Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If the increase was not properly filed
If the increase was not properly filed then the effect would be that the deal has not happened and the whole process would need to be repeated after the increase takes place.
It most certainly would have an effect, and also call into question as to how well the company is being run when they are having problems paying attention to the details of the process to get things done.
The 'waste of funds' would only be about $50, and would prove the point.
I believe the reason that HDSI did not do any filings is because then retail investors would have seen all kinds of costs/shares issued and no revenue being recognized, and start to realize that SirenGPS was worthless.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
I think you misunderstand
I expect that what I will find, will show that the company does not have the preferred shares authorized needed to complete the deal. (company needs to issued 85,600,000 preferred shares and only has a total of 50,000,000 preferred shares available.)
That means that the deal can not be completed.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
I will get a copy of the amendments
I will see about getting a copy of all of the amendments plus request information from the State of Nevada corporations office.
I may take a few days to get a reply but it will confirm the correct information.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
File 05/22/2015 but not 'taken effect yet'?
That is not how it works. When amendments are filed, and the state stamps the filing with a date and time (online or an actual ink stamp for papers passed over the counter), that is when changes take effect.
If something was filed on 05/22/2015; then it took effect at the time the state corporations division stamps it as being filed and would show on the summary page within a day or two at the most. Months later any such change, if it happened, would most certainly show up.
The preferred shares show only as being authorized as only 50 million authorized because HDSI never filed for any increase above that so far.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
HDSI summary page
One should note, that the summary page does show the increase in the common shares to 2 billion common shares. While there are other amendments listed about the preferred shares on the summary of the filings for HDSI, the most recent changes filed with the state only brings that total number of preferred shares to 50 million shares, because that is all that is showing on the summary page.
The reason that increases above that do not show, is because such increases have not been filed.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Filings with the SEC are not the same as the state coroporation division
The corporation exists, and is a legal entity with the State of Nevada.
Filings with the State of Nevada what the corporation is, when it came into existence, who the officers are, what are the classes of shares, and when the corporations closes or is dissolved.
While the reports with the SEC are called or referred to as 'filings', it would be more accurate if they were called reports or reporting, since they are supposed to report on what is happening with the company to the public. A filing (or report) with the SEC does not change what is filed with the state. While things are disclosed in a filing or report to the SEC, the actual change takes place and is in effect when a filing is made with the state corporations division.
11/03/2008 is the date HDSI came into existence. It is listed on the summary page so people will know when the company started, and it near the status of 'ACTIVE' so people will know the company currently exists.
EXamples of differences between an SEC filing (reporting) and the State Corporations division
1: Company formed and comes into existence. The legal entity that is the corporation comes into existence when it is 'filed' with the state'. An SEC filing does not do that.
2: Many companies never do an SEC filings. Many companies have no requirement to report to the public, so they never do any SEC filings (reports), they only file with the state corporations division.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Rauner is a lawyer.
Do you know what states he holds a license in to practice law?
The short bio at Bloomberg does not list any state licenses:
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=217497944&privcapId=139443999
That makes the contracts that have been drafted and filed even more shocking if Rauner is a lawyer. The problems I am describing could easily be solved with 'a peppercorn of consideration', where even a very small item of consideration (even as small as a peppercorn) could solve the lack of consideration problem.
'A Peppercorn of Consideration' discussion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppercorn_%28legal%29
In legal parlance, a peppercorn is a metaphor for a very small payment, a nominal consideration, used to satisfy the requirements for the creation of a legal contract. It featured in Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd ([1960] AC 87), which stated that a "peppercorn does not cease to be good consideration if it is established that the promisee does not like pepper and will throw away the corn".
'forward looking statements' / not on point
That would not apply in the situations I am discussing about consideration as one of the elements for a valid contract. Those situations are something that happened in the past and about if there was a valid contract or not. If there was no valid contract, and a shareholder lawsuit is brought to undo the contract, the phrase 'forward looking statements' in filings would have no effect on stopping or preventing such a lawsuit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-looking_statement
A forward-looking statement predicts, projects, or uses future events as expectations or possibilities. These statements can often be misleading, as they can be mistaken for factual statements, while they are actually speculation. According to United States Code 15 Section 78u-5, a forward-looking statement may include future economic performance such as revenues or income, plans for future operations, or use of a report written by an outside reviewer.
That document was filed on 11/03/2008?
You misunderstand the filing date.
The image I provide is the main information page for HDSI.
It shows a summary of the current status of the company.
The 'file date' on the summary page is the date that the corporation was 'filed' with the State of Nevada, and came into existence as a legal entity.
If you look at the list of amendments for the company, at the bottom, you will see the 11/03/2008 'articles of organization' that formed the corporation, plus the 'initial list' which was the first officers of the corporation
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=QC6Cw6tEE15KNc3xcTpnHw%253d%253d&nt7=0
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Why no 10Q filings for 2nd and third quarters?
Where are the 10Q report for the quarters ending June 30, 2015 and November 30, 2015?
There appears to have been no sales or anything going on with HDSI in those quarter, so that would have not caused any delays in filing anything.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Still no change to the authorized shares
The State of Nevada show no changes after May 22, 2015; and the 450 million preferred shares have not been done yet. There are only 50 million preferred shares.
HDSI can't issue the shares to complete the deal.
If you look at the photos at the bottom of message:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=118663693
You will see that the preferred are only 50 million shares.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Is a shareholder derivative lawsuit possible?
One interesting follow up to the Lack of Consideration on the SirenGPS deal, if there was a lack/failure of consideration earlier, it opens the possibility of that a shareholder, that lost money when the company issued the 1.4 billion common shares this summer, could look to see if any of those contracts or contracts to convert debt into common shares had problems in their formation.
If the answer is yes, then it is possible a shareholder could bring a 'shareholder derivative lawsuit' and get the contracts cancelled, and undo some of the common share conversions and/or the whole deal to acquire SirenGPS.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Rescinding the agreements
If the agreements were completed, then they are done. You can't just 'undo' a properly completed contract later, even if the parties agree to it, just because 'you feel like it'.
As an example, take a sale of property, a house, between you and me.
You have a house that I want to buy. We sign a purchase and sale agreement, I pay the purchase price, and then register the transfer of the house to me at the county registry of deeds. The contract is completed. You got cash. I got the house and the recording of the house to show it is mine to the world as recorded property.
Now some time goes by, and I decide I really don't like the house and you decide that you miss your old house and wish you could live there again. We talk and discover that we each wish to go back to the way things were prior to my buying your house.
The proper, correct and legal way to do it, is that we would execute a new contract where I would sell the house to you (back to you) and you would pay me for the house. We would NOT rescind or undo the original contract. We would draw up and execute a new contract that would, in effect, put us back to where were were prior to the first contract.
That is not what SirenGPS and HDSI did. Instead, on a completed contract, they now have 'made up' this right of rescission in the contract that was never disclosed in any filing as having existed, and I question if it ever really existed.
Who would want to buy shares in a company [SirenGPS] where the main product could be taken away due to the contract being rescinded? My answer, no one.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Elements of a Contract and Lack of Consideration
First, the amended 8K report detailing the deal between SirenGPS, Good Gaming, HDSI and CMGO:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=69303571
Second, a short summary and explanation of the elements that are needed to make a legally binding and enforceable contract:
http://contracts.uslegal.com/elements-of-a-contract/
The requisite elements that must be established to demonstrate the formation of a legally binding contract are:
(1) offer;
(2) acceptance;
(3) consideration;
(4) mutuality of obligation;
(5) competency and capacity;
and, in certain circumstances,
(6) a written instrument.
A court’s analysis as to whether a contract is supported by sufficient consideration typically focuses more on the promise or performance of the offeree than the promise or performance of the offeror. Courts often say that no consideration will be found unless the offeree suffers a “legal detriment” in making the return promise or in performing the act requested by the offeror. As a general rule, legal detriment is found if the offeree relinquishes a legal right in fulfilling his or her contractual duties. Thus, promises to give love and affection or make a gift or donation are not sufficient consideration to support a contract because no one is under a legal duty to give or refrain from giving these things to others. Similarly a promise to perform an act that has already been completed in the past fails to offer consideration to support a new agreement.
HDSI does not have enough shares to complete the deal
Amended 8K detailing the deal with Good Gaming, SirenGPS, HDSI and CMGO:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=69303571
According to the State of Nevada web site, HDSI only has authorized 50,000,000 preferred shares. The 8K calls for the issuing of 85,600,000 shares to CMGO in order to complete the deal.
From looking at other areas of the State of Nevada web site, filings should appear within a few days of being submitted, and one can pay a fee to even make a filing effective faster in increments of 24 hours, 2 hours and one hour, so there is no reason that an increase in authorized shares should not be showing up, unless it has not been filed for yet.
PDF of expedite guildines and fees from the State of Nevada:
nvsos.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1041
At the moment, HDSI does not have the ability to issue the shares needed to complete the deal.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Images from November 20, 2015 showing authorized shares at 7:45pm EST:
Possible contract problem - Lack of consideration
8K detailing the contract to transfer Good Gaming and details of the deal:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=69303571
One thing that bothered me about the whole SirenGPS giving it shares to CMGO, is that SirenGPS gets nothing in return.
That means that the contract 'Lacks Consideration' and means there is not a valid, enforceable contract.
Discussions of Lack of consideration on a contract:
http://study.com/academy/lesson/lack-of-consideration-in-contract-law.html
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/consideration-every-contract-needs-33361.html
Under basic principles of contract law, consideration is the answer to the question, "Why are you entering this contract?" or "What are you receiving for being a party to this contract?"
In order for any agreement to be deemed legally binding, it must include consideration on the part of every person or company that enters the contract.
Two companies will be issuing common shares
With the current setup, HDSI will be able to issue common shares, plus CMGO will be able to issue common shares; both of which will be riding on the 'value' of Good Gaming.
As the value of Good Gaming is promoted, HDSI shares will rise, which will them also increase the share price of CMGO since HDSI has issued all kinds of convertible preferred to CMGO.
It also seems strange that the controlling shares in HDSI was transferred from Paul to CMGO in return for nothing. Why would anyone do such a thing? I can't even imagine asking a person to 'turn over control' of a company to me without paying some kind of value for the right to control a company, yet here they made this incredible deal and then declared SirenGPS worthless.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Which company will be 'in control'?
But the initial press release used the phrase 'spin off' for Good Gaming, implying a transfer from CMGO to HDSI.
SO Good Gaming will transfer from CMGO to HDSI and CMGO will own preferred and common shares in HDSI; plus CMGO will be able to issue its own shares based upon owning part of HDSI which owns Good Gaming?
If that is the case, then the whole deal makes even less sense. In effect, common shares can be issued out of two companies for the same asset.
There would even be a 'perpetual motion machine' like aspect to the value of CMGO; as HDSI rises in value, CMGO also becomes more valuable because HDSI is more valuable.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
What would they signal with something like that?
I saw one time a trade went off for one share on a low price stock and think that someone was 'testing' to see of there were any other blocks waiting to trade, and by doing that confirmed that there was not. (I was the person on the bid wondering why someone would sell one share for $0.07 and baffled at such a seemingly strange trade. It was also the only trade in that stock for the day so far so it was not like it was somehow left over from a larger block of shares being traded.)
Also, why is everyone posting over at CMGO when HDSI is the company that is going to be the entity to acquire Good Gaming. While I think the fundamentals are terrible on the deal, it looks like some people think that CMGO is going to be the surviving entity in a merger with HDSI, instead of CMGO transfering Good Gaming to HDSI.
Without Good Gaming, there looks like there is nothing left to CMGO.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
That can't be right, only 600 shares?
How/why would anyone sell/trade only 600 shares at $0.0001. The trade would net only $0.06; the trading commission would be a lot more. If that was the entire order the trade would be 'silly' since even a trading commission of $6 for stock would put the cost at $0.01, plus whatever the commission was on the buy side when they bought.
The 600 shares must be part of a much larger block of shares on the bid that has not been hit yet.
I was starting to wonder if the symbol had changed or something, since I expected to see some volume so soon after the 300/400 million share day recently.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Merits of SirenGPS?
What mertis? There were no merits to SirenGPS.
No revenue, no customers, no working capital.
The product was worthless and taken off of the books as worthless.
The shell is not clean. There was still liabilities from the SirenGPS time sitting on the balance sheet. At some point I expect they will get issued common shares that they will sell into the retail market to get paid.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
I am sure he is just 'misunderstood'
I am also sure he will 'get things done' for himself.
I expect the first 8K will be filed any day now detailing the conversion of hundreds of millions of common shares, as soon as the authorized share count is increased.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Most businesses fail before five yeara
8 out of 10 businesses fail within 18 months
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericwagner/2013/09/12/five-reasons-8-out-of-10-businesses-fail/
Yes, Google at one point was almost out of business before they figured out how to get revenue from advertising.
But do you think it is a valid comparison to compare Google, one of the most successful and profitable companies on the planet, started by two graduate students from Stanford; with a company that is being headed by someone already with a 'troubled past' in the securities industry and a company that already has had a product (SirenGPS) declared worthless within a matter of months?
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Nobody knows what SirenGPS is worth?
Yes, we most certainly do know what SirenGPS is worth. It is worth zero, is worthless and was worthless. The product never generated any revenue and never had any cash with which to promote the product. According to the financial states, the most cash HDSI ever had while promoting SirenGPS was $515! That is not even enough money to pay one person minimum wage for three weeks. How would anyone ever think the product was going to sell?
The company clearly told everyone what SirenGPS was worth when it issued the amended 8K report of November 12, 2015:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=69303571
CMGO and HDSI have signed an agreement to remove the SirenGPS business from HDSI
Good Gaming would have been better off as its own comnpany
HDSI has negative stockholders equity, the company paid off all kinds of debt/payables buy issuing stock in a product that they have declared worthless.
Is there was real value to Good Gaming, a VC would have been glad to fund it. The fact that this did not happen tells one that it is just going to be a vehicle for issuing hundreds of millions more common shares to retail investors.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Learn about the CEO
I was surprised that he didn't put another person in as CEO that has no problems like he has in his past.
To me it says that he cares so little or expects that no one will check anything or that the people that will buy the common shares never do any research.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Comparisons to FB, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram
People made the same comparisons of SirenGPS to FB, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram; and look where it ended up.
SirenGPS got taken off of the books as being 'worthless' and the stock crashed to $0.0001, and stopped trading.
If Good Gaming was really the next FB, Twitter, Snapchat or Instagram, they certainly would not need the likes of a company like HDSI with such a poor track record, terrible financials, and a stock situation there the insiders control the entire company, plus when those comparisons did a financing round, they raised CASH, and had assets to operate with.
Here HDSI/CMGO only have 'commitment' for additional funding, which I predict will only get done for more common/preferred shares and not any actual cash to the company.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Good Gaming only reported $62K in Q2 2015 revenue
CMGO 2015 Q2 10Q report showing Good Gaming division:
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=10963880-1057-83289&type=sect&TabIndex=2&dcn=0001213900-15-007861&nav=1&src=Yahoo
If there is a lot of potential, why does the 2015 Q2 10Q report only show about $62K of revenue for the Good Gaming segment?
They CMGO bought Good Gaming 3-28-2014, so they had five quarters to get sales going, yet they only had $62K in sales in the last reported 10Q.
On a fully diluted basis, HDSI is being value at over $1.7 million (assume the stock is at $0.0001, if you buy for more than that price the valuation is higher and more out of sync with the fundamentals) for a product that would only bring in about $250K on an annualized basis and loses money.
It does not make any sense.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Good Gaming potential?
What potential? The company has been running for months and still loses money. HDSI is only going to have $12,500 in cash for working capital? How can they do anything with such a small amount of working capital? That is only enough to pay two, maybe three people of reasonable quality, for one month.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
15 year old news and nothing better that is more recent!
Has he done anything in the intervening 15 years to show that he has reformed or has a good track record?
The only other thing is CMGO, and that appears to be a 'dead shell' and now it looks like he is exchanging one shell for another shell, in order to get some 'more life' out of the Good Gaming story to sell common shares into the retail market.
Is Good Gaming going to be a modern version of the old stock trading story about the barrel of fish, that just get traded back and forth, until one buyer opens it up and find they went bad? When he tells someone else they say to him, "You dummy, those fish are not for eating (turning a profit), they are for trading"!
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Yawn?
Will you still be 'yawning' when there is a replay of those prior companies with Good Gaming and HDSI when the stock stops trading?
What I find amazing, is that things that I would expect would normally preclude a person from doing any kind of financing in the public markets, seems to have absolutely no effect. It as though the people that would never buy such an issue based on the numbers, still of course, would not, once they knew the background; but the ones clamoring to get into the new financing, don't care what the facts are. (Until the stock no longer trades and they can't sell for any price.)
I only found out about the background of the CEO by accident, while I was looking to see what Good Gaming did while it was part of CMGO. I didn't even have to look that far since the 'problems' are noted on the main page for CMGO on investorshub. I find it amazing that people would buy anything from them and even more amazing that people think anything bought from people with such a poor track record could possibly turn out well, even with all of the dismal financial information already reported.
I am also puzzled as to how people think substituting one publicly traded shell for another one is somehow going to generate extra revenue or profit.
The company states that there will only be $12,500 in cash for working capital, and the commitments to do more financing can be cancelled at CMGO choice. (Anyone want to guess what they will choose to do once they 'cash out' the convertibles?)
Louis J. Desy Jr.
CMGO CEO has 'troubled' past; which owns Good Gaming
The company that HDSI is buying Good Gaming from, CMG Holdings (CMGO), has a CEO that has what can only be described as a 'trouble' past and poor track record.
Good Gaming is/was owned by CMG Holding (CMGO). The CEO of CMGO is Glenn Laken. Glenn Laken was :
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=13511
In 2000 Mr. Laken was accused of conspiring to bribe union officials while raising money for a hedge fund and participating in an Internet stock promotion where the exact amount paid for that promotion wasn’t clearly stated. These allegations, made by a government informant, resulted in conviction after a 15-week trial, despite the fact that Mr. Laken never met any union officials, received any union monies for his fund or directly contracted for the Internet promotion.
But that's what FinancialWeb's largest single shareholder, a Chicago trader and company consultant named Glenn Laken, was indicted for in June.
The Web site's staff was in the dark
"We didn't know anything about this until the guy was indicted -- it made us look like hypocrites," says former Editor-in-chief Carl Surran.
Potential investors also were in the dark about FinancialWeb's largest options holders, the lawsuit contends.
Laken and another company consultant, John J. Katsock Jr., each received options on 1 million shares in early 1999. A year and a half later, the company revealed those immediately vested options added nearly $27.6 million in costs to FinancialWeb's bottom line.
The two consultants' agreements were notable for another reason: a lack of specifics. According to SEC filings, there was no defined role for the consultants. There was no specific dollar value placed on their work.
Yet the deal appeared to make Laken and Katsock the two largest stockholders -- with 15.7 and 14.4 percent of its value, according to federal filings.
There were more surprises. In addition to his June indictment, Laken had been twice suspended from commodities trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. In one instance, he punched and seriously injured another trader on the exchange floor.
Pump and dump
Formed in July 1997, FinancialWeb.com never showed a profit. In November of last year, creditors foreclosed and sold its assets.
Today, the stock is worthless. It last traded at a half-cent per share on Dec. 20 after topping the $10 mark in the previous year.
ACI 2019 7% bonds trading around 2
I do not know if you are aware, but the 2019, 7%, bonds are trading around 2. ( $1,000 bond costs $20) to buy. The implication, since the bonds are higher in priority than the stock, is that those people do not expect to recover par (100) on the bonds in any bankruptcy or restructuring and expect to get a lot less. It also implies that all of the bond issues (and common shares) that are lower in priority are going to get wiped out in whatever happens.
Even at 2, the 2019 bonds seem to be too risky, since the assets do not seem to be generating enough to cover their operating costs and there is a credit line that is higher in priority than the 2019 bonds.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Good Gaming potential?
Good Gaming was already part of a publicly traded company (CMGO), and appeared to be losing money most quarters and only had total assets of $169K, yet people are to suppose that by the 'virtue' of changing public shells, that the company is now worth millions? How?
How is changing Good Gaming from one publicly traded shell to another publicly traded shell going to change to fundamentals of the business? My answer is that it will not change anything.
My answer is that it will not. At best, Good Gaming will continue to turn in the dismal financial numbers that it had when part of CMGO; all the while hundreds of millions of common shares will be issued into the retail market based upon Good Gaming changing from one dead company to another dead company.
I expect that the end result for HDSI will be within several months, when there are a few billion (or more) common shares issued and the stock is dead at $0.0001 with hundreds of millions of common shares on the ask and no bid.
The only difference the run with Good Gaming will be from SierenGPS is that all of those retail shareholders will have maybe sold to new retail shareholders, that are now stuck with a large pool of 'decorative' common shares. In the common slag, these people could be viewed as 'bag holders'.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
He's interested so much in that (shareholder value)?
Do you really believe that?
If that is true, then how do you explain the press releases touting SierenGPS and its value, right up until the moment when they issued the report telling the world, that it was being 'taken off the books as worthless'?
Anyone who pointed out that the product did not seem to have that many downloads or didn't see what value the product had, plus the fact that the product never had a dollar of revenue, was derided as being irrational.
Now a company (HDSI) that has a track record of selling hundreds of millions of shares of 'decorative' common shares and admitted that they had nothing of value to show for it, appears to be repeating the process with Good Gaming.
It is also not clear why Paul would willingly give up the controlling preferred shares unless he was paid for those shares, or 'something was done' to get him to do it, and the filings do not explain how or why that was done.
It is still not clear how the ownership change happens with Paul starting off with the controlling preferred unless Paul votes for the changes and is somehow paid to give up control of the company.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Trade debt for shares
The problem is that there is not enough value in the company and there are various levels of priority in the debt. That is where the fight is going to happen. Everyone wants to be made whole, but there is not enough value in the company; plus all of the classes of debt want to take the existing equity in the company and 'push them out'.
I expect that a negotiation is impossible and the only way it can be settled is through a bankruptcy filing.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Trump will be too late.
Trump won't/can't get elected until November 2016 and wouldn't take office until January 2017. There is no way the company will make it until then. Even if for some reason the company does not file by December 15, 2015; there is no way they make it another four quarters, losing money at the rate of $200+ million per quarter.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
Paid Promoters?
It is hard to say, but I expect there must have been some promotion since I find it hard to believe that there would be a 400+ million shares traded on a day just from an 8K or press release.
I expect that information will not come out for weeks, plus they have to do something in order to get the market that will allow them to sell the 17B billion common shares that the preferred can convert into.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
I don't think that will help.
I think the company is so 'far in the hole' that not even any political pull could change the outcome.
I also think Peabody Coal is dead also and is going to file in a matter of months. The 2018 bonds are trading around 2; i.e. a $1,000 bond only costs $20.
Louis J. Desy Jr.
No volume to suggest a promotion?
What about that day earlier this week where the volume was a few hundred million shares? I think volume was over 400 million shares and got as high as $0.0004. Almost enough volume to sell off the 500 million shares that the insiders got for arranging the 'wonderful deal' with Good Gaming.
Louis J. Desy Jr.