Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have read back door emails from so many people of this will crash, or this will be stoped yadda, yadda yadda.
FACT, the stock went up 110% in a little over a week
FACT, Up almost 340% from the LOWS
FACT, The stock has held almost all of those gains.
If you look at the chart it shows it is ready for another breakout.
Now, what is it you say is going to happen again?????
There you go again bringing Tom into a Joe question. Why not answer the question about Joe?
Tex, Look at the employment date!
2007! Before the merger. Now there was no debt in the merger as stated by the filings. How is that possible?
I would love to see it.
Bring on some facts!
Tom does not matter to me, I want a CEO that is by the shareholders, Remember it is all about the shareholders of QASP.
I can't think of a better way to get what the shareholders want then by a vote, can you?
My question is why all the smoke about Tom, he is just trying to help YOU if you have some shares. I think you said that a family member did and not you personally.
Show me the DOTS of when Equas and QASP merged, what was the debt then, how did debt magicly appear?
Take a look at who was involved with Equas before the merger.
Tell me who it is.
TY
I thought you where all about the PPS and the shareholders of QASP.
You told Tom that while I listened.
Tex, he does not have to do anything, just like you. (hint)
ROTFLMAO,, well you asked!
Why do you want to know?
What does that have to do with the value of the shareholders of QASP? You have said that your quest here is to make the shareholders whole.
This is getting deeper and deeper.
Look this up for me, Who brought Equs to QASP?
Who said there was no debt? Then there was debt?
Who was involved with equs back in 2004?
Start connecting the dots Ken.
Why do you keep on about Tom?
Why not answer the questions asked you?
Tom is not the story here, it QASP. The stock you said that this was all about.
Tom Is trying to help you and the rest of the common share holders.
It will become even more interesting soon. As Tex says, Watch the "DOTS" connect.
The more I dig into this the worse it gets.
Who brought the company to QASP?
I will file it as I do with all stocks I play. Who would of thought that Chrysler, GM would turn into what they did. That the GOV had to bail out. (why I do not know)
I have another play that I bought into that has no shares traded for weeks. No revs no nothing.
Guys there think it is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Here we have shares being bought and sold. When that happens the price could go up or down. Happens with almost every stock out there.
I understand the warnings you put forth as well as every investor should know the risks of investing.
This is a great play for those who flip, I have a long position and a flip one here.
IMO, my posts are correct and to the point. NO FLUFF or non facts in them.
Why not answer DB2's questions????
You told Tom it was all about the shareholders of QASP.
This presents the best possible answer to who should be the CEO.
Why is camp Joe so worried?
If he has the best interest of the shareholders and they want him he should have the job.
I do not understand the sideways threats to Tom.
He is just trying to help the shareholders of QASP. That is what you said to Tom, (while I listened) several times.
You now have that chance,
Why the fight?
Would you not want a say in who is the CEO here? I mean Dean says he is, Joe says he is, Jeff wants the shareholders to choose a CEO.
I think this is the best that can happen. IMO
If I read this right, The Merger between Qasp and Equs was done in 2009.
There was no debt in that merger.
Then, in 2010 there is debt stating it had happenend in 2008.
WOW,
Mike, I am sorry for doubting this.
There is no hiding from this.
Those are the facts.
Tex, can you fallow this time line?
Hope there is some Humble Pie in the oven.
That post just makes no sense. IMO The stock went up 110% a week a go and has almost held all of those gains.
Now the bid support is still strong and the sellers are moving slowly away. I think we see 5 or maybe 6 cents next week.
Wouldn't that be nice!
I paid for my shares, I do not like how things are run here. Being a real share holder I have every right to do so.
Once (if) the bid EVER gets up to where you suggested for me to buy I will gladly leave. Until hen you are stuck with me.
No shares trading, bid support is 1/2 of the ask, NO NEWS. (ever?)
Almost a year has gone by and only a few hundred thousand shares traded.
You can get in, but you can't get out.
TRUST ME I KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think the turbo charger is broken.
This is how I feel about my investment here.
will be nothing
more than a faded memory~[/quote]
I don't undersatnd the ranting. If Joe is nominated and wins he will be CEO.
I do not understand why all the people that are for Joe are so upset.
Just vote for the guy. Of course you would need to own shares.
I predict that there will be mass buying on Monday so that the commons can be controled.
Just my opinion.
Wouldn't that be nice for the peeps here that own QASP?
Now Tom, Stop stating the truth here, It makes people feel uncomfortable.
IMO
I have read an email that says other wise.
Best of luck to you.....
And Joe? And others?
Not a good guy, Just wants the share holders of QASP to be able to choose who will run QASP>
I think that if Joe gets the votes he should be able to stay.
What is the worry?
ONE OF?????
How many where there????????????????????
I know you know his number.
ROTFLMAO, boy ole boy, you have been snookered. Full meetings, he was not even CEO, everything was a sham according to Dean!
OH, but wait, what about the back dated contracts. If they really did happen. It throws the time lines out the door.
Are you the only one that does not believe that?
I do not have to, Pick up the phone and say your sorry to Jeff and he may tell you what really happend.
Until then you are swinging and spinning, WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Wait a minute, Joe voted him out!
Now that gets dumped on Jeff as well?
The whole economy is GW's fault. LOL,
HEY, do not bring facts into this. It will spoil the whole thing!
IN this case, Dean had more rights than Joe with those very nice P A's.
I bet that Joe never thought that Dean would have the nuts to do this.
So sorry, Joe should of played nicer. imo
The ones Q never owned?????
Oh the spinning!
I think that it would not matter. Joe can't lose anything right?
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Oh the Spinning, LOL
Come on now, If Joe has done such a good job here and the COMMON shareholders want him, they can Vote him in. What a better way to handle this thing.
If you own shares you can vote him in if you want.
That is the whole purpose of this.
It is to let the COMMON share holder vote in who they want.
ROTFLMAO, the ones that where never legit!
Please stop spinning you will get dizzy and fall down.
Tom, I would say NOTHIN, if you truely want Q to be run by the true shareholders. Do not let Camp Joe get you into a chat that will cause harm to you. They will twist your words and you know that!
PLEASE, that is way TOO funny,
.0018 to .0001. That is Joe's CEO numbers. NO one elses.
I know of NO involvement with MS. I did hear that he wanted to be. As of today, I know of none.
I doubt that.