Each person much decide what the word soon means
and what they feel is a reasonable time frame to see some
progress. They said that they should be profitable by the
end of this year. I will ask you the same question, what are
the shareholders supposed to do?
63strat, just for laughs, lets say your right and this
entire thing is a ruse. First of all, no one is buying
anymore stock in Behl right now. Secondly, just exactly
what would you recommend to the shareholders to do. There
is no real solution at this time for people except to
hold on to their shares and hopefully salvage their in-
vestment.
Do you honestly believe that there is only one Michael
Burton on the planet? I remember when Doc and several
other people were contacting people by the name of
Michael Burton and none of them admitted to being in-
volved with Behl. So the only fact that came out of that
search was no one can prove they actually contacted the
real Michael Burton.
avaritia, this whole conversation has been about any
proof that the new management team at Behl as lied
about anything. Again, show the lies.
Doc claims that he contacted the real Burton, again, nothing
more than hearsay.
Since, Burton took over, there have been two prs released,
I want to know what lies have been told? I ask for proof
that any lies have been told by the new management team
at Behl, not what occurred after Burton. To state that
Burton does not exist, can be taken only as opinion and
nothing more.
pickard, please give me an example of any lies that were
stated after Burton took over the reigns at Behl. We all
know that the previous board was nothing but a bunch of
scam artists. I am looking for any lies that have come
from the new group.
What lies are you referring to?
This is a simple question and maybe someone can post
a simple answer. Behl is a penny stock and we all
know that pinky land is full of scam artists and crooks.
We all know that 98% of these stocks go belly up, so
very small odds of success. So why all the complaining
about the failure?
pickard, I originally invested some beer money in Behl and sold those share in August 09. I reinvested that money back into Behl
at various times on the way down. So if Behl does tank, what have
I lost? You stated that you have lost money in Behl but I am the
naive one.
Has anyone associated with Behl been convicted of any
crimes and sent to jail yet?
zman250, if the company is already worthless as has been claimed
here on almost a daily basis, then all of the investors money is
already gone. The company does not exist, no board, no business
no home office, zip, nada, no value. As I have read, so how can
anyone be worse off than they already are?
Wrong, there is a new team and Pawson has nothing to do with it.
I think that when all the smoke clears regarding Behl's
past board, we will see that Shen, Berry and Rawson came
out of this deal smelling like roses financially. Once
they sabotaged the company and did everything but ruin it,
why would they hang around? They have just moved on to
look for their next scam.
When Behl's old board of directors abandoned ship and ran
off like thieves in the night that company imo, ceased to
exist. A new group of people have taken over and have elected
at this time to remain quiet about their game plan and the
time line that they will announce it. Yes, same ticker but
two entirely different scenarios. So the constant comparison
of the two scenarios is not valid. This type of management
shuffle occurs all the time in the business world and is no
different on what is taking place at Behl right now. These
people not only have the task of overcoming the shaded past
of former employees, but also must re-establish their business
connections, new board, permanent corporate facilities as
well as new partnerships and a myriad of other problems to
overcome because of the past damage done by Berry, Shen and
Rawson. The bottom line is this, if the new team accomplishes
the task at hand it really does not matter how long it takes.
If on the other hand they don't, then nobody is any worse off
than they already are.
BB1, the only point is that you have two separate issues and
they must be looked at that way. Behl under the old management
team, proved to be nothing more than a typical penny stock scam.
The reorganization of the new Behl is still underway with a new
management team at the helm. The fact of the matter is that you don't know what is going on right now at Behl. So any state-
ments pertaining to Behl's current activities are again nothing
more than speculation and cannot be considered valid without
proof to back them up.