Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
what am i soppposed to do
Try spelling it soapposed and you'll have the right idea.
i can't wait 2 weeks, no one will remember the topic at hand?
You need to be a bit more careful about what you think is "at hand" in the Jailhouse. You could be the topic and you would wish it was only at hand.
Contrary to what you think, folks here do have the capacity to remember things for a couple of weeks.
Look, just because Susie is out of town, don't go confusing my wag with her in the squish department.
But, but, but, he started it!
As long as he's not BI with you it shouldn't matter should it?
You nailed that one.
~~~~~COMPX 9/08/2003~~~~~
Previous Close 1,858.24 -10.73
1824 rayrohn
1840 Horsetrader*
1854 Susie924**
1869 WTMHouston
* Horsetrader picks 1840 for the week.
**Susie's pick for the week too while she is in N'awlins! (is that spelled right?)
Just what is it that the frog is eating? It sure looks like a pile of something.
I was so dulled from reading hundreds of posts here that it went right past me. Half-hour later had a blonde moment and the light bulb went off while I was in middle of doing something else. Always wondered how that felt -- the blonde moment that is. Of course, now I can better understand and relate to blondes and all it took was a taste of 869.
Times like this I wish the edit window was unlimited. Those don't usually get by me.
Some more new math: 669 (sex sixty-nine) comes after 869 (ate sixty-nine).
Only 669 or so.
That link does not work for anyone, even though the pic comes up by itself with the url. AK got the pic to post because he reposted the pic on another site and thus had a different url.
My wife walked in just as I was playing that sound file. Explaining got me a serious eye roll.
I have 128
I prefer 269.
I'll take Miami to win this week.
Nah, keep it weekly. Just because there are days when the food is better than others is no reason to stop eating.
Once someone is charged, let me know so I can step in, collect a HUGE fee, and get them off.
Hey now, big boy. There were some things you were not supposed to talk about. By the way, where did you two end up after I left? He sure was smiling the next day.
How much do you want to bet I could get MMMary to take a photo of herself in an iHub T-shirt?
This fits firmly into the "be careful what you ask for, you just might get it" category.
the name of the lady's husband is Heywood Jablowme.
And her fling was with Studley Hungwell, who knew her as Iva D. Bush when she was Neva B. Forlade.
As for old Heywood, he was formerly known as Richard N. Hand.
I beg your pardon?
That is a good start, just don't bend over while you are begging.
I bet the guy on top would have a different attitude if the frog was aimed slightly differently. Might still be thrashing, but would be smiling while doing so.
Packer here.
You ought to be a little more discreet about bragging about that in here. Beware all packees.
How often do you dip your pickle in mustard?
You might have more success asking about his cherry dipping.
what happened to my wink?
I think he answered you with the frog pic. Wink, wink.
One man's wink is another one's....well you get the idea.
Is this what you were trying to post?
FWIW, I tried to do yours and it didn't work for me either!
What has this place become when a great line like that goes unnoticed.
No wonder his did not work. He has intentionally given you one that does not work so you will keep trying to do his.....it is the oldest con game around.
New math: 4 + 4 = 6.
Proof: Getting this foursome:
together with this foursome:
often results in this sixsome:
Churak looks like he is trying to move in on the 1669, 1769, and 1869 wags.
Hot dog....my two cents was finally worth something -- not much, but something.
Nope, thankfully. That deal gave new meaning to it "not being worth the paper it was written on." A real shitty agreement, if you catch my drift.
I think I understand it, I just don't understand the significance of it.
It seems a lot like the toilet seat complaint -- I understand it, I just don't see the significance of it.
In that vein, I cut a deal a few weeks ago. I'll put the toilet seat down every time I finish if she'll put it up every time she finishes. Let's just say I have one hell of a breach of contract action and I think I am going back to leaving it up.
The other stats were easy. Only took about an hour. Pulling second place stuff would be a real uncrown like royal pain in the arse and would require looking at every days results and the final wag posting for the day. I'll let someone else tackle that one.
Better yet, I'll just concede that Phil is the Prince of the second place wags. Some might call that being a permanent loser -- or always a bridesmaid (he could qualify for some kind of permanent jailhouse position as a permanent bridesmaid) but I would never say any of that.
I don't mind him posting it here, (like any of us have any room to complain about anythings relationship to a fixed topic and, actually, I kind of like it since it spruces up our regular dull monotonous colors), but I, too, am curious about the significance of it. Perhaps he will explain.
We don't tolerate jack from Canadians.
Just Crown.
It sounds like fun, but I have NO desire to keep up with the PCBM thread to do it. Tater ought to create a new thread for it -- of course, that would likely land it in the premium section and exclude some folks.
If it is AK in the hat, one has to wonder what use he has planned for the exposed tongue. Should Churak be worried? It does not appear to be a tongue in cheek moment. Then again, maybe this is just a classic example of lazy tongue syndrome.
Wow, talk about a bearish group with weekend worries.
Wish I had checked the wags before cut-off time. I could have dropped my wag to play a pure default. Then again, the 50 state's legal wag may still be better than a squish.
~~~~~COMPX 9/05/2003~~~~~
Previous Close 1,868.98 +16.08
1849 timhyma
1869 WTMHouston
Might as well give it another shot....the "try anything once and twice if I like it" theory of wagging.
In some places, those would be fighting words. Last I heard, lap dances were poopular around the showers in the Jail.
Actually, off by .02. I have been waiting for an opportunity to contribute my two cents worth.
Something like this, sans the ". . ."?
I think. . .I'll. . .summarize here.
We. . .want. . .to. . .read anything and everything in it. . .we. . .want to. There are. . . important things. . .from a technical viewpoint. . . .the messages can be read using direct access to the database. The. . .field they're stored in. . .display when accessing the database directly. . . .such routines exist on either site. . . .we all use. . . .routines available to us. . . .to. . .read messages not from or to us. . .the site sees us as. . .the exception. . . . Your PM's here are. . .less "secure" than your emails. . .people at your ISP can. . .read your emails. PM's. . .that're accessible from anywhere. . .they're no more "secure" in any other regard.. . .Oh, and. . .either of us can read someone else's mail. . .That's easy to do. It take seconds. . . we. . .do that. . .And for my own part (Matt likely does the same. . .), I. . .look at the PM. . .most of the time . . .it's been because they've done something bad. . .
I've figured out how to. . .log. . .in as them. . . .So, the short answer is: Yes, we. . .definitely read your PM's. . . .
Betcha I see a short. . .quote from this message on RB soon.