researching
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I know. I checked the Michigan secretary of state's office. Geographically, these independent bottlers are all over the place. Some are large and others are small.
Thanks. I saw that. Small company.
I was referring to the ones posting buyout and other nonsense. This is an individually owned coca cola bottling company. There's hundreds if not thousands of them that are independent. But like I said, it is good to get another distributor.
The gullible fall for it while the one's that know better made money and got out.
I didn't say it wasn't good. I was trying to clear up which bottling company it is.
While Coca Cola Consolidated is a very large bottler, it's a seperate company. There's many coca cola bottlers all over the U.S. In this case, the company is Hancock Bottling Company dba Coca Cola Bottling Company of Hancock.
That's a different bottling company. There's many of them.
That requires way too much money and wouldn't really do much. How about investing those millions in sales and marketing instead?
Usually it's worthless shares given as a dividend or something inconsequential. So now he "feels so bad" that he wants to do a share buy back and a dividend too? Right.
I don't know since the details aren't in the lawsuit. I don't know if that particular 504 was legal or not. The attorney may have been duped by E-Lionheart's attorney somehow. I wish I knew the whole story.
They were given a letter stating the shares can be free trading when they weren't. The TA had no idea and I'm sure if verified with BBDA, they would've been told the same thing since BBDA authorized it to begin with. The opinion letter is all that matters to the TA.
Yes, I know they used their own attorney. But the company had to know. The question is whether they were also duped. Obviously the TA was duped but they'll issue the shares provided they have an opinion letter stating they can be freely traded. There's not enough into to draw a conclusion.
It depends on if he knew or not. I was pointing out that 10 of the companies mentioned are not trading anymore you have to wonder if they knew what was going on. BW's never been known for honesty and integrity based on things he's done in the past so I wouldn't put it past him.
Either way, the 10 companies mentioned are all stinky pinky's so just the association isn't good.
You're confusing registered shares and restricted shares. All the shares are unregistered but should've been restricted. It's the reason they have to be held for a year before they can be sold. The opinion letter removed the restrictive legend from the shares and made them freely tradeable.
No, BW gave sold them unrestricted shares that should've been restricted by giving the transafer agent an opinion letter that wasn't correct. Fairhills then sold them into the market immediately after telling him they would hold them for a while.
I've read it. All I'm saying is that the 10 companies that were identified in the lawsuit have all been globally locked by the DTC and there could be more actions if the SEC can prove the companies knew about it. It's ironic that they're all globally locked. Even BBDA's chilled.
I think they're still trying to prove that the companies may have known what they were up to and went along with it. The raid tells me they were after records. It's certainly interesting.
Yeah, I know. There's some serious stuff happening for the FBI to get involved. And as unbelievable as it sounds, they were trying to set up a new company already.
I don't work for the SEC so have no idea if anything else is happening with the other companies. There's quite a few global locks though. The litigation is just Fairhills. The DTC starts chilling and globally locking down companies when they get wind of trouble.
I know they're not mentioned in the complaint but this can be just the beginnings of it. Essentially, the companies should've used their own attornies to get opinion letters so they're implying that the companies knew something and where in cahoots. All 10 of the companies listed have all been globally locked so we think it's just the start of other actions.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79064449
They're required to submit an opinion letter every quarter. It's not a letter of intent, though.
That's only a partial list. On OTC Markets website you'll find the agreement listed as an Attorney Letter which BW uploaded the agreement by mistake. I don't remember the exact date so you might have to go through them until you see it.
That's why I'm suspicious as BW's sloppy and far from thorough.
That's not good. I wonder if this happening because of Fair Hills Capital's problem with the SEC.
The date in the Opinion letter for share counts is wrong yet again. Attorneys are usually more careful then that. I sure hope those letters aren't being forged in order to get out of having to pay for them each time.
That's the same attorney he's had for a couple of years now.
If there is a Global Lock, BBDA will cease to trade.
Yeah, they did such a good job that BBDA was caught up in illegal issuances of shares to Fairhills Capital.
Huh? The DTC has this chilled for a couple of years now.
Because most of use know that a dollar is really funny and even a half a cent is over valued! 2.5 Billion shares outstanding and you're thinking a buck a share? lol.
It's not TDA. DTC chilled this POS so clearing isn't easy.
The positives outweigh the negatives? How so? You bought yesterday (Saturday)? Long term investor? lmafo.
Doubtful at best. But it sounds good to half penny pink sheet "investors" looking for any glimmer of hope.
I only know about it by following this stock. I had never heard of a start and park team before. But common sense dictates that an almost last place car doesn't get much attention. It's not a good use of funds, even you would probably admit that.
I have in the past and would if I felt like it. I'd rather watch my Football game.
There's a search tool. Search on "lie, liar, not true, disproven, etc" which makes it easier to follow message threads. There's a reason others use the term liar. It wasn't just made up. There's a history to it. Most that post here don't back anything they write up anyway.
My question was to someone posting about shorts when it's really a myth to protect those dumping shares by keeping them thinking the pps is dropping because of shorts. The only hedge funds that touch these stocks are illegal scammers with promoters and the companies themselves in many cases.
It's not my job to do anything. It's all archived for all to read.