Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The chart y axis? Nothing on the chart y axis gives that conclusion. In fact, X axis/y axis/ slope/ or whatever basic math function you are talking about has anything to do with anything share structure
Low 20s if they keep updating the UI
It's also interesting to make money over it. I'm treading carefully though, I still don't trust it
Either just a delayed trade or the MMs balancing their books. Actually can be an insightful piece of information on larger sample sizes
That's not very true. Actually the cheaper the price the more appealing it would be to investors
Believe it or not my opinion here has changed. I do think the delays and the management of public relations are piss poor but I feel like at this PPS this trade isn't looking so bad. Dilution is a reality down here, sure but that doesn't hurt much when your not heavily invested. The %s here are ripe for a nice gain and I'll be playing a short term position again
2.5 million is a lot actually. In addition, the %s would say otherwise about a company suddenly becoming profitable after taking a toxic loan. Actually in most cases you see the opposite. You see more loans being taken out to help pay back the previous loans + interest. It's the start of the death spiral
Small blocks. It's not in their best interest to bring PPS down
Could it be to the fact nobody really unfollows boards?
There is always dilution. It's just in smaller blocks with lower volume. Someone has to get paid
It's fair to say that is the case. It's ok though, some people can't handle the truth
Penny stocks have been struggling. Even some of the front loaders have had a hard time promoting their stocks. I'm holding nothing more than a day at a time until the %s change in my favor
If you believe in a company then swing trade it. It will do you a lot more good than holding holding through the red
Dilution counts as revenue
That's never the case
It's setting up for no bid. I would steer clear here or you may find that you can't even sell the shares you own
So much for the whales lol
Never follow stock promoters. If you don't front load you get caught. Even then the promoters aren't giving you a good stock just a good rumor. It doesn't take a guru to make up a good rumor
No pr again?
Luck you. Now days that stock would get halted and join the grays. That's when you would care it was a p&d. Thinking, this is amazing then next thing you know you have nothing
I have it at $8. But yes I agree, adding here is foolish. People have been screaming buy since this sucker was at 25. Only reason to buy in is to hold a short term position. Twitter is in the shitter
There is always dilution. Anyone who says there isn't dilution doesn't understand the reason companies trade publicly. To raise funds
Been watching this since cheds alerted me. Got in at .008. I see the opportunity but also read the 8k and understand the risks. Good luck to you
Good luck with that
Yeah I read that. He meant short as in he is flipping 3 million shares and he is holding for a short term. He didn't mean he's barrowing shares. In the sum of things 3 million isn't a whole lot
Short has multiple meanings
Penny land is commonly all lies and manipulation
I still fail to believe that we have any sort of revenue other than the funds raised from selling shares. Q1 will tell the story in full
There is a fine line there though. Why buy in at 16 if nobody wants them? I'll wait until somebody does want them and it's even cheaper
Ronactive, the apostle, longnstrong. your welcome
Your dreaming. Twitter is in the shitter and your predicting 80 long term? I'll wait and buy in at 12
I got two words for you: keyboard warrior
The company logs everything. It's fair to say that they do care but at the investors discretion
More light = more energy. At the same time plants can only take in so much CO2 before they saturate which is why they close their stomatal pores. Energy only excites the antenna complex and starts ETC which leads to glycolysis and the Krebs cycle. It needs light but it's not as important as the nutrients received from the roots. Also you can use auxins to increase the budding. So no lights are not as important as the soil the plant is grown in
As someone with a degree in soil & crop physiology I would like to say that you are only half right. You can cross breed and introduce hormones to suite any environment other than arctic. Increasing yield is easy, I don't need expensive equipment for that. Instead of paying for all the equipment I would rather hit up the laboratory and play around with the gene gun. As time goes on we can introduce new genes to the crops to make them resistant to whatever is in need. I know that isn't what SRNA is attempting to do but giving you some food for thought
.043 is the most random number. It was a level of support like 2 years ago and has no relevance anymore
We have been extremely close for awhile now lol
Even despite Africa, there is still no revenues even though there has supposedly been what, 20+ contracts? A load of bs is all I see. Ed needs to put up or shut up
Price action
CEO is still FOS