Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm certainly not offended. Pretty sure the admin wouldn't be offended either.
I just don't understand what's being perceived as a mystery.
The info is there for whatever it's worth to those who may benefit from it.
.
.
Delcath.org is intended to be helpful & informative. It's not a forum. It has been shared (as indicated via links) with delcath BoD.
There's no "mystery" that I perceive here. The administrator obviously simply went to the time and trouble to compile this info onto a user-friendly site.
People here can take it or leave it.
No mystery;
just irrefutable info.
We can each use it as we wish or ignore it.
It's not a whodunit mystery.
.
.
BTIG: Yes and if I'm not mistaken, back on the 13th, they were scalping from
.0138 to .0139
Sar Parabolic? Along w/this pump, why didn't you mention that you also expect that they'll naked-short it to death so that it never gets above the float?
.
.
Winter Weather Advisories issued for Manhattan yesterday and this morning are still in place and are probably enough to have deterred travel and resulted in cancelled events....regardless of conditions at this very moment.
Superones, you were privy to only the earliest and only the least of my evidence. You're only privy to a tiny portion of evidence that was collected several months ago.
I know what I know and I'm watching this unfold for better or worse.
As far as my recent appearance on iHub, doesn't everyone start somewhere? Weak argument.
Some of your other acquaintances directed me here.
As I said before, you stay your course and I'll stay mine.
As for me being a troll, thank you.
I have no bashing or pumping agenda;
I'm only interested in seeing how this plays out and in gathering as much evidence as possible.
.
.
Whether Green or Red, it will continue to suck until the bad actors are gone.
.
.
Good observations. Let's not forget that this lawsuit is currently ongoing...
HB & Ayrton being sued for destroying companies:
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/fl-bz-patriot-national-lawsuits-20180117-story.html
And a simple Google search will tell you that hired forum-trolls are not mythical creatures.
I don't give Simpson and other board members much credit, but I believe the problem is bigger than are they.
Good post.
.
.
We All are the "parties that be". Except, of course, for the ones who may be "insiders".
There's a legitimate reason as to why the site is registered how & where it is. It's accomplishing its intended purpose & delcath BoD is aware the site exists.
.
.
.
Yes many of us know the admin. The site is perfectly legit or I'd personally not be involved in sharing it publicly.
.
.
Oh, I see. When at first you don't "believe" someone's claim, you question their credibility and the claim.
Then, when you realize the claim has merit, you discredit the info as being irrelevant.
LOL, you sure know how to ignore the obvious.
.
.
I'm unable to post my phone recordings here.
However, the burden of proof is quite "light" actually and the proof is easily discoverable by every individual shareholder.
Simpson better than people think? Yes, she's extremely good at approving (or at least condoning) misuse of funds. Why does a struggling company need so much expensive, unused office space...and why are they buying houses and land?
She's using her expertise alright.
.
.
Yes, it can and has been verified via the office building realtor and, in addition, by the U.S. Postal Service.
Normal risk? Yes, of course. One always runs the "risk" of rogue company officers' dereliction of duty.
That is why there's a law to protect companies and shareholders from such.
This situation is in no way equivalent to unwise investing.
When shareholders invest unwisely, or if they gamble on a pump that doesn't pan-out, that's bad luck at best, poor dd at worst. In such cases, the burden of blame falls on only the trader; no laws broken.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty is a risk protected by law, however.
Big difference.
.
.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty easily defined:
(1) Failure to disclose certain information.
(2) Misappropriation of funds. (3) Misuse of influential position.
(4) Neglect of responsibilities. (5) Misrepresentation with regard to a statement of fact.
.
.
Responsibility as a shareholder notwithstanding; it's your responsibility as a person of "character" (if the shoe fits) to care about what I'm referring to.
.
.
Look to the Karen Leung foundation for one.
There are others.
You're not digging deep enough.
If you're a day trader just passing by, no need to.
If you're a long term investor or a bystander of character, you will.
Perhaps "you" should give pause to your own conflicting posts and views which seem to only reflect what you "wish" to be true.
You can continue to apologize-away their actions till the cows come home.
....or till, what many of us know as Fact...comes back to bite them in the rear.
You're not fooling anyone;
well, not anyone that matters.
.
.
Poppycock. You're assuming all people here have never been involved in a stock split, have never invested in another stock before and that they always gripe and moan when things don't go their way.
What is it about "fraud"
that you don't understand?
.
Poppycock. You're assuming all people
Addendum: Then why do members continue to flood my inbox w/ PM's wanting to know more? You say "there's no one here who hasn't heard me nor do they need to hear it again."
My inbox would suggest otherwise.
Many people don't have the cajones to express interest in public.
(No offense to anyone who's PM'd me. Just sayin'.....
It's okay to not run with the cool crowd; no need to hide.)
.
Pete & rePete: I know you, too.
I think it's safe to assume I have a right to continuing repeating myself and my thoughts and my discoveries...
just as many other users continue to pete & repeat theirs.
I have stated very few opinions.
I don't need them because I'm working with facts.
Opinions are not feelings.
Opinions must be at least somewhat rooted in fact or it's irresponsible to refer to that thought as an opinion.
I thought your opinion was well-stated. I have no problem with you.....yet.
You, however, must have a problem with me.
You don't mind "repeats" as long as they "repeat" what you "want" to hear, perhaps.
I'm sure there are many who are trading this stock from the bottom-up...simply to catch a run on an orchestrated pump,
and that's excellent. That's their agenda.
There are those who are just bitter because they've invested unwisely and they just want to slam the company.
Then there are those (often entwined) who are less concerned with loss and are hell-bent to bust a scamming company due to facts they've uncovered because no company should get away with it, especially not while holding Chemosat hostage.
You're only privy to a tiny portion of what I and others have uncovered regarding this company.
You'd be shocked.
Good luck to you.
You stay on your mission and I'll stay the course of mine.
.
.
Perhaps, but not likely. As summarized by you,
"...based on nothing at all."
Again, there is always going to be a segment of scarred and scorned shareholders who wish to do nothing but "Slam" a company after they've lost big on their investment.
That is only one segment of us.
Many of us, regardless of our investment success or failure are troubled by the obvious fraud and deception perpetrated by this company...which, in turn,
has suppressed the product and deprived needy patients of beneficial treatment.
Our concerns are not solely based on the fear and loathing of past or future monetary losses;
they're based on the company's lengthy track-record of squandering funds, misusing and misleading shareholders and other malfeasances which leaves the fate of Chemosat in
the dirty hands of bad actors.
.
.
Delcath shareholder site update:
I've been informed that the site
https://delcath.org/
has been
"updated"
to include Delcath's
"outdated"
and
"evaded"
Code
of
Conduct
and
Ethics.
.
Weak, irrelevant response. Investment expertise is not the issue here;
Fiduciary duty to shareholders, code of conduct and ethical management is.
There is actually a segment of people (current investors or not) who are interested in seeing the product be brought to market asap under proper management and without the undertones and stigma of fraud.
.
Regurgitation of known info & vague, obligatory mention of prospects and possibilities is Not commendable as being impressively "informative" in this situation.
.
Job Opportunity: $589K yr.. Skills: Power Point proficiency.
Where do I sign up?
.
How about sleuths w/ documented evidence?
A little "something" can't negate a lotta "nothing".
Furthermore, my personal position or non-position is irrelevant.
My primary interest, as should be everyone's (imo) is busting them due to the documented evidence of malfeasance & fraudulent activity in order to free-up a product that may have the potential to extend lives.
Chemosat's being smothered, whether it be from mismanagement/malfeasance...
or whether it's from injunctions and/or lawsuits that would help to put Chemosat into capable hands.
Something's gotta give and the truth will come out.
Mark my words.
.
Irrelevant. Doesn't address the topic at hand.
Just because an overpaid, unqualified CEO can cram for a final-exam and, every now & then, somewhat effectively execute an obligatory presentation, means nothing.
It's the very very least that could be expected of her.
If that's all the ammo you got to legitimize Simpson,
well....
that's
sad.
.
Not everyone's so easily seduced by a siren-song.
Nonsense. These malfeasances were not transparent, nor were they "discoverable" with the typical due diligence.
Shareholders had to resort to detective-work in order to uncover most of these egregious behaviors and issues.
Blaming it on the shareholder will not cut-it...regardless of how hard you attempt to explain it away.
Furthermore, we don't expect them to be "perfect" (as you stated "not everything they've done is good".)
That's an understatement.
They've gone out of their way to do "bad".
They became so accustomed to lying to shareholders that they'd often lie when it would've been easier and more beneficial to them to tell the truth.
If you're going to lie, you need to be very good at it...and clearly, they're not.
Blaming "current" mismanagement on Hobbs is a weak argument.
Are you suggesting that the funds that are still being squandered on empty Manhattan office spaces are a non-issue?
And you'be started that you are also "okay" with it if she draws more than Double the average CEO's salary+perks and
possibly doesn't even work full time?
Wow. Where do I sign up?
Whether this company was sitting on a breakthrough treatment for cancer....or whether it was a company producing "fertilizer", that's bad business...shareholders or not.
You're very dedicated and talented at excusing bad behavior.
I gotta give it to ya.
It takes guts to publicly display that level of unscrupulousness.
Derelict of fiduciary duty. I'm not from Manhattan either. I'm far-away from there.
However, our group made the connection last year and began making calls to verify all their addresses.
At first, we were just disturbed to find out that they'd be in such an expensive office-space.
Imagine our surprise (and outrage) when we later discovered that they were paying rent there but weren't conducting "business" there for, at least, the last 2 years.
All verified, recorded and irrefutable.
If so, Sam, then what have I said that you "don't" agree with?
I don't post much regarding fundamentals and technicals because, although I have friends whom I trust with "deep" due diligence in that regard, I know a lot about fraud and I have a lot of irrefutable evidence.
What is it I've said that you think you can refute?
You're just now learning this? Most expensive, posh office-spaces in Manhattan...sitting empty.
Verified by recorded phone calls to the office-building management company and via the postal service...vacant for 2 years!
Seriously: As Shareholders we should have a right to demand a decrease in those extraordinarily inflated salaries at least until the company is making money and meeting goals.
Any member of the BoD who's there to just collect an inflated salary without producing results doesn't need to be there anyway...obviously...especially in a bio tech company with a promising life-extending product.
If they had a passion for what they're doing (which one should have if in the the medical/bio field) they'd have no problem taking a salary cut for the team.
Otherwise, go to work in another field.
One can live comfortably on much less, especially when accomplishing Nothing in return.