Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't know why "shorts" are still to blame when things don't go one's way in penny world. If one learns of the risks of how much one can lose it becomes obvious why it isn't done even if possible, which it generally isn't.
Learn about the $2.50 thing if one is unfamiliar with it.
GVSI is obviously not even close to that threshold.
It's not "reporting". It's ripping off a source without giving credit.
It was copy/pasted directly from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/03/30/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-private-and-public-sector-investments-for-affordable-electric-vehicles/
I'm pretty sure that's just simple plagiarism when the source of the copy/paste is not attributed.
That's not at all what I meant by twitter ho, I was referring to those that compulsively tweet and retweet anything and everything in the pursuit of likes and attention. Not everyone is prone to that, believe it or not.
O)h look, here's the reference, https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171595740&txt2find=ho
Passively monitoring what gets tweeted is an entirely different matter. "Gawd gave you one mouth but two ears" kinda thing.
Just like some are better googlers than others, some are able to pay better attention to tweets than others.
I shared what was tweeted and then quickly deleted. One can believe or disbelieve. No skin off my back either way.
I shared what was observed. Not my fault others weren't paying enough attention at the same time.
Someone paying closer attention did in fact catch them before they were deleted.
They were gone by the time I investigated, which was within 4 minutes of the time stamp of 2:07.
Not everyone is a twitter ho. I saw the screenshot in a private group and obviously everyone kept it just that, private.
I only mentioned it here because I thought it was already out, not realizing that someone found out about the hockey player's mother passing totally independently of the deleted tweets.
I have no reason to invent something, unlike some twitter accounts we know that manufacture tweets that make it look like an influencer said something about VNTH when they did not.
Oh my bad, I assumed you saw the tweets before they were deleted. Coincidental timing, I guess.
A seemingly random trading-focused twitter account tweeted yesterday addressing shareholders as if they were "Adam" and blamed the lack of communication on his mother passing away in January - which checks out for the hockey player, as it seems you have figured out.
The two tweets were very quickly deleted, presumably when they realized they were logged in to the wrong account. So is the hockey player actually our guy? What's with the other twitter account that has never had anything to do with VNTH? Why couldn't he have said something a long time ago instead of ghosting? That other twitter account has had some activity this entire time, so it's not like he has not been online.
Why not just post again, from the proper VNTH account? Or was this a third party pretending to be "Adam" trying to generate some interest right now because he's bagging hard?
More questions than answers now, sheesh....
A mother passing in mid-January still doesn't explain the lying pumpy tweets back in September right after taking over.
Other folk caught the "Adam" tweets from the wrong account today that were quickly deleted.
I've only heard of buying a CE through Ally as a secondhand tale. I have yet to come across anyone that has actually done it themselves.
It suspect it's fiction, but I'm happy to be corrected by anyone with direct experience doing it.
LMAO at the paint job from .0006 to .00065 with 1056 shares - 69 cents worth, nice.
We got a big spender out here trying to raise the VNTH share price, look out!
Why all that selling volume? Guess not everyone is positive on the future stock outlook. And I'm guessing whoever it is that is dumping has their reasons.
And "Adam" has had 6 months to work on it!
Too bad "Adam" has not been able to get in on that action.
Why would anyone be selling unless they thought this was going nowhere?
That and the pump post last week - just look at those red selling volume bars.
Someone was prepared to sell that day!
What does "Hooba-stank" mean? Is that something to do with VNTH, the subject of this board? Please explain.
And that pump article came out the same day he tweeted. That's quite the coincidence. I mean, of all days the exact same day as his first tweet in 3 months.
Nah, just a realist. Harass me more, I think it's that much funnier every time.
It did get the shell tag removed though, which frankly means more than some think for how it can trade.
They don't seem to be much of anything beyond perhaps the hope of a quick last-minute exit from OTC Market shell status, frankly.
https://sgpgrid.com/company-details/ggl-interior-studio-pte-ltd
Their market presence is inconsequential and they have two officers.
This isn't some company with thousands of employees erecting skyscrapers left and right.
You can specify which shares you sell. You may not realize it but you already have a default of which shares are sold first, whether they be the last bought or the first bought.. You can also change which are sold as long as you do it before the sell settles in a few days.
You are looking for the term "lots" or "tax lots". Heck you can even specify a lot you bought in the middle if it floats your boat, but you must be active about it. Contact your broker if it's not easy to see where you can change them. Some brokers are less obvious than others.
It's an asian interior design company. I'm not sure there is much of an excited audience for that.
To the moon!!!
Oh wait, nope, it's just a claimed conditional letter of intent for an unnamed company in an unnamed south east asian country.
It's amazing how many OTC LOI's end up falling apart after investors blew their cash. Something to keep in mind, citizens.
ICNM did not issue RSU's that will vest in the future.
They added over a billion shares that counted immediately in the OS. They are there now - not in the future.
You are mistaking selling for dilution.
Adding shares to the OS is dilution whether or not the shares are sold. Every shareholder now owns a smaller percentage of the company - their ownership has been "diluted".
Yes, even if the additional new shares are Restricted. Doesn't matter - everyone's holding has now been diluted.
The act of selling is often confused as dilution because they are closely related when lenders convert debt into shares and sell them right away. The selling is not the actual dilution though, the conversion is the dilution - adding more shares to the OS. So whether they sell or not, dilution has occurred.
It's a common mistake, thinking that there has to be selling for dilution to have occurred, but it doesn't.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/11/dangers-of-stock-dilution.asp
What Is Share Dilution?
Share dilution happens when a company issues additional stock. Therefore, shareholders' ownership in the company is reduced, or diluted when these new shares are issued.
Assume a small business has 10 shareholders and that each shareholder owns one share, or 10%, of the company. If investors receive voting rights for company decisions based on share ownership, then each one would have 10% control.
Suppose the company then issues 10 new shares and a single investor buys them all. There are now 20 total shares outstanding and the new investor owns 50% of the company. Meanwhile, each original investor now owns just 5% of the company—one share out of 20 outstanding—because their ownership has been diluted by the new shares.
What time on what day did DDAmanda "alert" VNTH to its members?
"Adam" said plenty of things back then. None of them came true.
Will the leopard change his spots this time around?
Yesterday's pump article quote is from September last year:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/09/23/2521912/0/en/Nano-Mobile-Healthcare-Inc-Announces-Closing-of-Change-of-Control-Transaction-and-Provided-Shareholders-Update.html
It is in Delaware now, same name.
Unfortunately that is a six month old quote in that article.
"In the coming weeks" never happened.
Did you notice how the selling volume kicked into a higher gear after the pump article came out today?
I doubt that is a coincidence.
You would think he would put forth at least something to demonstrate he is real. It's been a publicly aired concern for some time now, and not by just little ol' me.
Where did that half million in debt suddenly show up from? It was not there previously.
I'm not sure that's a good thing.
Does "Adam" have a contract with Subway or 7-Eleven to build their EV-charging stations??
No?
Okay, that's what I thought.
How do you know that "a lot of $$$" was spent on this shell? How much was it?
Several Frank shells have reverted right back to him recently after a pump was done. I can name them, just ask.
But oh, some will remember that VNTH itself has also done that already before. The high school kid. Merger out, get a pump, energy fizzles, back to Frank.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
As far as 2+ Billion shares purchased - guess what? That also means those 2+ Billion shares were sold by someone.
For anyone wondering, you can see the "disappeared" versions to compare by selecting Inactive or All over on the right side.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ICOA/disclosure