Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
As you know a Dr can do what they want regarding off label they just have to answer to the patient the lawyers and the insurance companies and not always in that order!
Then you would of remember that the total number of US cases was indeed close to the limit but the good news is world wide numbers are much larger and if the indication was stretched it could be a really big number.
How do you know? At the time they applied it was close. If you don't ask you will never know.
Orphan designation doesn't apply to the entire world only US.
"No. There is no law or regulation that dictacts (or dictates) an unsuccessful trial is in a PR instead of an 8k" That's what I thought!
Is there a law or regulation that dictacts an unsuccessful trial is in a PR instead of a 8k?
All my posts are true now so you are admitting that your posts in the past have been false. That's the 1st step in coming clean!
Well what questions did you ask and what were his answers?
Baiting and railing is alive well!
Thank God! No more railings!
This should be stickyed!
Thanks PP! This info is very important for this board to understand because as you piont out more than a few around here have lead people to believe that without BTD B-OM is dead in the water and will have 0 value!
Ipix has multiple drugs covering multiple indications. Comparing it to a company that never had any products would be absolutely idiotic!
Yes and when they do it's a lot less valuable! Way more risk for the buying company!
I disagree. They also know how it works against gram positive bugs and inflamation.
Are you suggesting that these deals don't happen over night? What? You mean you have proof that deals can take along time and be complicated.
Lol!
Those 2 additional benefits look important but definitely not to the extent that it has been portrayed on this board.
Good article showing the difference between fast track v break through.
https://weinberggroup.com/blog/fda-expedited-approvals/
B-OM already has fast track designation correct?
I think in order to file a lawsuit one would need to actually own the stock. Of course I am not a lawyer but I would think that would be a min requirement.
Not without the blessing of Leo and Dr.M. They have the voting stock!
So you think that by having a poster there that a BP is going to come up and hand over a double digit deal and the company is going to PR the next day? Lol
Agreed but these patients are desperate and there are so many trials going on and being planned for oncology alone that the industry and the fda better come with a solution soon.
Very interesting article.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07351-8
Do you not read your pr's? It's never changed!
How soon do you think we can pay off P? The topline results should follow quickly.
It's crickets when you asked those questions!
Agree completely! Already developing under fast track.
Thanks for information. Lots of ignorance already today.
I think anyone suggesting adding patent protection for additional indications is a bad sign is probably ignorant of how a BP values the true potential of a drug. Which is sad!
Totally agree!
Maybe this is all happening because it’s required...? Why else would they be spending money and time on patents? Seriously, why? We are short on money and time so why spend money on patents unless it's required!
Lr is 10q due this Friday?
When is 10q due?
That's our boy Scott Nolan Smith!
That's all Nolan knows!
PS: Is IPIX a cult? No, but ipix haters are!
Just a rumor started by a rumor monger. No proof!
Lol! Complete bs!