Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GL is right. Shareholders funds have been used, work and taxes not done. Someone has to pay for it($200k+). BH was in charge. From there REELTIME will shine. Cleanup period is due.......unless BIG Investor will pay all the past due bills and responsabilities exchanged for BH stake ownership in Reeltime ?
JH is a small fish, small finance. Do you hear <REELTIME> ? It is big and self explanatory. RRRRRRReeeeeeeeLLTime - the place the movies are always on !!!
The pie is already cut -original investors are known. One day we could see $137 pps, just like Netflix or possibly more. Big studios cant play each other movies due to competition -and they need a central distributor like REELTIME or Blockbuster ......
REELTIME will be one of the BRAND NAMES like Netflix or Blockbuster. Does JH have enough financial backing ? As investor/shareholder I will not be taken for go around like with Barry. enough is enough...no more mom&pap operations, no wait time for years......we want REELTIME BIG and with proper advancing. Best technology, millions of viewers potentially. No Media company no fishing trips -pure MOVIE RENTAL COMPANY -<<<<< REELTIME >>> where movies reel is turning 24hrs a day 7 days a week. Big contracts, big movies, great customer service, great technical support and advertising. We do not need another Romney with 15mln capital that will rebuild America -we need a real FINANCE and REAL TECHNOLOGY.
Imagine, if large financial backing would come from Mr. Carlos Slim.Reelime would become Netflix competitor in US market, servicing both Americas. He likes to invest in technology.
Reeltime is a oldtimer in this field, with proper financing it would take off..............like a rocket baby !!!
Would you still talk without respect about Mr. Gonzalo ???
Desert Man -you are wrong. MG and BEV are great people and still shareholders who build this company -so have some respect. There are no skeletons in any closet and as they said be patient my friend or sell your mini stake for new more hopeful investors. There are only few original investors here....and they for sure are holding -otherwise the shares sale is locked till Moving Forward on the Green Light. Share inventory with assigned ownership numbers have been completed years ago - and not changed scientifically since. Recent broker investigations by SEC of Knight, made sure there will be no naked selling nor margin buying. RLTR trading was very organized in this matter and controlled by company.
Reeltime -Company worth fighting for.
#1 value is registered rights to rent, purchase, stream valid video content (BIG Studios). There is only few companies in US market that are registered as such.It is nice to be within the circle of companies like Netflix, Hulu and recently Blockbuster. If you follow Netflix the pps went from $20 to $300 over 2 years as rentals increased.
#2 Video Compression technology. (Reeltime still owns)
#3 Connections and possible contracts with major movie studios, experience and brand recognition.
#4 Trademark < REELTIME > and 2 websites
#5 Limited share number sold (100 millions)
#6 Two potential competitors for CEO -one English and one Spanish. Hopefully one with better potentials wins -eventually they will come to power/monetary agreement or even combine their strengths and money to pursue the dream together. In case of prolonged dissagreement -shareholder LAWSUIT will settle them both.
# Unlimited potentials in Movie Rental Market including media streaming to hand held devices. Technology is here and infrastructure could be outsourced.
Estimated Company Value in the present stage est. $100 mil.
Outstanding debt is a joke.($100k)
Personally, I am invested here since "Pre Barry Era" and still holding.
RLTR shares wanted. Planning to buy few millions shares here. Anyone can advice ?
Accumulation. Summer heat.
Accumulation from 15-25 going on. Shorted millions of shares. Time to take control and pursue the dream. Quiet before storm.
So RLTR will be big afterall. The financial markets are being cleaned up from the crooks. Shorting RLTR was #1 reason why this stock never took off. Naked buys by brokers and naked sales by shareholders were very comon here. Anyway, I still believe we should see $1 per share here shortly, as long as company is in technically sound hands and video compression website works without glitch....waiting impatiently for CEO to announce new developements, contracts and NEW WEBSITE. Reeltime LIVES !!!!
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/the-exchange/survey-wall-street-crime-still-pays-163407471.html
Bizarre Case of Failed Broker Gets Even Stranger
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bizarre-case-failed-broker-gets-175659760.html
I've been here for last 5 years. It looks to me that this time will be for REAL. Nice team of professionals assembled plus GREAT OLD Original Investors backing them up all the way to $300 per share Phenix run.Lets dream BIG that one day reltime Media Group will pass Facebook. All bills are cured....time to turn the engines to full power forward. It was worth to wait...............ENGAGE. Some things can never be repeated enough.
Ah, common guys....where is the Penny Stock Investor Spirit ? ReelTime is a always been a startup company very low in value, but with great potentials. I got into it cause of the BIG NEWS of ReelTime buying GridNetworks. The purchase was never consumated and recalled few days later. BOD decided it will be better paying for services of Grid (Gridplayer)and elected proponent of such way of Doing Business BH. BIG Mistake. Grid was bought by Cable Company for BIG BUGS few years later -leaving RT in the complete chaos. Guess we have to wait for next Technological Innovation to pull us out of the DARK......till then ASTALAVISTA BABY.
due for HUGE move....1c-7c possible
"on the low volume ?" -that is very good, since very LIMITED shares are available for sale. Each RLTR SHARE WORTH $$$, after 5 years of appreciation. Not too many original holders here .....Barry sold and Enableware is propably picking up the rest. Going UP to the $1 they are .......
Nice. I listen to these braggings of stockchick that she bought some at 5 6 etc....total BS. There is no shares of RLTR that are for sale now below 1.4c period. All investors are holding for big announcement and limited quantity is available at this point. I tried to buy for last 2 weeks and very litle shares were sold. It seems we will be heading toward 25c-39c range and beyond quite fast. Once the partnership goes trought $1 per each share is not overstatment. Next week could be interesting for those that holded long -too bad my holdings are small at this point.
It will be jumping to 2-7c before the subsidiary sell to NUBL. Outstanding shares were put on limit and propably were all purchased by NUBL holders with handsome bonus to CCTR holders. Buys are huge versus almost zero sells on L2. CCTR is "the most undervalued stock of all trades" Now we know why, since the BIG Market is picking up and NUBL buys huge volumes of CCTR stock. They lower the pps so they can start buying CCTR at reasonable prices. 7c-25c per share will be the final CCTR price after all shares has been transfered to NUBL.
25c as soon as the announcement hits the street. From there there may big quite a ride for Global domination. Partnership is great.
The nice thing about is that NUBL buys CCTR and it can be at very very low price anicipated.....which in turn can smell like rocketeering. If CCTR price was diluted "on purpose", to lower the pps and so the NUBL could make purchase -it for sure will be punishable by LAW. If NUBL has signed BIG Contract for "wireless device in Japan" and indeed has lots of cash on hand -CCTR pps will skyrocket. All we have to do is sit and wait.
how many shares has BH and MF ???
4mln volume ??? where are the shares coming from ??? who is selling ? Is it possible RLTR sold 2mln shares to pay the outstanding taxes ? Very discouraging cause once large amount hits the trading, manipulation will start in millions of shares causing shorting and preventing pps rise. Getting to the bottom of this trade day is priority of RLTR. Once naked shorting starts -it will be over for all investments here.
When are we going to OPEN FOR BUSINESS ??? website ready yet ???
GRAND OPENNING for NEW and IMPROVED REELTIME !!!!!!
Feb1, 2011
just a guess
it will be aquired by the end of this month. Huge investment coming.
WHERE ARE YOU REELTIME MANAGMENT ??? We are still waiting here for a BIG GALA OPENNING of new and improved REELTIME. Do something and do not waste the time of shareholder's -if you can't just come out and say it.
ALL REELTIME NEEDS is to Re-OPEN the website. The only business that will be successfull in VOD is PAY-PER-VIEW. They still can exist and prosper next to Netfix if they find premium content and sell it one at the time on Pay-per-view basis. Everything else should be free content and advertisment driven. They need to get their act together....Barry and Green and MF -come to agreement-pay debts-and see the future in sharing profits from their share ownerships. RE-OPENING is a MUST and ASAP !!!!! All Reeltime previous success was in ABILITY to AQUIRE PREMIUM CONTENT. Playing Movies Engine was fine.......the only think that sucked was managment and Technical/website. FOCUS RT focus...you still have a BIG Shot at the Success in VOD.
Pls, sell me your shares. Today there is nothing to buy. My order for 1-5mln is in.
CCTR needs to buyback shares on the days of rally like this. Taking shares from the manipulators stash, so they can't stop the buying rally and follow with shorts. Each company listed should have their STOCK GUY on payroll, who trades in the open market and buys when Manipulators sell their reserves. Otherwise BROKERS/MANIPULATORS/Headges/DailyTraders always win as long as they own more shares then daily volume. They sell 80-90% of their holdings to stop the buying rally and next day they start shorting.....and buying back shares cheaper. They can do this over and over until causing the pps to be destroyed-same devaluating company. They seem to go around of wash rule, possibly using other broker's holdings. Killing the "buying rally" destroys the individual investors as well as the company + chance for steady climb. This procedure should be stopped and companies like this one shoul act in order to stop their fall -afterall they have revenues of hundreds of millions and have rights to defend their stock by buybacks.
BH is the guy who still holds mountains of RLTR stock. I will not buy RLTR if his stock is not under control of new managment. Same with MF's and possibly Mr.Green's options. Those 3 amigos need to be talked to before the new adventure of Reeltime begins.....we do not need stock war games going on while RLTR is working to succeed.
Combine AVASTIN with ZYBRESTAT and you got the cancer cure.
After the failure of AVASTIN Roche will go after ZYBRESTAT to combine killing tumors with preventing growth of new tumors (veins to them). They drug could not work by itself (preventing tumor growth), they need the power of ZYBRESTAT to kill the tumor first.
ZYBRESTAT should be used first and then AVASTIN
Hopefully Roche and OXYGENE will find each other soon-actually they did and Phase I study has started. Roche is a BIG Partner.
% Held by Insiders6: 38.69%
% Held by Institutions6: 8.50%
1570% down
worth $1.50-$2.50 as it is
Reeltime used to be better then Netflix. RLTR had better picture quality and better movie contracts. Look at what happened to our investment 23c-0.0001 while Netflix stayed in business of VOD and pps $20-200. Why RLTR did't just stay in the race and continue slowely, adding movies, improving website etc.....in comparation to Netflix growth we would have been priced at least $3 -just for wesite streaming big movies. We could off been buyed out etc....The bad of the Rltr Managment was -not to continue, Barry did give a f...ck as no income was reported, MF tried -but no skills. Now quiet....Bev needs to gather all those biggest shareholder like Barry MF and maybe Green and MAKE Business Arrangement putting lid price on shares and re-open reeltime, so they all would agree....for future of RLTR. Website should be re-instated ASAP and continue streaming as before (if no money for it -play free comercials or trailers).
There would be a chance for all shareholders, otherwise CLOSE IT DOWN, so INVESTORS will not be left hanging like this in the air.
Phil is buying and eliminating shares (float) Shorting is at zero and he loves those sells coming his way. Soon shares will became limited and carring weight....nobody will be selling. PPS jump expected on buy pressure to 7-9c then even further
shorts will get totally wiped out through share liquidation. They set themself up for huge failure. Today there was 13million shares waiting to be cleared of short (just in one day). Not more to say here......shortsqueezeeee the largest ever seen in OTC. Margin accounts not clearing for many.....word of advice buyback -do not wait till the bitter end-2billion shares outstanding is just a smoke screen-majority are gone and shorts covers will come uncoverabled.
In the case that nobody wants to sell...they need to be forced to do it, cause I am ready to buy. All my orders till 0.005 are coming back empty. Should I try at 1-2c ??? I got plenty to buy with, since next year is "The Year of The Reel" and the wheel is spinning....... New investors are ready and standing by. End of the year for losess sales did not came true, so either BH or CGI needs to sell cause I am puting the buy orders with limit 1c tomorrow(GTC). Waiting for news is boring.......
The reason for low pps is....
"My guess is this will end soon...Company just needs to de-list in Germany and that will end the false supply that has been holding the stock down. Hopefully whoever is doing this gets what they deserve.
Read this link...seems eerily similar.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-119749424.html
also - check this out, this tactic was used in 2004 on over 200 companies according to some internet searches.
he Financial Times of London recently reported that the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange is being used to circumvent new US regulations aimed at barring a form of share price manipulation, according to several small US companies which have suddenly found their shares listed on it.
In this article, it states that these Berlin listings came just weeks before a new Securities and Exchange Commission rule on so-called naked short selling. Under the new rules, those seeking to sell shares short must be able to demonstrate that they are able to gain access to the securities within two days. However, the rules contain a loophole for what are deemed to be genuine arbitrage trades, defined as short sales in shares that are listed on another stock exchange. "
THE END OF CABLE TV.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Cable-subscribers-flee-but-is-apf-3875814716.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=
NEW YORK (AP) -- Cable companies have been losing TV subscribers at an ever faster rate in the last few months, and satellite TV isn't picking up the slack.
That could be a sign that Internet TV services such as Netflix and Hulu are finally starting to entice people to cancel cable, though company executives are pointing to the weak economy and housing market for now.
Third-quarter results reported Thursday by major cable TV companies show major losses, but don't settle the question of what's causing them.
If "cord-cutting" in favor of Internet video is finally taking hold, that has wide-ranging implications. Consumers who use the Internet to get their movies and TV shows bypass not just the cable companies, but the cable networks that produce the content. The move could have the same disruptive effect on the TV and movie industries as digital downloads have already had on music.
A few weeks ago, the CEO of phone company Verizon Communications Inc. likened cord-cutting to what started happening to the local-phone companies five or six years ago, when people started giving up their landlines in favor of relying solely on their cell phones.
"The first thing when that happens is you deny it," Ivan Seidenberg said. "I know the drill. I have been there."
On Thursday, Time Warner Cable Inc.'s chief operating officer, Landel Hobbs, said the company doesn't see evidence of people dropping cable in favor of the Internet. He said the biggest subscriber losses have been among people who don't have cable broadband services; high-speed Internet -- from cable or a competitor -- is key to watching video online. These people seem to be going to satellite or giving up on pay TV entirely.
On the theory that college students might be among the first to drop cable TV, the company looked at changes in subscriber figures in college towns such as Austin, Texas, and Columbus, Ohio. They weren't out of line with previous years, and they corresponded to the level of student enrollment, he said.
"We'll continue to monitor cord-cutting, but haven't found evidence where you might expect to see it," Hobbs told analysts on a conference call.
Time Warner Cable lost 155,000 video subscribers in the July-September quarter, compared with 64,000 a year ago.
The only larger cable company, Comcast Corp., reported last week that its subscriber loss more than doubled in the third quarter, to 275,000. Comcast said many of those leaving had taken advantage of low introductory rates that the company offered last year when the analog TV broadcast network as shut down.
All together, seven of the country's nine largest pay-TV companies, representing about 75 percent of the subscriber total, had reported their results for the third quarter by Thursday. They showed a combined gain of 95,700 video subscribers, or a 0.6 percent increase at an annualized rate, less than the growth of the population. In the third quarter of last year, they gained 405,800 subscribers.
(Missing from the top nine: the third-largest cable company, Cox Communications, which is privately held and doesn't report subscriber counts publicly; and the second-largest satellite TV company, Dish Network Corp., which reports results Friday.)
Cable companies have been losing video subscribers for some time, but they have been compensating by upgrading basic subscribers to more expensive digital tiers, as well as adding broadband and phone subscribers.
However, both Time Warner Cable and Cablevision Systems Corp. lost digital video subscribers in the third quarter. Both added record-low number of phone subscribers, as years of growth are coming to an end.
Meanwhile, Netflix Inc.'s streaming service has become so popular that it is now the largest source of U.S. Internet traffic during peak evening hours, according to Sandvine Inc., a Canadian company that supplies traffic-management equipment to Internet service providers.
A variety of gadgets can send Netflix's streams to the living room TV, including game consoles and the $99 Apple TV box. Many high-end TVs now come with the built-in ability to play Internet content.
Thomas Clancy Jr., 35, in Long Beach, N.Y., canceled the family's Cablevision subscription this spring. He said he has been happy with Netflix and other Internet video services since then, even though there isn't a lot of live sports to be had online.
"The amount of sports that I watched certainly didn't justify a hundred-dollar-a-month expense for all this stuff. I mean, that's twelve hundred dollars a year," Clancy said. "Twelve hundred dollars is ... near a vacation."
But Clancy -- who has no relation to the thriller writer -- is also an example of the hurdles cord cutters face. He uses an Internet-connected Blu-ray player to get Netflix movies to the TV. And he pulls a cable from his computer to the TV for Internet content Netflix doesn't have. Clancy owns a computer consulting firm and is tech-savvy enough to do all that. Most people wouldn't know how.
Cablevision wanted to raise Clancy's Internet bill when he canceled TV service. That would have made cord-cutting less attractive, but he happens to live in an area where Verizon provides Internet service at speeds that are comparable with the best cable has to offer. He got a better deal from Verizon and switched to that provider.
Most people who have the technological skills to take advantage of Internet video find that the selection of movies and shows isn't broad enough to make the jump worth it, Sanford Bernstein analyst Craig Moffett said.
On the other hand, poor people have an excellent motive to cut cable and simply replace it with an antenna or nothing at all, he said.
"The price cable TV has risen to the point where it's simply not affordable to lots of lower-income homes. And right now there are an awful lot of lower-income homes," Moffett said. "The evidence suggests that what we're seeing is a poverty problem rather than a technology phenomenon."
In addition, high unemployment means fewer new households, as kids are probably delaying moving out of their parents' houses, or people move in with roommates. That can reduce the number of households that pay for TV.
Cable companies would like to get low-income customers back with cheaper cable packages, but their hands are tied. Content providers such as The Walt Disney Co. and News Corp. won't license their channels one by one, so subscribers have to take big, expensive channel packages, or very basic ones, which offer little beyond what's available with an antenna.
Content providers now get billions of dollars in fees from cable service providers, and they want to make sure that whatever new industry model comes along, they'll get paid. It's not obvious yet that Internet video will let them sustain their profit levels.
Six companies create the content that consumes 85 percent of U.S. viewing hours, Moffett said. "Until they get on board, the train's not leaving the station."
Nobody seems to sell the stock anymore.....I was trying to buy some today. Looks like good news are coming or market picking up.
then from 22c down to zero stock was shorted...wondering who did the biggest shorting ??? If we are coming back ever, it will be obvious since they need to buyback -hard when investors still holding to their shares and no new investors show up ??
let me tell you Asus....Barry was a technical computard who could not deliver any technically sound website -he tried few times and failed. His technical team was none existent or consisted of ONE Person Team. His failure was inability to hire Technical People -I guess cause he never believed in success of Reeltime. His tech deals with Grid Networks were shady....he failed to purchase the GRID where was time for it -instead he thought they will support him forever. No... as GRID was sold to Cable Company for Big Millions (they play movies on their intranet) company RT failed to have tech support and died. He wasted investor's money and time trying to homemade the technology without paying BIG $$$ for it, if he did Reeltime would look like Hulu and worth a lot. That is what all investors thought he will do....instead it was one big disaster caused by his incompetence. Maybe he was a good businessman but NONE TECHNICAL -and that was unacceptable causing failure for RT.
When do they START ???? How is a website coming along??? WE NEED SOME NEWS !!!! I am ready to buy more stock. Even as a shell RLTR is wort 1c with all the money invested in stock previously..