Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DJ China Official: FX Reserves In US Treasurys 'Not Worthwhile'
**Rogue comment...No sh#t Sherlock!
BEIJING (Dow Jones)--Investing some of China's massive foreign reserves into U.S. Treasurys is "not worthwhile," a senior party official said Thursday.
"I think it's better that China should invest its huge forex reserves in overseas energy resources stocks as reserves," said Zheng Xinli, deputy minister of China's Central Policy Research Office.
The Central Policy Research Office is under the Communist Party of China. Its views aren't official but tend to reflect the potential thinking of China's leadership.
Zheng made the remarks during a speech at a conference on China's energy and investment outlook.
(MORE TO FOLLOW) Dow Jones Newswires
September 22, 2005 03:48 ET (07:48 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2005 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.- - 03 48 AM EDT 09-22-05
Rogue
Four times the number of rigs and platforms Katrina affected could be hit by Rita."
Rita May Eclipse Even Katrina's Impact On Energy Industry
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
September 22, 2005 12:49 p.m.
NEW YORK -- The latest guidance on the likely path and development of Hurricane Rita from government and private forecasters makes the storm look even more menacing for the U.S. energy industry than it did just hours ago.
Just as Hurricane Katrina set a new benchmark for damage to the industry less than a year after Ivan tore through the Gulf of Mexico, meteorologists are now warning that Rita could be even worse.
"I don't see how possibly this won't be as big of a blow to the energy industry as Katrina," said Michael Schlacter, chief meteorologist at Weather 2000. "Four times the number of rigs and platforms Katrina affected could be hit by Rita."
After shifting the predicted point of landfall up the coast to Galveston overnight, the latest update by the National Hurricane Center shows a landfall even farther to the east, close to the Louisiana border. The path would take it through the heart of the Gulf of Mexico's rig system, whereas Wednesday's official projections seemed to suggest it would be on the fringes of the storm. The shift didn't come as a surprise to Schlacter.
"The two things that the Gulf of Mexico tends to do to fool computer models is make things much stronger and make them curve more to the right," he said.
Rita remains a category five storm but weakened by 10 miles per hour to maximum sustained winds of 165 mph. The NHC said that it will be "at least a category three" upon landfall late Friday or early Saturday. Schlacter agreed that there will be some weakening as the eyewall re-forms and as cooler water temperatures are encountered but said it should be a category four on landfall.
"Nothing stays five forever. There's going to be a relaxation, but that doesn't mean it's going to be a constant weakening," he said.
While a turn to the Louisiana border may be welcome news for the refineries clustered around Galveston Bay and Houston, it's bad news for gas producers. Analysts noted that the key natural gas production and transport area lies off the western Louisiana coastline, an area mostly spared by Katrina three and a half weeks ago.
"Longer-term, it's going to have a significant impact on the natural gas industry," said Mike Schick, president of consulting firm Energy Analytics.
About 3.4 billion cubic feet of gas remains curtailed as a result of Katrina and, even after crews are returned to rigs and platforms next week, analysts and traders expect this figure to rise. With total gas storage already 100 bcf below year-ago levels and the start of the heating season less than six weeks away, a further loss of output could stoke supply concerns for the upcoming winter.
At 11:00 a.m. EDT (1500 GMT), the eye of Hurricane Rita was located 460 miles southeast of Galveston, Texas, and 445 miles southeast of Port Arthur, Texas, at latitude 25.4 north, longitude 88.7 west.
Rogue comemnt....
WOW!....."Mother Nature" really knows how to hit us hard! LOL Len!!
Rogue
ARTX....sold my block of shares a few days ago. I'm waitng to re-establish a position. It could make new lows on this selloff IMHO.
Rogue
Len and others.....this book here is known as an "underground classic". The author, William Cooper was a brilliant researcher of the highest order, a great American patriot also.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0929385225/qid=1127369687/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-8870....
He was assasinated right after 9/11.
He gets a bit into NASA in the book or check out his website.....
http://www.hourofthetime.com/
Here's a NASA science guy( Richard Hoagland) following that agency since the 1960's talking about weather control....
http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/weblog.htm
Rogue
"Earth is still flat" Lentinman....I bet you've never done any research on NASA!! Are you aware at all of any of the "occult" origins of that mega agency??
Aw shucks........NASA would never do anything like that... would they??
That agency is so "de-compartmentalized" they could do just about anything they damn well wanted with the billions upon billions of taxpayer dollars and who would know any better???
Cetainly not you "Earth is still flat" Lentinman!! LOL!!
CAN YOU SAY "BLACK-OPS"??????
Rogue
WOW!!!!.......If that photo's not "doctored" it looks like someone's shooting a laser or something into the hurricane from space!
That old "occult" mega de-compartmentalized money-pit agency NASA couldn't have anything to do with that......could they???
Rogue
Len.....you said "we are the greatest, most advanced, most technologically superior country in the world and we are letting some group of mad scientists somewhere pummel us with C5's".....
You know it could be an "INSIDE JOB" just like 9/11 was!!.....
Have you ever heard of secret "Black-Ops" where bilions of dollars may have been funnelled into secret projects? Are you aware at all of the "occult" history of NASA?
If you don't understand that "death cult" called Skull and Bones that I've posted about numerously, then all this WOULD seem nutty to you!
Just maybe,like the BIG changes we are seeing in the weather.....we may be seeing BIG changes in this country. The late William Cooper said right after the 9/11 incident before he was assassinated that they would first DESTROY what's left of this country before they would offer the "final solution" or "New World Order".
Stay tuned! I guess we'll see Len.....I really hope you're right and I'm "just nut's"!
Rogue
Len.....I would like you to be "objective" as you claim to be.
Here's a site where you can practice a bit on to bring your skills up in that area.....
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer
I became a "voracious" reader of Ayn Rand about 20 years ago as a young man. Alot of the "nonsense" in the mainstream media didn't "jive" with the intelligent young man I was. Hearing some of thing's you say Len make's me cringe........I think you'd do well to make yourself a little familiar with true "Objectivism".
"Challenge" yourself a little Len!!! I did!
By the way....even though I believe he's now tottally "sold out to his masters".....Alan "Bubbles" Greenspan was once a true believer and personal friend of Ayn Rand back in the day.
Rand had some very good ideas about preserving the rights of the individual..........she is the antithesis in many ways to this "New World Order" AGENDA going on today.
Rogue
FA.....You're a bright young guy. I recommend this Ayn Rand book to you also. It's a "college education" in 160 pages in my opinion. It was hard for me to "disagree" with any of her philosophy.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0451163931/qid=1127278177/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-....
http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm
You young guys are the future of this country and this book cuts through alot of the "BS" out there in my opinion.
Read it and if you like it recommend it to your friends.
Rogue
Len....I was pretty "confused" too about the role of government in a modern society until I read that Ayn Rand Book....."The Virtue Of Selfishness".
It's an excellent read.....seriously(all conspiracy theories aside!).
Rogue
Len...I am starting to think that you are a "danger" to my personal freedoms with some of the things you say.
Since you have obviously never bothered to read this book I highly recommend by Ayn Rand....
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0451163931/qid=1127278177/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-....
http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm
it doesn't surprise me that you seem "clueless" about the encroaching big brother police state that is going to "destroy" the rights of the individual and in the process destroy this country.
Rogue
Train Wreck of the Week - September 18 2005
http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/trainwreck.php?Id=92&PHPSESSID=b83614a098f9a17a4058344....
What FEMA really Stands for... New Orleans cut off from America... No-bid contracts make profits for party contributors like Halliburton and others... elitists proft and rule, the poor continue to suffer and get less...
Printer Friendly Version
American's have lost control of their government. They no longer have any voice on how their government operates. Ninety percent of our House and Senate and our executive branch do not have our best interests at heart.
All branches of government are run as secretly as possible and some in complete secrecy to the detriment of our people. Our government is run by a shadow government from behind the scenes as Dan Smoot said so many years ago. Perfect examples are the CIA and FEMA. Back in 1979 President Carter instituted an executive order, which rolled many of the disaster agencies into FEMA. Today it is a 7,500 member agency including disaster-ready reservists. Its new role, in addition to disaster relief, is related to terrorism and civil unrest. Now its new duty is to assume the safety of our government. If their performances in the hurricane region are an example, we can kiss our government goodbye. What FEMA has the power to do is take over the reins of government and implement a dictatorship. You name it and they can do it. Worse yet, FEMA’s powers did not come from Congress; they came from an elitist President via executive order. This turkey farm is run by unelected officials who happen to be political trash. These political appointees can become dictators. Of course, the shadow government behind them all is really pulling the strings. Thus you have to observe their every action to determine what they are really up to. Needless to say FEMA is no longer a disaster agency. It is where political favors are dumped and it is a housing for dictatorship whenever the elitists decide to make that move. It is also being used for clandestine operations and preparing for that national emergency that was planned many years ago. Why is our Congress sitting on its hands when FEMA spends over $1 billion a year on operations they won’t explain? That is because our Congress responds to the highest bidder and the elitists have an endless supply of money. Americans know very little about FEMA and that is deliberate. The media hides FEMA by not talking about it and its executive mandate of control. For 25 years FEMA has tried to overturn the Posse Comitatus Act by using the military in domestic law enforcement. A good example was recently in New Orleans when FEMA tried to force Governor Blanco to give control over to law-enforcement and the National Guard and Reserves. FEMA held up aid to the hurricane region for four days trying to get the governor to succumb. She did not and FEMA and the people of Louisiana were the losers. How dastardly can you get?
FEMA is a backup government for elitists. It was created to control the American public. It is the enemy.
The economy has begun to slow as real estate for sale inventory rises. Until at least next June the economy faces not just this natural slowing but also higher energy prices, increased interest rate costs and 14 million taxpayers who will be hit with the AMT, the Alternative Minimum Tax on 1/1/06 for an average of $2,000 per household. During that period inflation will rise and wages will remain stagnant. That also means higher unemployment and lower house prices. All of the above are going to take a toll on consumer spending, thus we expect the economy to slow over the next nine months. We see GDP slipping to 2.75% growth, which is just above recession level. We will update in a couple of months.
Consumers are scrambling to lock in energy costs even at these elevated levels. In New England heating oil is $2.61 a gallon up from just $2.00 a week ago and $1.00 higher than a year ago. Energy costs are going to cost the consumer dearly this winter and it will affect the economy.
The Administration has gotten nowhere trying to get the Europeans to help form a worldwide coalition to stop Iran’s pursuit of nuclear power. India, Russia and China have rebuffed a Bush proposal to bring the issue before the UN Security Council for possible sanctions. Iran has not broken any agreements and is operating within guidelines. Many are concerned that a few years down the line, when they can, they will go in the direction of nuclear weapons.
Not only has our President by executive order allowed contractors to pay below prevailing wages in the crisis torn hurricane region, but also they have suspended normal federal contracting rules. Hundreds of millions of dollars in no-bid contracts have already been let out and millions more are to flow to the private sector in the weeks and months to come. Leading the charge are Halliburton, Bechtel and Fluor. The Feds, FEMA are shoveling money out the door and the lobbyists and connected companies will make a fortune. When all is said and done more than $150 billion of taxpayers’ funds will have been spent. The bulk of the contracts will go to elitist connected companies and campaign contributors. They will make fortunes. There is no question in our minds that non-action and obstruction by FEMA was part of a plan to exert complete federal power over operations. We mentioned that last week when FEMA-Bush and the neocons tried to force Louisiana’s Governor to allow FEMA to take over and control all law enforcement. This would set a precedent for violating the Posse Comitatus Act. They also wanted the American public to accept the concept of total federal control as the only answer to disasters or the control of civil unrest.
Mr. Bush expressed his height of arrogance when he said he would personally lead an investigation to see what went wrong in the aftermath of Katrina. We wonder does he fashion himself as Caligula or Nero?
John Roberts nomination as Supreme Court Chief Justice tells us the elitists are totally satisfied that Roberts will do exactly as he is told and will grant the Executive Branch unlimited authority over everyone. The approval of Roberts and another replacement for Sandra Day O’Connor will solidify the elitist’s control over the Supreme Court for the next 30 years. Mind you, Roberts is not conservative or right wing. He is an elitist. They have only one master the Illuminati. Each passing day more and more decisions are made to solidify the power of the insiders and that movement is perpetually to the left and into the bosom of fascism. Americans are going to pay dearly for what they have done especially the dumb conservatives and right-wingers who continue to support a fascist dictatorial government. These two Supreme Court appointments are just two more nails in the coffin.
New Orleans is being cut off from America in a world controlled by FEMA and Fatherland Security. We not only have US military acting as law enforcement we have mercenaries as well. The second and fourth amendment rights of our fellow citizens no longer exist. Weapons are being confiscated even though they are legally registered. Those orders are for the collective us; the wealthy are allowed to have private armed guards. This is gun control by force and this is only the beginning. Are you getting the message out there?
Let the good times roll. Bechtel has been chosen in a no-bid contract to provide short-term housing for people displaced by the hurricane. Bush named Bechtel’s CEO to his Export Council and put the former head of Bechtel Energy in charge of Overseas Private Investment Corporation. What the neocons have been doing is stacking senior positions with elitists who are repeatedly cashing in on the public trust in order to further their private commercial interests.
Then we have Joe Allbaugh, Mr. Bush’s former campaign manager and a former head of FEMA, who is a lobbyist for Shaw Group and Bechtel who just landed mega-no bid contracts. Allbaugh is also a lobbyist for Halliburton’s subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root. As you can see the crooks are busy at work spending our money.
AP-Ipsos Poll, which had George Bush’s approval rating at 84 after 9/11, now shows it to be 39%. Sixty-five percent of Americans believe we are on the wrong track. That is up from 59% just a month ago. Fifty-two percent disapprove of his handling of the hurricane. Ipsos says consumer confidence sank in September to the lowest level since early March 2003 before the start of the Iraq war.
George Bush sits in the eye of a political storm and he could become Katrina’s next casualty. The new Newsweek poll shows only 38% approve of the job he is doing. They showed overall 55% disapprove. Only 28% say they are satisfied at the way things are going in the country, down from 36% in August and 46% in December.
We believe the costly impact of Katrina and their ineptitude, lying and law breaking by the federal government overall and FEMA will cause a loss of faith in government generally, and the President in particular. Already 65% are dissatisfied. What will the numbers be after the federal government spends $200 billion, insured losses are $100 billion and uninsured losses are $200 billion? That is a $500 billion problem plus all the political machinations. Wait until the public finds out all the details of what the Administration and FEMA were up to before and during the disaster. Already 52% say they do not trust the President to make the right decisions during a domestic crisis. Seventy-two percent say his response was poor to fair. Only 20% said he did a good job and five percent said he did an excellent job. Forty-two percent of Americans and 44% of registered voters believe the President cares about people like them. That is down from 50% in the first week of last November.
Reflecting the tarnished view of the Administration, only 38% of registered voters say they would vote for a Republican for Congress if elections were held today, while 50% said they would vote for a Democrat. Fifty-three percent of Democrats said the federal government did a poor job in getting help to people in New Orleans after Katrina. Forty-eight percent of Republicans believe they did a good job. Americans are stuck in a rut via political parties. They will not accept the reality that both parties are controlled by the same group of elitists. We are divided by party and that is just the way elitists want it. At best, we believe George W. Bush is a lame duck president and that is good for us. It will keep further damage to a minimum. Sir Alan Greenspan and other elitists want hedge funds to stay unregulated, which is suicidal. The SEC has brought 51 cases charging hedge fund advisors with defrauding investors of more than $1 billion. There are more than 7,000 hedge funds managing close to $1 trillion in assets, a 300% jump over five years ago.
Connected elitists never go to jail. Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, will pay charity $100 million to resolve a lawsuit charging that he engaged in insider trading in 2001. Martha Stewart was charged with the same thing on a miniscule level and went to jail. Mr. Ellison will, of course, take his tax deduction. Ellison sold $900 million worth of shares ahead of bad earnings, thus he pays 1/9th and pockets the other $800 million, gets the tax deduction and doesn’t admit guilt. Ellison’s wealth is estimated to be $13.7 billion. Never in such a derivative lawsuit has the settlement gone to charity, it should have gone to shareholders.
According to Transparency International, Iraq could become the biggest corruption scandal in history. It starts with petty officials looking for bribes all the way up to contractors doing shoddy work and those contractors getting their contracts from government officials who get a kickback.
We can start with Ahmed Chalabi who was convicted in Jordan for a $200 million financial scam. That does not deter George and the neocons; he is obviously their kind of guy. He was one of the first of the Bush cabal to land in Iraq after the takeover. Then there was the plan to sell of Iraq’s oil fields to US elitist interests at $.30 on the dollar. That is what triggered today’s ongoing insurgency that we pay for in money and lives every day. That is why oil facilities and pipelines continue to be bombed as we write.
Then Halliburton wiped all the money out of the Iraq Development Fund though the award of five no-bid contracts for just under $1 billion. Then there were the mercenaries, who were often paid in piles of $100 bills - about 7% of overall receipts had no invoices. A UN audit concluded that $2.5 billion of $5.0 billion in Iraq reconstruction funds could not be accounted for. Most all of the payments were made to US and UK companies. The CPA was the epicenter of fraud, waste, bribery and kickbacks.
Halliburton received 52% of two $25.4 billion contracts; they overcharged by $1.5 billion and lost 12 pre-fabricated bases worth $75 million. They are subject to five investigations presently and now have just been awarded contracts and Louisiana and Mississippi. George and the neocons reward theft and failure. This is why Bunnatine Greenhouse was fired, for her testimony to Congress. She said her superiors forced her to sign no-bid contracts for Halliburton she said were scams. As it turns out our Congress could care less. Worse yet the Pentagons just gave Halliburton another $5 billion contract for Iraq. It is no wonder they do not want the war to end. We could be doing this for another 30 years. In the last two weeks infrastructure work was stopped. Perhaps that is a blessing for the taxpayer. This is how our government is run. Growing up I learned a lot about corruption and how it worked from the Democrats. The Bush neocons and our Republican Congress have honed it into a fine art.
Louisiana is facing an epic legal battle to determine who should pay to repair damaged properties. Insurance companies say most homeowners won’t have the money to rebuild. Those who bought federal flood insurance, which is beyond the reach of the poor, will find coverage falls far short, insuring up to only $250,000.
Do you want to read more by Bob Chapman? There are 85 previous issues for you to read...
Rogue
Some excellent observations on the recent New Orleans disaster...
Train Wreck of the Week - September 18 2005
http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/trainwreck.php?Id=92&PHPSESSID=b83614a098f9a17a4058344....
What FEMA really Stands for... New Orleans cut off from America... No-bid contracts make profits for party contributors like Halliburton and others... elitists proft and rule, the poor continue to suffer and get less...
Printer Friendly Version
American's have lost control of their government. They no longer have any voice on how their government operates. Ninety percent of our House and Senate and our executive branch do not have our best interests at heart.
All branches of government are run as secretly as possible and some in complete secrecy to the detriment of our people. Our government is run by a shadow government from behind the scenes as Dan Smoot said so many years ago. Perfect examples are the CIA and FEMA. Back in 1979 President Carter instituted an executive order, which rolled many of the disaster agencies into FEMA. Today it is a 7,500 member agency including disaster-ready reservists. Its new role, in addition to disaster relief, is related to terrorism and civil unrest. Now its new duty is to assume the safety of our government. If their performances in the hurricane region are an example, we can kiss our government goodbye. What FEMA has the power to do is take over the reins of government and implement a dictatorship. You name it and they can do it. Worse yet, FEMA’s powers did not come from Congress; they came from an elitist President via executive order. This turkey farm is run by unelected officials who happen to be political trash. These political appointees can become dictators. Of course, the shadow government behind them all is really pulling the strings. Thus you have to observe their every action to determine what they are really up to. Needless to say FEMA is no longer a disaster agency. It is where political favors are dumped and it is a housing for dictatorship whenever the elitists decide to make that move. It is also being used for clandestine operations and preparing for that national emergency that was planned many years ago. Why is our Congress sitting on its hands when FEMA spends over $1 billion a year on operations they won’t explain? That is because our Congress responds to the highest bidder and the elitists have an endless supply of money. Americans know very little about FEMA and that is deliberate. The media hides FEMA by not talking about it and its executive mandate of control. For 25 years FEMA has tried to overturn the Posse Comitatus Act by using the military in domestic law enforcement. A good example was recently in New Orleans when FEMA tried to force Governor Blanco to give control over to law-enforcement and the National Guard and Reserves. FEMA held up aid to the hurricane region for four days trying to get the governor to succumb. She did not and FEMA and the people of Louisiana were the losers. How dastardly can you get?
FEMA is a backup government for elitists. It was created to control the American public. It is the enemy.
The economy has begun to slow as real estate for sale inventory rises. Until at least next June the economy faces not just this natural slowing but also higher energy prices, increased interest rate costs and 14 million taxpayers who will be hit with the AMT, the Alternative Minimum Tax on 1/1/06 for an average of $2,000 per household. During that period inflation will rise and wages will remain stagnant. That also means higher unemployment and lower house prices. All of the above are going to take a toll on consumer spending, thus we expect the economy to slow over the next nine months. We see GDP slipping to 2.75% growth, which is just above recession level. We will update in a couple of months.
Consumers are scrambling to lock in energy costs even at these elevated levels. In New England heating oil is $2.61 a gallon up from just $2.00 a week ago and $1.00 higher than a year ago. Energy costs are going to cost the consumer dearly this winter and it will affect the economy.
The Administration has gotten nowhere trying to get the Europeans to help form a worldwide coalition to stop Iran’s pursuit of nuclear power. India, Russia and China have rebuffed a Bush proposal to bring the issue before the UN Security Council for possible sanctions. Iran has not broken any agreements and is operating within guidelines. Many are concerned that a few years down the line, when they can, they will go in the direction of nuclear weapons.
Not only has our President by executive order allowed contractors to pay below prevailing wages in the crisis torn hurricane region, but also they have suspended normal federal contracting rules. Hundreds of millions of dollars in no-bid contracts have already been let out and millions more are to flow to the private sector in the weeks and months to come. Leading the charge are Halliburton, Bechtel and Fluor. The Feds, FEMA are shoveling money out the door and the lobbyists and connected companies will make a fortune. When all is said and done more than $150 billion of taxpayers’ funds will have been spent. The bulk of the contracts will go to elitist connected companies and campaign contributors. They will make fortunes. There is no question in our minds that non-action and obstruction by FEMA was part of a plan to exert complete federal power over operations. We mentioned that last week when FEMA-Bush and the neocons tried to force Louisiana’s Governor to allow FEMA to take over and control all law enforcement. This would set a precedent for violating the Posse Comitatus Act. They also wanted the American public to accept the concept of total federal control as the only answer to disasters or the control of civil unrest.
Mr. Bush expressed his height of arrogance when he said he would personally lead an investigation to see what went wrong in the aftermath of Katrina. We wonder does he fashion himself as Caligula or Nero?
John Roberts nomination as Supreme Court Chief Justice tells us the elitists are totally satisfied that Roberts will do exactly as he is told and will grant the Executive Branch unlimited authority over everyone. The approval of Roberts and another replacement for Sandra Day O’Connor will solidify the elitist’s control over the Supreme Court for the next 30 years. Mind you, Roberts is not conservative or right wing. He is an elitist. They have only one master the Illuminati. Each passing day more and more decisions are made to solidify the power of the insiders and that movement is perpetually to the left and into the bosom of fascism. Americans are going to pay dearly for what they have done especially the dumb conservatives and right-wingers who continue to support a fascist dictatorial government. These two Supreme Court appointments are just two more nails in the coffin.
New Orleans is being cut off from America in a world controlled by FEMA and Fatherland Security. We not only have US military acting as law enforcement we have mercenaries as well. The second and fourth amendment rights of our fellow citizens no longer exist. Weapons are being confiscated even though they are legally registered. Those orders are for the collective us; the wealthy are allowed to have private armed guards. This is gun control by force and this is only the beginning. Are you getting the message out there?
Let the good times roll. Bechtel has been chosen in a no-bid contract to provide short-term housing for people displaced by the hurricane. Bush named Bechtel’s CEO to his Export Council and put the former head of Bechtel Energy in charge of Overseas Private Investment Corporation. What the neocons have been doing is stacking senior positions with elitists who are repeatedly cashing in on the public trust in order to further their private commercial interests.
Then we have Joe Allbaugh, Mr. Bush’s former campaign manager and a former head of FEMA, who is a lobbyist for Shaw Group and Bechtel who just landed mega-no bid contracts. Allbaugh is also a lobbyist for Halliburton’s subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root. As you can see the crooks are busy at work spending our money.
AP-Ipsos Poll, which had George Bush’s approval rating at 84 after 9/11, now shows it to be 39%. Sixty-five percent of Americans believe we are on the wrong track. That is up from 59% just a month ago. Fifty-two percent disapprove of his handling of the hurricane. Ipsos says consumer confidence sank in September to the lowest level since early March 2003 before the start of the Iraq war.
George Bush sits in the eye of a political storm and he could become Katrina’s next casualty. The new Newsweek poll shows only 38% approve of the job he is doing. They showed overall 55% disapprove. Only 28% say they are satisfied at the way things are going in the country, down from 36% in August and 46% in December.
We believe the costly impact of Katrina and their ineptitude, lying and law breaking by the federal government overall and FEMA will cause a loss of faith in government generally, and the President in particular. Already 65% are dissatisfied. What will the numbers be after the federal government spends $200 billion, insured losses are $100 billion and uninsured losses are $200 billion? That is a $500 billion problem plus all the political machinations. Wait until the public finds out all the details of what the Administration and FEMA were up to before and during the disaster. Already 52% say they do not trust the President to make the right decisions during a domestic crisis. Seventy-two percent say his response was poor to fair. Only 20% said he did a good job and five percent said he did an excellent job. Forty-two percent of Americans and 44% of registered voters believe the President cares about people like them. That is down from 50% in the first week of last November.
Reflecting the tarnished view of the Administration, only 38% of registered voters say they would vote for a Republican for Congress if elections were held today, while 50% said they would vote for a Democrat. Fifty-three percent of Democrats said the federal government did a poor job in getting help to people in New Orleans after Katrina. Forty-eight percent of Republicans believe they did a good job. Americans are stuck in a rut via political parties. They will not accept the reality that both parties are controlled by the same group of elitists. We are divided by party and that is just the way elitists want it. At best, we believe George W. Bush is a lame duck president and that is good for us. It will keep further damage to a minimum. Sir Alan Greenspan and other elitists want hedge funds to stay unregulated, which is suicidal. The SEC has brought 51 cases charging hedge fund advisors with defrauding investors of more than $1 billion. There are more than 7,000 hedge funds managing close to $1 trillion in assets, a 300% jump over five years ago.
Connected elitists never go to jail. Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, will pay charity $100 million to resolve a lawsuit charging that he engaged in insider trading in 2001. Martha Stewart was charged with the same thing on a miniscule level and went to jail. Mr. Ellison will, of course, take his tax deduction. Ellison sold $900 million worth of shares ahead of bad earnings, thus he pays 1/9th and pockets the other $800 million, gets the tax deduction and doesn’t admit guilt. Ellison’s wealth is estimated to be $13.7 billion. Never in such a derivative lawsuit has the settlement gone to charity, it should have gone to shareholders.
According to Transparency International, Iraq could become the biggest corruption scandal in history. It starts with petty officials looking for bribes all the way up to contractors doing shoddy work and those contractors getting their contracts from government officials who get a kickback.
We can start with Ahmed Chalabi who was convicted in Jordan for a $200 million financial scam. That does not deter George and the neocons; he is obviously their kind of guy. He was one of the first of the Bush cabal to land in Iraq after the takeover. Then there was the plan to sell of Iraq’s oil fields to US elitist interests at $.30 on the dollar. That is what triggered today’s ongoing insurgency that we pay for in money and lives every day. That is why oil facilities and pipelines continue to be bombed as we write.
Then Halliburton wiped all the money out of the Iraq Development Fund though the award of five no-bid contracts for just under $1 billion. Then there were the mercenaries, who were often paid in piles of $100 bills - about 7% of overall receipts had no invoices. A UN audit concluded that $2.5 billion of $5.0 billion in Iraq reconstruction funds could not be accounted for. Most all of the payments were made to US and UK companies. The CPA was the epicenter of fraud, waste, bribery and kickbacks.
Halliburton received 52% of two $25.4 billion contracts; they overcharged by $1.5 billion and lost 12 pre-fabricated bases worth $75 million. They are subject to five investigations presently and now have just been awarded contracts and Louisiana and Mississippi. George and the neocons reward theft and failure. This is why Bunnatine Greenhouse was fired, for her testimony to Congress. She said her superiors forced her to sign no-bid contracts for Halliburton she said were scams. As it turns out our Congress could care less. Worse yet the Pentagons just gave Halliburton another $5 billion contract for Iraq. It is no wonder they do not want the war to end. We could be doing this for another 30 years. In the last two weeks infrastructure work was stopped. Perhaps that is a blessing for the taxpayer. This is how our government is run. Growing up I learned a lot about corruption and how it worked from the Democrats. The Bush neocons and our Republican Congress have honed it into a fine art.
Louisiana is facing an epic legal battle to determine who should pay to repair damaged properties. Insurance companies say most homeowners won’t have the money to rebuild. Those who bought federal flood insurance, which is beyond the reach of the poor, will find coverage falls far short, insuring up to only $250,000.
Do you want to read more by Bob Chapman? There are 85 previous issues for you to read...
Rogue
Some excellent observations on the recent New Orleans disaster...
Train Wreck of the Week - September 18 2005
http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/trainwreck.php?Id=92&PHPSESSID=b83614a098f9a17a4058344....
What FEMA really Stands for... New Orleans cut off from America... No-bid contracts make profits for party contributors like Halliburton and others... elitists proft and rule, the poor continue to suffer and get less...
Printer Friendly Version
American's have lost control of their government. They no longer have any voice on how their government operates. Ninety percent of our House and Senate and our executive branch do not have our best interests at heart.
All branches of government are run as secretly as possible and some in complete secrecy to the detriment of our people. Our government is run by a shadow government from behind the scenes as Dan Smoot said so many years ago. Perfect examples are the CIA and FEMA. Back in 1979 President Carter instituted an executive order, which rolled many of the disaster agencies into FEMA. Today it is a 7,500 member agency including disaster-ready reservists. Its new role, in addition to disaster relief, is related to terrorism and civil unrest. Now its new duty is to assume the safety of our government. If their performances in the hurricane region are an example, we can kiss our government goodbye. What FEMA has the power to do is take over the reins of government and implement a dictatorship. You name it and they can do it. Worse yet, FEMA’s powers did not come from Congress; they came from an elitist President via executive order. This turkey farm is run by unelected officials who happen to be political trash. These political appointees can become dictators. Of course, the shadow government behind them all is really pulling the strings. Thus you have to observe their every action to determine what they are really up to. Needless to say FEMA is no longer a disaster agency. It is where political favors are dumped and it is a housing for dictatorship whenever the elitists decide to make that move. It is also being used for clandestine operations and preparing for that national emergency that was planned many years ago. Why is our Congress sitting on its hands when FEMA spends over $1 billion a year on operations they won’t explain? That is because our Congress responds to the highest bidder and the elitists have an endless supply of money. Americans know very little about FEMA and that is deliberate. The media hides FEMA by not talking about it and its executive mandate of control. For 25 years FEMA has tried to overturn the Posse Comitatus Act by using the military in domestic law enforcement. A good example was recently in New Orleans when FEMA tried to force Governor Blanco to give control over to law-enforcement and the National Guard and Reserves. FEMA held up aid to the hurricane region for four days trying to get the governor to succumb. She did not and FEMA and the people of Louisiana were the losers. How dastardly can you get?
FEMA is a backup government for elitists. It was created to control the American public. It is the enemy.
The economy has begun to slow as real estate for sale inventory rises. Until at least next June the economy faces not just this natural slowing but also higher energy prices, increased interest rate costs and 14 million taxpayers who will be hit with the AMT, the Alternative Minimum Tax on 1/1/06 for an average of $2,000 per household. During that period inflation will rise and wages will remain stagnant. That also means higher unemployment and lower house prices. All of the above are going to take a toll on consumer spending, thus we expect the economy to slow over the next nine months. We see GDP slipping to 2.75% growth, which is just above recession level. We will update in a couple of months.
Consumers are scrambling to lock in energy costs even at these elevated levels. In New England heating oil is $2.61 a gallon up from just $2.00 a week ago and $1.00 higher than a year ago. Energy costs are going to cost the consumer dearly this winter and it will affect the economy.
The Administration has gotten nowhere trying to get the Europeans to help form a worldwide coalition to stop Iran’s pursuit of nuclear power. India, Russia and China have rebuffed a Bush proposal to bring the issue before the UN Security Council for possible sanctions. Iran has not broken any agreements and is operating within guidelines. Many are concerned that a few years down the line, when they can, they will go in the direction of nuclear weapons.
Not only has our President by executive order allowed contractors to pay below prevailing wages in the crisis torn hurricane region, but also they have suspended normal federal contracting rules. Hundreds of millions of dollars in no-bid contracts have already been let out and millions more are to flow to the private sector in the weeks and months to come. Leading the charge are Halliburton, Bechtel and Fluor. The Feds, FEMA are shoveling money out the door and the lobbyists and connected companies will make a fortune. When all is said and done more than $150 billion of taxpayers’ funds will have been spent. The bulk of the contracts will go to elitist connected companies and campaign contributors. They will make fortunes. There is no question in our minds that non-action and obstruction by FEMA was part of a plan to exert complete federal power over operations. We mentioned that last week when FEMA-Bush and the neocons tried to force Louisiana’s Governor to allow FEMA to take over and control all law enforcement. This would set a precedent for violating the Posse Comitatus Act. They also wanted the American public to accept the concept of total federal control as the only answer to disasters or the control of civil unrest.
Mr. Bush expressed his height of arrogance when he said he would personally lead an investigation to see what went wrong in the aftermath of Katrina. We wonder does he fashion himself as Caligula or Nero?
John Roberts nomination as Supreme Court Chief Justice tells us the elitists are totally satisfied that Roberts will do exactly as he is told and will grant the Executive Branch unlimited authority over everyone. The approval of Roberts and another replacement for Sandra Day O’Connor will solidify the elitist’s control over the Supreme Court for the next 30 years. Mind you, Roberts is not conservative or right wing. He is an elitist. They have only one master the Illuminati. Each passing day more and more decisions are made to solidify the power of the insiders and that movement is perpetually to the left and into the bosom of fascism. Americans are going to pay dearly for what they have done especially the dumb conservatives and right-wingers who continue to support a fascist dictatorial government. These two Supreme Court appointments are just two more nails in the coffin.
New Orleans is being cut off from America in a world controlled by FEMA and Fatherland Security. We not only have US military acting as law enforcement we have mercenaries as well. The second and fourth amendment rights of our fellow citizens no longer exist. Weapons are being confiscated even though they are legally registered. Those orders are for the collective us; the wealthy are allowed to have private armed guards. This is gun control by force and this is only the beginning. Are you getting the message out there?
Let the good times roll. Bechtel has been chosen in a no-bid contract to provide short-term housing for people displaced by the hurricane. Bush named Bechtel’s CEO to his Export Council and put the former head of Bechtel Energy in charge of Overseas Private Investment Corporation. What the neocons have been doing is stacking senior positions with elitists who are repeatedly cashing in on the public trust in order to further their private commercial interests.
Then we have Joe Allbaugh, Mr. Bush’s former campaign manager and a former head of FEMA, who is a lobbyist for Shaw Group and Bechtel who just landed mega-no bid contracts. Allbaugh is also a lobbyist for Halliburton’s subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root. As you can see the crooks are busy at work spending our money.
AP-Ipsos Poll, which had George Bush’s approval rating at 84 after 9/11, now shows it to be 39%. Sixty-five percent of Americans believe we are on the wrong track. That is up from 59% just a month ago. Fifty-two percent disapprove of his handling of the hurricane. Ipsos says consumer confidence sank in September to the lowest level since early March 2003 before the start of the Iraq war.
George Bush sits in the eye of a political storm and he could become Katrina’s next casualty. The new Newsweek poll shows only 38% approve of the job he is doing. They showed overall 55% disapprove. Only 28% say they are satisfied at the way things are going in the country, down from 36% in August and 46% in December.
We believe the costly impact of Katrina and their ineptitude, lying and law breaking by the federal government overall and FEMA will cause a loss of faith in government generally, and the President in particular. Already 65% are dissatisfied. What will the numbers be after the federal government spends $200 billion, insured losses are $100 billion and uninsured losses are $200 billion? That is a $500 billion problem plus all the political machinations. Wait until the public finds out all the details of what the Administration and FEMA were up to before and during the disaster. Already 52% say they do not trust the President to make the right decisions during a domestic crisis. Seventy-two percent say his response was poor to fair. Only 20% said he did a good job and five percent said he did an excellent job. Forty-two percent of Americans and 44% of registered voters believe the President cares about people like them. That is down from 50% in the first week of last November.
Reflecting the tarnished view of the Administration, only 38% of registered voters say they would vote for a Republican for Congress if elections were held today, while 50% said they would vote for a Democrat. Fifty-three percent of Democrats said the federal government did a poor job in getting help to people in New Orleans after Katrina. Forty-eight percent of Republicans believe they did a good job. Americans are stuck in a rut via political parties. They will not accept the reality that both parties are controlled by the same group of elitists. We are divided by party and that is just the way elitists want it. At best, we believe George W. Bush is a lame duck president and that is good for us. It will keep further damage to a minimum. Sir Alan Greenspan and other elitists want hedge funds to stay unregulated, which is suicidal. The SEC has brought 51 cases charging hedge fund advisors with defrauding investors of more than $1 billion. There are more than 7,000 hedge funds managing close to $1 trillion in assets, a 300% jump over five years ago.
Connected elitists never go to jail. Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, will pay charity $100 million to resolve a lawsuit charging that he engaged in insider trading in 2001. Martha Stewart was charged with the same thing on a miniscule level and went to jail. Mr. Ellison will, of course, take his tax deduction. Ellison sold $900 million worth of shares ahead of bad earnings, thus he pays 1/9th and pockets the other $800 million, gets the tax deduction and doesn’t admit guilt. Ellison’s wealth is estimated to be $13.7 billion. Never in such a derivative lawsuit has the settlement gone to charity, it should have gone to shareholders.
According to Transparency International, Iraq could become the biggest corruption scandal in history. It starts with petty officials looking for bribes all the way up to contractors doing shoddy work and those contractors getting their contracts from government officials who get a kickback.
We can start with Ahmed Chalabi who was convicted in Jordan for a $200 million financial scam. That does not deter George and the neocons; he is obviously their kind of guy. He was one of the first of the Bush cabal to land in Iraq after the takeover. Then there was the plan to sell of Iraq’s oil fields to US elitist interests at $.30 on the dollar. That is what triggered today’s ongoing insurgency that we pay for in money and lives every day. That is why oil facilities and pipelines continue to be bombed as we write.
Then Halliburton wiped all the money out of the Iraq Development Fund though the award of five no-bid contracts for just under $1 billion. Then there were the mercenaries, who were often paid in piles of $100 bills - about 7% of overall receipts had no invoices. A UN audit concluded that $2.5 billion of $5.0 billion in Iraq reconstruction funds could not be accounted for. Most all of the payments were made to US and UK companies. The CPA was the epicenter of fraud, waste, bribery and kickbacks.
Halliburton received 52% of two $25.4 billion contracts; they overcharged by $1.5 billion and lost 12 pre-fabricated bases worth $75 million. They are subject to five investigations presently and now have just been awarded contracts and Louisiana and Mississippi. George and the neocons reward theft and failure. This is why Bunnatine Greenhouse was fired, for her testimony to Congress. She said her superiors forced her to sign no-bid contracts for Halliburton she said were scams. As it turns out our Congress could care less. Worse yet the Pentagons just gave Halliburton another $5 billion contract for Iraq. It is no wonder they do not want the war to end. We could be doing this for another 30 years. In the last two weeks infrastructure work was stopped. Perhaps that is a blessing for the taxpayer. This is how our government is run. Growing up I learned a lot about corruption and how it worked from the Democrats. The Bush neocons and our Republican Congress have honed it into a fine art.
Louisiana is facing an epic legal battle to determine who should pay to repair damaged properties. Insurance companies say most homeowners won’t have the money to rebuild. Those who bought federal flood insurance, which is beyond the reach of the poor, will find coverage falls far short, insuring up to only $250,000.
Do you want to read more by Bob Chapman? There are 85 previous issues for you to read...
Rogue
Len....you're being silly. Please read the link provided here and have an "open mind". My God!!.....the world isn't flat anymore and there have been technological advancents this century!! LOL!
http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/weblog.htm
I gave you an interesting link on weather control and you're trying to tell me to make predictions like I'm the "Great Karnak" or something.
Wherever it hits there will be "Order from Chaos" I am assured. The "New World Order" type......ala Pappy Bush's "infamous" September 11,1991 speach! (An interesting date to mention "A New World Order" dozens of times huh? Just a coincidence I'm sure)
Stay tuned.
Rogue
Len....here you go! Some great DD on the possible "weather manipulation" going on now.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/weblog/weblog.htm
If you read this carefully I think you will enjoy it.....and possibly "open your mind" to these possible technological advances.
Rogue
A Place in the Sun
By ERIC J. SAVITZ
SUNSHINE IS FREE. That simple fact is what gives the solar-power business so much allure. You don't have to extract it from the ground, it's not subject to embargos, it's nonpolluting and if the supply ever ran out, we'd have a bigger problem than high gasoline prices. On the surface, at least, it certainly seems like an obvious way to address some of the economy's ongoing energy problems.
It's also well understood: America has been tinkering with solar power for decades. In a symbolic act during the 1979 energy crisis, Jimmy Carter installed solar panels on the roof of the White House. (He also urged us to wear more sweaters.) But as the crisis faded, so did interest in solar. After Ronald Reagan and his brown suits moved into 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., the White House solar panels were removed -- and solar power resumed its previous position as a technology considered more suitable for calculators and pool heaters than powering the grid.
But with talk growing of a new energy crisis, thanks to record prices for crude oil and gasoline, solar companies have been attracting renewed attention. Michael Rogol, an analyst with CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets who tracks the global solar market, says the stocks in the sector are up about 150% over the past 12 months. Wall Street is ramping up to slake the thirst for solar stocks with more supply: SunPower, a subsidiary of chip-maker Cypress Semiconductor, has filed to come public, as has Q-Cells, a large, fast-growing German solar-cell company that Rogol calls "the Netscape of the solar sector." Another large player, Norway's Renewable Energy Corp., or REC, has also said it plans an IPO.
Encouraged by this new enthusiasm for the sector in the public markets, venture capitalists have been funding a steadily increasing number of solar-related start- ups, sinking more than $100 million into new solar companies in the first half of 2005. (See table: The Next Generation.) The recently passed energy bill provides some modest incentives for solar power, and many states have installed solar-friendly tax incentives of their own.
While solar represents a tiny percentage of global power generation, it is growing rapidly. Worldwide, solar power production this year should reach 1.5 gigawatts, double the 2003 level. By 2010, according to CLSA, the total should quadruple to six gigawatts. Industrywide revenue, the firm predicts, will grow from $11 billion this year to $36 billion in 2010.
Now that's some nice, Google-style growth. But investing in the sector isn't easy. Many of the biggest producers of solar cells are actually divisions of much larger companies -- BP, Sharp, Shell, General Electric -- that you'd hardly consider pure plays. And most of the more focused solar companies, with a few exceptions, are still private or trade outside the U.S.
Meanwhile, just as demand seems poised to take off, the solar industry finds itself grappling with a shortage of polysilicon, the raw material used to create both silicon cells and semiconductors. At least for the next few years, the industry's growth rate will be muffled not by any shortage of demand, but rather by insufficient supply. In all, finding good investments will require ingenuity.
The basic idea of solar power is simple. Energy from the sun strikes a silicon panel, releasing electrons and creating electricity. Those panels are connected together in modules, which can provide power standing alone or hooked into the electrical grid. One of the standard, but magical, pitches made by solar equipment providers is the image of your electricity meter running backwards: When the sun is shining and demand for power is high, you can be selling power back to the grid, while others buy it.
The Bottom Line: Though solar stocks have surged over the past year or so, some could rise further. Some analysts think MEMC, the largest-capitalization play on solar, could jump another 50%.
What's not so simple is the economics of solar power. For starters, while the sun's energy is abundant, it isn't available 24/7. (You may be familiar with a fascinating natural phenomenon known as "night," and another frequent but less predictable factor called "clouds.") Ergo, solar power is more practical in some places than others. Also, silicon panels are rather inefficient: Most of the potential energy in sunshine is lost. So to create meaningful amounts of electricity from solar panels, you need lots of them.
The good news is that as the industry has grown, the retail cost of solar energy has dropped an average of 6%-7% a year for the past 15 years, says Rhone Resch, director of the Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade group. Within 10 years, Resch says, solar should reach parity with the average retail electricity price.
"This is not your grandpa's solar," says Ron Pernick, the principal of Clean Edge, a Portland, Ore.-based research firm. He figures the costs of production have been dropping about 18% for every doubling of output -- and output is doubling every two or three years. Still, the industry isn't at parity yet. Resch says solar power, at 22-23 cents per kilowatt, costs about twice as much as the average retail price of electricity in the U.S.
Keep in mind, too, that installing a solar system requires a large upfront capital investment that may require some creative financing. Putting a solar system on your roof with enough cells to run your house could set you back $25,000-$30,000. You do get to lock in costs, though: Resch likens it to buying a car and paying for 25 or 30 years of gasoline upfront.
One small company, Sun Edison, has set up an intriguing scheme where it places solar systems on the flat roof of a supermarket or big-box retailer, then sells the power back to them. The equipment itself is owned by an investor -- in each of the four installations they've completed, it's Goldman Sachs -- which benefits from tax incentive programs. Sun Edison's payoff comes years from now as it gradually buys back the equity and associated income in the equipment.
Fortunately for the solar-power industry, a number of state and national governments have decided that there is a public good in developing alternatives to fossil-fuel based energy production, and have installed lucrative subsidy programs designed to overcome the cost differential.
The most substantial incentives have been offered by Japan and Germany. While neither country is among the world's sunnier climes, both have become the global leaders in solar power. So it should be no surprise that many of the more successful publicly held solar companies are traded in Frankfurt or Tokyo, not New York. (See table: Sunny Prospects)
For domestic solar advocates, that situation is a source of no little frustration. "Our resources are orders of magnitude better," sighs the trade group's Resch. "But Germany has created the best incentives in the world." Germany's policy, designed to reduce the country's reliance on fossil fuels, provides a fixed payout of about 54 cents per kilowatt hour for as much power as you can produce.
Rick Feldt, CEO of Evergreen Solar, a Marlboro, Mass., solar-cell company, complains that the incentives in the recently passed federal energy bill provides little help. He notes that the bill offers only two years of tax credits, with no assurances after that -- not enough to get manufacturers to commit investment capital in the business.
In the U.S., the industry suffered a blow recently from the demise of California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's so-called Million Solar Roofs initiative, which would have provided substantial incentives in the nation's largest state for both residential and commercial buildings. Though the measure passed easily in the state Senate, it fizzled after the governor threatened a veto over amendments to the bill in the state Assembly that would have required solar-installation work to be handled by licensed electricians at the prevailing union wage rate. The governor lately has talked about stepping around the legislature via the adoption of similar incentives through the state's Public Utility Commission.
WHILE THE STATUS OF THE CALIFORNIA MEASURE is important, the talk of the solar industry is the ongoing shortage of polysilicon, the raw stuff used to manufacture photovoltaic cells. For many years, the only real use for that particular material was to make silicon wafers for the semiconductor industry; the solar industry's needs were minimal. But not anymore.
Thanks in no small measure to the incentive programs in Germany and Japan, solar-cell demand has expanded 40% or more for several years running, versus 20%-25% in the past. The result is that by 2006 almost half of the world's polysilicon supply will be soaked up by the solar-cell makers. Richard Winegarner, proprietor of consulting firm Sage Concepts, says the market is about 10% short this year, with the solar-cell industry, and not chip makers, absorbing most of the resultant pain.
"I can't find a data point anywhere that shows anything other than a very real shortage of polysilicon that is going to get worse over the next two or three years," says Paul Leming, an analyst with Princeton Tech Research. "It would take a solar-panel market collapse to bring any slack capacity to the polysilicon business any- time soon."
Not surprisingly, polysilicon prices have soared: Winegarner says contract pricing has moved from about $32 a kilogram to $45 since 2003. Spot pricing, depending on whom you ask, is running $60-$80 a kilogram, though Winegarner notes that there is "essentially no volume" in the spot market. "The industry has already wrung out every nook and cranny of inventory and scrap," he says.
The world's polysilicon makers are working frantically to add capacity, but supply is unlikely to catch up for a while. Optimists think the shortage could be cured by 2007. Neil Gayle, coordinator of the Critical Materials Council of Sematech, a chip-industry consortium, thinks there could be shortages though 2009.
The bottom line is that there won't be enough solar cells to meet demand for at least the next several years, potentially triggering a supply crisis for some smaller players that lack contractual supply arrangements with polysilicon producers.
The chip industry has expressed its own concerns about the potential for the shortage to slow the electronics business. But this is a lot bigger problem for solar-cell companies than for the chip industry: While silicon represents less than 1% of the cost of semiconductor products, they account for more than 30% of the raw-material costs for solar cells. A doubling of silicon pricing wouldn't mean much for chip makers, but it would be a big problem for the solar business, which must hold down costs to compete with conventional power.
The obvious play on the polysilicon shortage is MEMC Electronic Materials (ticker: WFR), a St. Peters, Mo., company that is one of the world's largest producers of silicon wafers. Unlike some of its rivals, MEMC produces most of its own silicon feedstock, and in fact sells some excess supply back into the market. The result is that MEMC benefits from soaring wafer pricing without suffering the associated increase in raw-material pricing. MEMC shares have doubled over the past year, to a recent $19.79, boosting the company's market capitalization to about $4 billion. That makes MEMC the largest-cap play on solar growth.
And there may still be some juice left in MEMC shares. Leming of Princeton Tech Research thinks the stock could move up another 50%, and says he can "sketch a scenario where it can double or triple from here," noting that the company trades for only about 12 times expected 2006 earnings of $1.56 a share. Profits at that level would be up 39% from an expected $1.12 a share this year. And this, by the way, is for a company that does not yet do much direct business with the solar industry. Leming thinks MEMC could eventually cut a deal with solar-panel makers to provide dedicated wafer supplies. If so, Lemming says, the growth could lift the stock to $50.
MEMC ranks fourth in the world in polysilicon capacity, behind Hemlock Semiconductor, which is partially owned by Dow Corning. Third on the list is the other potential wafer investment, Japan-based Tokuyama. Also in the top five are Wacker Chemie, a privately held German chemical conglomerate, and Advanced Silicon Materials, which was recently sold by Japan's Komatsu Electronic Metals to Renewable Energy Corp., the Norwegian solar-panel maker. The purchase of Advanced Silicon by REC, which as noted is planning an IPO, assures the company of sufficient silicon supplies.
Then there's SunPower, the Cypress subsidiary now in registration to come public. It is losing gobs of money -- for the first half of this year, it lost $13.6 million on revenues of $27.3 million. But the company is attracting considerable interest for its highly efficient solar cells: The company claims in its SEC filings that it generates up to 50% more power per unit of area than conventional cells. In an industry where driving costs lower is a key to long-term success, SunPower should attract eager buyers.
The only current domestic pure-play solar option is Evergreen Solar (ESLR) of Marlboro, Mass. -- and it has some similar attractions. Evergreen shares have increased sixfold over the past 18 months. The company uses a novel process for generating solar cells that it claims uses 35% less silicon than conventional manufacturing processes. That should give Evergreen an edge in the race to reduce costs. And CEO Rick Feldt says the company has a pilot project that would cut the silicon used per wafer by another 50%.
WHILE CERTAINLY THE STREET IS ENAMORED of Evergreen's technology, analysts are equally enthused about its joint venture with Germany's Q-Cells. The two companies are building a new solar-cell manufacturing plant near Q-Cells' headquarters in Thalheim, in eastern Germany. The plant will dramatically increase Evergreen's capacity, adding 30 megawatts of cell production to the 15 megawatts it can produce at its own factory in Massachusetts. Feldt thinks the German plant will be far more efficient than the company's domestic plant, perhaps generating $100 million a year in revenue with gross margins of 30%-35%. Assuming the plant comes on stream as expected, Feldt says, the company should turn profitable on a run-rate basis sometime in 2006.
Moreover, Feldt says that if the German venture is successful, the partners would increase their production to as much as 120 megawatts. And if that happens, he says, the joint venture could add additional capacity in other locations. If that all plays out, says J. Michael Horwitz, an analyst at Pacific Growth Equities, "it could be one of the better stocks in 2006." And if the German project has problems? Then so will the stock.
CLSA's Michael Rogol, a big Evergreen fan, in a report earlier this year, listed a total of 15 solar stocks to buy. Many are outside the U.S.: Kyocera, Sharp and Sekisui Chemical of Japan; Thailand-based Solartron; Motech of Taiwan; Carmanah and ATS in Canada; and Germany's Conergy and SolarWorld.
The global range is a reflection of the fact that, unlike oil or gas or coal, producing energy from the sun is about creative engineering and -- at least for the moment -- bold government policy, not geographic advantage. No one is going to discover a new source of sunlight, but it's possible to figure out better ways to use it. Anyone can get in the game. Even America.
Rogue
Gold settles at new 17-year peak 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. benchmark gold futures closed at a 17-year high on Friday as robust demand for bullion and jitters over inflation and the U.S. economy stoked a buying spree in the precious commodity for a second straight day.
ADVERTISEMENT
December delivery gold on the New York Mercantile Exchange's COMEX division climbed $4 to end at $463.30 an ounce. The session high at $464 was the loftiest level for a most-active futures contract in New York gold since June 1988.
Gold's rally this week has added $10, or 2.3 percent, to the December gold contract.
Prices extended gains after first hitting a 17-year peak on Thursday as money from investment funds and independent traders continued to flow into the market, traders and analysts said.
"The inflation signals are getting to be stronger and stronger and that's what is attracting the buying," said Frank Aburto, a broker at Rosenthal-Collins Group in New York. "And it is not over yet."
Gold, seen as a classic hedge against inflation and economic uncertainty, has benefited from record crude oil and gasoline prices and doubts about U.S. economic strength and the dollar, especially after the destruction wrought by Hurricane Katrina along the U.S. Gulf Coast.
With gold's move on Thursday, December futures eclipsed the 16-year high of $458.70, set last December by the then-benchmark February contract.
Now a number of traders were awaiting a break above the key $471 level, which was the high in the COMEX spot month from last December.
"I'm bullish and I think it's going to go much higher -- another $15 to maybe $475," said a dealer at a New York precious metals desk.
Final estimated volume was a brisk 85,000 contracts on Friday, off Thursday's official tally of 100,427 contracts.
The level of participation in the COMEX gold market rose dramatically after Thursday's session, with open interest increasing 17,311 lots to a historically high 343,286 contracts.
A U.S. government report showed the current account deficit narrowed in the second quarter to $197.7 billion, although the previous quarter's gap was revised higher.
Economists warn that the deficits at above 6 percent of gross domestic product represent a serious imbalance in the U.S. economy, reflecting high levels of U.S. consumption but an extremely low savings rate.
Precious metals consultant CPM Group said Friday that gold and also rising platinum have further upside in the short term, but they may be nearing longer-term peaks.
Factors including more mine supply and less jewelry demand at higher prices plus rising interest rates in the United States affecting investment demand, could combine to put a ceiling on the gold price, it added.
CPM said that although a spike above $470 may be possible, it likely was not sustainable due to market fundamentals.
The market also was in the rare position of breaking up its close inverse relationship with the dollar as the U.S. currency barely budged in the last two days while gold surged.
Bullion likewise jumped to a 17-year high Friday, reaching $460.10 an ounce. It last traded at $459.40/460.10 in New York, from $455.10/5.80 late on Thursday. Friday's afternoon London fix was $457.20.
As gold was breaking out in a range of currencies, the metal priced in euros made a new all-time high Friday, reaching above 376 per euro.
In other precious metals, silver, platinum and palladium prices all shot to one-month highs, buoyed by gold.
December silver futures rose 21 cents to end at $7.288 an ounce, after trading from $7.07 to $7.32. Spot silver changed hands at $7.22/25 vs. $7.01/04 previously. It fixed at $7.08.
On the board at NYMEX, October platinum peaked at $927 an ounce and settled at $923.80, up $4.10. Spot platinum rose to $918/921.
December palladium jumped $6.30 to close at $193.45 an ounce. Spot palladium was worth $190/193.
Rogue
Lentinman....you claim to be "objective and logical" but I don't believe you are.
Please read this great little book on the subject by Ayn Rand..."The Virtue of Selfishness".
http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm
It's considered a classic collection of essays relating to "Objectivism". It to me can be considered a manual to running a modern society. Many great traders have listed it in their footnotes!!
Start there and READ IT and then let's talk.......you'll never be so passively naive to the agenda going on again!!!
Your a good guy....just a little brainwashed and naive! I'm positive this book may put you on the right path!
Rogue
Bobwins..... krsyf.pk/krs.v Kroes energy. Recently doubled my position on the recent selloff.
I think this is going to do fine long-term. I heard that alot of brokers(ETrade/Schwab) are now going to be offering Canadien securities which may help bring attention here.
I really should be buying these on pink-sheets instead of Canada though. One BIG thing to remember is that through the pink sheets we will "capture" any appreciation of the Canadian Dollar. Long-term we probably go from .83 to $1 US dollar to $1.25 to $1 US dollar...
not too shabby a return on currency appreciation alone!! Never mind increasing oil production and stock price down the road "to boot"!
Rogue
Len..."So much for Rogue's police state takeover".... you're really not being very "LOGICAL" at all with that statement Len.....
How many people have been forced out of their homes against their will???????
How many law abiding citizens have had their guns taken from them and destroyed????
Was this a racial "cleansing" drill?
Why the favoritism in the French quarter?? Maybe the rest of the area will be leveled and drilled for gas and oil???.....just like Iraq.
Many have said(Alex Jones for one) that the door to door "search and siezure" going on in Iraq would be coming soon to a neighborhood near you. Well it just happened in NO...so much for you're alleged "freedom and liberty". Where will it be next? Want to wager we've just seen the beginning of this crap?
One question before I go......Name me some specific examples of how this country is becoming more "freedom and liberty" oriented?????
I'll give you 10 examples to every one of your's that we are becoming a "police state"!
Rogue
Bobwins.....Gold is going to get a huge run in my opinion. I see a minimun of $600 per ounce next year. It "should" spill over into a frenzied rally the Gold shares at some point.
I imagine there are quite a few "10-bagger" micro-cap golds hiding out there that will be doing the ASPN "thingy".
Rogue
This war on terrorism is bogus
The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination
http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/meacher_war_on_terror_bogus.htm
London Guardian | September 6, 2003
By Michael Meacher
Massive attention has now been given - and rightly so - to the reasons why Britain went to war against Iraq. But far too little attention has focused on why the US went to war, and that throws light on British motives too. The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaida bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the US and UK governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier.
We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).
The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says "while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the US must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role". It refers to key allies such as the UK as "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership". It describes peacekeeping missions as "demanding American political leadership rather than that of the UN". It says "even should Saddam pass from the scene", US bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently... as "Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has". It spotlights China for "regime change", saying "it is time to increase the presence of American forces in SE Asia".
The document also calls for the creation of "US space forces" to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" using the internet against the US. It also hints that the US may consider developing biological weapons "that can target specific genotypes [and] may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool".
Finally - written a year before 9/11 - it pinpoints North Korea, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes, and says their existence justifies the creation of a "worldwide command and control system". This is a blueprint for US world domination. But before it is dismissed as an agenda for rightwing fantasists, it is clear it provides a much better explanation of what actually happened before, during and after 9/11 than the global war on terrorism thesis. This can be seen in several ways.
First, it is clear the US authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the US of the 9/11 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation (Daily Telegraph, September 16 2001). The list they provided included the names of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was arrested.
It had been known as early as 1996 that there were plans to hit Washington targets with aeroplanes. Then in 1999 a US national intelligence council report noted that "al-Qaida suicide bombers could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the CIA, or the White House".
Fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers obtained their visas in Saudi Arabia. Michael Springman, the former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, has stated that since 1987 the CIA had been illicitly issuing visas to unqualified applicants from the Middle East and bringing them to the US for training in terrorism for the Afghan war in collaboration with Bin Laden (BBC, November 6 2001). It seems this operation continued after the Afghan war for other purposes. It is also reported that five of the hijackers received training at secure US military installations in the 1990s (Newsweek, September 15 2001).
Instructive leads prior to 9/11 were not followed up. French Moroccan flight student Zacarias Moussaoui (now thought to be the 20th hijacker) was arrested in August 2001 after an instructor reported he showed a suspicious interest in learning how to steer large airliners. When US agents learned from French intelligence he had radical Islamist ties, they sought a warrant to search his computer, which contained clues to the September 11 mission (Times, November 3 2001). But they were turned down by the FBI. One agent wrote, a month before 9/11, that Moussaoui might be planning to crash into the Twin Towers (Newsweek, May 20 2002).
All of this makes it all the more astonishing - on the war on terrorism perspective - that there was such slow reaction on September 11 itself. The first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8.20am, and the last hijacked aircraft crashed in Pennsylvania at 10.06am. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the US Andrews airforce base, just 10 miles from Washington DC, until after the third plane had hit the Pentagon at 9.38 am. Why not? There were standard FAA intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11. Between September 2000 and June 2001 the US military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft (AP, August 13 2002). It is a US legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to investigate.
Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could US air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11? If so, why, and on whose authority? The former US federal crimes prosecutor, John Loftus, has said: "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defence of incompetence."
Nor is the US response after 9/11 any better. No serious attempt has ever been made to catch Bin Laden. In late September and early October 2001, leaders of Pakistan's two Islamist parties negotiated Bin Laden's extradition to Pakistan to stand trial for 9/11. However, a US official said, significantly, that "casting our objectives too narrowly" risked "a premature collapse of the international effort if by some lucky chance Mr Bin Laden was captured". The US chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Myers, went so far as to say that "the goal has never been to get Bin Laden" (AP, April 5 2002). The whistleblowing FBI agent Robert Wright told ABC News (December 19 2002) that FBI headquarters wanted no arrests. And in November 2001 the US airforce complained it had had al-Qaida and Taliban leaders in its sights as many as 10 times over the previous six weeks, but had been unable to attack because they did not receive permission quickly enough (Time Magazine, May 13 2002). None of this assembled evidence, all of which comes from sources already in the public domain, is compatible with the idea of a real, determined war on terrorism.
The catalogue of evidence does, however, fall into place when set against the PNAC blueprint. From this it seems that the so-called "war on terrorism" is being used largely as bogus cover for achieving wider US strategic geopolitical objectives. Indeed Tony Blair himself hinted at this when he said to the Commons liaison committee: "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11" (Times, July 17 2002). Similarly Rumsfeld was so determined to obtain a rationale for an attack on Iraq that on 10 separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq to 9/11; the CIA repeatedly came back empty-handed (Time Magazine, May 13 2002).
In fact, 9/11 offered an extremely convenient pretext to put the PNAC plan into action. The evidence again is quite clear that plans for military action against Afghanistan and Iraq were in hand well before 9/11. A report prepared for the US government from the Baker Institute of Public Policy stated in April 2001 that "the US remains a prisoner of its energy dilemma. Iraq remains a destabilising influence to... the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East". Submitted to Vice-President Cheney's energy task group, the report recommended that because this was an unacceptable risk to the US, "military intervention" was necessary (Sunday Herald, October 6 2002).
Similar evidence exists in regard to Afghanistan. The BBC reported (September 18 2001) that Niaz Niak, a former Pakistan foreign secretary, was told by senior American officials at a meeting in Berlin in mid-July 2001 that "military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October". Until July 2001 the US government saw the Taliban regime as a source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of hydrocarbon pipelines from the oil and gas fields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean. But, confronted with the Taliban's refusal to accept US conditions, the US representatives told them "either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs" (Inter Press Service, November 15 2001).
Given this background, it is not surprising that some have seen the US failure to avert the 9/11 attacks as creating an invaluable pretext for attacking Afghanistan in a war that had clearly already been well planned in advance. There is a possible precedent for this. The US national archives reveal that President Roosevelt used exactly this approach in relation to Pearl Harbor on December 7 1941. Some advance warning of the attacks was received, but the information never reached the US fleet. The ensuing national outrage persuaded a reluctant US public to join the second world war. Similarly the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the US into "tomorrow's dominant force" is likely to be a long one in the absence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor". The 9/11 attacks allowed the US to press the "go" button for a strategy in accordance with the PNAC agenda which it would otherwise have been politically impossible to implement.
The overriding motivation for this political smokescreen is that the US and the UK are beginning to run out of secure hydrocarbon energy supplies. By 2010 the Muslim world will control as much as 60% of the world's oil production and, even more importantly, 95% of remaining global oil export capacity. As demand is increasing, so supply is decreasing, continually since the 1960s.
This is leading to increasing dependence on foreign oil supplies for both the US and the UK. The US, which in 1990 produced domestically 57% of its total energy demand, is predicted to produce only 39% of its needs by 2010. A DTI minister has admitted that the UK could be facing "severe" gas shortages by 2005. The UK government has confirmed that 70% of our electricity will come from gas by 2020, and 90% of that will be imported. In that context it should be noted that Iraq has 110 trillion cubic feet of gas reserves in addition to its oil.
A report from the commission on America's national interests in July 2000 noted that the most promising new source of world supplies was the Caspian region, and this would relieve US dependence on Saudi Arabia. To diversify supply routes from the Caspian, one pipeline would run westward via Azerbaijan and Georgia to the Turkish port of Ceyhan. Another would extend eastwards through Afghanistan and Pakistan and terminate near the Indian border. This would rescue Enron's beleaguered power plant at Dabhol on India's west coast, in which Enron had sunk $3bn investment and whose economic survival was dependent on access to cheap gas.
Nor has the UK been disinterested in this scramble for the remaining world supplies of hydrocarbons, and this may partly explain British participation in US military actions. Lord Browne, chief executive of BP, warned Washington not to carve up Iraq for its own oil companies in the aftermath of war (Guardian, October 30 2002). And when a British foreign minister met Gadaffi in his desert tent in August 2002, it was said that "the UK does not want to lose out to other European nations already jostling for advantage when it comes to potentially lucrative oil contracts" with Libya (BBC Online, August 10 2002).
The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the "global war on terrorism" has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda - the US goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project. Is collusion in this myth and junior participation in this project really a proper aspiration for British foreign policy? If there was ever need to justify a more objective British stance, driven by our own independent goals, this whole depressing saga surely provides all the evidence needed for a radical change of course.
Rogue
It seems obvious to me that there is "AN AGENDA" going on here.
Anyone else seeing this as for what it is???
The late William Cooper (assassinated 3 weeks after 9/11) had always said that we would someday see American troops firing on American citizens and going door to door confiscating guns.
http://www.hourofthetime.com/
Beleive it or not it's happened in new Orleans. Americans SHOULD BE OUTRAGED! Nary a wimper about the atrocious destruction of our once great country.
The responce to Katrina was NO ACCIDENT!
"Order from Chaos"
Where do we go from here as a nation?
Rogue
CHAR......I'm thinking of buying more NLG.TO because of the huge run-up in CHAR. They are majority owner of CHAR and the price has languished as CHAR has run up.
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=NLG.TO,uu[w,a]dahayyay[pb50!b200!f][vc60][iut!Ub14!Lh14,...
Will NLG.TO play "catch up"? Or will CHAR continue to outperform?
Rogue
Is the world running out of oil? Yes and no
Joseph Nocera The New York Times
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2005
'We're halfway through the hydrocarbon era," my old friend Boone Pickens has been saying for the last couple of years. You may know Pickens as a corporate raider of the 1980s, but he has spent his life in the oil patch. A geologist by training, Pickens founded an oil exploration company, Mesa Petroleum, at the age of 26 and ran it for the next 40 years. Now, at the age of 77, he works the oil patch in a different way, running a pair of energy-oriented hedge funds in Dallas.
A folksy line like that, it sticks with you. But I hadn't realized until I began poking around the world of oil forecasting in the wake of Hurricane Katrina that it also meant Pickens had taken sides in a surprisingly heated debate. He subscribes to what is sometimes called the "peak oil hypothesis," which holds that there simply isn't very much new oil left to be found in the world. And, as a result, we are currently in the gradual process of draining the more than 1.2 trillion barrels of proven reserves that are still in the ground. And when it's gone, it's gone.
The best-known "peakist" these days is Matthew Simmons, who runs Simmons & Co., a Houston-based investment bank and consulting firm specializing in energy companies. Some of Simmons' views were recently given an airing in a New York Times Magazine article about the awful possibility that Saudi Arabian oil has peaked, something Simmons believes is a distinct possibility. His essential belief, he told me recently, is that "energy demand is about to significantly exceed supply. And that was pre-Katrina" - before the hurricane damaged refineries, pipelines and offshore rigs all along the Gulf Coast of the United States.
"I would argue that we are in a serious energy crisis," Simmons added. He forecasts increasing oil prices.
There is a second group of forecasters, though, who argue with equal vehemence that, Katrina notwithstanding, the world is not only not in an energy crisis now, it probably won't face one for a very long time. The best-known proponent of this view is Daniel Yergin, author of "The Prize," a history of oil that won the 1992 Pulitzer Prize, and the founder of what has become a rather sizable consulting firm, Cambridge Energy Research Associates, or CERA.
"This is the fifth time that we're supposedly running out of oil," he said the other day. But, he added, each time new technologies made it possible for oil companies both to find new sources of oil and extract new oil from old sources. A CERA survey released a few months ago says that between 2004 and 2010, world oil supplies will have increased by as much as 16 million barrels a day, "outstripping the likely demand increase." Most of those who hold this view believe that oil prices will eventually drift down.
Does it surprise you to learn that when it comes to one of most vital resources known to man, there could be such an incredible divergence of opinion? It sure surprised me. I was especially surprised to realize that even some of the oil majors are on opposites sides, with Chevron taking the peakist view and Exxon Mobil more aligned with the Yergin camp.
There are three reasons for this lack of consensus. First, because oil is buried underground, it is hard to measure. So basic "facts" - such as how much oil remains, and how much can be ultimately extracted - are as much the product of guesswork as science.
Second, the world of oil can be shrouded in secrecy. As was recently pointed out in that New York Times Magazine article, Saudi Arabia, the biggest producer of them all, won't even allow its reserve and production data to be audited.
Finally, the fact that this enormous divergence has developed speaks volumes about the very different way each camp views the world. As Seth Kleinman, an analyst with PFC Energy in Washington, put it recently, "It's the geologists on one side and the economists on the other side." And while it is impossible to know, right now, whether the geologists or the economists will turn out to be right, we can at least understand why each side believes what it does - and form some judgments from that.
Just about the only thing about which both sides agree is that the recent run-up in oil prices, which began well before Hurricane Katrina, has been caused because demand for oil - spurred by growth in China, the generally healthy economic condition of the Western world, and other factors - has caught up with supply. "The world produces about 85 million barrels a day," Pickens said. "That's where demand is now, too. And I've seen forecasts that demand is going to be higher than that by the end of the year."
What's more, Pickens said, pre-Katrina refining capacity was already at the breaking point. "Refineries were operating at 96 percent," he said. "You can't operate anything at 96 percent. It'll start breaking down."
That, though, encapsulates the world view of the peakists: All the easy deals have been done. One reason refineries are operating at such a high capacity is that no new refineries have been built in the United States for some 30 years. Simmons claims that this was due to the shortsightedness of the oil industry: "My theory was that if the industry didn't expand like crazy, the U.S. would find itself running short of energy." It didn't, and that's what happened.
Even more troubling, the pessimists believe that, despite new technologies, it is going to be increasingly difficult to replace the oil that we're now using up. "Let me give you a number that is pretty shocking when you hear it," Pickens said. "The world uses 30 billion barrels of oil a year. There is no way we're replacing 30 billion barrels of oil. Just a million barrels a year is 1,000 wells producing 1,000 barrels a day. That's big," he said.
How do the economists respond to that? They don't deny that it is hard to find new oil. But they believe that when tight supplies push up the price, as is happening now, the rising price becomes our salvation. For one thing, higher prices will probably temper demand, as people begin to change their energy habits. Surprisingly, this has not yet happened, even as the price of gas at the pump has more than doubled in the last year or so. But there will come a point where it will change behavior.
Secondly, they believe, the rising price itself is what spurs innovation. Oil that could not be extracted profitably at, say, $15 a barrel can be enormously profitable at $60 a barrel. In the view of Yergin and his allies, in fact, this is exactly what has been happening. They point to new oil that is coming out of the Caspian Sea, deep-water drilling in Brazil and the oil sands in northern Alberta. The 16 million barrels a day of new oil Yergin expects to see by 2010, he told me, "is predicated on $25 and $30 oil." If oil stays higher than that, there will be even more investment - not just in ways to extract oil, but in new refineries, pipelines and other infrastructure.
Mention this theory to a hard-core peakist like Simmons, and get ready for an earful. "These economists are so smug," he said derisively. "All they talk about is the magic of the free market. They don't seem to understand that this is incredibly capital-intensive." He pointed to the Canadian oil sands - where, he said, Shell Canada recently announced it was going to increase its investment to $7.3 billion from $4 billion to produce an additional 100,000 barrels a day. "$3.3 billion for just 100,000," Simmons said. "Doesn't that tell you something?"
Of course, the economists can be just as dismissive of the peakists. "I've gone from disagreeing with them to debunking them," scoffed Michael Lynch, an energy consultant. "By most estimates, total global resources is 8 trillion barrels of oil. They are saying only a small percentage of that is recoverable, and you can't do anything about it. We are saying the amount that is recoverable expands over time."
I wish I had the confidence to make my own forecast. What I do know is that oil is a finite resource. Surely, the peakists are right about that. What I also know is that the economists have generally been right about how the price of oil has wound up fixing the problem. As Gary Ross, chief executive of PIRA Energy Group, a consulting firm, put it, "Price is the only thing that matters. The new threshold of price will do its magic on the supply and demand side."
After all, it always has before. And it will again. Until it doesn't.
Rogue
ksauve.....you stated "Kerry would have been better than Bush....".
Have you read any of my postings on the "Skull and Bones" death cult from Yale????
Bush and Kerry were both members and are controlled by the same entity. No difference!....just "theater" from the "right" and "left".
Rogue
Bobwins.....EGY selloff today. Lot's of technical damage done today on the chart....down 20%.
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=EGY,uu[w,a]daolyyay[pb50!b200!f][vc60][iUb14!Lh14,3]&....
It looks as if the yearly lows may get tested....if they don't hold we may get a great long-term buying oppurtunity with the "capitulation" that may ensue if that happened.
I guess you're sitting pretty on this one right now with no position.
Rogue
EGY just hit a downside Fibonnacci retracement point a few minutes ago at $3.85 that I had calculated a while ago...
Comments?
Rogue
Huge EGY selloff today....any comments on this PR today????
VAALCO Energy, Inc. Updates Gabon Activities
Monday September 12, 2:54 pm ET
HOUSTON, Sept. 12 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- VAALCO Energy, Inc. (Amex: EGY - News), today announced that the Etame consortium has elected to stabilize the production of the Etame Field at between 17,000 and 18,000 barrels of oil per day. The higher initial production levels experienced with the addition of the Etame 6H well resulted in pressure interference with nearby wells and some declines in their productivity. Rather than risk local pressure decline, and possible damage to the reservoir, the Etame ET-3H well will be shut in. By resetting production the consortium expects improved aquifer support and stable production. The Etame ET-6H well, which has produced at rates in excess of 7,000 barrels oil per day, is the structurally highest well in the field. This well will ultimately recover attic oil that could not have been recovered by any of the other wells in the field.
ADVERTISEMENT
Robert Gerry, Chairman and CEO, stated, "We would like to produce the field at higher rates, but prudent reservoir management requires us to take these actions. This decision is not an indication of any less oil in place in the field. The importance of maintaining sufficient aquifer support exceeds the benefits of accelerating cash flow in the near term if we are going to recover the maximum amount of reserves from the field."
On the Avouma development project, the Company announced that the fabrication yard building the production platform reopened on Tuesday September 6, 2005 after a ten day shut down for Hurricane Katrina. The Company is assessing additional costs and delays that may occur as a result of other manufacturers of platform equipment that are still shut down. The manufacturers have indicated that no damage occurred to our equipment, but until such time as the return of power infrastructure is known, it is difficult to assess the nature of delays for completing this equipment. The Company currently believes a delay of between 30 to 90 days for the Avouma project is possible.
VAALCO's next scheduled lifting for the consortium is set for approximately 600,000 barrels in mid September which will bring total oil sales from Etame to approximately 18 million barrels since inception. The Company expects to report third quarter results during the first week in November.
This press release includes "forward-looking statements" as defined by the U.S. securities laws. Forward-looking statements are those concerning VAALCO's plans, expectations, and objectives for future drilling, completion and other operations and activities. All statements included in this press release that address activities, events or developments that VAALCO expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These statements include future production rates, completion and production timetables and costs to complete wells. These statements are based on assumptions made by VAALCO based on its experience, perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond VAALCO's control. These risks include, but are not limited to, inflation, lack of availability, goods, services and capital, environmental risks, drilling risks, foreign operational risks and regulatory changes. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These risks are further described in VAALCO's annual report on form 10K/SB for the year ended December 31, 2004 and other reports filed with the SEC which can be reviewed at www.sec.gov , or which can be received by contacting VAALCO at 4600 Post Oak Place, Suite 309, Houston, Texas 77027, (713) 623-0801.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: VAALCO Energy, Inc.
Rogue
WHY THE BUCK JUST DON'T DIE
by Jim Willie CB
September 9, 2005
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/willie/2005/0909.html
Home: Golden Jackass website
Subscribe: Hat Trick Letter
Jim Willie CB is the editor of the “HAT TRICK LETTER”
For specific detailed analysis of the Gold, USDollar, Treasury bonds, and inter-market dynamics with the US Economy and Fed monetary policy, see instructions for subscription to my newsletter research reports, which include stock recommendations positioned to rise in the commodity bull market.
An innocent simple question came to my inbox the other day, an email from deep in cyberspace. Sometimes the best questions are ones lacking complexity, asked without multiple parts. This one was from an investor, curious as to why the USDollar simply hasn’t died quickly like everyone expected within the precious metals community. Here is the full question, worth sharing, along with my answer.
Question: Jim Willy, I am new to PM investing and have done a ton of research prior to my taking positions in gold. While reading many of the great articles on the coming demise of the US dollar, I was shocked to learn that many of them were written as late as five years ago, some even longer. So many people, including yourself, have been calling for a dollar crash for so long, I wonder if it is probable. I have made my bets that the dollar will fall, but it is sure hard to watch Joe Six Pack make millions on real estate investments after making millions on tech stocks. I realize many lost their shirts, but not all. Is this PM bull / dollar crash just a bunch of hot air?
My answer to the person was brief, almost a full page in outline form. My agenda is busy. However, what an excellent topic for further development at a high level! Instead of providing my response verbatim, let’s attempt to answer the question more fully, but briefly, as that agenda is still busy. What follows will conform to the outlined response from my email. A more comprehensive reply would take 50 to 60 pages of analysis, data, arguments, and a reported path on progress for the crash demise of the world reserve currency, the USDollar. In no way is my response complete, but it is surely of sufficient depth to make the point on why death is not sudden, or even within the timespan of just a few years.
Much has been written about how the USDollar has survived longer than any previous fiat currency. The previous record is 31 years, and the United States has attained 34 years in this futile sprint. The Bretton Woods Accord, written to enforce a gold-backed USDollar, was abandoned in 1971. A tie to gold required massive shipments of gold from the USA vaults to foreign central banks, a very unsavory punishment for running rampant national debts. So President Nixon ended the gold shipments, ended the gold backing for the USDollar, and sent the world on a certain path toward perdition and destruction. Up to the twentieth century, the world had never witnessed the USGovt before, never been subjected to the extraordinary bond leveraged machinery. With extraordinary response measures come extraordinary longevity. Couple the machinery weapons with subversive institutional weapons such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and you have a recipe for profound longevity. Many are the tools and agents for the USGovt to defend the USDollar.
Start with the acceptance of a crippled set of fundamentals for the United States economy, exorbitant federal deficits, even more magnificent and growing balance of payment deficits (trade gap), an absent manufacturing base, escalating debt levels both public and private, dependence upon asset inflation for debt collateral, outsourcing to foreign lands for low-cost solutions, magnificent unbridled growth in USDollar money supply, dangerous growth in foreign-held US Treasury Bond debt, a central bank whose professional competence badly lags its unwarranted icon status reputation, and an economic council whose dedication to sound policy and reliable indicators is so far astray that any reasonable man would conclude their heads are squarely lodged up their rectums.
THE HUMAN RESPONSE
The world will not descend into financial oblivion without a fight. The world reserve currency is so widely held, so well entrenched, that its death must echo the death of the world banking system. A new banking system must emerge from the financial rubble. The human response from sovereign governments and their central banks (some operating independently, others far too compromised and connected), can be very effective at buying time for the current system. Many are the response mechanisms:
tax cuts (to the brackets paid by taxpayers)
tax refunds (to the population of consumers)
official monetization of federal bonds (use of printed money)
foreign central bank bond support (often coordinated intervention)
export of overvalued currency (to country which defends itself inadequately)
Asian oversized bond accumulation (called “flexibility”)
rising US interest rates (to defend the USDollar)
Governments do not simply lie down and take lethal blows. They respond when they can, and the USA can respond emphatically and demonstrably. Many are their available weapons, since they control the rules and the change of rules. Heck, they can make illegal the ownership of bona fide constitutionally mandated money. The ordered forfeit of gold by President Franklin D. Roosevelt following the Great Depression was patently illegal. Foreign money deposited in US banks can be frozen and seized. When men overshadow law, we got trouble. Man oh man, what a dangerous and increasingly lawless world we live in!!!
On the more mundane side of typical governmental response are what we come to expect, anticipate, and demand from the USGovt. Tax cuts are ordinary at the onset of economic slowdown, especially recession. Lower tax percentages within defined brackets invite a positive response toward revived economic activity. To be sure, with inflation and its gradual rise in income without a rise in purchase power, reduced tax percentages remove the dreaded “tax creep” which enables a hidden increased tax burden.
When more immediate response is necessary, a tax refund is the best policy action. Taxpayers receive a sudden check in the mails. No need to wait for a full year, for business decisions to exploit the new tax policy, and for a sixteen month delay. A tax refund puts money into the consumer hands right away. Early in 2001, a tax refund was enacted, based upon the recorded activity and tax bills of 2000. Easy as pie. Both tax cuts and tax refunds encourage spending, which keeps the boat afloat and buys time. These human responses all buy time.
If interest rates threaten to rise, and foreign buyers fail to show up at US Treasury auctions where our voluminous bonds are sold, then more drastic action is required. The Dept of Treasury gives the orders to print money out of thin air (don’t you just love that phrase?) so that the freshly minted money can be used to purchase US Treasury Bonds. The end result is that interest rates are kept from rising, and the US Economy is kept from suffering a higher cost of money. The sad joke nowadays about our lopsided, inflation driven economy is that it cares far more about the cost of money than it does the cost of any particular commodity. Well, except perhaps oil and natural gas.
When the USDollar goes into temporary tailspins on the foreign exchange markets (FOREX), even more radical action is urgently called for. The FOREX markets endure a truly gigantic flow of funds, far more than any single nation can withstand and fight off. So the USGovt calls on the Bank of Japan typically as its first line of defense. Some regard the BoJ as the Far East Outpost for the Federal Reserve. Those days might actually be experiencing a sunset of sorts, as Japanese officials have come to harbor more disdain for American leaders and our policy than meets the eye or hits the printed word on news stories. Often at the same time, the European Central Bank coordinates efforts to rescue the USDollar by means of its primary vehicle, the USTBond. When just the US Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan work in concert, or just the USFed and the Euro Central Bank work in concert, often the coordinated central bank intervention succeeds to forestall a USDollar plunge. It is all about buying time and instilling fear among FOREX traders not to grapple with powerful central banks. After all, DON’T FIGHT THE FED. And yes, the Fed has many powerful formidable friends.
THE SOUR FRUIT FROM HUMAN RESPONSE
Ludwig von Mises warned about currency wars, a vicious practice which can be likened to tossing a “hot potato” from one nation to another. One of the principal challenges for a widely used currency to find its true much lower value is the progressive response effect on other currencys. A feedback loop is created, whereby for instance the euro currency rises in value as the USDollar declines in value. The euro does not rise in an economic vacuum though. Germany and France lose much of their export trade, jobs are lost, incomes fall, federal budgets jump to meet the social safety net needs. Precisely this has happened, as the European Union has witnessed a sudden fall in their exports. The EU has suffered over 10% joblessness. Federal budgets have surpassed the limits on their stabilization pact. In short, the European economy has been damaged by a currency assault from 2003 and 2004 as the euro rose over 30%. The United States in effect exported to Europe its over-valued currency, but did so indirectly via the FOREX markets. Despite the chronic weakness of US Economic fundamentals, Europe now has lost some appeal. The USDollar cannot careen downhill around the next bend in the road until the USA begins to look as bad as Europe. In the words of some analysts, “it becomes a race to the bottom.”
Chairman Greenspan might boast of improved flexibility in world credit markets. Others might counter that the United States financial situation has taken on the look of a group of international welfare states. Since when does $2 billion per day of foreign funds dependence exhibit strength? Since when does such large infusion, like what can be described as a capital intra-venous to Uncle Sam, exhibit strength? So Japan owns $710 billion in USTBonds in their foreign reserves, eager to avoid further piles of questionable paper. So China owns $230 billion in USTBonds in their foreign reserves, eager to avoid further accumulation. So Russia owns $140 billion in USTBonds in their foreign reserves, eager to avoid further accumulation. Collectively, Asia owns at least $1500 billion in accumulated USTBonds, the net result of a worldwide disastrous experiment to test flexibility. Pull a strong rubber band way back, hold it, pull it further, subject it to the cold breeze of trade friction, then stand back. That boasted flexibility might not remain intact. The rubber band might break, from stress or else increased brittle. If your neighbor owns your mortgage and much additional debt, does not speak your language, has no indigenous roots culturally with your national birth formation, shares little culturally and religiously, and competes for a seat with a Boy’s Club among the G-10 Finance Ministers, a truly dangerous situation arises. The old saying goes “give a loan, make a client; but give a giant loan, make a partner.” How true, as Asia has become dependent upon the American consumer. In the next damaging stage, Asia is likely to weaken by some diminished business demand from the US export market.
Caught in the middle is the US Federal Reserve, which must raise interest rates in order to defend the USDollar. In my September Hat Trick Letter issue, this topic is developed more fully. We are near the end of the Fed rate tightening cycle. The US Economy has weakened from higher rates. Therefore rate hikes must soon end. The US housing market has weakened from higher rates. Therefore rate hikes must soon end. Eventually, retail commerce will weaken from higher rates. Therefore rate hikes must soon end. The rogue event agent is next the impact from higher gasoline and heating costs in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Therefore rate hikes must soon end. A nation under siege from a declining currency, meted out in the brutal unforgiving FOREX markets, will respond by raising its interest rate just as the USFed has done. In time, experts will wonder why they continue when the domestic economy feels the pain. THEY WILL EVENTUALLY CONCLUDE: TO DEFEND THE USDOLLAR. Look out below when the USFed ends its business of tightening.
When the official rate tightening cycle ends, administered by a truly hapless Federal Reserve, whether this early autumn or this coming winter, the USDollar downpath trajectory will be more clearly visible. Gold will love it. Energy will love it. A stealth rally has begun with gold. A loud rally is underway with crude oil and natural gas. The stage is set for gold to make new long-term highs. With Gulf of Mexico oil production crippled, the stage is set for crude oil to head toward $80 per barrel. The draw from our Strategic Petroleum Reserve only temporarily relieves supply concerns. Shipments from Japan, Germany, Spain of oil tankers only temporarily relieves supply concerns. The constant in the equation is lost Gulf oil output. Insurance firms might dictate that relocation of deep-water drill rigs away from the Gulf be done. Potential sites are South America, the Caribbean, even Saudi Arabia. Last year, insurance losses from Hurricane Ivan were costly. They will not invite annual losses in a hurricane zone.
THE NEXT CURRENCY BATTLE GROUND IS ASIA
The US Economy continues to experience a hemorrhage of trade deficits. In the last 12 reported months, the national trade gap has averaged $55.8 billion, with a high in Feb2005 of $60.6 billion and a low in July2004 of $50.5 billion. The blood letting continues. So is US balance of payments in trade getting better? No, no way! If not, then the hemorrhage is still in progress, nothing has changed. If a man has a mild but worsening form of cancer, he might live 18 months. Unfortunately, he is forced to endure a death sentence, with sure degradation in quality of life. This is a long pathogenesis of demise. It is real, it is ugly, it is relentless, it is unforgiving, but it will take time. In a sense, the currency world represents a “zero sum game” wherein the primary currency can fall only if all other currencys tend to rise. As all paper currencys weaken further, from fundamental deterioration of their respective economies, look for gold and energy prices to rise relentlessly. Phony money is to be exposed as increasingly lacking value, of lessening worth. Real money like gold and hard assets will mushroom upward in value. This is not poppycock, not a false preach to the choir. Money is flooding the entire world, most of it with a US$ denomination. The effect on US$-based pricing structures is unmistakable. All commodities will rise in price.
It is my expectation and forecast that the next round of currency appreciation will come from Asia !!! The Chinese yuan upgrade announced in July has marked this upcoming event as clearly as graffiti on subway walls, or on city street billboards. The Chinese will upgrade their yuan currency “at a measured pace” (HA HA) over the next few years. Sorry, could not resist. USGovt officials will applaud the process in a mindless fashion, despite how China will transfer higher material costs to the United States. Imagine a 2% Chinese upgrade every 4-6 months for as far as the eye can see. The best description might be “Chinese water torture” for the process. The topic of Chinese yuan upgrade and its many effects will be continually developed in the Hat Trick Letter. Diversified foreign reserve purchases will take time in Asia, and not just China. All of Asia will mimic their new industrial leader, China. Continued quiet accumulation of gold is certain by the Peoples Bank of China. Ownership by its private citizens has been encouraged. Future yuan upgrades will render lower their huge cost for imported commodities. The years 2002, 2003, 2004 were all about Europe in the currency world. The years 2005 to 2010 will be all about Asia, led by the Middle Kingdom. China will demand and receive a respected seat on the geopolitical stage, now dominated by the United States. While the Western world weakens from excessive debts, lost jobs, and heavy reliance upon Asia for industrial production, the opposite will occur in Asia. Look for steady growth and increasing strength coming from Asia. Resurgent vigor and strength will be reflected in Asian currencys, even in Japan.
The USDollar is toast, that much is certain. However, its path to the bottom of the barrel is not well mapped out for the observer. In order for the USDollar to be declared dead & buried, the entire world banking system must undergo a severe crisis and near death experience. To expect otherwise with a fast profitable dollar demise is naïve, indicative of unreasonable impatience. Brief fits & spurts of promising activity might actually become evident in coming months within the crippled US Economy. Some economic so-called experts point to improved US exports from the cheaper US$ exchange rate. Well, not so fast. Imports to the United States have grown by 23.5% since the beginning of 2004, overwhelming the 18.6% growth in exports from the USA. Sadly, if not tragically, the US Economy is attempting to revive itself via imports of products, imports of capital, and asset inflation. Anyone with a semblance of economic training and business intelligence can easily conclude that the prescription written by the USFed and the White House Council of Economic Advisors is bogus, bound to fail. To gold and energy investors, stay the course.
Uncle Sam will stumble around for at least a couple more years. Who knows what he is capable of doing while staggering, listing, bloated, and out of control? Are we certain about the next steps for the Iraqi War, its troop deployment, its costs? Are we certain about no additional new war fronts? Are we certain about our official reaction to dramatic shortages of key commodities? Are we likely to trigger a trade war with China which shoots ourselves in both feet? Can we be assured of continued cooperation on Asian credit supply, our lifeblood supplied by strangers? We have begun a highly risky dangerous new phase. Any hunter knows that a wounded bear is to be avoided, perhaps the most dangerous situation in the wild. Its path is unpredictable. Its ultimate position of dead on the ground is the only certainty. Where it will lie breathless, who knows? In what position it will lie still, who knows? Who it takes down in the process, who knows?
© 2005 Jim Willie, CB
Editorial Archive
Jim Willie CB is a statistical analyst in marketing research and retail forecasting. He holds a Ph.D. in Statistics. His career has stretched over 23 years. He aspires to thrive in the financial editor world, unencumbered by the limitations of economic credentials. Visit his free website to find articles from topflight authors at www.GoldenJackass.com
Rogue
Evacuees Treated as Internees by FEMA
Foreign mercenaries killing US citizens?
http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/fema_treats_evacuees_as_internees.htm
Wayne Madsen | September 9 2005
Reports continue to come into WMR that evacuees from New Orleans and Acadiana who have been scattered across the United States are being treated as "internees" and not dislocated American citizens from a catastrophe. Some FEMA facilities are preventing these internees from leaving on their own. Reports of mandatory registration and the issuing of FEMA ID cards suggest that FEMA, an agency that is rife with right-wing security goons and severely lacking in humanitarian workers, has other motives in treating poor and destitute American citizens as prisoners in their own country.
Meanwhile, WMR is receiving reports that mercenary private military contractors (PMCs) are now operating in the New Orleans metropolitan area. These may include foreign nationals with questionable human rights records in their native South Africa, Israel, Colombia, El Salvador, Britain, and Australia. PMCs have been extremely active in occupied Iraq, especially under the aegis of massive Pentagon omnibus contracts awarded to Halliburton and its Kellogg Brown & Root subsidiary. Joseph Allbaugh, the former FEMA director under Bush and current FEMA director Michael "Brownie" Brown's college roommate, is currently a registered lobbyist for disaster relief business for Kellogg Brown & Root. Allbaugh's lobbying firm is called the Allbaugh Group. Halliburton has recently been awarded lucrative contracts to repair U.S. Naval bases damaged by Katrina.
The presence of PMCs is worrisome. There are unconfirmed reports of mercenaries shooting residents of New Orleans and that mercenaries are involved in burning the bodies of victims in makeshift crematoria set up throughout the city. Three mercenary companies have been reported to be in the Nedw Orleans area: Blackwater USA, Steele Foundation, and Wackenhut. The reported burning of bodies could be an attempt by the White House to suppress the total death count to an "acceptable," "manageable," and "spinnable" level.
FEMA is anything but a humanitarian rescue and recovery organization. It is once again a hotbed of security goons as it was under Reagan and GHW Bush. The past is prologue.
A little history on FEMA: " When Ronald Reagan took over the presidency in 1981 he named his old California National Guard chief, retired General Louis Giuffrida as his emergency czar. Giuffrida had a tainted image as California's National Guard commander. He drew up lists of 'militant negroes' who were to be rounded up in emergencies. He designed 'Operation Cable Splicer,' which kept track of political dissidents in California, especially anti-Vietnam War protestors. When Giuffrida took over at FEMA, he began to embark on similar projects. FEMA began to store some 12,000 names it had obtained from the FBI's domestic intelligence files. FBI Director William Webster was so outraged at this interference in FBI matters he forced FEMA to turn the list back to the FBI. FEMA's surveillance lists may have included at least 100,000 U.S.A. citizens that were assumed to be potential threats to security. These included the names of survivalists and tax protestors." -- Wayne Madsen, Handbook of Personal Data Protection, Stockton Press (NY) and Macmillan (London), 1992.
Meanwhile, ABC News has reported that National Guard troops and police are arresting and confiscating the weapons of those in New Orleans who have refused to leave their homes. These include residents of some of the more affluent areas of New Orleans. What say you now National Rifle Association? You helped put these people in power and now your members are being arrested and having their weapons taken by the military and police. Does the NRA still support the Bush regime?
Rogue
Blackwater Mercenaries: Coming Soon to Your Town
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/mercenaries_coming_soon_to_your_town.htm
Kurt Nimmo | September 12 2005
It is now obvious how martial law (not officially declared as such) will work in America in the wake of the devastation of New Orleans. Instead of federal troops or an influx of National Guard troops sent to “restore order” (the latter mandated in our now anachronistic Constitution; see Article 1, Section 8) and empowered to “suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions,” in Louisiana the state and federal governments have brazenly violated the Constitution by sending in Blackwater Security and other private goon squads. “Heavily armed paramilitary mercenaries from the Blackwater private security firm, infamous for their work in Iraq, are openly patrolling the streets of New Orleans,” write Jeremy Scahill and Daniela Crespo. “Some of the mercenaries say they have been ‘deputized’ by the Louisiana governor; indeed some are wearing gold Louisiana state law enforcement badges on their chests and Blackwater photo identification cards on their arms. They say they are on contract with the Department of Homeland Security and have been given the authority to use lethal force.”
Soon after Katrina slammed into New Orleans, the media reported the presence of Blackwater goons (and have no doubt, Blackwater hires “special ops types from South Africa’s former apartheid regime,” according to James Ridgeway and others, people fairly characterized as murderous paramilitary goons). Initially, it was reported that Blackwater was hired to protect the property of New Orleans’ rich elite (and hotels and other businesses), but soon the company admitted it was “helping the U.S. Coast Guard Sept. 1 with search-and-rescue missions, lending one of its Puma helicopters for the missions…. [and] protecting facilities that house ‘priceless art pieces’ and special landmarks” from “looters” who were mostly interested in water and food, not priceless art. “We are preparing for a rather long deployment for this work,” Jack Serpas, who works for Securitas Security Services USA Inc., another “security” firm, told Marguerite Higgins of the Washington Post on September 10.
“As the threat of forced evictions now looms in New Orleans and the city confiscates even legally registered weapons from civilians, the private mercenaries of Blackwater patrol the streets openly wielding M-16s and other assault weapons,” note Scahill and Crespo, a fact that runs counter to Police Commissioner Eddie Compass’ assertion that only New Orleans law enforcement would carry and use weapons. In standard Bushian fashion, the Ministry of Homeland Security has feigned ignorance of this invasion of private security company goons in New Orleans. “A spokesperson for the Homeland Security Department, Russ Knocke, told the Washington Post he knows of no federal plans to hire Blackwater or other private security,” write Scahill and Crespo.
It’s like a scene out of Sinclair Lewis’ dystopic novel, It Can’t Happen Here. “Gun toting militias terrorize the nation at a local level, with the redneck morons handed leadership roles in every community, with the right to summarily execute people who say the wrong thing. Resistors are threatened with imprisonment or death if they don’t go public supporting the party line,” opines Rob Kall for Op-Ed News. “Lewis wrote his book in 1937, having see Hitler’s rise to Power. We’ve seen many articles describing how similarly the Bush administration has operated, starting with When Democracy Failed by Thom Hartmann. In 2002, Hartmann’s article seemed to reek of conspiracy theory and paranoia to some. Now, it is a frightening portent, characterizing too many parallels suggesting that we are much further along the dangerous road that Sinclair Lewis created as a fiction.” Kall continues:
An American city is under military rule, with citizens being dragged and handcuffed out of their homes, helpless, frail old women thrown around, manhandled, captured and thrown into transport trucks. FEMA has created “detainment camps” which people are not allowed to leave, where they get two meals a day, are not allowed to cook, can’t leave to go to church…
As our illegitimate president and his cronies keep telling us, it is only a matter of time before a terrorist nuke takes out an American city. If this happens (and we are told repeatedly it is not a matter of if but when), the Bush administration, FEMA, the Ministry of Homeland Security, and the Pentagon will be ready, having field tested their “response” in New Orleans. Expect Blackwater goons, experienced in killing “insurgents” in South Africa and Iraq, to enter your house—by way of kicking in the front door or pitching a stun grenade through the living room window—and confiscate your weapons and haul you off to a FEMA concentration camp. Of course, they will bear special badges, issued by a corrupt or compromised local government, and thus it will be said the gun and Constitution nuts resisting will be going up against the will of the people (that is to say the will of our neolib plutocratic overseers who have decided the Constitution and a constitutional republic are no longer workable under the rubric of their globalist agenda).
Unfortunately, many Americans are so brainwashed (and afraid of al-CIA-duh, due to an unrelenting and highly organized campaign of fake terror alerts) they are unable to realize the threat (due in large part to a complicit media that soft pedals totalitarianism as “compassion”). For as Sinclair Lewis wrote in his prophetic novel, “most of the easy-going descendants of the wise-cracking Benjamin Franklin had not learned that Patrick Henry’s ‘Give me liberty or give me death’ meant anything more than a high school yell or a cigarette slogan.” Many of them will come around when a goon trained by South Africa’s apartheid government shoves the muzzle of an M-16 in their faces, barking obscenities and smashing up the furniture. Of course, by then, it will be far too late
Rogue
Police forcibly tackling elderly, confiscating firearms and dragging them out of their homes
FOX News | September 12 2005
http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/gun_grab_police_force_elderly_out_of_homes.htm
So-called conservative O'Reilly lauds it as cops force their way into homes and aprehend dangerous insurgent old women.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLASHBACK: New Orleans Court Opens Door To Searches Without Warrants
WDSU | March 29, 2004
NEW ORLEANS -- It's a groundbreaking court decision that legal experts say will affect everyone: Police officers in Louisiana no longer need a search or arrest warrant to conduct a brief search of your home or business.
Leaders in law enforcement say it will keep officers safe, but others argue it's a privilege that could be abused.
The decision in United States v. Kelly Gould, No. 0230629cr0, was made March 24 by the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed in Denham Springs in 2000, in which defendant Gould filed a motion to suppress information gleaned from a search of his home. The motion was granted by district court, and the government appealed this decision. The March 24 ruling by the 5th Circuit is an affirmation of that appeal.
Searches Without Warrants
Agree With Ruling?
Discuss This Topic
Read The Opinion (Adobe Acrobat Required)
In the case, the Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office was contacted on Oct. 17, 2000, by a Gould employee who told officers that Gould intended to kill two judges and unidentified police officers and to destroy telephone company transformers. The LPSO informed the East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office of the threats.
A search of Gould's criminal history revealed several arrests and that he was "a convicted felon for violent charges," according to the Facts and Proceedings section of the 5th Circuit ruling.
When officers went to question Gould, they were told he was asleep. The officers asked if they could look inside for Gould, and were allowed to enter.
The officers testified that that they believed a search of the home was necessary to ensure their safety, given the allegations by Gould's employee and Gould's criminal history, according to the Facts and Proceedings section of the 5th Circuit ruling.
Gould's bedroom door was ajar, and officers testified they peered inside and saw no one. Thinking Gould could be hiding, the officers looked in three closets. In one of the closets, the officers found three firearms, according to the Facts and Proceedings section of the 5th Circuit ruling.
Gould was found hiding outside the home a few minutes later. He was taken into custody and questioned about the guns. The officers asked for and received Gould's consent to search the home, with Gould signing a waiver of search warrant. Gould subsequently was arrested for allegedly being a felon in possession of firearms.
One judge, Judge Grady Jolly, said he concurred in part and dissented in part with the majority opinion. Judge Jerry Smith, however, completely disagreed with the majority ruling, saying: "I have no doubt that the deputy sheriffs believed that they were acting reasonably and with good intentions. But the old adage warns us that 'the road to hell is paved with good intentions.'"
New Orleans Police Department spokesman Capt. Marlon Defillo said the new search power, which is effective immediately, will be used judiciously.
"We have to have a legitimate problem to be there in the first place, and if we don't, we can't conduct the search," Defillo said.
But former U.S. Attorney Julian Murray said the ruling is problematic.
"I think it goes way too far," Murray said, noting that the searches can be performed if an officer fears for his safety.
Defillo said he doesn't envision any problems in New Orleans.
"There are checks and balances to make sure the criminal justice system works in an effective manner," Defillo said.
Rogue
Montana's governor eyes coal to solve U.S. fuel costs
By Adam Tanner
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050825/pl_nm/energy_montana_dc
HELENA, Montana (Reuters) - Montana's governor wants to solve America's rising energy costs using a technology discovered in Germany 80 years ago that converts coal into gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel.
The Fischer-Tropsch technology, discovered by German researchers in 1923 and later used by the Nazis to convert coal into wartime fuels, was not economical as long as oil cost less than $30 a barrel.
But with U.S. crude oil now hitting more than double that price, Gov. Brian Schweitzer's plan is getting more attention across the country and some analysts are taking him very seriously.
Montana is "sitting on more energy than they have in the Middle East," Schweitzer told Reuters in an interview this week.
"I am leading this country in this desire and demand to convert coal into gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel. We can do it in Montana for $1 per gallon," he said.
"We can do it cheaper than importing oil from the sheiks, dictators, rats and crooks that we're bringing it from right now."
The governor estimated the cost of producing a barrel of oil through the Fischer-Tropsch method at $32, and said that with its 120 billion tons of coal -- a little less than a third of the U.S total -- Montana could supply the entire United States with its aviation, gas and diesel fuel for 40 years without creating environmental damage.
An entry level Fischer-Tropsch plant producing 22,000 barrels a day would cost about $1.5 billion, he said.
The Democratic governor of this Republican state said he had met with Shell president John Hofmeister, General Electric's CEO Jeff Immelt, as well as officials from the
Department of Defense, and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad to discuss his proposals.
Schweitzer added that the recently passed federal energy bill includes an 80 percent loan guarantee for a Fischer- Tropsch plant.
A former cattle rancher who lived for seven years in Saudi Arabia working on irrigation projects, Schweitzer is also seeking energy deals with other states, especially California.
California "says they need 25,000 megawatts of electricity during the next ten years," he said. "We'll give you a delivered price and we'll forward contract that for the next 20 years.
"Transmission companies from England, from Canada, from all over America are coming to my office and saying 'we'll build these transmission lines as soon as you have the contracts to build the generation."'
Rogue
Lentinman.....The real reason you "deleted the post" is because you CAN"T STAND a very educated and successful member of the Reagan Administration AGREE with me on the "Rising Fascist Police State".
IT LENDS MY ARGUMENT TOO MUCH CREDIBILITY FOR YOUR COMFORT ZONE!!
He was telling it like is and sounding "way too much" like me!!!
Are you a little insecure that you might just be one of those he accuses of "being brainwashed"????
Rogue
OTC....Im sure you just love the US milatary coming back from Iraq and shooting at American Ciizens!
Posse Commitatus...Out the Door!!
You must love US milatary troops going door to door to confiscate guns in America!
Throw the damn Bill of Rights right out the window!!
SADD....SAD...SAD!
Rogue
Lentinmam...you're bending my words. I'm not saying the crap you say said.
That said.....You better start getting familiar with 9/11 this weekend. Because that's where I'm going to take you and EDUCATE you.
You're a bright guy and it's sad to see you waste your intelligence on bending my word's.
I'm going to take you and everyone else onto the mat on that one......because to understand what really happened on 9/11 and the massive coverup of the truth is to understand where some would like to take this nation.
Denial isn't going to be a help you one bit when the "sh*t" hits the fan again.
Simple question for you "Mr. Skeptical"...
Where are we seeing more freedom and liberty in this nation????
All I see is a Rising Fascist Police State. If I told you 3 months ago the US milatary would be coming back to the States to fire upon US citizens you'd tell me "I was nuts".
YET THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED!!
You are living in DENIAL!
Rogue
Kroes Energy.....KRS.V or KRSYF(pinksheets). I've added several thousand shares on the recent price selloff. Technically very oversold.
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=KRS.V,uu[w,a]daolyyay[pb50!b200!f][vc60][iUb14!Lh14,3]&a...
Good value for the patient right here in my opinion.
Rogue
AnderL.....and I bet you still think the world is flat! LOL!
Some of you people are "something else".....
We put a man on the moon 36 years ago....
yet it is preposterous to think someone may have developed technology to change or alter or create weather??
That's illogical to dismiss the possibilty.
Rogue