Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes you are rooting for shareholders. Just look at all the positive posts you've written about BHUB in the past few months. All the positive information you researched and posted. All the positive scenarios and positive outcomes in so many of your hundreds of postings here. Oh... wait... I'm sorry, there are no positive postings. Well except for the last one. I guess that counts. Thanks.
( ;
BHUB Trades soon.
"HE WORKS FOR YOU"!!! Lololol... Stop the presses boys, we have a new headline for tomorrow's front page!
PINKIE SHAREHOLDERS CALL MEETING AFTER LEARNING CEO WORKS FOR THEM!!
Why do certain posters or should I say poster here, have such a pressing desire to have BHUB shareholders get lawyers and launch lawsuits? Could it be so BHUB will remain a halted stock, with litigation tying up any efforts to trade again? Now who would benefit from that?
Once again a post is manipulated by serf. Court said his Lawyer told him he had a CHANCE to win in small claims court. A CHANCE to win does not mean "So people can get refunds for their BHUB shares, if they spend time chasing it." People have A CHANCE to get refunds if they win in small claims court. Good luck with that process. I would say FAT CHANCE!
I wouldn't be surprised if you start to see on another board, messages that say Art "promised" that BHUB shareholders will get their money back. The same thing happened to VOIP-INTERFACE, when he said "maybe" we will see news by the end of the week. He was immediately misquoted on another board, saying he "promised" there would be news by the end of the week. Documented below:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20848738
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20849688
Replevin = John Sparrow ?
Hee hee, I smell a negative agenda poster who smells fear : )
I believe a "public update" will come when there is actually something to publicly update. Otherwise, one week after an information vacant "public update", released for the sole purpose of soothing the nerves of nervous ninny shareholders, there will be exactly the same hysterical outcry for another "public update". When there is news to report, they will report it. Fluff press releases are not helpful. Substantial news is.
Get a grip man! This is not an exact science you know. It could take longer than 90 days for countless reasons. If it happens in 90, all the better. If not, its certainly not reason to blow a gasket and start spouting even more negativity. That most certainly would not get BHUB trading any sooner. Raging at the moon, and attacking the only one who apparently can get us out of this mess is foolish to the max, IMO.
I am happy as a BHUB in a Tub of Anchor Steam Beer! Whoopeeee! ( The Ruskies aren't too happy with me though! ) Seems to me, there might be a chance we hear from the Big Hubabub soon. Now that's not a promise, it's just the formation or expression of an opinion or theory without sufficient evidence for proof.
VOIP-INTERFACE never said or "promised" that there would be news by the end of this week.. He said "maybe we'll see something positive here by the end of the week". The spin was put to that post by serfie, who incorrectly posted that VOIP-INTERFACE "promised" there would be news by the end of the week. His actual post makes it perfectly clear as to what was said, and squashes the false rumors posted regarding his post.
Posted by: VOIP-INTERFACE
In reply to: Art2Gecko who wrote msg# 46847
Date:6/27/2007 11:32:02 AM
Post #of 47057
I have the sudden urge to say maybe we'll see something positive here before the end of the week. I mean there are certain steps that need to be taken to get us in a more of a trading status. I think we see step 1 very soon.
Posted by: VOIP-INTERFACE
In reply to: slazenger7 who wrote msg# 46725
Date:6/24/2007 11:03:32 PM
Post #of 46868
.<font color=green>I agree just a question of how soon?
"Gee, I am so glad I was wrong", will be the gloom and doomers chant!
I'm a firm believer that we'll see some type of progress here soon. Something that will give a lot of shareholders a more positive outlook and to be able to see the light at the end of the tunnel. Plus knowing were heading towards a trading status finally. It shouldn't be that hard to get us up and running here as I've previously stated.
VOIP-INTERFACE "promised" no such thing. He said "maybe we'll see something positive here by the end of the week". Stop spinning and misquoting others posts to fit your agenda, it only makes you look.. well.. uhh.. foolish! Lolol..
Posted by: VOIP-INTERFACE
In reply to: Art2Gecko who wrote msg# 46847
Date:6/27/2007 11:32:02 AM
Post #of 47057
I have the sudden urge to say maybe we'll see something positive here before the end of the week. I mean there are certain steps that need to be taken to get us in a more of a trading status. I think we see step 1 very soon.
Posted by: VOIP-INTERFACE
In reply to: slazenger7 who wrote msg# 46725
Date:6/24/2007 11:03:32 PM
Post #of 46868
.<font color=green>I agree just a question of how soon?
"Gee, I am so glad I was wrong", will be the gloom and doomers chant!
I'm a firm believer that we'll see some type of progress here soon. Something that will give a lot of shareholders a more positive outlook and to be able to see the light at the end of the tunnel. Plus knowing were heading towards a trading status finally. It shouldn't be that hard to get us up and running here as I've previously stated.
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46353 Date:6/13/2007 12:35:39 AM
Post #of 46412
Good thing you are not charging for that advice you would be sued.
I guess the next thing you will want to be "proved" is the actual proven identity of DP. Let's see... I think you should demand to see his official original birth certificate. If he produces a birth certificate, then you should demand to see "proof" that the birth certificate is actually the original and was not a forgery. You could also demand to see "proof" that the baby foot prints on the back of the birth certificate are actually DP`s baby feet. (and then demand "proof" that DP actually has feet).
Sounds like serfie is getting just a tad nervous about being sued. Gee... I guess there has never been a lawsuit associated with "message boards" before"! Lolol.. Better check your history son. There have been numerous "message board" litigation cases involving slanderous, or maliciously defamatory message board posters with dubious agendas! Watch out gloom and doomers! Lolololol...
Ahhhh yes! The words of a true unbeliever! With the nice touch at the end, hoping everything works out well for shareholders. Such is the state of the shareless harpies and naysayers. They are getting nervous now, and are hedging their doomsday predictions with disclaimers of well wishes to the shareholders. Pretty pathetic antics. Now we wait for the congratulations to all shareholders when BHUB trades again, and trades upwards from the halt price. "Gee, I am so glad I was wrong", will be the gloom and doomers chant!
Then BHUB will be his first. I think it is a good sign that you are not a believer in DP. Potential success always has its trail of band wagon naysayers and pessimists. It is so easy to ride that vehicle. Nothing to lose by whining and complaining except credibility if all the angst was for naught. The hounds will howl at the moon if the 90 days pass without resoulution. So much more the satisfaction when the whirlwind starts at 99.
Something "ain't right here" with your constant bogus assertions. Your agenda is so obvious you should post a disclaimer.
Here is your reply "ad nauseum" from BHUB - Get a clue, stop pretending otherwise, and stop acting like your question of ownership has not been answered.
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46318 Date:6/12/2007 11:35:47 PM
Post #of 46412
Well how about finding the "real owners" so they can pay back Yucatan for the legal and administrative costs. Oh and then they can pay the $6,000,000 due under the disclosed agreement and you can then harass them. I believe the shareholder's of the company understand and can read. More important I am the interim president at the request of the board of directors. DTC, NASD, and the legal team are satisfied, your interest is frankly irrelevant as you are not a shareholder nor a vendor, nor a governing body.
You seemed legit, until you used "ain't" in your reply. I suggest next time you try "will not" or "will never" trade again. When you say "BHUB ain't ever trading again", it sounds more like Jethro Clampet marveling at how the cement pond ain't got no frogs in it.
Thanks pal.
Do some research, by your lil ole lonesome. Hint #1: Live Interview. Hint #2 - Radio.
I love the daily countdown of the minimum 90 days that DP said it would take to get trading again. Keep in mind, he did say minimum which means at least 90 days. I am kind of hoping it takes a little longer than 90 days, so I can sit back and listen to the screaming, hysterical, garment wrenching, angst filled, accusatory posts that will deluge this message board by the "count downers" if it happens to take longer than 90 days! Lolol..
"Something is terribly wrong here. What are the insiders hiding from us?"
Well.. uhh.. Nothing, my friendly Gloom and Doomer. One thing here that is "terribly wrong" though, is why a Barking Dog gloom and doomer such as yourself is howling and yelping about others being "barking dogs"! I think the "suspicion factor" has been neatly addressed, and the factor needle is pointing at YOU!
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46316 Date:6/12/2007 11:17:35 PM
Post #of 46412
I've read your posts for some time. You are trite and misinformed. Don't rely on that last comment to protect comments. As far as damage, let's see where the price of the stock is at the opening compared to the April 12 close and multiply it by 1.5 billion, if it's down, that could qualify as damages. I will not accept labels such as YNOTME has so bravely written on more than one occasion, that is uncalled for and not conducive to level headed discussions concerning the past, present and future of this stock. GLTY
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46329 Date:6/13/2007 12:00:16 AM
Post #of 46412
You certainly have a gift to twist, appreciated but not admired. I believe you can do the math with regards to the document, which speaks for itself. As far as structure disclosures that is all part of documents being prepared for mailing to shareholders. If you were a shareholder you would receive the documents.
Second; technically the purchasers of stock were issued unregistered shares illegally. Ontario Securities commission is already there in their investigation. So technically no one that purchased shares have more than Yucatan. Of course that is what the halt is all about, working on correcting that problem.
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: jimmenknee who wrote msg# 46326 Date:6/12/2007 11:48:35 PM
Post #of 46412
I will clear it up with shareholders in the right venue. Under any reading of Reg F/D, I think that would be appropriate. Answering you because of personal issues you have with me is not constructive.
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46353 Date:6/13/2007 12:35:39 AM
Post #of 46412
Good thing you are not charging for that advice you would be sued.
Serfie complains - "Then there is Yucatan's deliberate refusal to disclose current ownerhip info."
He has already been schooled on the bogus complaint:
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46318 Date:6/12/2007 11:35:47 PM
Post #of 46412
Well how about finding the "real owners" so they can pay back Yucatan for the legal and administrative costs. Oh and then they can pay the $6,000,000 due under the disclosed agreement and you can then harass them. I believe the shareholder's of the company understand and can read. More important I am the interim president at the request of the board of directors. DTC, NASD, and the legal team are satisfied, your interest is frankly irrelevant as you are not a shareholder nor a vendor, nor a governing body.
This reply to you was quite natural too, and very insightful as well!
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: jimmenknee who wrote msg# 46326 Date:6/12/2007 11:48:35 PM
Post #of 46412
I will clear it up with shareholders in the right venue. Under any reading of Reg F/D, I think that would be appropriate. Answering you because of personal issues you have with me is not constructive.
I see the BHUB Gloom and Doom tag team are conversing with each other again tonite. Gets pretty ugly here when gangs of Gloom and Doomers roam the board, looking for someone to pick a fight with.
I have also learned that taking your advice, could result in financial disaster, as voiced in this post:
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46353 Date:6/13/2007 12:35:39 AM
Post #of 46412
Good thing you are not charging for that advice you would be sued.
I have learned something from you. What I have learned is better stated in the following post:
Posted by: BigHub
In reply to: serfdom who wrote msg# 46316 Date:6/12/2007 11:17:35 PM
Post #of 46412
I've read your posts for some time. You are trite and misinformed. Don't rely on that last comment to protect comments. As far as damage, let's see where the price of the stock is at the opening compared to the April 12 close and multiply it by 1.5 billion, if it's down, that could qualify as damages. I will not accept labels such as YNOTME has so bravely written on more than one occasion, that is uncalled for and not conducive to level headed discussions concerning the past, present and future of this stock. GLTY
It depends on what the meaning of "stone throw" is. I will attempt to respond to your question "Why does that have to turn into a stone throw?" in the same painstaking manner in which you so steadfastly research and present gloom and doom theories about BHUB et al.
The throwing of objects dates back thousands of years to the pre Cro Magnum period when hominoids first discovered that they could cause damage to other creatures by hurling objects like stones at them. After extensively researching all aspects of stone throwing, I feel I am ready to analyse and formulate an opinion on the validity of your question "Why does that have to turn into a stone throw?"
Stone tools are the oldest traces of human activity. The theories of the origin of humans vary widely and have been at the center of heated debates for hundreds of years. Despite our modern technology and advances in the sciences, concrete evidence is still lacking to prove any of these theories. Creationists believe that man was simply created in a modern form and did not evolve from more primitive creatures. Those subscribing to the belief in evolution believe that man's beginning is founded in early mammalian evolution. Certain lizards evolved into mammals, those mammals gave rise to apes and monkeys and finally, man emerged from these primates through a progression of species leading to modern man, Homo sapiens. Finally, some subscribe to a hybrid theory as a combination of these two - man was created as "man" and went through a series of developmental changes. Theories aside, we all cannot argue the existence of prehistoric humans as we DO have concrete evidence from the presence of campsites, tools and artifacts that date back as far as over two million years and have been found throughout the world.
One of the most important artifacts of primitive man is the existence of stone tools. The PALEOLITHIC Period is defined as the time from the first use of stone tools around two million years ago to the Pleistocene Period, 12,000 years ago. The Paleolithic Period is divided into three categories, Lower, Middle and Upper Paleolithic Period. Four basic traditions (and time periods) of their manufacture have been identified:
OLDOWAN / DEVELOPED OLDOWAN (2 million to 1.5 million years ago)
ACHEULIAN (1.5 million to 150,000 years ago)
MOUSTERIAN or MIDDLE STONE AGE or MIDDLE PALEOLITHIC (200,000 to 30,000 years ago)
LATE STONE AGE or UPPER PALEOLITHIC (30,000 to 10,000 years ago)
While signs of developing Neanderthals arose 300,000 years ago, true Neanderthals can first be attributed back to 150,000 years ago. They populated regions in Europe and the Near East, and existed right up to just 30,000 years ago in western France. Between 125,000 and 100,000 years ago, the Neanderthals spread east and south, and they are known in northern Africa and from France through southern Europe, the former southern Soviet states and Iraq. Current evidence shows that despite Neanderthals' stockier build, they share several key features with modern man. There is also clear evidence that they had control of fire, lived in caves or open-air structures of stone and vegetation,
I welcome any responsible rebuttal to my research by anyone who, like me, has now devoted my life to researching and answering these questions.
It is also duly noted on this board, that when gloom and doom posters are skewered here, they immediately try to get the post that exposes them removed for alleged "IHUB TOU" violations. Must be a gloom and doom War Games strategy discussed at the weekly Chuckie Cheese meetings.
Sorry to tell you, but saying your posts are hypocritical is not an IHUB TOU nono, it is a legitimate opinion based on the content of your posts, which by the way, make you "fair game" in a stock chat room.
.. and calling someone a crook is not getting personal? Have another swig of that hypocritical koolade you are drinking. Was that the beverage of choice at Chuckie Cheese?
I see today's gloom and doom meeting at Chuckie Cheese has ended. You must have been elected to be the designated jalopy driver for the new BHUB gloom and doom talking points posting scheme. I suggest you change the oil on those points before the cylinders get completely clogged with mindlessly inaccurate sludge postings like your last one.
In other words: Yikes!! I better get out of here before I get skinned alive!! Lolol...
News Flash - Serfie, jimmy and YNOT get spanked by BigHub! Ruskies in an uproar, as panic seeps into the crumbling BHUB gloom and doom talking points strategy! Emergency meeting called for tomorrow at Chuckie Cheese! ( Note: as per Chuckie - due to previous problems with rejected credit card purchases, cash only accepted for burgers and fries)
Thanks for your advice. I believe the post I was responding to was rife with personal judgements and attacks about postings on this board. You lost your own debate by not seeing something so obvious. That spin on your part, as well as the tone of your reply, shows your own agenda has clouded your judgement. Lighten up, you'll live with less stress in your life!
Ah yes, the BHUB Savior has spoken from the Mount of Prunes. Are you also going to supply the loaves and fishes to feed the starving masses? Me thinks you have a budding messiah complex young man! There are 12 step programs available to help you kick the obvious BHUB obsession in your life!
You are forgiven my son. Go in peace, and sin no more. May the Big BHUB in the sky be with you.