Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
A discussion by opposing posters on the board. I thought you were referring to the company. LMAO.....almost as good as talking maybes.
Facts only please. These maybes are too hard to follow.
They used to post the information, but as I understand it, have stopped doing that due to crazy people calling for more information. I know for a fact that last year the winners had some harassing calls, and complained to the committee.
You have to be joking about the audit being completed in 2013....How would they have done that without finishing the calendar year 2014....as that is what is being audited. Really funny though.
Maybe they have too much on their plates already....
I know that we had all determined that he had no tradeable shares.....if fact no shares at all.
Not a lot of volume to see this as dilution. I am still awaiting the announcement of the audit by the CPA firm. This is one of the reasons that I had previously said that Bayport, as well as most companies, should not pre-announce any deals, or audits, etc. It just gives ammunition to those that want to find fault. However, for my purpose, this is wonderful to have the price knocked down for the short run. At this price, I will be starting to buy again tomorrow, as I know what is expected here, and what 'should' occur in the demand for shares.
All this is complete nonsense and half truths. LMAO
Wow, now I am confused by your thoughts on this deal with Bayport and what shares have been issued. Now I read here that Shainberg DID NOT GET FREE STOCK to dump, and he has not been selling these fictitious shares? And that he can only sell these fictitious shares ONE YEAR FROM NOW. What next????
Or maybe they gave them to me or my dog.....lots of possibilities. All ridiculous.
You have hit the nail on the head....I too saw this coming a week or two ago.
If I were the CEO, I would not let the cat out of the bag yet either. Shareholders do not have to be kept in the loop ever step of the way. This is going to be more than expected by me.
He may be getting shares, but not of Bayport.
I did not think I could be any clearer. He has received no shares from Bayport.
This is getting tedious. It has clearly been stated that no shares of Bayport are in the mix. Not sure why this erroneous statement should be made. Hmmmmmm, I need to think about reasons.
....and so it did.....day one of 30 over a penny.
I would say LMAO at that, but it is getting too old to respond in that way. Bayport made me a quadruple before, and I am into double right now, with the next news release putting me in that quadruple again.
This is the week it starts moving higher. I will consider adding a small portion to my holdings, now that I can, if it stays below .01 today. By end of week we should see .02, if not higher. I think it will open in the .011 range though.
No shares of Bayport were issued for this financing...so how is it toxic? Words with no meaning?
I do not know where you find any current issues with the DEP. Those were resolved awhile ago.
That post is located in Fantasy Land. Although you may be correct that the facility is not currently in use, it is ready to go with short notice. All clear with the DEP.
That is not true. However, even if this fantasy statement was true, we all know that what is going on now with Bayport is huge. I know we will see the price at least double from here, if not quadruple. When the audited financials are published....very shortly.....we will be in a position to get off the pink sheets, and on the QB.
Love this line....JFK and Bayport will share in revenues from all such associated projects, as well as any future joint ventures between the two companies.
Hmmmm. maybe it is something that was not supposed to be in the financials.
Interesting interpretation of non facts....
An auditor does not hand out NDAs, and then release to SHs confidential information of their clients.
Firstly, where did the thought about me being an insider come from....I said it was only something I needed to confirm. This was regarding my NDA. Wow......much ado about nothing.
As I said, I inferred from the conversation that it was in the final stages, as what they were asking for was a personal confirmation of data that I was aware of. They, in my opinion (inferring) were triple checking that data to make sure the i's were dotted, and the t's were crossed.
What you are suggesting is a Catch 22. If they were to give their best guess timeline for deals, and there was any slippage, they would be viewed negatively.
I did speak to the CPA, and I inferred from the conversation that they were in the final stage of verifying the data. I guess the reserve reports were the last items to be completed. I did not think they were going to take this added time.
One cannot have it both ways, either we are told about deals as they are LOIed or when they are set in concrete and complete. I would rather know as things are unfolding....but that does raise questions about who/what/why/where and how. Again, not sure which is a better way to communicate, but they are trying to let us in for the early stages.
I am not sure where you picked that up from the PR. I read that the audit is being wrapped up, and then they will do what they need to do to file. What words make you 'uncomfortable' with the PR information?
Are you suggesting/saying that you are aware that the audit is not nearing completion. Or are you saying the migration to uplist is not nearing completion?
What I read in the PR was that the audit was nearing completion, and when that is done, they will migrate to the QB. Companies are smart enough to know when they would be eligible....so it would be at least 30/45 days after the filing of the audited financials before they could even consider to file to uplist.
That is correct. Maybe the words should have been NICE UPDATE HERE. The company has obviously seen the light and are opening the curtain so we can see what the plans are, and where they are. Communication was what we were looking for....as well as follow through. This is great.
This press release is really short and very sweet. Well worth the few minutes to read it in its entirety. No shares of Bayport are being offered in this JFK Deal. Looks great for us shareholders.
Wow it is all coming together quickly.
What you wrote was confirmation that the newly issued 'restricted' shares were issued this year....
Start 2014 with an O/S of 15M. Cite a 2014 issuance history of 15.9M. Math time: 15M+15.9M = 54.5M! That is what management claimed. Start with 15M, add another 15.9M, and end up with an O/S of 54.5M. Then in Feb 2015 the TA reports 230M, and in Apr 248M.
The links provided in this referenced message provide confirmation that this is no longer an issue.
I knew that was what you referring to, but would like to be reminded of which post it was, as I am not following this closely, and it appears that others are. I am convinced that there is no issue, but since it has been brought up again, I would like to revisit it if there is a credible source.
Please remind us of which post or poster indicated that they were 'close to the situation'. I do not remember anyone with the right credentials saying that. I do remember a couple of posters speculating about it, but not with real facts.
I call BS on that statement. The restricted shares that you are referring to were issued less than 6 months ago. We might have an issue, when BAYP is uplisted, with those shares becoming tradeable at that time.....as the 1 year period is only 6 months when that happens. But, that is a trade off that I would happily make.