Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, obviously it took no time to witness more evidence that these two statements were spot-on:
If that doesn't scream "Overvalued Bagholder Stock," I don't know what does.
There is zero justification for the current valuation. No one with any experience in the markets would ever argue otherwise.
There is no question as to why TRTC has sustained this stepdown pattern for 18 months. Throw in the fact that the company faces further dilution just to keep the lights on (not to mention the proposed buildouts), and it becomes painfully obvious that TRTC is far from investment worthy at .10.
The only source of argument to the contrary is from investors trapped with huge losses. That's why TRTC has been named THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector.
Our commitment to objective analysis results in a long standing history of accuracy that continues to go unmatched. Not sure? Look into it.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
FYI - For those who are more interested in the truth: TRTC has never made a dime's profit since inception.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't MSRT plummeted ~35% since the 420Investor service "recommended" folks buy and claimed a target of $4.20?
$4.20?! LOL
And haven't the 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" resulted in 75% LOSSES since inception?
If just about every stock 420Investor "recommends" plummets 50-75%, why would we be surprised to see MSRT doing the same? And why would anyone ever buy a stock touted by 420Investor in the first place?
The 420Investor service's long standing history of horrible "recommendations" is well known. IMO, that has something to do with the pitiful performance of MSRT.
I'm sorry but I'm not trapped with expensive shares...so I'm comfortable acknowledging the truth that TRTC is losing millions every quarter and has since the day operations began.
Not sure? Simply look at the financials.
Looking rather weak today.
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
Don't get trapped guys.
lol I'm pretty sure we don't need access to medical records to know that IVXX, LLC isn't a "patient."
How many millions of shares do we expect major stakeholders will unload into this conference call hype?
Not to detract from the trade - because we'll take advantage of it - but isn't the likely scenario as follows?:
Speculative move into the CC -> Disappointment following the CC due to the realization that the hype was fabricated-> Big volume selldown.
We know TRTC is riddled with dilution, and we know that the company is under a lot of pressure to sustain pps for the diluters...so it would make sense that this cute little virtual investor conference is nothing but a show and will produce no material information that has a fundamental impact on the company's value to investors. Sooo....
Trade it up. Sell the hype.
lol So the suggestion was to hold .86s through a move to $2.00...and then watch it plummet back to $1?
Clever.
I remember my first pennystock.
Up nearly 12% and still not even close to what was supposed to be the "bottom."
Looks like we were spot-on (again) with this post:
••Update••INSIDERS DUMPING-CFO,Secretary selling millions?
This is an example of the type of critical information that we don't see discussed when the subject is a bagholder stock:
••Article••TRTC, Worst bagholder stock in OTC history?:
http://tinyurl.com/OTCTRTC-BagholderStock-Nov2015
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't MSRT plummeted ~35% since the 420Investor service "recommended" folks buy and claimed a target of $4.20?
$4.20?! LOL
And haven't the 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" resulted in 75% LOSSES since inception?
If just about every stock 420Investor "recommends" plummets 50-75%, why would we be surprised to see MSRT doing the same? And why would anyone ever buy a stock touted by 420Investor in the first place?
The 420Investor service's long standing history of horrible "recommendations" is well known. IMO, that has something to do with the pitiful performance of MSRT.
Sophisticatedlol
Some .10s to go with those .80s?
lol
Bagholder stock.
What's even more entertaining is that if you look back at the 365 day performance of the 420Investor service's portfolios - which are comprised of 420Investor "trade recommendations" - CANL has actually OUTPERFORMED 420INVESTOR.
lol
It kind of seems like the 420Investor service likes to focus on failed companies (even ones that trade less than $5,000 per day like CANL) in order to obscure the failure of 420Investor itself.
Inferiority complex'd?
Seriously though - no one follows CANL. No one cares.
Who cares? CANL trades less than $10k per day.
Seems like the 420Investor service has become pitifully desperate to remain relevant. No?
75% losses since inception? Is that for real!?
Ha. Maybe so. Shareholders have about as much of a chance of benefitting from black market sales as they do legitimate sales. HOW SAD IS THAT!
If I were trapped with expensive shares, I'd do my best to convince myself that DP was credible. But the simple fact still remains - TRTC has fulfilled very few (if any) of the promises made to shareholders over the past few years.
TRTC - Still .10.
Still no active for profit cannabis operations.
Still only owns half of proposed operations in Nevada.
Still no money.
Still millions lost every quarter.
Still a ~$50,000,000 deficit.
Still no acquisitions (2 years since promised).
Still blatantly overvalued.
Still the cannabis sector's worst bagholder stock.
It only has no value to those that are already trapped at a huge loss. To everyone else, it is the single most comprehensive and accurate due diligence on TRTC to-date.
In any event - TRTC still hasn't followed through with any of the promises they made regarding those acquisitions, or anything else for that matter. Nothing has progressed according to their promises since TRTC first became a cannabis related stock...and still to this day, the only active cannabis-related operations to TRTC's name are non profit operations. lol It's a running joke at this point.
••Article••TRTC, Worst bagholder stock in OTC history?:
http://tinyurl.com/OTCTRTC-BagholderStock-Nov2015
I'm still amazed by how predictable this stock is. Yet again, our post from yesterday turned out to be spot-on.
Missed out? lol As if folks are somehow benefitting from holding positions at a 50%+ loss for years?
When you step back and examine this simple question, the reality of this stock becomes more disturbing than ever...
What does TRTC have to show for that $50MM other than huge insider bonuses and not-for-profit IVXX - from which only insiders can benefit...?
This is just a tiny portion of the horrifying big picture that investors are faced with.
If TRTC wasn't such a massive bagholder stock, there would be absolutely no one willing to argue that this looks anything like a viable investment. No way.
But hey - what does a random dentist from Ontario know about anything...
Right in my neck of the woods. I'll be attending to see if I can finally get some straight answers to the vastly important questions that they continue to ignore.
CANL trades less than $10k a day. No one cares.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" have resulted in ~75% losses since inception. That's 100+ horrifically failed trades, many of them ending in losses exceeding 40%.
Is it safe to assume that business over at the failed 420Investor service is so slow that it's warranted taking focus on a stock trading less than $10k a day?
lol It is very true.
No. In fact, this company loses money....loses millions upon millions every quarter. Don't take my word for it though - see every filing since inception.
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump.
IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme.
420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service.
That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on CannLabs insofar as its viability as an investment is concerned. After all, the 420Investor service's performance since inception is marked by a 75% LOSS overall...right?
Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't MSRT plummeted ~35% since the 420Investor service claimed a target of $4.20?
$4.20?! LOL
Ouch. MSRT is down HUGE ever since the 420Investor service began touting it.
How does this keep happening?
••Update••INSIDERS DUMPING TRTC: CFO&Secretary selling millions?
Looks like Amy has sold ~$115,000 of TRTC shares since August. Couple that with the CFO's recent massive selling spree and the reality that shareholders may indeed be left holding the bag becomes crystal clear.
Folks, when the Chief FINANCIAL Officer of a company determines that it's time to sell muck of his common stock, investors are getting what is likely to be the most dependable sign of things to come they will ever witness.
No technical signal, no expert analysis and certainly no fabricated hype is as valuable of a clue as a CFO dumping his shares is.
There should be no surprise when TRTC establishes new lows in the near future. With TRTC's deficit nearing $50 MILLION, IVXX remaining not-for-profit, and no cash to fund proposed build-outs in NV, TRTC is tremendously overvalued....and the company's own CFO is acting on that fact - loud and clear.
Be careful with bagholder stocks - they're hyped with no regard for the facts.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
All that fabricated hype and paid pump & dump promo but only .10?
Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
Low volume pops & Big volume drops.
As many of us know, this is a critical signal for traders.
For TRTC, as we first pointed out upon our most recent exit alert at
.139, this remains the persistent trend.
Trade smart guys. Don't get trapped.
The threat of TRTC losing its provisional licensing due to the ongoing delays is very real.
Based on the consistently disappointing progress overall and the numerous broken promises shareholders have fallen victim to, it looks like TRTC is indeed at risk of losing the NV licensing that shareholders spent millions on.
The wise move might turn out to be selling those licenses after all. It looks like they're falling too far behind.
You can count on it as long as there is sufficient bidding to support another big volume selldown brought to you by one of the major stakeholders.
If the bidding isn't there to keep it from tanking to .08, I expect there to be another desperate pump & dump PR to drum up more unfortunate retail buyers...at which point you better believe there will be dumping.
In any event, this is a total crapshoot for investors (bagholders).
TRTC's Secretary/Treasurer has dumped ~$115,000 since August? @WhoIsLaughin @Orion_Arm see https://t.co/uI0YKJVjgm pic.twitter.com/kcZH2IOmON
Looks like insiders love to sell TRTC:
This is in addition to the CFO's recent selling-spree.
If the company's own insiders don't want the stock, I doubt anyone is looking to "steal" anything.
That means absolutely nothing. When I bought my first stock, I want to believe everything the salesmen were telling me too...but then I remembered: They're salesmen. And they're trying to sell their stock (or in this case, they're just trying to keep the bagholders from selling).
No one with any grasp on how these laws are promulgated believes that TRTC has any chance to affect the amendment of this kind of legislation.
The law is clear: Companies operate "as-is" until they've been appropriately licensed under the new regulations.
That is literally at the core of this legislation and I assure you - it will not change just because some little pump & dump pennystock company wants it too.
lol2016
Bagholder stock.