Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's the same as the FB post. Cheryl Casone is on from 5AM to 6AM. I missed it today. The clip should be made available
I missed the actual interview. Just read the summary on FB. I don't see those exact quotes.
Nobody has posted that Chan was on Fox Business, national TV? I've been out this morning and figured everybody would be stoked over this. Great news.
When something significant is up, they are precluded from buying. My guess is they are feeling some heat. I don't give a crap how rich some investors are, they are not happy. (Save for the cheerleader)
You're very welcome "It doesn't matter to me if it goes to $2" Cheerleader.
Chan's $3.60 purchase starting to gurgle. Nose barely above water. Bravo. Raises and options for everyone!
Obviously not a paltry $3.61, but tell the rest of us what share price is going to be completely unacceptable to you? Or is it on a sliding scale with you, emphasis on sliding?
And there's your moving of the goal posts, again, post from Hemo.
You left out, Did he intentionally not tell us about Mortenson on the cc, knowing he was out the next day?. YES. Does our 52 week high keep dropping? Yes. Are we 4 cents from the 52 week low? Yes. These boobs couldn't hit water if they fell outta the boat. And now I'll sign off so Hemopure can call me a whiner. What price do we have to fall to Hemopure before it's legit to condemn these dopes?
THEY cause it to be half empty. When, recently, have they deserved the benefit of the doubt? They've done a number on trust.
My A$$ is getting so sore from all of these buying opportunities that the normal Prep H no longer works. Anyone else have this issue and recs for a remedy?
And even then I had asked a very legit question, or I may have pointed out, that the shareprice rarely rises during or after these conferences. I used the term dog and pony show, which is not derogatory in my world of business. I wasn't here for pre split but those who are have every right to say "We're even down on that now". This is serious money now. I expect the truth and I'll make my own decisions. We all should want truth. TODAY. What did they know and when?
Someone asked if the 65,000 per day was a 7 day week or 5, and did that figure included those we had to give away for studies. I e-mailed and got no answer, which is typical lately. They are hiding. You and others ridiculed me for singling out the Mortensen exit being the day after the cc and that they had to know it when they intentionally left it out of the cc. I want to know if they had an idea about REFRESH the day of that cc too! If Mortensen's exit is connected, they most certainly did. And if true, they will have a big f'ing problem. I'm not ranting. Yes I'm pissed when I get smacked down as some kind of whiner when I concentrated on Mortensen and the failure to tell us on the cc. All I want is the truth and transparency.
Everybody go back and read this post from the thought police, er hemopure, who wants to tell you you're wasting his time saying anything negative. You're lookin' good pal.
Oh you want a conference call??? You mean like the one they didn't tell us that Mortensen was out the next day? When did they know this news? I want that f'ing answer. If Mortensen is out because of this, it means they knew it at the time of the cc. I have sent unanswered e-mails to the company lately and I have had it. The last one was a clarification on the 65,000 units a day. They get no more benefit of the doubt. Call people who've lost EVEN MORE NOW whiners.
You have no clue the personal predicament of the various investors here, nor do I. Some are young and could wait another 10 years. Although not young, I can wait this out for the couple of years that are discussed here. Some others who say they've been in for 10 years may be in their 70's now and time does matter. That you bunch everyone together calling them selfish that this hasn't come together yet, and it upsets them, is pretty outrageous to me. In the end, what I am down or you are down is of no concern to guy like Burnt for example. Of course we are all selfish. We're in this to make money for ourselves, family, and in some cases friends we've recommended this to. "Selfish". Ridiculous.
Burnt, spot on. I would hail these conferences if there appeared to be a connection to an increased share price. There is none. Calling people who are down 6 figures on this thing "selfish" is just about the dumbest thing ever posted here.
We always get the last time it appears too. Most have headed to cocktails by that time if you've been to conferences.
Nobody had posted the PR and I made that characterization. Can you point to any of these that showed an appreciation in the share price? I'd be ecstatic if they did.
Another PR announcing a dog and pony show being held tomorrow. Link says company presentations from 1PM to 4:05PM. Our PR says we are on from 4:10 to 4:40. Interesting
I'm not even saying you are wrong about this being manipulated. I'm asking how you can justify telling people to buy if you truly believe this? Neither of us knows how far down that manipulation can take this. Correct? I stopped recommending this to friends and family a while ago because I have multiple eggs on my face. Their investments are down here. Some big. Mine is down huge. My situation is that I'm now stuck in this (and please don't come back telling me I can sell blah blah blah). I'd love to do a search of how many "This is a great spot to buy" posts there are all the way down. I've lamented I thought I stole shares at $7.04. And, and this is important, I don't question that you thought it at the time.
Since you told everyone what a great buy this was 30 cents ago, maybe you should stop telling us what is going to happen. "Watch". Puhleez. And if you really believe this manipulation stuff, why recommend buying when neither of us has any idea where this is headed?
I think you were looking for some analysis/debunking of all that number stuff no? I know I was.
The SA disclosure says no interest. I'm not a doctor and don't play one on TV. The writeup is pretty lengthy and detailed. If we have a doctor on this board I'd love to hear opinions. I don't know what to make of it. I do know that you can slant statistics in almost any direction.
I remember thinking I had put one over on everybody when I made a steal at $7.04. I was thrilled with myself. "Never catch a falling knife"
LOL. Garoppolo?
I don't need to read your post. I would have been attacked if it had been mentioned. You and I both know it. But you, you win the prize for berating me for being right without hearing the cc. How bizarre. I'm long the stock. I am amazed that some here cannot even bring yourselves to criticize the omission of our top doc departing. Some need a reality check. Yes, people leave companies and are replaced. The next in line is either better or worse. If Brady blows his knee out today, who is Sunday's QB? Is he as good? Dunno but I doubt it. They consciously decided not to tell you. If that doesn't bother you, you need to step away from the kool aid pitcher. I want this to GO UP but I'm not blind. And unfortunately I've been in this rodeo before with some companies that conveniently left out some important info. That's all. Open your eyes.
I apologize right now if it was mentioned. Your turn. Was it? Burnt just posted that the Dr. was on the call answering questions about where things are headed. I didn't hear it. Did he drop an "Oh by the way, tomorrow I'm out"? I didn't hear any of the cc. Help me out. What was said?
I thought it was a legitimate question. The company does 4 quarterly reports a year with a cc allowing the owners of the company, us, to ask questions. The cc's are to bring us all up to date on the state of things. That happened Tuesday. Now they either knew on Tuesday the Dr. was leaving or they were blindsided yesterday. I know which one I'm picking. So you have a company that issued a PR to announce a bunch of additions to the clinical team but omitted this. I'll go further. Somebody (multiple somebodies?) had to make a conscious decision to omit it. If you think nobody said "Do you think we should tell them about Mortensen?" prior to Tuesday I don't know what to tell you. It may not even be that bad of news. I'm asking, legitimately, why weren't we told because they knew? Doesn't smell right and we deserve transparency in the very least. Disclosure, I was away and have not heard the cc yet.
They didnt know this yesterday? Afraid to answer questions?
Oh, and it's time for your quarterly post. I'll draft it for you. "Nobody said it was going to be a blowout quarter. Whoever said it would be a blowout quarter? No blowout quarter." Good?
He's in his office and not speaking at the East Podunk Nurse Practitioner's Convention? He's slipping up. Give him that message for me. Tell Vinnie we'll get to 5.91 one of these days so he can dump his options and make a buck.
August was when they priced their options at a max 4.91 after the so called fake news. How convenient that was, including our slow pathetic response. I can only imagine it's killing Vinnie that they really haven't been in the money yet. You know he's a dumper the second he can make a few bucks. Really exudes confidence for us.
So people who bailed between $7 and $6 are stupid lemmings? What's the price today?
Sorry, I should have mentioned I read it on yahoo (I still haven't received the PR e-mail)
PR out on a new UK heart surgery study
PR out on a new UK heart surgery study
First, I appreciate your posts so this is informational not personal. I'm guessing you are closer to this than I am (bc I'm not as close as I should be with how much I have invested). There's marketing/selling of the product and then there's marketing/promotion of the company to investors. Two different things. I'll reserve judgment on the product selling with the new sales team. The second one can't be called anything but a failure. The only scorecard that matters to investors is the share price. I'm a Giants fan. They're 2-6. I don't wanna hear they're trying hard, giving it the old college try. Is there a W on Sunday? No W....no credit. Peace to you. Hoping for good news on Tuesday.
I understand how difficult it is for a small company to elbow their way in. I see films of the product being used during heart surgery and helping to save lives/turning some bleak situations around for some very sick people. We should be higher on the amazing story alone. Somebody (multiple somebodies?) is failing, and failing badly at the company.
If a tree falls in the forest.....er, if your stock, any stock, goes down on low volume do you still show a loss, albeit on paper? One could argue it's fallen all the way from $14 on low volume. Should we be happy by that small solace fact? How far does it fall on low volume before you become concerned?