Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Cox and the skank team have zero updates....alll they have left is a shameful lie about a Naz listing that didnt come 2 years ago and will never come....
They used the rest to pump up the stock price...
SCURG CREDIT RATING "F" AFTER MULTIPLE DEFAULTS-LAWSUITS
COX BURNED EVERY OPTION....SUCH A CLEVER FRAUDSTER IN HIS OWN MIND!
FOR THE RECORD 3/15/21 Share Structure
Market Cap Market Cap 39,501,337
03/15/2021
Authorized Shares 500,000,000
03/15/2021
Outstanding Shares 140,574,152
03/15/2021
Restricted 94,165,487
03/15/2021
Unrestricted 46,408,665
03/15/2021
Held at DTC 44,765,536
03/15/2021
Float 44,164,419
03/03/2021
NASDAQ LMFAO...COX USED EVERYONE AGAIN!
LMFAO SO NOW COX HAS MAXIM SEEKING OUT ANYONE WILLING TO TAKE ON SOME OF SURG'S DEBT FOR A RETURN OF 250% WITH WARRANTS....lololoxlaxzxzloloxzz NASDAQ LMFAO!
In connection with this transaction, on March 9, 2021, the Company entered into a Confidential Engagement Agreement (the “Engagement Agreement”) with Maxim Group, LLC (the “Placement Agent”), pursuant to which we have agreed to pay the Placement Agent a cash fee equal to 8% of the gross proceeds received by the Company from the Investor in this transaction and reimbursement of up to $20,000 of the Placement Agent’s legal fees. The term of the Engagement Agreement is 18-months, and contains a right of first refusal, whereby the Company granted the Placement Agent the right of first refusal to act as sole managing underwriter and book runner or sole placement agent for any and all future public or private equity, equity-linked or debt (excluding commercial bank debt) offerings during the eighteen (18) month period following the Closing (as defined in the Engagement Agreement”).
The SPA, the Note and the Warrant are attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The description of the SPA, the Note and the Warrant contained herein is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of the SPA, the Note and the Warrant.
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On March 8, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), SurgePays, Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Evergreen Capital Management LLC (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Company sold to the Investor a 15% OID convertible promissory note with a principal amount of $2,300,000 (the “Note”) and a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 13,437,500 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) for proceeds of $2,000,000.
The Note matures on March 8, 2022, bears interest at the rate of 5% per annum and is convertible at any time upon the option of the Investor into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price equal to $0.16 per share or, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default (as defined in the Note), if lower, at a conversion price equal to 75% of the lowest daily VWAP of the Common Stock during the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the applicable conversion date. The Company has the right to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Note in an amount equal to 115% or 120%, depending on whether such repayment is made before October 8, 2021 or after October 8, 2021, respectively, multiplied by the portion of the outstanding balance to be prepaid. The Company is required to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Note upon the occurrence of a Qualified Financing (as defined in the Note). If at any time while the Note is outstanding, the Company completes any single Future Transaction (as defined in the Note), the Investor may, in its sole discretion, elect to apply all, or any portion, of the then outstanding principal amount of this Note and any accrued but unpaid interest, as purchase consideration for such Future Transaction.
The Warrant is exercisable at a purchase price of $0.16 per share at any time on or prior to March 8, 2026, and may be exercised on a cashless basis, beginning on the six-month anniversary of the Effective Date, if the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrant are not then registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Investor will not have the right to exercise the Warrant if the Investor, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to its conversion and under no circumstances may exercise the Warrant if the Investor, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 9.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to its exercise.
The SPA contains customary representations, warranties and agreements by the Company, customary conditions to closing, indemnification obligations of the Company, other obligations of the parties thereto, and termination provisions.
In connection with this transaction, on March 9, 2021, the Company entered into a Confidential Engagement Agreement (the “Engagement Agreement”) with Maxim Group, LLC (the “Placement Agent”), pursuant to which we have agreed to pay the Placement Agent a cash fee equal to 8% of the gross proceeds received by the Company from the Investor in this transaction and reimbursement of up to $20,000 of the Placement Agent’s legal fees. The term of the Engagement Agreement is 18-months, and contains a right of first refusal, whereby the Company granted the Placement Agent the right of first refusal to act as sole managing underwriter and book runner or sole placement agent for any and all future public or private equity, equity-linked or debt (excluding commercial bank debt) offerings during the eighteen (18) month period following the Closing (as defined in the Engagement Agreement”).
The SPA, the Note and the Warrant are attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The description of the SPA, the Note and the Warrant contained herein is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of the SPA, the Note and the Warrant.
COX THE CLOWN SHOW..HERE WE GO AGAIN MORE SPECIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENTS TO PAY OFF THE ONES FORM LAST YEAR...
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/surgepays-qb-SURG/stock-news/84596547/current-report-filing-8-k
LMFAO ANOTHER 8K JUST OUT...EVEN MORE DILUTION! WHAT TOTAL FOOKUP COX IS...
COX hired a bunch of pumpers on twitter...working all day and night...COX has a couple hundred million shares he needs to dump!
LINKS TO LIE'S LAWSUITS AND A LOAN DEFAULTS! YIKES 100% SCAM!
In the last 10 weeks CEO has Diluted share holders by over 20,000,000 shares...Taken out another Bridge loan from a mystery loaner to pay it's lenders so it doesnt get sued again....filed an S-8 to pay it's employees in shares and filed an s-1 to dilute more shares to pay basic operating costs before the bridge loans funds run dry.....and now Cox is using the same old LIES that this company is uplisting to Nasdaq.... oh brother....COX is right..his shareholders are suckers...
here are links... first one is the same lies about the NAZ listing over 2 years ago!
https://ir.surgepays.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/34/surge-holdings-inc-files-application-for-uplisting-to-the
https://docoh.com/filing/1392694/0001493152-21-005790/SURG-S8
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/surgepays-qb-SURG/stock-news/84351344/securities-registration-statement-s-1-a
https://ir.surgepays.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/79/surgepays-inc-closes-bridge-financing?inf_contact_key=f02eaf271afc4894e6b03bf280e7d787
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
WEEKLY DILUTION DATA UPDATED AGAIN,OVER 2.5M DUMPED AGAIN!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
Outstanding Shares
140,574,152
03/15/2021
Outstanding Shares
138,074,152
03/08/2021
Outstanding Shares 133,190,335
02/22/2021
Restricted 89,175,916
02/22/2021
Unrestricted 44,014,419
02/22/202
Outstanding Shares
132,419,335
02/17/2021
Outstanding Shares
127,566,582
02/01/2021
Outstanding Shares
122,507,519
01/04/2021
Outstanding Shares
118,937,711
11/12/2020
Outstanding Shares
114,215,911
10/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
113,327,080
09/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
111,197,866
08/03/2020
Outstanding Shares
104,922,150
05/31/2020
Outstanding shares
101,015,459
01/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
97,414,983
08/14/2019
COX BOUGHT ECS FROM GTCH ANOTHER PINK SHEET SCAM FOR $5M IN STOCK AND A NOTE HE DEFAULTED ON....FUNNY ITS THE ONLY REVENUE SCRUGE HAS AND GTCH IS STILL SCAMMMMING PEOPLE WITH THE SAME OLD CRAP...EVERYTHING COS SAYS IS A PROVEN LIE! THIS IS AN ENDLESS PUMP NAD DUMP SCAM....JUST LOOK AT THE ENDLESS ACCELERATING DILUTION...HARDLY THE ACTIONS OF A COMPANY WITH GROWING REVENUES HEADED FOR NASDAQ LOLOLOLZZZZXZXZLOLZZZ
https://ir.surgepays.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/44/surge-holdings-announces-asset-purchase-resulting-in-the
BUT HERE IS THE BEST PART..COX'S ACCOUNTANTS HAD TO ADD THIS DISCLAIMER BECAUSE THEY KNEW ALL THE REVENUES WERE 100% BULLSHIT...WHICH EXPLAINS HOW SCURGE CAN PURCHASE ASSETS FOR 5M WITH 50m IN REVS....ALL BULLSHIT!
*Annualized revenue is assumed if the Company had completed the acquisition on January 1 of the current fiscal period. The $48.7M is based on the gross revenue of the acquired businesses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The Company has not completed an audit on the value and annualized revenue is not a basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such amounts have not been audited by the Company.
ACCELERATING DILUTION NOW OVER 2,000,000 PER WEEK!
ALERT NEW DILUTION #'S 3/15 NOW OVER 140m O/S WOWSA!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
Outstanding Shares
140,574,152
03/15/2021
COX ..SAME LIAR ..SAME BULLSHIT MEMPHIS, Tenn., March 6, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Surge Holdings Inc. ("Surge") (OTCQB: SURG), a Memphis-based Technology and Blockchain FinTech Software Company is pleased to announce today it has filed an application for uplisting on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
SurgeHoldings Logo (PRNewsfoto/Surge Holdings)
"We believe uplisting from the OTC Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market will increase corporate visibility, improve liquidity, and broaden awareness in the financial markets," stated Brian Cox, Surge's CEO and Chairman of the Board. "An up-list will open the investment opportunity to a larger pool of investors and help create greater shareholder value. We have made significant progress in strengthening our financial performance, governance and liquidity, positioning the Company for future growth and profitability. A listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market is a natural progression for the Company and our shareholders."
The Company's common stock will continue to trade on the OTCQB under its current symbol, SURG, during the NASDAQ review process and while the Company prepares to meet all the requirements for uplisting to NASDAQ.
SURG-Visa Vanishes from the website without a peep...COX touted the card as being the next best thing for underbanked in all the pump and dump paid for interviews...and like a thief in the night it just disappears with no explanation like so many things and the BS investor relations wont reply....100% SCAM!
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/08/22/1905461/0/en/Surge-Holdings-Announces-Official-Launch-of-the-SurgePays-Visa-Prepaid-Card.html
https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_1ebc1c6dbc5326b2dd8c2d400aa7c70c/surgeholdings/db/276/1627/pdf/ExecutiveSummary_Jan2020_V14.pdf
SAME LIES FROM 2 YEARS AGO.WHEN WILL PEOPLE LEARN!
https://ir.surgepays.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/34/surge-holdings-inc-files-application-for-uplisting-to-the
******DD- UPDATE FACTS! WITH LINKS! CAUTION! ******
In the last 10 weeks CEO has Diluted share holders by over 20,000,000 shares...Taken out another Bridge loan from a mystery loaner to pay it's lenders so it doesnt get sued again....filed an S-8 to pay it's employees in shares and filed an s-1 to dilute more shares to pay basic operating costs before the bridge loans funds run dry.....and now Cox is using the same old LIES that this company is uplisting to Nasdaq.... oh brother....COX is right..his shareholders are suckers...
here are links... first one is the same lies about the NAZ listing over 2 years ago!
https://ir.surgepays.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/34/surge-holdings-inc-files-application-for-uplisting-to-the
https://docoh.com/filing/1392694/0001493152-21-005790/SURG-S8
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/surgepays-qb-SURG/stock-news/84351344/securities-registration-statement-s-1-a
https://ir.surgepays.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/79/surgepays-inc-closes-bridge-financing?inf_contact_key=f02eaf271afc4894e6b03bf280e7d787
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
Outstanding Shares
138,074,152
03/08/2021
Outstanding Shares 133,190,335
02/22/2021
Restricted 89,175,916
02/22/2021
Unrestricted 44,014,419
02/22/202
Outstanding Shares
132,419,335
02/17/2021
Outstanding Shares
127,566,582
02/01/2021
Outstanding Shares
122,507,519
01/04/2021
Outstanding Shares
118,937,711
11/12/2020
Outstanding Shares
114,215,911
10/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
113,327,080
09/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
111,197,866
08/03/2020
Outstanding Shares
104,922,150
05/31/2020
Outstanding shares
101,015,459
01/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
97,414,983
08/14/2019
ALERT! A/S RAISED TO 500,000,000 WOWSA! DILUTION SCAM! LINK!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
COX DANGLES THE NAZ CARROT OVER AND OVER THEN DILUTES!
SAME OLD CEO PUMP AND DUMP DILUTION SCAM!
ALERT SEC S-8 just filed! Offering price .15 LMAO!
https://docoh.com/filing/1392694/0001493152-21-005790/SURG-S8
SEC INVESTIGATION AND LAWSUITS! 100% SCAM!
SURG DEFAULTS ON LOANS LAWSUIT DETAILS 100% SCAM!
2. Surge’s Payment to Plaintiffs.
2.1 As of the Effective Date, Surge agrees to issue and/or pay to AltCorp and/or its designee shares of its common stock in an amount equal to three million three hundred thousand dollars ($3,300,000) (the “Payment”) in resolution of the claims against Surge in this Action which are released hereunder arising from the Exchange Agreement and other agreements with Plaintiffs to which Surge is a party and are identified within the Complaint. Surge shall treat the Payment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The Payment shall be satisfied through the series of issuances of shares of Surge’s common stock to AltCorp and/or its designee as set forth within this Agreement. The shares shall be issued as unrestricted and free-trading upon delivery of a legal opinion to Surge. Any legal opinion required in order to remove any restrictive legends from the shares shall be provided by Surge at its own cost.
4.1 Within three (3) Trading Days of the first (1st) Trading Day of each calendar month after January 8, 2021, (the “Monthly Transfer Deadline”), for a period of thirty-two (32) months after January 8, 2021, Surge shall irrevocably instruct its transfer agent to transfer to AltCorp and/or its designee an amount of Surge’s common stock from the Increased Reserved Shares Quantity (the “Monthly Transferred Shares”) equal in value to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) (the “Value Amount”) per month for the thirty-two (32) months following January 8, 2021.
13.1.5 The Monthly Transferred Shares when issued and delivered in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, for the consideration expressed herein, upon receipt of a legal opinion indicating the same, will be free trading without encumbrances and duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
UH-OH SURG FILES S-1 FOR PUBLIC OFFERING ! WOWSA!
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/surgepays-qb-SURG/stock-news/84351344/securities-registration-statement-s-1-a
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEVIN BRIAN COX a/k/a Brian Cox, and LEONARD I. SOLT.
Kevin Brian Cox objects (Doc. 316) under Rule 59(a) to the magistrate judge's order (Doc. 290) denying a motion to compel (Doc. 254) the United States' compliance with an earlier order (Doc. 238) for a bill of particulars. A review of the objection, the response, and the pertinent predecessor papers reveals no demonstration by Cox that the magistrate judge's order is either contrary to law or clearly erroneous (or erroneous at all).
The objection (Doc. 316) is OVERRULED.
In part III of a document (Doc. 259) that responds in a single paper to several distinct motions (this awkward practice confuses attempts to track motions on the court's electronic docket), the United States requests an order that precludes Biddix from asserting at trial a defense based on the advice of counsel. To support this novel request, the United States states, "Before indictment, Biddix foreclosed the grand jury from investigating relevant communication by and between him and counsel." (Doc. 259 at 14) For the reasons stated in part I of Biddix's response (Doc. 303 at pp. 3-8), the motion is DENIED.
Cox moves (Doc. 275) "to preclude the government from offering any evidence under Rule 404(b) at trial." Cox asserts that the United States failed to provide "timely and sufficient notice" of the intent to offer evidence under Rule 404(b). The parties agreed (Doc. 108) that Rule 404(b) disclosures must occur before March 13, 2015. The United States' disclosure letter identifies "fraudulent misrepresentation made in connection with the Lifeline Program prior to January 2009" by five, named business entities. Cox asserts that the "bare-bones, excessively broad letter" fails to contain the reasonable notice required by Rule 404(b)(2)(A).
Paragraph five of the Advisory Committee Notes to the 1991 Amendments to Rule 404(b) states, "The court in its discretion may, under the facts, decide that the particular . . . notice was not reasonable, either because of the lack of timeliness or completeness." Obviously, "reasonable notice" contemplates a useful, even if still generalized, description of the prospective Rule 404(b) evidence. The United States' disclosure merely identifies the business entity within which a "fraudulent misrepresentation [was] made in connection with the Lifetime Program prior to January 2009." A statement that, more than this statement, says something rather than nothing while fully retaining the statement's maximum unhelpfulness is hard to imagine. If the aim of this statement's drafter was to provide to the defense the minimum permissible disclosure and nothing more, the drafter undershot the mark. This studiedly obscure disclosure apprises neither the defense nor the court of anything that meaningfully directs the reader's attention to some manageable and practical field of inquiry.
Cox's motion (Doc. 275) is GRANTED to the extent that admission of the contested evidence under Rule 404(b) is DENIED.
Associated Telecommunications Management Services, LLC moves (Doc. 250) to intervene in the criminal prosecution of Thomas E. Biddix (ATMS's owner), moves for a protective order, and moves for an evidentiary hearing "regarding the government's violations of the attorney-client privilege." Biddix joins in the motion for a protective order and the motion for a hearing.
The magistrate judge conducted a hearing (Doc. 314) and examined the claimed privileged material in camera. The magistrate judge's October 7, 2015, report (Doc. 361), to which there is no response, (1) finds that "the corporation has neither the standing to intervene nor the grounds to assert the privilege," (2) finds that Biddix "has no authority in any personal capacity to assert ATMS's attorney-client privilege for his own benefit," (3) finds that because "ATMS has no standing to assert the privilege and that none of the statements at issue is covered by the privilege, no conflict of interest exists, and a rule 44(c) hearing is not required"; and (4) recommends denial of the motion.
In consideration of the motion (Doc. 250) and the responses (Doc. 258, 329), the report and recommendation (Doc. 361) is ADOPTED. The motion (Doc. 250) to intervene, for a protective order, and for a hearing is DENIED.
Cox moves (Doc. 276) under Rule 403 to preclude the United States from offering "evidence or argument characterizing Defendants as `undisclosed owners' (and similar terminology)" of ATMS. By "similar terminology" Cox means "shadow owners," "secret owners," or another term designed to convey an unspecified but unmistakable air of suspect motive or other general disapprobation. The United States responds (Doc. 308) that the term "undisclosed owner" is an entirely neutral encapsulation of the fact that Cox owned only an option to purchase certain ATMS shares.
The United States over-simplifies. The term "undisclosed owner" conveys at least the notion of "ownership," which is not the equivalent of holding an option. Saying that someone who owns only an option to purchase is either a purchaser or an owner of the item subject to the option is a deception. Similarly, the United States' saying in a jury trial that something is "undisclosed" (or "shadow" or "secret") suggests strongly the existence of a duty to disclose. Therefore, unless the United States can establish an ownership interest in the pertinent shares and some legally cognizable duty to disclose, the term "undisclosed owner" or an equivalent is confusing and misleading and unnecessarily elongates the proceedings (and is probably argumentative, depending on the circumstance). The motion (Doc. 276) is GRANTED absent the establishment of a proper predicate.
Cox moves (Doc. 277) to "exclude evidence or argument at trial of uncharged conduct relating to taxes." Again, Cox notes that the evidence is inadmissible if offered under Rule 404(b) because the parties' stipulation required disclosure in March, 2015, and no Rule 404(b) notice of the income tax evidence has appeared. Also, Cox argues (Doc. 277 at 3) that:
There was nothing secret about how much money ATMS was receiving from USAC. How ATMS or its subsidiaries accounted for Lifeline reimbursements on their tax returns, or how the Defendants accounted for whatever funds they received from these entities on their own personal tax returns, are issues wholly disconnected from Defendants' role in the submission of Forms 497 on behalf of ATMS and its subsidiaries.
Noting that the indictment alleges that as a part of the criminal conspiracy the defendants concealed the proceeds from the Internal Revenue Service and that Count Seven charges money laundering, which is a scheme to disguise criminal proceeds, the United States argues that the tax-related evidence is intrinsic to the criminal scheme and admissible.
Given the allegations of the indictment, the challenged evidence is probative of whether a defendant concealed from the IRS and laundered the proceeds of the allegedly criminal scheme. Cox's motion (Doc. 277) is DENIED.
Cox moves (Doc. 278) "to exclude at trial evidence relating to Defendants' purported wealth, lifestyles, and spending habits." Cox argues that the prosecution's allusion to these topics during trial presents a toxic appeal to "class prejudice" and presents a "severe risk of unfair prejudice" from an inflamed jury.
The United States responds (Doc. 310) that "spending and wealth evidence" is admissible because the evidence "supports the wire fraud conspiracy and substantive wire fraud counts charged in Counts One through Six, and it is critical to proving the money laundering conspiracy charged in Count Seven." The United States cites United States v. Hope, 608 Fed.Appx. 831 (11th Cir. 2015), in which "wealth evidence" assisted the prosecutor in rebutting the defense that the defendant "did not knowingly commit fraud, but rather [the money received was] the result of billing errors." 608 Fed.Appx. at 839. Also, Hope finds that wealth evidence "goes to Hope's motive to commit the offenses." The defendant in Hope argued that motive was not an element of the offense that the prosecution must prove, but Hope dismisses that argument based on United States v. Williford, 764 F.2d 1493, 1499 (11th Cir. 1985), which states:
Evidence, not part of the crime charged but pertaining to the chain of events explaining the context, motive and set-up of the crime, is properly admitted if linked in time and circumstances with the charged crime, or forms an integral and natural part of an account of the crime, or is necessary to complete the story of the crime for the jury.
A long line of cases in the Eleventh Circuit and elsewhere reliably recites the fact that "it is often difficult to determine whether wealth evidence is intended to appeal to class bias or to establish a fact in issue." 608 Fed.Appx. 838. To assist in that determination, Hope cites United States v. Jackson-Randolph, 282 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2002), which includes an instructive selection of illustrative precedents and which includes the following list of "good markers" that inform a ruling under Rule 403 in an instance of proffered wealth evidence:
[T]he unfair prejudice does not outweigh the probative value if three factors are met: (1) there is other credible evidence, direct or circumstantial, of the illegal activity; (2) the money spent was not available to the defendant from a legitimate source; and (3) the accumulation of great wealth or extravagant spending relates to the period of the alleged illegal activity.
282 F.3d at 378. Although not an exhaustive list, the Jackson-Randolph factors undoubtedly provide a sound foundation for decision.
A review of the facts of Jackson-Randolph suggests another factor that will warrant consideration in the usual application. Johnson-Randolph recites the disputed wealth evidence as follows:
The district court overruled the objections and permitted the government to introduce evidence of Jackson-Randolph's purchases of expensive jewelry, clothing, and several fur coats. The government also presented evidence of Jackson-Randolph's trips to Aruba, the Bahamas, Las Vegas, and Atlantic City for gambling, where Jackson-Randolph arranged large lines of credit prior to arrival. Witnesses also testified to Jackson-Randolph's propensity to give away expensive gifts such as jewelry, clothing, and trips. A government agent estimated her expenditures during the indictment period at $3,896,939. This evidence, Jackson-Randolph asserts, was merely inflammatory, prejudicial, and irrelevant to any issue in the case.
282 F.3d at 376.
Assuming that the evidence establishes the absence of a "legitimate source" for her money, Johnson-Randolph's spending in the pertinent time $3,896,939 on luxury items is evidence much more clearly probative of a pertinent fact than is evidence of her particular travel destinations (Atlantic City, for example), the exact activity (gambling, for example) she chose after arrival, the exact gifts (jewelry, for example) that she gave, and the like. Even if the fact of, and the amount of, extraordinary expenditures might fairly evidence the need for, or disposition of, feloniously acquired wealth, the wealth is needed no more to travel to Aruba or Las Vegas than to travel elsewhere. In other words, the "gory details" of the extraordinary expenditures are typically less probative and more prejudicial than the amount spent or the categories of expenditure (travel, automobiles, clothing and accessories, etc.). In all events, the United States should present evidence in a dignified and straight-forward manner and without undue attention to a sensational or provocative particular that is more likely to trigger an eruption of "class bias" or other prejudice — in whatever form and by whatever label.
WEEKLY DILUTION JUST KEEPS COMING...READ AND LEARN!
ANOTHER 5M DILUTION JUST REPORTED NOW 138,074,152 FROM 133,290,335 LESS THAN 2 WEEKS....IVE WARNED EVERYBODY ACCELERATING DILUTION!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
Outstanding Shares
138,074,152
03/08/2021
Outstanding Shares 133,190,335
02/22/2021
Restricted 89,175,916
02/22/2021
Unrestricted 44,014,419
02/22/202
Outstanding Shares
132,419,335
02/17/2021
Outstanding Shares
127,566,582
02/01/2021
Outstanding Shares
122,507,519
01/04/2021
Outstanding Shares
118,937,711
11/12/2020
Outstanding Shares
114,215,911
10/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
113,327,080
09/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
111,197,866
08/03/2020
Outstanding Shares
104,922,150
05/31/2020
Outstanding shares
101,015,459
01/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
97,414,983
08/14/2019
ALERT SEC S-8 just filed! Offering price .15 LMAO!
https://docoh.com/filing/1392694/0001493152-21-005790/SURG-S8
CEO BRIAN COX PAST INDICTMENT FOR WIRE FRAUD LINK
https://www.newson6.com/story/5e3632a32f69d76f62051959/oklahoma-cell-phone-company-owner-arrested-on-fraud-charges
They're accused of funding their lavish lifestyles with your hard-earned money funneled through a government program.
The Department of Justice charged three men in an alleged scheme to defraud the government-subsidized cell phone program called Lifeline of millions of dollars.
One of the men indicted, "owns a cell phone company," operating in Oklahoma.
It's not unusual for the owner of a cell phone company that takes government subsidies to have many different companies in different states, and that's the case here.
11/4/2013 Related Story: FCC Proposes $33M In Fines Against Cell Phone Companies Providing Lifeline
Prosecutors say all three men charged in the federal case created a cell phone company and turned in false reports to the government which gave them $32 million in subsidies.
The men are accused of 15 counts of wire fraud, false claims and money laundering.
The feds say the men used the program, designed to provide cell phones to the poor, to make themselves millionaires, buying a Lamborghini, a Mercedes, a Cadillac Escalade, an Audi R-8, a corvette, a limo, a private jet and a boat, among other things, all of which the government now wants to repossess.
One of the men indicted is Kevin Brian Cox, the owner of True Wireless which we've reported on here in Oklahoma for allegedly breaking the Lifeline rules.
While its owner, Cox, is named in the federal indictment, his alleged crimes are connected to a different company.
True Wireless, his Oklahoma company, is not part of this case and prosecutors haven't answered my questions as to whether it could eventually be included.
ANOTHER 5M DILUTION JUST REPORTED NOW 138,074,152 FROM 133,290,335 LESS THAN 2 WEEKS....IVE WARNED EVERYBODY ACCELERATING DILUTION!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SURG/security
Outstanding Shares
138,074,152
03/08/2021
Outstanding Shares 133,190,335
02/22/2021
Restricted 89,175,916
02/22/2021
Unrestricted 44,014,419
02/22/202
Outstanding Shares
132,419,335
02/17/2021
Outstanding Shares
127,566,582
02/01/2021
Outstanding Shares
122,507,519
01/04/2021
Outstanding Shares
118,937,711
11/12/2020
Outstanding Shares
114,215,911
10/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
113,327,080
09/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
111,197,866
08/03/2020
Outstanding Shares
104,922,150
05/31/2020
Outstanding shares
101,015,459
01/01/2020
Outstanding Shares
97,414,983
08/14/2019
LMFAO SCURGE...THE SCAM THAT KEEPS GIVING!
FAKE REVENUES CAN'T PAY REAL BILLS SORRY COX!
COX HAS TO PAY EMPLOYEES WITH SHARES NOW LMFAO!
LMFAO DILUTION DILUTION EVERY WAY COX CAN!
LMAO Cox used the bridge loan to pump PPS this morn Before s-8 filing holy shit waht a scammmer!
Just shorted 100K .30 free $$$$ SCRUG OFFERING! LMAO!
ALERT SEC S-8 just filed! Offering price .15 LMAO!
https://docoh.com/filing/1392694/0001493152-21-005790/SURG-S8
CEO BRIAN COX PAST INDICTMENT FOR WIRE FRAUD LINK
https://www.newson6.com/story/5e3632a32f69d76f62051959/oklahoma-cell-phone-company-owner-arrested-on-fraud-charges
They're accused of funding their lavish lifestyles with your hard-earned money funneled through a government program.
The Department of Justice charged three men in an alleged scheme to defraud the government-subsidized cell phone program called Lifeline of millions of dollars.
One of the men indicted, "owns a cell phone company," operating in Oklahoma.
It's not unusual for the owner of a cell phone company that takes government subsidies to have many different companies in different states, and that's the case here.
11/4/2013 Related Story: FCC Proposes $33M In Fines Against Cell Phone Companies Providing Lifeline
Prosecutors say all three men charged in the federal case created a cell phone company and turned in false reports to the government which gave them $32 million in subsidies.
The men are accused of 15 counts of wire fraud, false claims and money laundering.
The feds say the men used the program, designed to provide cell phones to the poor, to make themselves millionaires, buying a Lamborghini, a Mercedes, a Cadillac Escalade, an Audi R-8, a corvette, a limo, a private jet and a boat, among other things, all of which the government now wants to repossess.
One of the men indicted is Kevin Brian Cox, the owner of True Wireless which we've reported on here in Oklahoma for allegedly breaking the Lifeline rules.
While its owner, Cox, is named in the federal indictment, his alleged crimes are connected to a different company.
True Wireless, his Oklahoma company, is not part of this case and prosecutors haven't answered my questions as to whether it could eventually be included.