married
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This sounds extremely promising
I figured it out. The way ring around the rosey works is you find a price that is supportive on the buyer end and the seller end.
You then buy low sell high. When several buyers do this it creates support on the .0007 end and those desperate to sell, sell low at .0007. The buyer than puts his shares up for sale at .0008. This is repeated over and over again until the share price is no longer supported and they repeat at another price whether lower or higher. When the stock is really moving though this cannot be done. I think we will still have our run. Too many announcements forthcoming.
Once they have their free shares and are ready to rumble, they will release the .0007's and .0008's hostages and up we go.
This has nothing to do with a pump or dump, it has to do with daY traders playing ring around the rosey with the .0007's and .0008's.
I think they will be announced together as M*M said what else would the news be on (TEXTRAW).
Would you agree though that a few is not 7. Or you would move on to say a week or two and not a few days. I just hope a few is not their way of saying the end of May.
Forget about the technicalities. A few is a couple. Quite a few is a lot.
Friday and Monday have already been taken into consideration by me. You are right in the sense that a few is not a couple when it is stated by M*M. By the person on the street, a few is a couple.
Don't forget ROCK (and roll)
If a couple of days is not equal to a couple of days they should say that.
A couple of days should not be a couple of weeks or a couple of months.
The announcement is also going to be about a completed Textraw merger if you read between the lines. At least that is what they are implying.
I guess couple of days has diffent meanings to different people.
In a couple of days an announcement will be made concerning Textraw (completed deal) should of happened yesterday or the day before. If it (Textraw) deal doesn't get announced by Friday, then to Min*Mar, a couple of days means several days.
According to last Fridays tips, they said they would be announcing something in the next couple of days regarding Textraw and said they got it done. To me that is almost as good as the official Merger announcement. M*M is probably pumping this thing up like crazy right now (reverse boost) and preparing it for takeoff.. Most likely there are a lot of eyes on this one and there will be a bidding war once this thing goes into full thrust. Hopefully bid/ask is very thin and will rise quickly.
I have a feeling it will.
The way they made it sound, it should be tomorrow by their words.
I think financing is all in place (not almost). If they are going to make an announcement in a couple of days, this thing is ready to rock. I was under the impression though that SKGO was going to be fully reporting (on pinksheets). (not no information to limited information).
"with financing almost all in place."
you are gambling at this juncture in the road if you sell.
I think now that it is 99 percent probable that the merger is going through and within days, why would you want to sell.
Are you afraid of making money?
I just got this gut feeling that this is going to run like it did in JAN/FEB of 2010 (Almost to a penny or higher). Anybody else feeling the same thing. This time I think the price will linger at a higher PPS for a much longer time then it did back in 2010.
WE JUST NEED SOME NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Response from Mike Barbee.
From: Mike Barbee <Mike@textrawinternational.com>
Subject: RE: SKGO questions
To: "'P&T Carey'" <carey.t@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Friday, April 8, 2011, 6:05 AM
Please understand that the company does no comment individually but rather to a group via news.
Best,
Mike
News a couple of minutes from the end of the trading day, so that people can get all psyched up about it over the weekend. Followed up with news on Monday, that SKGO is fully reporting on the pink sheets like they claimed they would be in a couple of weeks (via Min*Mar) a couple of weeks ago.
If Skybridge does what we hope/know that it can do
I will have to change my name from skyrocketinsight to Skybridgeoutofsight (as the share price will be so high)
At least we know one thing from M*M perspective. April is going to be an interesting month. Hope that is prophetic.
Never received a reply from Mike Barbee as of yet (on the questions I sent him). He must be extremely busy getting the Textraw reverse merger done.
If you mean MIN*Mar you can put placeholders in there to get it to go through.
I am not sure what you mean. you are posting as we talk.
Will do. Have resent the same email to Mike
Barbee.
I don't believe so. Do you have those figures?
If they are not on the up and up I bet you the atucker deal under Mike Barbee's name got their blood pressure to rise.
Thanks, Hopefully I will hear back from Mike Barbee soon to share it with the board.
It is kind of weird though. I click on email for Mike Barbee and get Allan Tucker. Why would it work this way. To make it look like the Textraw deal was done?
I gave them the benefit of the doubt in that regard, however there was the December 23rd proclamation that the deal may go through then (wouldn't that make a nice Christmas present).
The 23rd of December came and went. They made the proclamation that the deal would be finalized mid first quarter 2011 (mid February) at the latest.
Then January 28th or something like that they received funding from an outside source (and believed they had the money to finalize the Textraw Deal).
Two monthes later they announce that M*M introduced an Indian company to SKGO so they could finalize the deal with Textraw as the Indian company had liquid assets to seal the deal.
Now it seems that they are on schedule to finalize the deal by the end of May. Just what is the game.
With the kind of M*M announcements on Monday/Friday's tips, they would be better off not making an announcement in the first place rather then such uncolorful diluted words that really have little meaning.
I raised my sale price on SKGO substantially based on this procrastination by the company as I said I would (as more time went by) however something doesn't add up with all of their (SKGO/M*M) previous announcements.
I know this may not stand out to some but vague words like seems adds another question mark to the equation. I would like to know who is writing these M*M tips.
Answer: Everything seems to be on schedule for SKGO regarding the 120-day time frame.
This answer was used back in December. Seems, appears or something along that line.
I am still waiting for a concise reply from SKGO(without double talk) as to what is occuring. Not a reply from a child that the dog ate my homework.
Listen folks, we need and deserve concise responses. Not generic statements that can be taken 10 different ways. Maybe when and if SKGO becomes fully reporting on the pink sheets, they can shed the M*M verbage.
I believe this company will work out for investors, it is just the lapse of 3 or 4 months that creates that little bit of doubt as to the validity of previously made SKGO (M*M) statements.
atucker must be Mike Barbee's secretary or something. He probably is not the one who directly responds to inquiries. That is my guess after thinking about it a little bit. Not used to seeing that sort of setup. It is not used where I work.
email I sent to Barbee (alias atucker)
I do not know why Mike Barbee is listed under your email account but here goes anyway. Please forward this to Mike Barbee.
What is going on with the game playing around the Textraw deal? Your shareholders have been given absolutely zero consideration regarding what is going on outside of the
M*M tips that comes out on Monday or Friday.
Please explain
December 23rd 2010
January 28th - 90 to 120 days (funding secured)
Recently announced that an Indian company was sought out to merge with SKGO to get funding to close Textraw deal. Is this one and the same with the funding made available to SKGO (in January 2011) to seal the deal with Textraw?
You need to give a hoot about shareholders rather than making sweet comments that you give a hoot. Email them please.
Several people have invested thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars in your company on good faith based on your M*M statements.
When I clicked on Mike Barbee and get atucker (atucker@textrawinternational.com) that only reinforces that something is amiss with your company.
Again please respond.
Sincerely,
Concerned shareholder,
P.S. this email that I sent you will be shared with the board.
Mike Barbee should give his interjection in here. I called him the other day and he was busy. He is still located within the Textraw company so that would indicate a done deal. I do not know what kind of game is being played here, but in my opinion if they (SKGO) keep farting around with the Textraw completed date they are going to hurt their company.
I believe the financials were due a while back (like several weeks ago). When I asked about the financials I was told that they were looking for a book keeper. They are waaaaaaay over due on this. I wonder how overdue they will be on their self proclaimed fully reporting that was said to be happening any day now?
SKGO information
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SKGO/company-info
This is better than bigcharts and was passed on to me by someone from Ameritrade.
Another way to go about it at the end of the day is have your sale AON. Either it gets filled completely or it doesn't get filled at all.
What would really open up the share price would be if there was a 'x' merger such as the lighting company that we currently are not really even thinking about. That would make 3 possible reverse mergers. It has been pretty quiet about the lighting company but SKGO expressed a lot of interest in this possibility as well.
There was some kind of spiel that with the money left over from the Textraw Merger funding they would pursue the lighting company as well.
There may have been one other company or maybe two more suitable for the reverse merger with the lighting company (as they did the same kind of thing). You just never know though.
Another reason for not doing a RS is because if they did they would not be able to sell many shares. A RS kills momentum.
With the lower share price they are able to do more of a pump and get more money. They will not be anxious yet to do something like this, especially about this time and a pending reverse merger or two announcement. That along with the thing about shareholder value.
Here are my thoughts on this. After re-reading Friday M*M post (20 times or so), I believe that SKGO has already done a reverse merger with the Indian company (as a term of the agreement), this company has been making payments into the Textraw merger already, as alluded in more than one reference on this board that payments were being made. This is not a present tense thing of finding funds as the funds were already found (as posted in January of this year). SKGO and the other company that they merged with are still hashing out details as to who gets what out of the deal. SKGO has made it clear they want to have majority control of the shares of Textraw.
The bottom line here is not if but when. I believe after SKGO becomes fully reporting like this week or next week we will see rapid fire occuring on all fronts.
All of this is being delayed and for good reason. They want to promote this stock and get all of their t's crossed and i's dotted.
I think that announcement of the already merger is being detained as that is probably what is believed to bring in the highest share price (and hence more money for them).
I think that March 25th posting by M*M was worded poorly and they need a new writer so that thoughts can be concisely communicated rather than painted with words that have virtually no inherent value as they are only confusing the daylights out of people.
I really would like to know if this poor writing was intentional.
This is all my opinion but I think we are in the home stretch.
After rereading the March 25th tips for SKGO and taking a lot of the information that we previously received and giving them SKGO the benefit of the doubt, this is the only conclusion that I could come to.
I have seen these same (memo) things floating around for other companies that they will double by March 31st. Some investment companies are trying to get people to sign up for their stock letter so that they can promote their own agenda (like making a stock run). All of a sudden you have a whole bunch of newbies onboard who do not know any better and they are chasing stocks driving the share price up. I would be beware of the hype and concentrate more on the facts.
I am not saying that this memo isn't on the up and up (after all NWTT is sitting at .0003 to .0004 and it would not take a whole lot to double the share price.