Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Again in plain easy to understand English there is nothing that says deitch sold any shares. Try again.
more BS. even the SEC doesnt show anywhere in their case that deitch sold any shares. maybe you can enlighten everyone about that wild accusation.
Federal Court can drag on for years and if you check PACER Deitsch is responsible for most of the delays along with the Judge.
Prove it. what an opinion that was.
Federal Court can drag on for years and if you check PACER Deitsch is responsible for most of the delays along with the Judge.
You know when the sec is getting nervous from their weak case when asking deitsch to just give up.
just ridiculous.
Sec has a weak case. It scares them because they know they wanted sooooo much time on it.
The only thing the sec will want to do is settle their weak case.
Yes, I don't agree with anything you said.
I don't agree with you at all.
So you see now the previous post was the wrong VANCOUVER COMMODITIES GROUP, LLC that was dissolved in 2011.
And did you find the right one? You definitely have the wrong one in your prior post. That's all I'm disclosing.
I had thought that, then I did more digging.
VANCOUVER COMMODITIES GROUP, LLC
this is how bad the sec case is.
https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/south-florida-company-turns-cobra-venom-into-healing-treatment/31261/
clearly shows the snake farm.
There you go - no snake farm.
You found the wrong company with the same name.
VANCOUVER COMMODITIES GROUP, LLC
NPHC financials are audited. I clearly understand how an audit works. it is you that doesn't understand how an OTC audit works. To sum it up for everyone audit means to verify.
Auditors verify what they are given to be true or not. then the auditors give an opinion. very easy to understand. right there in red below the auditor says based on our audit. cant be more clear than that.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements
based on our audits
No you don't understand how a OTC audit works
Not according to nphc Twitter account. I'll take the companies word as they know what they are doing.
You don't understand as nphc Financials are sec audited compliant. That means an outside audit company verifies Financials. Not just signs off on whatever a company says.
And absolutely no proof from what I read except a general working theory how otc ceos operate.
Oh do point out in the sec investigation where the sec states that the ceo used money for the company on himself.
Nothing but another crazy theory with absolutely zero substantiated proof.
Your keyword in describing that wild theory is "probably". So you are guessing that the ceo probably gives himself 100 to put in 5 to the company?
the ceos money he put is in the audited Financials. That's undisputed.
Deitch has put his own money into nphc in the past many times. Its in the Financials.others saying he's living off toxic loans is fos with no proof. Financials are audited by an outside cpa firm.
The defendant never admitted to any manipulation. purchasing stock in the open market is not an admission of manipulation. hope that helps.
Because it happened in the past doesn't mean its applicable to this civil case. with that thinking, the theory can be applied to every case whether its meets that criteria or not.
never said that. not sure how you deciphered that one from me.
So; based on the Judges Findings and Orders, in this case, it's the Judge that has wild theories and is pushing an agenda.
until the ceo is charged with anything, its just a wild theory made up for the sole purpose of pushing an agenda.
this is just an opinion
The facts are Deitsch will be banned from any involvement in securities for a minimum of 5 years.
What a wild theory you have there. Anyone can make up wild theories to suit an agenda.
The SEC is CIVIL. The DOJ handles CRIMINAL cases. The SEC CIVIL case does not extend the statute to file a CRIMINAL complaint/indictment. They (the DOJ) have 5 years from the EVENT or behavior to file the CRIMINAL complaint/indictment. All of the behavior that the govt has made allegations on happened in 2015 or earlier, so that ship has sailed. A tolling agreement with the SEC does not create a tolling agreement with the DOJ. They are completely separate.
I never said there was one. There isnt any as nothing was criminal.
Of course the sec case can go on till it's concluded. No one has said otherwise.
Just common sense.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the doj that some keep posting. That ship sailed.
Thats just common sense.
Why don't you post your proof that the SEC is disappointed.
That post was not from January 2021 as you said prior. People questioned the authenticity of the audit saying it was fake because of the blacked out amounts. We know now for sure that the audit was real.
Don't be mad at me when someone else starts a conversation that apparently wasn't following the thread and I used a chart from saild conversation.
Your chart is a whole new conversation. Otcmarkets.com won't allow people to buy. Otc markets is getting exactly what they want. Someone from otc markets tipped off someone to short the stock hours before the ce was put on. There was an anomaly in short interest right before it.
It wasn't a one day chart. When you follow the conversation back you will see the discussion was Jan 2021. I just followed the discussion that I didn't even start.
You said Jan 2021. I printed out the chart for Jan 2021. Just going by what you said.
Not worried one bit. You couldn't be farther from the truth.
The audit did get completed though. Whether the auditing firm did it by Jan 2021 is moot because it got done in 2021.
I also sounded the alarm january 2021 after the "audit" was not complete like pr stated.
did you forget,this was a civil trial, not a criminal trial.
show us where deitchs small trades moved the stock anywhere. you cant cause it didnt. the sec was very disappointed when they found out deitch didnt sell any of his shares.
The purchases were way to small to move the stock. Facts. Stock didn't go up on ceos purchases.
Well, i know a real lawyer that says otherwise that deals specifically in these types of matters. The sec overreached. the only thing the sec won was a late disclosure filing. not a non disclosure but a late disclosure. The sec at best will want to save face and settle with the company and its ceo. someone will be getting fired for their incompetence over at the sec.