Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You might be late for those, but take a shot. Bayport may hit over 2 cents this week alone.
Any that exit there will be missing the boat.
This appears to be very tightly wound. Bayport should soar very shortly.
....and many of those 55M are tightly held by long term holders. I know my group has a little over 2M of that 55M, and we have no intention of slimming it down until well over 5 cents.
Thanks for clearing this up for all of us.
On another issue, I am really glad Simon Shainberg is now connected with Bayport as he will be introducing fantastic opportunities to Bayport.
.....and zero sellers. Know when to hold em'.
Great, since the float has not changed, that confirms that these were all/most restricted shares. Those are used to obtain assets for the company, and do not benefit anyone other than shareholders. I guess that has some bearing on the announcements in the pipeline for us shareholders.
I am confused by your statement. Where may I read his posts? I am interested in reading some hype on Bayport.
I think your bogus allegations have been asked and answered many times here over the past week or two. Bayport is doing the right thing for shareholders....stay tuned as more stuff is on the way.
I would guess that shares are involved....of a restricted nature. Which make it all more plausible that we see a good run in this company stock to make those shares worth more than they are today. That is great, and thank you for pointing me to that.
I am not sure what you are referring to....but daily I see some large bids that no one seems to want to sell to.
end prize I am referring to is a boatload of folding money when the audit is published to the SEC, the company gets uplisted, and all the new and other ongoing ventures show the profit.
If they were trying to sell shares we would see dilution. But I had again confirmed with the transfer agent that we only have 230M shares outstanding, and most of those are restricted until next year.....that is unless we get uplisted, and then they would be tradeable sooner. That is definitely something I would accept with open arms.
Since you ask the question.....If you follow my posts, as you obvious do, you would know that my shares were accumulated over a period of 5 or 6 years, going back to EXTO days. My average cost was .0005 or a little less. I sold out in February of 2014, when the stock went to .002 or so. I made in the neighborhood of $70K on that trade. My current 1M shares have a cost basis of about .005. As to the allegation that they played the MMJ card to do something...as you are no doubt aware, they almost immediately announced the pull out of that venture, when their attorney suggested that they do so. Is there anything else I can answer for you to help others on the board understand positions.
LMAO at this. We need to keep our eyes on the end prize, and not get distracted by meaningless bumps in the road, most of which are erroneous mirages. Bayport longs will be awaiting next week with excitement in their eyes. Love the way things are happening. By next week I should be at least able to buy some more shares.
If they were pumping, would they not be trying to sell stock. The only stock issued since the RS....which was a long time ago....has been restricted stock for acquisition purposes. Please tell me where Bayport has sold any tradeable stock into the market. The best person to confirm this with is the transfer agent.
This is the audit from the 'licensed CPA' that we are expecting shortly. Will there be an issue with that?
Dear Curious,
Bayport International has only been in business a little over three years, what is this 2006 that is being quoted here?
Rubs1
Why would it need to be 'discussed' when it is filed. Will there be an issue with it? Like I said........
Remember James Porter has again been nominated to Micro-cap Ethical CEO of the Year.
As I said, I knew it would move on quickly. Like when they publish their financials, there will be chatter about how the numbers are bogus, the CPA is not accredited, it was done under duress, etc, etc. Bayport has so many irons in the fire that they want to talk about, I would not be surprised to see one or two come out next week. These moon boots are made for walkin'....to da bank.
This is one of the few agencies that I do have much confidence in...as I know some DEP workers, and how seriously they take their jobs, and the interest shown by their management in their results. Bayport has a winner here.
There is no doubt that governmental agencies do not always care about what they do....however, when it comes to the DEP, I know how much scrutiny they come under when something goes wrong. The fact that we are talking about the DEP, like the FDA, where the public safety is at risk, I know we are on solid ground with our venture. You are incorrect in your statements.
Who would be dumb enough to hand their cash over to him????? People that know ability, and knowledge. Dumb people do not typically have $45K to throw around without having done some DD.
LMAO.....I knew that once the ridiculous concern about the condition of the tanks went away, the next things would be the irrelevant stuff you bring up now. What will be next???? The neighbors might not like the color choice when the painting is done???? Bayport is on the verge of more announcements.
As you well know, my comment was about the assumption that the DEP would let it go for that period of time. That is a ridiculous assumption. They do not leave it as an open item for as long as it takes, they will either have it condemned or sue the owner to clean it up. What you are suggesting is really not reality.
Really funny that you would post something like this, as all sites remain inactive until they are activated again. Meaningless. All projects are open to any potential DEP appearances and may be open at any time due to constant potential work on site when that happens with piping-tank repair-soil movement-tank cleaning-etc. No such statement has been made by DEP at this site. I have investigated this. They also bought it in 2004, so what you guessed at it not accurate.
I guess than you agree with the fact that the government would not allow this to be in the shape you say it is in if there really was an issue. I would love to see any official link to this situation on a DEP website...that is within the last 3 years.
I do not promote, I just post known facts, not fiction.
What a load of crud. I have never seen any pink stock tout that were in the final stages of an audit, and give the auditors name, unless it was true. Would love to see these situations you refer to.
Wish I could share my information....but it will become public knowledge soon enough. At that point many will wish they owned and were not short Bayport shares.
So, we are to believe that the DEP has let this go unmitigated for 12 years. I call a massive BS on that. But, even assuming you have concrete facts, and are correct, I have not read the contract of the JV deal. So, unless you are aware of the particulars that is huge speculation, that is probably incorrect.
LMFAO, just because these ventures never were completely profitable, does not mean that Bayport did not attempt to make them work. As you your 'speculation' of what they did with any issued shares, when I see proof of your allegation, I will believe it. Having personally dealt with the management of Bayport I think I know what their intent is.....and that is to make this company grow....in spite of some trying to drag it down. This is a company to bet on.
I believe enough has been said on both sides of that subject. I actually found the banter very boring, as no new information was presented in the past few days. Bayport has this property, and it either will be useful or it won't. Any argument about it at this point is useless.
Don't know what the issue is on this....As I have stated here prior....a few times.....I had an NDA, and the auditor needed to confirm some facts with me.
Wrong, as Bayport International has not even been in existence for more than 3 years. I do not know what company you could be referring to....and of course revenues do exist here.
Thanks for your pity. I, and my associates are holding in the neighborhood of 5% of the float. Pity is not anything I need (but will accept), but rather an idea of where to spend the profits that will be rolling in when Bayport regains the credibility that it had lost with no information being published. We will now see what has been going on behind the curtain, and it is good news for us investors/speculators.
There is no sell off, and this company is growing. I pity anyone that has not at least gotten their toes wet with some shares by next week. I know I will be sitting pretty when the real news hits. We just got a small taste of it this morning.
James Porter, CEO of Bayport, has spent the last few years working with Bayport to turn it into a profitable venture for us shareholders. He should be crowned Micro-cap Ethical CEO of the Year.
If this is true, and in force today, then why has the SEC allowed him to be involved here. Because it is not in force, as it had been settled years ago.