Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yeah, I calculated over the last 2 years, only 3% of volume was due to shorts.
4 shares traded on Friday. Why didn't you pick any up then when you had the chance to?
Only 4 shares traded today. Is this company even still in business?
Hot Ventures has been associated with DarkPulse for years - their relationship with DarkPulse isn't new.
Yeah... not good for shareholders, again.
Also, BVTK's accountants are not allowed to work in the OTC which further complicates the situation. How many accountants have they gone through in the past few years (3-4)?
LOL, no.
You did a Trademark query, not a patent query by assignee. We're not talking about trademarks, we're talking about patents.
Here's the link to the database:
https://assignment.uspto.gov/patent/index.html#/patent/search
If, as you say, DPLS does have patents assigned to them, what are the patents/patent numbers?
The SEC does nothing to verify patents, the USPTO does. Penny stock CEOs mislead investors in filings all the time..
Per the USPTO NO PATENTS have been transferred OR assigned to DarkPulse despite what Dennis has said in his filings to the SEC. I've posted the screenshot that proves it multiple times.
Are you saying the USPTO is wrong?
Shareholder: they own patents
USPTO: they don't own any patents
Shareholder: but Dennis said...
USPTO: nope, no patents
Shareholder: The USPTO is wrong, call them
LOL, smh
Nope.
Per the USPTO themselves NO PATENTS have been "transferred, and assigned to the Company" despite what you reference in your post.
DPLS entered into an Assignment Agreement with the University of New Brunswick, Canada (“the University”), pursuant to which the University sold, transferred, and assigned to the Company
DarkPulse said the University sold, transferred, and assigned certain patents to them. Why doesn't the USPTO database show any patents Assigned to or owned by DarkPulse?
Agreement with the University of New Brunswick, Canada (“the University”), pursuant to which the University sold, transferred, and assigned to the Company certain patents related to the University’s BOTDA dark-pulse technology
DarkPulse doesn't own any patents despite the CEO saying they do.
Per $DPLS filings:
Agreement with the University of New Brunswick, Canada (“the University”), pursuant to which the University sold, transferred, and assigned to the Company certain patents related to the University’s BOTDA dark-pulse technology
$DPLS - DD Thread
The CEO Dennis O'Leary is a NYC tour guide and con man. They don't own any patents despite saying they do. They have no offices and no product. No revenue in 11 years, millions in debt. A 3.2 BILLION O/S and a 20 BILLION A/S. Shareholders will get diluted to hell then they'll reverse split and do it again
Your own post contradicts what you're saying.
Why doesn't the US Patent Office show ANY patents being "sold, transferred, and assigned" to DarkPulse whatsoever. NOTHING in the USPTO database reflects what you and Dennis are saying.
If a patent was sold to DarkPulse and transferred/assigned "Assignee" would show DarkPulse, not UNB still.
Agreement with the University of New Brunswick, Canada (“the University”), pursuant to which the University sold, transferred, and assigned to the Company certain patents related to the University’s BOTDA dark-pulse technology
No, it's facts. The USPTO doesn't show DarkPulse as having the rights to or owning ANY patents despite you and Dennis saying they do. We've proven that to be false through the USPTO's own database.
It’s Just semantics trying to discredit the company
...but the USPTO doesn't show they do. Why is that? DarkPulse's name isn't shown anywhere as having the rights or being an Assignee/owner.
Per Dennis's Twitter post:
Some have already been changed into darkpulse' name...
That's not accurate, per Dennis's own Twitter post 2 years ago...
Why doesn't the USPTO show DarkPulse's name anywhere despite Dennis saying "Some have already been changed into darkpulse' name"
Some have already been changed into darkpulse' name rest will also be updated but not a priority as we've purchased them
Some have already been changed into darkpulse' name rest will also be updated but not a priority as we've purchased them
— DarkPulse (@DarkPulseTech) September 20, 2017
Why doesn't the US Patent Office show any patents assigned to or owned by DarkPulse? Anybody can search the database easily. Nothing is assigned/owned by DarkPulse despite what Dennis says.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=158560379
LOL. Source?
Idiotspenny was telling people that they missed the run a couple of weeks before that when it went to .0003.
On that same tweet thread Dennis said some patents have already been changed into DarkPulse's name yet the US Patent Office doesn't show DarkPulse as the Assignee/Owner on any patents.
Some have already been changed into darkpulse' name rest will also be updated but not a priority as we've purchased them
Some have already been changed into darkpulse' name rest will also be updated but not a priority as we've purchased them
— DarkPulse (@DarkPulseTech) September 20, 2017
LOL. Last I heard he was wearing a Batman suit in Times Square grifting off tourists.
Nope. It's just a shell with a P.O. Box/mail forwarding service and a bunch of lies.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=158536325
Why doesn't the USPTO show any of this? No patents are owned or assigned to DarkPulse per the US Patent Office itself.
...the University sold, transferred, and assigned to the Company certain patents
If DarkPulse owns it why does it say
Current Assignee: University of New Brunswick
Who owns the patent?
Its been a year since Bravatek submitted any SEC financials. Are they even still in business?
$DPLS is a pile of poop waiting to be flushed
$DPLS - DD Thread
The CEO Dennis O'Leary is a NYC tour guide and con man. They have no offices and no product. They don't own any patents. No revenue in 11 years, millions in debt. A 3.2 BILLION O/S and a 20 BILLION A/S. Shareholders will get diluted to hell, then they'll reverse split and do it again
Maybe he'll announce Google as a partner because they got an AdWords account.
LOL. Nope
Yup, why hide it when less informed investors consider it a net positive? Lol
Spin it as a good thing (cheapies!) while ignoring the O/S, ta da, rocketship!
$DPLS - DD Thread
The CEO Dennis O'Leary is a NYC tour guide and con man. They have no offices and no product. They don't own any patents. No revenue in 11 years, millions in debt. A 3.2 BILLION O/S and a 20 BILLION A/S. Shareholders will get diluted to hell, then they'll reverse split and do it again
DPLS PPS dumped to .0001, -50%
Weak sauce "news" did nothing to prop up PPS
LOL! Be careful, it might catch on..
Soon enough Dennis will say he was knighted by the Better Business Bureau for his work detecting the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
Next up: Dennis becomes an admiral in the Texas Navy