Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What about this one, hmmmmmmmmm!
"3D printing varies from traditional manufacturing techniques in further ways. For example, conventional casting and forging both have a long cooling process, but at GE Aviation, 3D printing requires rapid cooling. Rengers adds that this complicates the analysis process. However, “several universities are researching 3D modeling techniques that can predict material behavior under such conditions.”"
Why is this eeeeeeeven necessary?
Today's not slow. Pretty good volume. Shitty results though.
Well I think the kerfuffle over the meaning of "acquired" is silly. They bought the damn thing.
Well they mention GE, Materialise and Morris Technologies. Why would an EOS/Sigma partnership be under wraps? I find it hard to believe one exists.
But like most things the choice of wording is curious.
Will do Sally.
Oh sorry, I mis-remembered. It actualy depends on where you live and if you travel east or west. Traveling west would make it a day behind and going east would make it a day ahead.
That's how all timezones work.
China is + or - 3 months from where I live in New York.
The moon is actually closer to me than China is. I confirmed on Mapquest.
Posted recently by someone else sans details. Gary will be speaking on July 9th OR 10th in Melbourne. SGLB should be getting a mention.
http://www.inside3dprinting.com
Seems like there will be a lot of exhibits including Materialise.
Ggggggoooood luck Ggggggary.
Edit: he's speaking on the 10th -- http://www.mediabistro.com/inside3dprinting/australia/speakers.asp
I think Austrailia is a week ahead so it may have happened already.
Look at it, dpmworkshop2012 is in the url.
Anyway, found this which confirms it:
http://www.midwestsampe.org/?u=/content/pages/events/20121113&t=-1
SAMPE Midwest Chapter/Wright State University
Direct Part Manufacturing Workshop
Wright State University Student Union
Nov 13-14, 2012
Tuesday, November 13
DARPA session 1030-12 with a link to that very presentation.
Some time in 2012 based on the URL.
We just acquired one of their printers and apparently they come with the Materialise software on them.
We're either ready or we're not. There's an inbetween but it's not worth discussing.
$sglb #samsoniteluggage
Planning? It's already in there baby.
http://www.eos.info/quality-assurance
Messier-Bugatti-Dowty struck me as an odd one. 4 contracts then nothing? I also recall in one of the PRs that Cola comitted to commercialization by the end of 2012. I'll have to look that one up.
It just highlights the risk associated with this bugger,
This made me laugh out loud and to myself:
http://profit.ly/5001CY (Sykes and crew):
$2 profitSGLBLong Stockbysvoboda
--
Bught this small 3D printing company for overnight trade. The whole 3D printing sector was heating up and i was aiming for continuation of uptrend. My goal was to sell into a morning gap-up/spike but unfortunatelly nothing of that has happened. The whole 3D printing sector was negative the next day. Sold in the first few minutes of market open for punny gains. Once again because i cut my loss quickly my trade was still positive. Otherwise i could easily lost $80. It was a good trade overall.
----
$2.40 profit! 2.40!!! TAXED!! I lose a $1 every time I swear in front of my <$&@£¥**!!!> niece!!!
I think we all know it's "exciting".
I additionally think that it'd be a 1:1 relationship but anything's possible. Who cares as long as it works and it's priced right.
I'm expecting that my present will be in unrealized gains. I ain't selling anytime soon.
ALSO GE and other companies are not going to abandon their current inspection processes so worst case it takes them 25% longer to do the fuel nozzle printing if there's some issue that would prohibit them from going with SGLB. Or they find an alternative that would give them some of that 25% back.
Anyway, it's important to think about other possibilities.
INSPECT is delayed and due out EOY and EOS has EOSTATE built-in. There is still some risk here and SGLB is still a spec play.
Keep those feet firmly planted on the ground folks.
That being said, I'm just as hopeful as the next schmuck.
Well that's just an entry on their blog. I don't see any connection beyond the fact that they posted an article about them.
Awesome! What makes it so clear that we'll hit .15 in the next few days?
Is it the reverse whirlybird that's starting to form? Or maybe it's the upside-down toothpick that has now crossed the MACTruck line?
I'll make a safer prediction. The stock price won't move in either direction tomorrow.
Don't ask how I know this because I will *not* give up my secrets!
Will it really be interesting? We know how much we move on a PR, it's insignificant. We also know that yesterday's pump was inflated and artificial and we also know who caused it.
It'll be more interesting to see how this reacts once real revenues are announced.
What about the Sigmanic Impressives? On a down day we're the Sigmanic Depressives.
Boooooo! Boo only because I didn't come up with it.
I was just joking about beliebers, I "belieb" it's already taken!
My suggestion is to go with #samsoniteluggage. Our slug line can be:
"$sglb #samsoniteluggage 'Hey, we're going places.'".
He called us a cult! He's probably right but I think we need a name. What about "beliebers"? I'll make the tshirts.
Steve Heller (@3dfool) wrote:
"Sigma Labs sure does have a cult following. Crazy bc it trades at a 66x trailing 12 month sales... and it's a penny stock! $SGLB"
Gosh I pity this guy.
It's a year old quote. The author's a fool for not mentioning that.
Technicals schmechnicals. Mr. Sykes is a young hotshot OTC investor. This is why we have 10 million in volume today. This is why it's artificial. This is why it's temporary. I'll bet you a quarter that we retrace back to .11 in a week.
Without news, revenues or contracts then Alan's vision is still intact. IMO JMHO AJMHO.
Under false pretenses, no? This just seems a bit artificial to me.
I'm happy to be proven wrong.
Erm, the folks who just hopped on pop are shorties.
That's his twitter and he has a whopping 725 followers.
Hii Guy,
First rule of the internet, turn off the CAPS.
He knows about them. He does reply to tweets @3dfool but I guess he may not if he gets spammed.
He said he doesn't deal with OTC stocks and thinks there are better plays out there.
So he's either lying or he's being honest, there's not too much of an inbetween.
Timothy Sykes is a pretentious looking twerp. I hope he gets run over by a station wagon full of clowns.
There's lack of revenues and a lot of outstanding shares. It's also not a sexy story like ONVO. That ran up to $13 only based on PRs.
1.5 years (end of 2015) is their best guess for uplisting based on the Rockville PR at the beginning of the year.
I don't see what artificially pumping this will do however someone mentioned that they're looking to hire a marketing guy. Hiring doesn't happen immediately after listing a job so who knows if or when that'll happen.
Our time will most likely come in a couple of years.
My idea of a fun video involves 5 monkeys and a bed.
Click at your own risk:
Well no two people are in the same situation financially. Some people have millions of shares, others hundreds of thousands and my dad has 2000 shares so it's really not a fair comparison.
Conventional wisdom says no more than 5% of your portfolio should be in high risk stocks. I'm not following this advice but I am playing with money I can afford to lose.
Regarding timeframes, we don't even know for sure that SGLB is the chosen one although many on this board including myself believe it is.
I also think that our time to shine will be after INSPECT is commercialized by end of the year then again when we uplist by the end of next year with revenues sprinkled inbetween.
That's my best guess and I've shared much of this earlier and if you have been following the board you'll have seen a lot of great speculation from several others.
Good luck to you with your position.
He never replied to the last two emails I sent him. When he replies to me, it's within minutes.
I doubt it's indicative of any problems but it's litterally anyone's best guess.
Looking forward to seeing the blog. Your time taken to do this is appreciated.
Hopefully nobody's with you. Adding everything you can is reckless. People should invest what they can afford to lose. It's important. Whether it's $10 or $100,000. People should not be taking out a second mortgage just to buy more. Nothing's a sure bet.
Additionally you don't back up your predictions. .50 is a 300 million dollar valuation. What are our current revenues? To hit .50 by EOY organically we'll need realy good Q2 and Q3 results.
Not to nitpick but it's actually box+box+box+box.
Hii guy,
Q2 results are mid-August.
Welcome aboard! They were part of a team that received a grant. I'm pretty sure they didn't get 5 million.
And I'm with ya. If 2 zeros ger added to what I have invested in 5 years, I'll scream like a little girl then faint. After coming to, I'd repeat the process.
I'd be the human version of the fainting goat.
Me too Bubba. We have another 1.5 years to wait.
I hope their ducks are in a row despite my feelings about INSPECT being delayed.
I emailed Mark after the last announcement and asked if INSPECT was delayed. He didn't reply.
My gut feeling is that he replied to me earlier because he thought I was a client and not just some putz investor.
This either goes up or down, there is no other option.