Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I can supply the bird.
You gotta change your signature, that might be what prompted the lack of replies. Could be some other excuse, too, of course :)
Well, dilution IS a form of corporate financing :)
Indeed they don't, most of those are given posthumously.
Well, he may be successful in his endeavours, but the question is how successful those endeavours were for everyone else involved. From his point of view, the current situation must be a success, for example :)
That was a joke and a teasing attempt. It obviously didn't work :)
Nepotism, the one USMC is infamous for, that's what this is! I wish you people look at the Army for the example. No such things happening there, AND we know how to use a fork (it's part of the advanced training) :)
You're right, of course. I just found the situation rather amusing, that's all.
Thought it was the company's business to do that, and shareholders' business to finance that. If shareholders do both, then what's the point of having a company to begin with? You people should really organize. With all the effort put into discovering anything new about the company and figuring out what it should do if it had good management, applied to some other venture founded by the shareholders here, now that'd be a company to invest in :)
Well, I hope you're right.
For #2, one can use one of those services like live365.com. You can upload mp3s, and they'd stream for you. Of course, one has to tell the users about it, and that seems too much to ask from these, umm, competent and business-other-than-selling-shares-savvy people.
Hmm, that I wouldn't mind seeing. It's not very likely, but would be nice :)
The usuals, whatever I post is my opinion, yaddayaddayadda. I'm still learning this, so if you listen to me, well, good luck to you :)
Well, the need for replying to 8000 people contacting can be dealt with by creating a proper CRM system, or, at least, a FAQ, where most of the commonly asked questions are answered.
It'd probably require too much creativity and professionalism than these people seem to project though, unless all this is a master plan to make everyone underestimate them :)
When they come, that is, and not just promised.
I hope he does that and wins. Pity that such things have to be settled through lawsuits these days, and not, say, ostracism.
Heh, they probably thought they were seeing the future President, or at least a senator :)
Because they already bought it, and are way down on it. WHich makes the interest in it quite understandable. Now that I think of it, it makes negativity quite understandable, too.
Actually, that number is derived from the feedbacks left for the seller by other Paypal users who bought something from him.
Yeah, can't do it based on charts alone.
Ah, sorry, I assumed you meant Brian Kistler.
The usuals, whatever I post is my opinion, yaddayaddayadda. I'm still learning this, so if you listen to me, well, good luck to you :)
He's not. I bought in because the chart looked good, and didn't do proper DD, for example, who runs the company. If I saw Brian Kistler's name then, I wouldn't've bough in to begin with, as he's quite notorious in his, umm, business practices. However, not having invested much to begin with, and having waited too long to sell, through a combination of being too busy at the time, oversleeping on an important day, and making bad decisions, it seems an ok decision to ride it out. Might be another one of those bad decisions. However, with all that, buying more would be throwing good money after bad.
The usuals, whatever I post is my opinion, yaddayaddayadda. I'm still learning this, so if you listen to me, well, good luck to you :)
Well, they still have something to speculate about, probably fueled by the company trying to sell shares. RVGD has already sold the shares it wanted to sell, and it was DDed so much that it wore thin. Very thin, indeed. Hence no rung on pure speculation here, those have already occurred, and most of those following it now want facts and not more speculation. At least, it seems so.
Nope, he works for a company that heavily advertises online, hence he knows the rates for the major portals :)
Which is why he doesn't think that this company has used any sizable part of the money it raised through selling shares for, well, actually building their claimed business. He's also happy that he hasn't invested heavily in it, but is unhappy that he overslept the day it failed to break .0046, and instead of selling just above .0030, when he'd still have moderate profit, waited long enough to go negative, and didn't sell at a small loss, either.
The usuals, whatever I post is my opinion, yaddayaddayadda. I'm still learning this, so if you listen to me, well, good luck to you :)
Actually, advertising on MySpace is relatively cheap. Much cheaper than on Google, or Yahoo, or AOL, or MSN, or pretty much any major site.
Howdy, Marines. Been away for a while. What's new around here?
Is way overdue.
Trouble is, that extra $1000 added to your tax bill, would you really trust it to go to the military, and not to some "important social project"? :)
Banks don't usually give loans to the companies that aren't established, and when they do, they give them based on the company owners' credit history and income (and the company owner is then personally responsible for the loan. Given Kitslers' history, I doubt they'd want to be personally responsible for anything that has to do with their business).
Besides, loans have to be repaid, and banks keep track of those who don't repay them. Selling shares puts money in your pocket with pretty much no strings attached.
Of course, yet another way is convertible debentures, where the loan you take is backed by the shares of your company, but as a shareholder, you really don't want that.
Let's hope you're right. I certainly do.
Speculations on contracts, speculations on what Peter will do, etc. I was actually joking in my post, but like in most jokes, there's a grain of truth in it, I think.
I hope their DD didn't include checking out the rumors on iHub :)
Why not? And I'm not saying whether he's scamming us or not, that's another discussion, and I simply don't have enough information for judging that. But registering a domain for 5 or more years, it'd make sense in either case. If you're scamming someone and say that you intend to stay for long, well, that's a cheap proof of that, isn't it? If you do intend to stay for long, then it also makes sense, to ensure you won't forget to renew it, and maybe to save a few bucks.
Let's just try to keep the logic straight here, there's been enough mindless (or malicious, depending on the intent) pumping as it is.
A domain is $10/year. It doesn't take much to register one.
I'd imagine through revenues, on which the valuation has to depend, as well.
Well, in all fairness, that decision is still some years ahead. Thanks for the info.
And I thought property taxes here were high at 1.25%. Is that normal for those parts?
I'm considering moving to New England, and haven't checked on local property taxes yet. Looks like I should have :)
The local property tax is 3%?
Well, it's still there after 5 years though. Doesn't provide for instant gratification, of course.
Also, if it provides jobs, that's also increased tax base. Same for supporting services.
Hmm, now that I think about it, maybe you should host such a contest. You seem to be doing a good job at it, certainly better than ADCS/Vstarr have managed so far.
Happens when people save on infrastructure.