Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DB - Thanks for showing once again that Emil GIFTED the shares and didn’t actually SELL them.
Wrong again...column 3 & 4 go together. He would have to use code “S” in column 3 if he SOLD shares. It was a GIFT, or 16(b)-3 transaction therefore the proper disposition code is “G”
Here a link to the actual SEC Form 4 instructions. All the codes are listed on in Section 8 on page 5.
https://www.sec.gov/about/forms/form4data.pdf
Enjoy!
TS - That’s unreal. A daily recap of PPS for 2 weeks should get the job done.
Umm...restricted shares are just that...RESTRICTED! They can’t be sold in the open market until the conditions to remove the RESTRICTION are met, which in this case is monetizing the patents!
Wow...just wow!
Not really...please explain how any VPLM or any other public company can just dump common shares in the market without a document “placement” or “offering.” What street name is the stock traded in?
We’ll wait...
Someone is trying hard to tank the PPS today...doesn’t seem to be working.
To simplify monitoring the current Waco cases...check out my post #92423 with the links to each case. Here’s a link to the post.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=155788647
It was pinned but somehow was taken down. It would be helpful to all on this board if someone would pin it again.
Some funny stuff right there. Nice try.
Illegal ex-parte communications???LMFAO...Apple lost their initial request for sanctions at the PTAB and will more than likely lose the appeal too. The communications were so illegal Apple’s top notch, high priced lawyer had no questions for nor wanted any part of the PTAB attorney at the appeal hearing. Instead Apple throws up another Hail Mary hoping to have every other claim in the patent cancelled which isn’t what that hearing was even about. Comical.
But we keep hearing how VPLM is the one trying to delay & drag the cases on. Let’s face it, Apple can’t put forward any consistent nor comprehend-able defense so they continue to throw all kind of BS against the wall to see what sticks.
Agree Bird. The ONLY way VPLM gets a fair trial that does claim construction is if their cases stay in Waco. If the Bigs are so confident that they didn’t steal or aren’t continuing to use VPLM technology, why does it matter what court the cases are tried in?
If you read up on Waco juries, they aren’t as favorable to Patent holders as they are in East Texas so if this goes to a jury trial, the argument that a Waco win is a sure thing for VPLM is not exactly right either.
The next 2-3 weeks will reveal much in the way of what to expect...if it stays in Waco, I like our chances of moving forward towards a settlement.
GreenBackClub - is it possible to re-pin the West Texas Court cases post #92423 so the board has easy access to get updates?
Lol... As Alan Shepard said way back in 1961, “Let’s light this candle!”
Wow...what an open today. Let’s keep the upward momentum going.
Sure is...I think it’s comical that so many think Apple is such an ethical & innovative company. They steal other company’s technology shamelessly then use endless stall tactics when brought to court to face the infringement charges!
Read the verdict here...Apple LOST big time today! Odd, they never steal anybody’s technology. LMFAO!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eqFJKXSVzB1ekyAOSEOerlrNiQniQO1w/view?usp=drivesdk
Be careful what or who you listen to...lots of misinformation being pushed on both sides. Real due diligence, fair unbiased trials, and test of time will get us home.
Truth...but wait, we keep hearing VPLM is a pump & dump scam. Can’t have a dump with any pumps! LMFAO!
Dollars would be awesome but let’s start by getting into the dimes...$0.20 or $0.30 would go a long way to helping draw in more outside interest.
Right...it was the 815 patent. Thanks for noting the correct patent...they don’t have a 805 patent like I typed.
I agree. It is unusual that the PTAB would intervene the way they did to support their IPR decisions & VPLM in the appeal. One way their intervention can be viewed is for the PTAB defending their “honor” in light of removing & replacing the panel due perception of corrupt/biased judges.
What I find more more interesting is that the Apple legal team, after all their crying foul about the final written decisions in both cases and alleged ex parte communication with the PTAB by VPLM, didn’t have a single question for the PTAB lawyer at the appeal hearing. Apple’s request for sanctions regarding the allegedly illegal communication was the reason for this appeal and not one question for the PTAB. Instead, Apple pivots to trying a Hail Mary with the appeal judges to have the balance of claims in the 805 patents ordered ineligible, which Apple’s attorney & the appeal panels said would be unheard of & has never been done before.
Why the pivot by Apple & no questions for the PTAB? That is the 9 billion dollar question. I like our chances in Waco. Time will tell how this ends.
Be well.
Bird - All excellent points, especially those about prior art. If the VPLM patents were so vague or so wide you could drive a truck through them as some profess, what magic or slight of hand did Emil & company use in the claims to define very specific calling attributes to allow the patents to be granted. To me, that’s the comedy here...so much BS being thrown around without ever taking time to read & understand the actual patents.
Wait...we keep hearing Apple never steals anyone technology. How many times have they been found to be freeloading on other companies patents?
Who said this again? “We’ve always been shameless about stealing great ideas.” Oh yeah, that was the great innovator Steve Jobs.
Show us how & where THE COMPANY has hyped Hudnell’s performance. We’ll wait...
Care to elaborate? If they’re out of money how can they afford a promotion campaign? More BS.
I think the original was posted by ButtersOnARoll
The company? Never saw any news release from VPLM like that. Where did you read that?
Hyped up? It was a “scheduling conference.” The purpose is to work towards resolving any pre-trial issues & set the trial schedule dates. Those hearings are about as exciting as watching paint dry.
List the multiple handoff patents.
Now that’s some funny stuff. Apple is a well-known, multiple times guilty IP thief. As they say it’s cheaper to steal then develop. But hey let’s complain about China.
Really? Is your cell phone capable of seamlessly transferring to a cellular network call to a wi-fi network call without losing the connection? If so, that’s VPLM technology at work.
If as you say, VPLM did nothing, Apple and all the other Bigs would have been granted patents for that technology yet VPLM owns the patents. Along with 24 other VoIP patents in the US and other countries. This cannot be disputed!
Time will tell how these lawsuits end.
DB - Albright’s schedule showed a 12:00 PM Central time start. Did that change to 11?
About the court conference? It was rescheduled to Noon (Central Time) today do it hasn’t happened yet.
Is there any way to stream the court proceedings down in Waco? There are some streaming sites but I can't seem to find Albright's courtroom on any of the lists.
Please post a link if it's out there...would love to hear real time what's happening.
VPLM legit business purpose defined..."Connecting the World"
Source: https://www.voip-pal.com
CONNECTING THE WORLD
Voip-Pal.com Inc. (“Voip-Pal,” or the “Company”) is a global leader in cost-efficient technology that enables high-volume text, voice and digital multi-media communications. We open locked doors across many social and enterprise applications, allowing all "callers" to message each other, regardless of platform. We simply bring people together through the internet, WiFi, and phone networks. Our mission is simple: to Connect the World.
?
The biggest names in technology utilize Telco pioneer Voip-Pal’s patent portfolio. All of these companies seek to grow their businesses by offering increasingly integrated Internet communications services, including simple-to-use telecom and mobile payments. Only Voip-Pal can make this possible.
?
Voip-Pal’s suite of patents offers a major change in the way communication traffic is managed across the Internet and telephone networks. Voip-Pal's intellectual property covers the classification and routing of all voice, messaging and data traffic across telephone networks and the Internet. Voip-Pal creates virtual bridges that span global communications.
?
Key Benefits:
• Reduce capital requirements for network platforms
• Allow major network functionality to live in the Cloud, facilitating lowest cost transmission
• Let users go between different types of wireless networks while they’re on a call
• Help Operators maintain "call" financial relationships as traffic is delivered to other networks – and to monetize data traffic across networks
ONE NUMBER, ONE WORLD
Today, “callers” connect via private-to-private messages with people who downloaded the same walled-off app such as Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Twitter and others. A maze of nodes, networks and proprietary software create major challenges for consumers who just want a simple way to reach others around the world.
?
Tomorrow, “callers” will connect using their single phone number – messaging any user, anywhere, on any network and any social messaging app – across phone networks, Wi-Fi and the Internet – all enabled by the technology integration capabilities provided by Voip-Pal.
After re-reading, I don’t think the conference was delayed...I think Albright allowed VPLM an additional week to submit all the supporting documentation required for the infringement allegations. Looks like the call will go on as originally planned.
Exactly Butter...Facts matter!
Totally agree with your assessment.
Just pushed out a week...new scheduling order date is 8/14.
Already addressed...only 1 Amazon entity of 4 was dismissed. Lawsuit still proceeding agains other 3 Amazon companies. Read the court doc here...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1huwS8RbwDzFb3Ks7i909k31gyVYofwf8/view?usp=drivesdk
Curious to hear your view on the Hudnell response to Apple.