Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump.
IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme.
420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service.
That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on MSRT insofar as its viability as an investment is concerned.
Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
How much did outstanding shares increase in the last 6 months?
Must be more than I thought. That's not a good sign.
lol That's not even true.
Nothing but carnage after the 420Investor service "recommended" the buy at $1.32, touting a target of $4.20.
lol I swear I've never witnessed more consistently failed trades than I have observing 420Investor.
MSRT$4.20Investorlol #Fail(again)
lol There is no "strip dispensary."
"The strip" is a very specific area in Las Vegas and TRTC does not have, nor does it plan to have, a dispensary on the strip.
Worth noting - the location near the strip (not all that near, really) where TRTC has proposed operations happens to be one of Vegas' worst crime hotspots. It is not somewhere that attracts tourists, nor is it an area frequented by tourists...i.e. It's not the strip.
Such a shame to see constant fabricated hype:
Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
UPDATE:"Nevada property 'purchase' EXPOSED?":
• DEED SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *TEN DOLLARS.
• PRESS RELEASE SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *THREE HUNDRED AND FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS.
TRTC told shareholders that $344,000 of THEIR money was spent on purchasing property that OFFICIAL RECORDS indicate they only paid TEN DOLLARS for?:
http://icris.washoecounty.us/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/4490937.pdf?id=DOC815S12590.A0&parent=DOC815S12590
This is an unbelievably startling red flag, and JUST THE BEGINNING.
WHY HAS TRTC FAILED TO COMMENT ON THIS?!
As we suggested after alerting the closure of our long term position at $1.39, TRTC is obviously TOXIC to shareholders.
Our level of accuracy continues to go unmatched, folks. LOOK INTO IT.
Be wary of the fabricated hype ---->
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
NOTICE: We deal in facts supported by official records, not hype.
••IS THIS FOR REAL?!••
So TRTC's former biggest fan, the 420Investor service, which "recommended" folks buy and hold at prices as high as .58, suggested folks cut their losses from the service's recent entry "recommendation" at .18.
The 420Investor service's "recommendation" was to take a ~40% LOSS on TRTC! ••LOL••
Crazy isn't it?
TRTC's most adamant promoter doesn't even have faith in the stock hitting .18 again!
Sounds bad, I know...but the 420Investor service has been the laughing stock of this sector for years...making "recommendations" that routinely resulted in immediate carnage for anyone who would fall for them.
That being said - since the 420Investor service's "recommendation" is to exit on huge losses, maybe the stock will finally gain some steam...history strongly suggests that the profitable move to make is the opposite of whatever this service says...
So maybe this is TRTC's big break!?
lol Definitely not - but it's funny nonetheless.
More proof that TRTC is THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector.
I guess when all else fails, we resort to making things up?
We all know that's not the truth. But hey - whatever works. Being that 420Investor service's performance has resulted in 78% losses since inception, I'm sure these are desperate times. No hard feelings.
Bagholder stock.
When I bought my first stock, I accepted things at face value instead of looking at the big picture...mainly because it made me feel better.
But it didn't take long before I realized how costly that would become.
California law prohibits IVXX from generating and/or disbursing profits. Shareholders have no way of benefitting from such transactions. The only parties capable of benefitting are insiders. Therein lies the problem. What's more, sources indicate IVXX will continue to operate in this way until 2018.
Don't get trapped folks.
To everyone who isn't trapped with expensive shares, this represents one of TRTC's most glaring red flags:
No doubt. This company can't survive without significant dilution. I think this is exceedingly clear to market participants based on the overall lack of interest. TRTC is certainly not a stock I'd like to be stuck with.
Technical bounce will lead to more disappointment. Don't get trapped folks.
MSRT420Investorlol
The bid dumping is constant. When a pennystock is this blatantly overvalued, I certainly can't blame'em for selling.
When's the next round of toxic financing going to be announced? Soon by the looks of it.
Be careful with these bagholder stocks folks.
Sorry, but the reality is, to the folks out there who haven't spent years being trapped after going "all in at .80,"
the big picture remains unchanged:
TRTC has all the obvious characteristics of a typical pump & dump, and shares are indisputably overvalued by a tremendous margin.
The overarching theme (as illustrated by the chart) is simple: No value for shareholders = No value per share.
Bagholder stocks are always the most adamantly promoted, yet worse performing stocks on the market. TRTC is the posterstock of this unfortunate reality.
Be careful folks. Fabricated hype is everywhere.
•••TRTC EXPOSED ON SEEKING ALPHA•••
This expose' is a bagholder's worst nightmare. Is it hard to find buyers when this information is so readily available?:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2256753-terra-tech-a-natural-born-capital-killer
What happened?
Lots of confusion around here. It's a shame that this stock has apparently trapped so many first time investors. Literally all of the company's support comes from investors trapped with huge losses.
More disturbing is that presumably, that was the goal when the company was first listed and promoted like a typical pump & dump.
There is a reason 99% of investment professionals tell their clients not to touch penny stocks...and the reason is that most, like TRTC, offer no value whatsoever to shareholders.
TRTC is THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector. Don't get trapped.
lol If you say so.
Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
I remember my first stock.
This statement doesn't make even the slightest bit of sense. Just fyi.
Unfortunately market cap has nothing to do with the company's viability as an investment...so TRTC's standing on that list is largely irrelevant.
Another 200k shares dumped at the bid right away this morning, after the 400k dumped at the bell yesterday.
This is headed lower.
I lol'd. You're right. What do I know ;)
MSRT is down ~35% since our most recent exit alert.
Down even more from the 420Investor service's touting of a $4.20 target. Unreal.
And there you go...nearly 400k shares dumped on the bid into close.
There's no excuse for being fooled by these tricks, especially when we're here kindly spelling it all out.
Don't get had folks.
MSLP - Still not $6.
The carnage continues.
MSRT420Investorlol
You serious?
Our target of .10 was announced when we alerted our long term exit back at $1.39. Call it doom and gloom if you want, but our level of accuracy continues to go unmatched.
Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
Low volume pops, big volume drops. Huge red flag for traders. Significant stakeholders continue to dump this on retail "investors."
Overvalued. Overhyped. Doomed.
Look at what this stock has done ever sonce the 420Investor service touted a target of $4.20. Pure carnage...as if everyone saw the service's target, laughed, and raced toward the exit. lol How does this happen over and over again?
420Investor touts stock ---> Stock crashes 40%.
It's literally just funny at this point.
••••TRTC ON SEEKING ALPHA••••
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2256753-terra-tech-a-natural-born-capital-killer
Lots of confusion around here. It's a shame that this stock has trapped so many first time investors...
More disturbing is that presumably, that was the goal when the company was first listed and promoted like a typical pump & dump.
There is a reason 99% of investment professionals tell their clients not to touch penny stocks...and the reason is that most, like TRTC, offer no value whatsoever to shareholders.
TRTC is THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector. Don't get trapped.
lol I can't blame anyone for trying...but so far there STILL hasn't been a single example that substantiates the allegation that the article is "full of false information."
That's a huge, detailed article and STILL nothing within it that was stated as fact has been proved to be false. Pretty odd for something that is allegedly "full of false information."
100% Pure Bagholder Stock
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
Don't get trapped.
Alllllll that and still not a single example of anything stated as fact within the article that has proved to be "false information" as alleged.
lol Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
That's funny...because we all know that the article is extremely well supported by a vast number of resources...all of which are referenced AND LINKED in the appendix.
The author of the article indicated his/her opinion that the bankruptcy and securities violations made it less likely for TRTC to receive licenses. Notice that I requested examples of information stated as fact within the article that have proved to be false...not examples of opinions.
That article is genuinely MASSIVE and filed to the brim with STATEMENTS OF FACT. If the article is "full of false information," why is it that the only example anyone can provide isn't even a statement of fact, but rather a statement of opinion?
So again, if the article is "full of false information," why is it so difficult to get specific examples?
Again - Please provide SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF INFORMATION STATED AS FACT that has proved to be false.
All I know is that KindFinance is consistently accurate. Check it out.
KF was certainly right about MSLP, no question there.
Good luck guys!
I don't recall that. Got a link?
Still not a single specific example of said "false information"?
That's a giant article...to allegedly be "full of false information," it sure is hard to get examples!
Is that because the article is in-fact SPOT ON?