That will be alot of advertising to attempt to make up their 4.2 million dollar deficit then make a penny profit.

They tried to sell a movie that was the pet project of eade for his first russian bride and it failed to sell or make a dollar.

Trust us when we tell you we know this character and his Modus Operandi very very well. To say he is no longer involved with this company since there is a CFO is to kid yourself.

we are disgruntled shareholders of previous incarnations of this game he plays. We know it well and warn others who have any type of sense. Apparently the one line pumps are friends and relatives of the king himself. These are not the posts of a real shareholder or persons truly interested in the company. It is very apparent to anybody who has ever dealt with these pink chit stocks exactly what the deal is. And, we are not bashers, but realists. My fellow Does know exactly what the deal is and anyone who has a clue will know. Keep posting how this is a wonderful site, how it is great, blah blah blah...the truth is very apparent...Say hello to the frenchman for us and tell him he still owes iHub some cash.

hahaha And he lost the lawsuit and the lawsuit ihub had against him and he LOST and he owes Ihub money and is hiding like a poor child and never paid what the court decided he owed for such a bogus lawsuit.

So the hahaha is on you and your air filled comments on this "company" and "website".

Also note on the 10Q the following:

• in business to pay salaries and "Professional Fees"
• many, many shares to eade
• Net loss of almost 4.2 million dollars

Quoted from the 10Q:
"Independent Film Development Corporation’s (IFDC’s) overall plan of operations is to acquire and develop independent films for production, sales and distribution, with a goal toward significant partnerships with mini-major and the major film studios, such as Lionsgate and Sony, while simultaneously emulating those companies’ recipes for success."

They tried that with Imperia and failed.

Since my last post went unanswered, I will again ask the same things:

"Other than some website that has no real worthwhile $$ potential, what do they have? Why will a company partner with this company? The track record of the previous attempt is very poor. Lets hear what this company has to offer, other than a website that will not make anyone rich."

Sure, lets talk about the company and not the personalities behind the scene of the company.

Other than some website that has no real worthwhile $$ potential, what do they have? Why will a company partner with this company? The track record of the previous attempt is very poor. Lets hear what this company has to offer, other than a website that will not make anyone rich.

The theory is say anything and hope your friends can pump it enough to get you that round trip first class airfare ticket from Paris to LA. A BIG film maker can never fly coach! LOL

Also just love the smattering of one liner catch phrases. So amateurish in the pump. My parakeet can see through those one liners!

Winder when they will start to disgorge that SIIR is actually a property of this IFLM thing. I wonder if VIRA found a cure for cancer yet through their "open source web based research networks" LOLOLOLOL

would have to actually trade and have something other than a "website" before it took off.

mrsdoubtire, it has happened to us all. I have been lead astray when listening to baseless hype on these boards. should never have bought some trash and others should have sold and not listened to the nonesense spewed on these boards. We just hope we make it up on other plays. Just always have to be careful of those who are paid pumpers and those who have been sucked in, bought lots then try to pump so they can dump. sometimes it is not easy to see through the BS.

Fellow Doe, perhaps you spoke too fast? :)

The market was so impressed by the news, website and company that the stock really reacted in a positive fashion with unheard of volume.

It is not anywhere. The 2014 comment is a pipedream and complete hype.

The real interesting new, IMO, is Dr Sloan.

Did you see his pic? Too much french food?

It is great that you are "long the deal".

According to the last filing they have 0 in cash, net loss of 4,199,099 since the inception of the company, and much of that went to the insiders.

Other than that it seems like a solid play.

SIIR was an Imperia product and not IFLM, and IFLM seemed to have "stolen" it. SIIR made no money with their "big movie" and all of their lack luster accolades. Look up Eade under the bar association in CA and see his past record and why. See the lawsuit he attempted and lost and still has not paid the judgement on the countersuit. Look up Eade and all of his associated past companies. Read up on your facts on Imperia.

The truth is the truth and the truth hurts. Let me know the positive facts that you have found out about IFLM, IMPN and IPEI and show me a company he has been involved with that actually proved a real profit for anyone except those who were insiders.

For somebody to be so passionate in defending Kenneth Eade, there HAS to be a catch...always has been.


TIA

Means nothing.

lol, Lil Piggy, perhaps you should do your research on Kenneth Eade and why some people might not quite like him and his methods and "companies".

You will be truly enlightened.

Well, as somebody has stated once:

""hell hath no fury than an investor scorned on koolaide"

dont let this be you, DO NOT DRINK THE KOOLAIDE"

This is something that many should abide by.

Viratech Corp. (OTC-VIRA) is an open source biotechnology development company engaged in the business of researching and developing cancer treatment protocols through the use of open source web based research networks.

I never really looked at that before, but it is the most pointless description of anything I have ever read about a pink sheet company!
Thought they ahve the cure all!


Also for your bathroom reading pleasure. Needs money badly.:


"Press Release on Preliminary Injunction

Posted by Chris RyanMon at 2:10 PM- 559 views - 0 comments - 0 likes - - #Chase- #Preliminary Injunction- #Injunction


JP Morgan Chase Loses Federal Injunction Alleging Predatory Lending Practices



JP Morgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) lost a preliminary injunction motion alleging predatory lending practices on February 23, 2012 in , the United States District Court for the Central District of California, which granted a preliminary injunction in Case No. CV-116809 DSF, to cease any attempts by the bank to collect on a home equity line of credit (HELOC) or to supply any negative information based on the HELOC to credit reporting agencies, in a case that marks a blow to the successor of Washington Mutual Bank's (WAMU) alleged predatory real estate loans prior to the Economic Crash of 2008.



In a first amended complaint, filed by the Law Firm of Kenneth Eade, on January 6, 2012, the plaintiff alleges that WAMU issued both a first mortgage and the HELOC in what Eade alleged as a predatory loan practice, to cover the purchase price of a home in Southern California, according to the first amended complaint in the case. As a result of the real estate crash, both loans went into foreclosure in 2008. Despite the fact that the plaintiff obtained a buyer on a short sale for the property, WAMU ignored the short sale offer and foreclosed, according to the first amended complaint. According to the Court order, on September 25, 2008, nine days after the foreclosure sale, WAMU was seized by the FDIC and its banking assets were purchased by JP Morgan Chase. However, despite the California anti-deficiency statutes, which bar collection of a deficiency on purchase money mortgages after foreclosure, JP Morgan Chase attempted to collect nearly a $250,000 deficiency on the HELOC, and reported it negatively on the plaintiff's consumer credit profile. The first amended complaint in the case alleges a violation of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).



In the reply memorandum to the opposition to the injunction filed February 16, 2012, Eade contended that it was "in the public interest that Chase should not be permitted to report outstanding deficiency balances that are barred from collection by state statutes that were enacted to provide those same consumers with relief. Such statutes were enacted to balance the equities between the consumer and the banks; to protect the consumer and give him power against entities such as the defendant, one of the largest banks on the world... The California legislature enacted the anti-deficiency statutes in light of the foreclosures and abusive deficiency judgments obtained by lenders during the Great Depression. Spangler v. Memel, 7 Cal. 3d 603 (1972). Eade contended in the reply that the real estate lending practices of the large banks were a huge contributing factor to the Economic Crisis of 2008, and the Defendant should not benefit from the result of these practices, especially in light of the ban on collection of deficiency balances in California."



Eade also stressed in the reply memorandum, "the importance of fairness to the consumer is a vital element of the legislative history of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Cases where creditors are able to exercise non judicial remedies to recover their collateral to loans and then seek deficiencies, such as in this case, it is essential that consumers such as the Plaintiff have a remedy for creditors who break the law."


The granting of the injunction today serves as a major win for people who believe they were victims of predatory lending practices. A preliminary injunction is an extreme remedy and it is only issued when the Court find that the plaintiff establishes a likelihood of success on the merits of his case. The Court found that Chase is providing derogatory information to reporting agencies based on a debt that it is likely legally barred from collecting and enjoined it from doing so pending the outcome of the case, according to the Order.

To learn more about how this lawsuit, please visit kennetheade.net of contact the Law Office of Kenneth Eade at (323) 782 8802



Extensions, Inc. © 2012 - Privacy - Terms of Service - Contact - Feedback"

Some of the companies related to
6399 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 507

Fidelis Energy, Inc
Independent Film Development Corporation
Gold Standard Mining Corp
ReputationsRUS
Eade Kenneth G Attorney At Law
Kensington Leasing Ltd (KNSL)

ok, so this matters why? oh and btw, fyi, check out the registration of the website which seems to be all this company currently owns other than "stolen" rights imo

Oh and I love this site under privacy statement reads
"This page will contain the privacy statement of your choice."

as well as Terms of Service
"This page will contain the terms of service of your choice."

Oh and the "popular Members" seem to be all Eade connected folks. I hope he is enjoying his life in france and his what, 2nd or 3rd russian wife?

Remember, Eade only does what is profitable for Eade.

Registrant:
Cinecam Corporation
Kenneth Eade
6399 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 507
Los Angeles, CA 90048
US
Phone: +1.3237828802
Email:

Registrar Name....: Register.com
Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: www.register.com

Domain Name: hollywoodindy.com
Created on..............: 2008-06-26
Expires on..............: 2012-06-26

Administrative Contact:
Cinecam Corporation
Kenneth Eade
6399 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 507
Los Angeles, CA 90048
US
Phone: +1.3237828802
Email:

Any website changes detected?

Read this for more proof of which you have been 100% unable to provide in defense of your stance with this poor excuse of a company. Hey if you want it for a chance of a run that is great, but understand there is nothing behind the ticket other than smoke and mirrors.

Re: parent company's "holding" that of course has nothing at all to do with winick. My 2 yr old goldfish can even comprehend the facts and proof.

wiltshiresmyth "holdings of nanotech and imwl and eor aka foyj are ALL Winick scams. Nothing has happened with these companies of real value other than paid promotions and senseless blind hyping. wiltshiresmyth is not anything than winick trying to get more money from suckers...IMHO

http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/Proceedings_soa_20120127_winicks.htm


Still waiting...Thanks kaos and remember, admission is the majority part of recovery.

Winick and his liquid gold scam:

http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/Proceedings_soa_20120127_winicks.htm

hope comes in so many forms. Hope in the form of ADSV doing something is hope wasted. Just im my opinion of course

HEHE looks like Tony is hawking real estate now:

http://www.manta.com/g/mr0d8yl/anthony-r-shupin

Some people love garbage.

Another update:

http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/SecuritiesLaw_ord_20120203_222_american-heritage.htm

http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/Proceedings_enr_20120217_winicks.htm

Love the "parent" company to this thing. Here is something about companies they "own".


http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/Proceedings_soa_20120127_winicks.htm

Talks about the nanotech scam and Liquid Gold which is FOYJ which is EOR reincarnated.

A great "company" to represent only the best opportunity in scams and no connection at all to winick lololol..but it is JMHO of course.

BRB, I am going to check the website for "Website Changes Detected".

Thanks for the update. I wish nothing but the worse that can happen to them does happen. As for Winick, his obituary would be cause for celebration.

Is this the first time you have ever owned a stock in a scam company? TGLN is a dead company with no real website. Glenn rid himself of this piece of garbage and Fleming is still listed as President of this revoked company. Just curious because the obvious eludes some.

Just in case there is some confusion as to the meaning of revoked:

"to take back or withdraw; annul, cancel, or reverse; rescind or repeal"

Thanks

Great website and company direction. They are now selling plastic folding chairs and ceiling fans. Great potential! And the product listings really sum up this company from the beginning: "There are no products in this group."
LOLOLOLOL

http://www.sterlingyachtsales.com/

Better chance of snow in the sahara desert

Always remember, Eade does nothing if it does not directly benefit Eade.

Means nothing. He is still the chief _______ in charge!

murmel, all I ask for is any REAL proof. I am waiting and just read lots of baseless jargon.

Please show proof of possible RM, proof that anything that Arlene and Glenn are currently doing have anything to do with TGLN, proof that TGLN was not revoked by the state of Nevada and that John Fleming was not the last registered President, etc... of TGLN.

It is easy to spew hype on pink sheets and harder to show facts.

Thanks Murmel...I look forward to your REAL proof.

So Murmel Abondance...is there something you do not understand and grasp about this following comment that you made?

"Fairline Florida in Fort Lauderdale, FL is a private company..."

Note the key words...PRIVATE COMPANY

Also, the PUBLIC company of TGLN of which ONLY John Fleming was listed as President, has a business license that is REVOKED! The stock has been DELISTED.

The ONLY rumor of a RM have been created by 2 people on this iHub board.


FACTS Murmel-Abondance...Just REAL facts please!!

Thanks

ok, then when it comes to the reverse merger, WHERE is the proof of the rumor other than some chatter between 2 people on a stock chat board that know nothing at all about any reverse merger and just hope to god that they can make a little bit of money back that they lost from being scammed into this POS!? Too late???? LOLOL...wow, at .0001, it is too late? Where do you perform, I need a good comedy act to laugh at some more.

Furthermore, this company's business license is REVOKED! THe stock is DELISTED. Glenn's new company has NOTHING to do with TGLN.

Murmel, Abondance, I have been around these pink Chit stocks way too long and know all of the BS tricks. All I ask for is PROOF! Yours is the next move and I expect more than just some hype.....Thanks!

No matter how much you was feces, they still smell.

That is great, but it says nothing on anything that you had posted about it's association with TGLN. He has had a boat company before TGLN and probably way after the TGLN disaster. Good try though.

Also, what reverse merger rumor other than a few hopefuls on here? Where is this real reverse merger rumor? I can state that TGLN is valued at 500 billion dollars and that now becomes a rumor. But unfounded just like any reverse merger.
Thanks and have a great day murmel!

wick, Dont start telling me some fibs about Santa and the tooth fairy. I know they exist and also, I have been down the yellow brick road and saw Flemingturd there and btw, he was not the wizard.