Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wow that's pretty deep stuff...can you find something that spells out Robert Battis's involvement? I see Laserenergetics, but as I recall they were to provide laser technology to LantisLaser's dental imaging equipment. So I'm a bit confused how a supplier/developer has anything to do with fraudulent SEC activity? Did they go out and promote this on their own accord? Lantis had their own listing on the pink sheets plus they have/had their own website. I see this as guilty by association nothing more. Until the courts deem it otherwise its no more than frivolous commentary.
So taking a dart and throwing it at the possible lawsuits board is now a legitimate way to present believable information? I find it strange that a new name has been thrown in the hat and yet from reading some messages here it has been common knowledge for quite some time. My question is if this new enlightenment is all so fired up big news why has it taken so long to come out?
"This is exactly what the lawsuit alleges" and so that is factual? has the court dropped the gavel on that claim? No so its just another one of many statements that has to be PROVEN!
"is it remotely possible that Daniel Schall and Colon are actually the same person?" Why even go there Deacon? If you don't have the facts then what is your objective. To link a criminal with somebody you claim don't even know is treading a fine line in my honest opinion.
"All the patents are being take out of the Laser Energetics name and moved to other people or companies" I request a link to this statement please. I too thirst and seek the truth. TIA
Doe Boy a word of advice don't make it so easy for a TOS violation to be thrown at you. This site is very strict when it comes to talking about other people. Try and keep it straight to the point about LEI. Believe me I have had my fair share of violations. Its hard sometimes to make a point without referring to another individual, but sure as a laser dazzler is green as soon as it happens the post will get taken down. Thanks for sharing your information though.
"folks have moved with their lives" Truthfully? Not from my perspective. If that was a true statement there would be z.e.r.o going on in the two blogs and yet they both still have daily postings. No links to any of the comments though so I would expect people will continue on with their lives but spend a percentage of that time visiting, checking up and making sure nothing flies in under the radar..of course as always this is just an opinion and an observation.
yeah me too... good thing there is enough interest out there that keeps the company alive from day to day. I'm thinking its the lure of what could happen at any moment. In light of that statement then keeping totally silent appears to be a great strategy..yes?...no?
I thought "probablies" were disregarded here in the land of "links please" yes/no?
Tesla Motors gave away their lithium battery patents. How much did it hurt their bottom line? Just a thought since the subject for the day is the LEI patents..btw I do believe Wayne Armstrong is mentioned on at least one of LEI's patents..so how does that work in the grand scheme of things? Truth be told I believe its Armstrong who is the unsung Engineering genuis in the first place.
"the value is in the patents" It appears there has been a change about how valuable the patents are. I thought the recent view was they held no value since the Dazer has never been proven to work? So why should anybody be concerned what happens to them? Are the shareholders at this point worried they are going to lose the remaining .0025? From what I gathered here most folks didn't bet their entire life savings on this only an amount that they could afford to lose. Which in my humble opinion is the best approach to investing in a penny stock..wouldn't you agree?
"EXIT" as the patents are transferred out"
"Why would Bsttis be shifting the patents out of LEI"
Is hearsay allowable as evidence in a courtroom? I'm asking this in connection with the Battis lawsuits pertaining to Laser
Energetics Inc. The quote posted is said to be a comment not a sworn statement.
Also why would it be of any concern for the patents to move? Are they changing ownership too? Help I am not getting the point.
yeah kinda the number that has been floating around here for years. Just wanted to see what kind of a response I would get from that article, and it was exactly what I had expected.
Well I guess 5 months is too long ago... hec 10 minutes could be considered too long ago as far as this blog is concerned.
The long anticipated much requested "link"
http://www.princetoninfo.com/index.php?option=com_us1more&Itemid=6&key=09-09-09%20dazer
Been posted here a few times with a link to it. The article is now over two years old so is it relevant? Prices fluctuate and can be negotiated depending on the contract IMHO.... so its another fine and sunny day here in the land of enchantment..peace
I just had another dreadful thought
What if General Dynamics and CACI have done this before or worse yet they are doing it now with an entirely new penny-stock! OMG is anybody out there looking into this? There are potentially hundreds if not thousands of innocent investors out there about to lose their hard earned cash to a false hope created by these folks. wow...wow : (
It sounds like a pretty solid case. I think if I had enough information gathered up I would go for the big big big dogs like General Dynamics and CACI for being part of this scam. Who do they think they are fooling anyway giving LEI photo ops in their booth and alongside management somewhere in Kuwait not to mention those phoney PR's on both their websites GEEEZ what stones they have. Man they sure suckered in a lot of people with that. Yessir why waste time with a sub-penny company when you can go for the billion plus guy's! Frk'n defense contractors you would think they had enough money without stooping to such underhanded tactics. Let's go get em!
I'm not quite sure I got what the point of the message was. Would a possible history on this blog help to clear up any confusion? Thanks in advance.
I have a quick resolution while you wait for a web administrator to fulfill your request. On the spot where it is typed hide intro click on that and whala its like it never existed. Another helpful contribution would be to call the Transfer Agent:
Interstate Transfer Co.
801-281-9746
Then post it here for all of us. Hope I was of some help and thank you for your concern about LEI and its poor website and its poor intro information. FDA approval=No.. New Contracts =No.. New Pr's = No
Another simple stress reliever I found to be effective is to assume pretty much anything can be construed as a no since there is no word from management.
Wow love the new look to this board
of course watching the sp fall from $4 to .09 probably didn't help too much either.
I'm not really sure but I think comparing a sub-penny with a blue chip stock is like comparing the horsepower of a titan missile to a pop gun...just saying. Is the point that a sub-penny does not act like a company who is a leader in its sector? How about General Mills how do they compare to LEI? How about Ford how do they compare to LEI? May I ask are we seeing a definite gap in the learning curve about this subject? I haven't seen one post that even remotely sounded confused about how this specific company and its management conducts business. In fact I am 100% confident that until an official notice in the public record stating this company has closed its doors there will be postings daily of the same regurgitated message. enjoy
Geez I don't know why there's all this complaining here. I think its another opportunity for folks to step up and voice an opinion. IMHO there are many who have yet to gather enough information to decide if people are for or against this and why. I know if I just happened across this site I would see the sentiment right at 50/50 straight down the line.
Now getting back to the real meat and potatoes...if the website is so offensive maybe the plug could be pulled on it... I don't think there would be any harm in it. Besides its old gawdy and a down-right nuisance to some. yes/no?
I think LEI turned the website off on purpose just to see if anybody was paying attention...LOL! I think they got their answer yes/no?
Thanks for the update have a great 4th of July
I believe that information was provided by Datanet a few days ago. Also even when they were still in contract the very same message would be given to outside inquirers . So what does that actually mean? The original guys are gone that's it nothing more nothing less. The rest is left up to the individual. So is this informative? slightly surprising?...like you just stated no.
TASR was/is a pretty good play yes/no? Just speaking from past experience with things posted on this board. Being the Dazer is in the same category as the taser I can see why there is so much passion in some of the messages.
Whatever deacon you can take it all does it make it factual? I don't think so. If it makes your entire week take it. The fact still remains most of the claims are used for an ulterior motive. Get real with the info and the problem goes away. Besides that how many times does it have to be repeated? What is to gain from that? A newbie needs to read it from the same two bloggers a dozen times in the span of five days? really? This site does not refresh itself so the post can linger for weeks on end!
I guess we are all supposed to take it as true because a blogger put it there, but again show me lightpod won from a public record stand point show me the house is completely foreclosed upon from a public record, the internet and website are not three issues, "several lawsuits" again show a public record of it.
Its a waste of time to argue these points when an individual thinks what they say is absolute when in reality it wouldn't hold up in a court of law.
you win deacon I will give you your 20% (probably more like 18.359%) but on the flip side why should there even be that much margin of bs?
Looks like over 50% of these "claims" are just that. I don't think it comes as any surprise why nobody even bothers to respond to such gibberish. Links links links is the name of the game if you are serious about wanting people to believe you. As far as the website...really? It hasn't been worth a dang for a couple of years if ever so am I heart broken it is no longer out there? Was it a great big customer magnet in the first place? What I would like to know is how these claims of closure can be verified when nobody has even attempted to go there? Always the easy route if I can't Google it then it must not exsist. Good Luck
"wow you make is sound like the website will save the company " care to expand on that statement? I mean there was a post prior to this expressing concern over the website erring out now it sounds like there is agreement about a possible new website is in the works? hmmm interesting.
Not really, and the reason why I feel this way? I have observed many companies with new products attempting to roll it out. Ever watch Shark Tank? ever pick out one of the thousands of pennies offered on iHub and compared them? I know of two right off the top of my head that have yet to make it, and the time frame, stock swings, lousy CEO etc is very similar to this one. So yeah six years I guess so. Unless you have some Angel Investor or somebody willing to risk a chunk this is what .005 gets you. Is that statement too much of a stretch? What more does a person need to make up his/her mind? Why is it that this entire reply is so hard to digest for some? I don't think there is anything hidden in the message I present. At some point all the chips are on the table and then all that is left is a yes or a no. From what I have gathered from all the cat and mouse games being played the last four weeks the answer has never been in question...am I wrong?
Here is a personal opinion on why the LDAP no longer recognizes LEI's website. I think the companies management has been monitoring the board and have taken some of the comments about the phone, email and website to heart. The last time the link was broken a totally new website emerged a day or two later. So here we are the end of the month with 500K shares dumped. Hmmmm
Maybe its all about July 4th. Maybe its going to be a whole new ball game with a new website, phone number and leadership....No? Well I guess we will just have to wait and see. I just wanted to be the first to chime in with something a bit more optimistic than what the usual comments consist of....Hey Good Luck and.....Oh and I nearly forgot today's suggestion to change the name of the company because it was confusing with the company out of Rochester NY...wow talk about reaction time!
"news I am certain is not far away." By all the activity I see here that is an understatement! Its Saturday the stock market is closed, and yet this .005 stock has plenty of activity! This company really puzzles me. It batters the hec out its shareholders, but the support remains. Then on the other side of that there is a whole campaign going on trying to get supporters to see all hope is lost and jump ship with no more information than what everybody else has access to. IMHO I think the plaintiff and the defendant should air their dirty laundry in the court room and let the best man win. One observation I have is the information presented thus far would be seen as frivolous in the courts eyes and thrown out. Good Luck though.
It appears this subject was addressed just a scant few weeks ago.
Datanet in reply to dazedumconfused
"Risko is nothing more than an impatient buffoon, just like Lou (Lothar). They didn't have the tolerance to take the risks they were signing up to and now they are crying foul.
This will be dismissed as lacking any merit whatsoever. The meeting went well and this is going to be a good summer for all those who have been patient to stick around long enough to see this finally bear fruit.
Expect a PR before July 4th, if nothing else to address all of these bogus accusations and suits. Lots of real opportunities still in the pipeline and CACI leadership is still very much on board although different players now".
Sounds like the information presented isn't chiseled out in stone...so the answer is a resounding yes there IS hope. IMHO until that door is completely shut, locked and bolted down there is always a chance. I'm no wizard therefore I do not have the ability to see the future. I think the lack of news over such a long period of time actually heightens the awareness and the anticipation that something could happen suddenly and soon....I don't have anything to base that statement on its just another side of the equation. I like the optimistic view it makes summer and life much more fun. GLTAL's!
Its obvious the answers will never be good enough. I think the majority of people here have invested in this on their own accord. Its rare to have interested parties taking the iHub DD well past the point of information depletion, and still feel there is somebody out there who is going to come forward with a brand new revelation.
IMHO the only misleading posts are the ones the reader misinterprets either through wishful thinking, laziness or just plain stupidity. Day after day the same request goes out, and quite frankly after over a year of it, with no results I may add, a person should realize they will have to put forth a bit more effort than just sitting in front of a computer posting on the companies blog. I think everybody here gets the message being conveyed, and to be honest I see no fresh inquiries from either side of the fence so how does one gauge the effectiveness...5000 share trades and 13% swings? LOL again,