Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not unless this Titled industry has a funny, narrow interpretation of the meaning
of the word "Title", which we reckon ttttttttttttttttthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheee
eeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyy, isn't the case.
Oh, ta, Stew, ie, u. Hokey dokey. Will? What?
Reckon we'll make swimming? Looking shakey.
A beer? Why not. With some music.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=12844038
Stewie? What? This must really, shit, some people offf, eh?
Yehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhha ha. Ok, Will, just a quickie.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=11534759
cheers, frankie, enjoy, you honest bastardo.
Morning iceman, morning Xan.
Kol, gotta go with the others on this one.
As,we've said before we have been a bit critical about the CC deal, but, and we'd hope that we might get more of a promotion,but, we really don't know what was in the deal and, as ChangeDirector stated, recently, in
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?
message_id=13863141
"Lastly, if I may vent, if CC is not following up on its obligations about this "rollout", or not doing what GZFX would like them to do, it is GZFX's responsibility to pursue that and get on CC to give it more attention. It's not CC we should be complaining about here, it's GZFX, if they're not doing anything to get CC going."
Know where, you're coming from, but, how about save those kinds of protests for against companies who are doing something which in your mind is more ethically or morally, wrong. Like, when Lion Nathan, took over Toheeys Breweries, years ago and fired some 20+ engineers, on 24 hours notice, I stopped drinking "black" for a number of years. Back to my favorite, now, but, felt good doing it.
Dunno, about getting a sense of empowerment from a post; maybe, save that for bigger things, also.
As for pumps and bashes, don't know and don't give a damn, who is just doing that, or not. As far as I'm concerned, most if not all of those who are labelled by others as "pumpers" do care that the company is a success, in the long run. Shite, man, every one on this board, just about, anyway, would hope that the company does well. As far as the "bashers", Frankie, as wick and others, have stated, only said it like it was and I feel, he, should be free to come back if he wished. cheers.
ps. wish Wood, would bring that lady back, if just for a little while.
Me, I still need tidbits ...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avb4QvQBEI0Ddc7FDRUxzVjsy6IX?qid=20060914214616AANc6DH
just so much to get caught up on ... thanks again for everybody's help, on the way through ...
am listening to da Wolfman ... he sez it all..
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13025835
...except, when he says, "I'm so blue", cuz, that don't apply to one of us,
does it, Stewie, does it, Will. Nope, it, don't. We leave some pictures,
sometimes in view, cuz, memories, are good, .. of you ....
Hee ha he he,
good to be you
good to be me
Elsa agrees ...
Well, relatively, anywhoooooooooo ...
Howdy, kol, sorry, was wandering. Know you're kiddin', but ...
Nope, never a DJ, quite the opposite. Hated having to take piano lessons,
as a kid, because my dad made me practice.
Have always loved music, but, never stuck at anything enough to learn to play well.
have neglected it, for years and my introduction to this place has brought me back into music.
love it and supposed to be good for the brain, so,
what do you reckon, champ, you like that one?
That board is the first music board I was introduced to and so the one I post around.
Listen, the odd time, at others.
What's new, boss, I miss anything?
OT, anyhowwwweeeeeeeeeeeee,
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=12946662
"U.S. geological officials said they had not detected any seismic activity
on the Korean peninsula in the last 48 hours. Japan said it could not confirm
a nuclear test had been carried out."
... you'd think the first would negate the NK claim?
... the second does not back up the first that no seismic activity was detected.
Why didn't Japan just confirm the U.S. postion?
I get too picky at times, but, the question arose in me wittle, mind.
me 2. thanks for your insight, Stehanie.
I'm one of those a'holes who always give
the benefit of the doubt and, always,
but, always, wonder if each I have
a dialogue with, may have something
me and that I may have something useful
to offer to them.
I really do wonder at the fact that he
could/would not give me the countries which
those vicious bastards a way back in
our conversation, were from. He does
seem to have some perverse,
unhelpful agenda.
Think he just may be in some sort of conflict with his self.
Doesn't sound very happy. It's a shame,
maybe, he could be a nice guy, if he
considered changing. I dunno.
Anyway, life's too short, eh whattttooooooo!
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=12946662
G'day, champ, gimme a real good one, eh, what???
Saw a great little movie early this morning, too good to sleep
jack Lemmon and Shirley M'Claine sp? ..
damn can't find the tv program and never got
the title ... an honest cop becomes a top pimp ,,,
you guys must know it.
Was a screrammmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
3 min old????????? Korean test successfull ????????/
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/World/North_Korea
Excellento, Missy, primin' for a swim, later,
to get the circulation pumping.
Have a bit of lawn, to transplant.
EEE EEE EEeveringgggg, is sunny and warm.
And you?
"yes, you wish to beleive that."
...and what do you believe???
"to me you appear to be someone who reads half of what is there and then makes opinions about the writer and the data."
...just trying to get to know you better, like two people talking, with no defensive baggage.
"I urge you strongly to reserve forming opinions until you spend a long time reading up on things."
... ouch, supercilious? advice to an obvious, in need ...gee.
"you also blame others for your own deeds, as suggested in you message."
WHAT, YOU MUST BE KIDDING! WHO THE HELL DID I BLAME? AND FOR WHAT? ohhhh ...
"the posts are back to back and you referenced one of them. So you know exactly which they are."
...that, sir/madam? is a completely erroneous assumption.
"Yet, you blame me for not telling you where they are, even though you already know."
... I never blamed you for anything, but, simply and honestly pointed out, to you, that you could have made it easier, for me, by giving me the numbers of the posts, to which you referred.
Seems, perhaps, an exhibition, for all to see, of a mainly reactive, defensive and petulant position. That is, considering the speed of your reply and relative to the sincere effort I made to accede to your request, in an effort to understand where exactly you are coming from and, so, be fair to your position. Our, brains, have evolved to the position where we have an advantage over the "lower" animals on the evolutionary scale. That is, we have the ability to not react, instinctively and without thinking. I urge you to consider taking more advantage of the "human" faculty to which, however, we have come to. By, the way I do not, know, what is true or not in the area in which we are dealing.
I simply, put, different theories, about our origins, about Gods etc etc; about WHY? HOW? and Where TO? on a relative probability scale, thaaaaaaaaat's it. No more, no less. No beliefs or opinions about you are solidified. Since you refuse to tell me anything about you, at all, then, what else am I supposed to do, but, guess? OOps, I guess, I'm blaming you, again?
"what clearly happened is that you read one post, decided it fit into some schmeme of reality you had and then asked a question about my opinion of what the post meant, yet you didnt look at the other post by me on the same subject, posted witin seconds of the first one."
... you really have to be kidding! I've dealt with this already. One thing is sure, at this point, and that is, that, you are certainly not a trusting individual. I fuck some things up, heaps, and it looks like, from your rather unpleasant and ungracious post that I did it again. Not blaming you, for that, just pointing out that all this bs could have been avoided if you had had the courtesy, or, I guess you didn't think of it, to give me the numbers of the two posts, in the first place. I would have done it and if I had omitted to I would have apologized for not doing so and then helped me, by giving me the correct numbers. Man, you got me really wondering what you're on about.
"so I ask again, have you read both posts, and what are your questions relating to them?"
... if you don't know what to do, by now, then, I hate to say, it, but, to me, it feels that you are living up to your alias.
You, just seem to me like one of those people who, while preaching from a sidewalk or on park grass, are roses until you get asked a question which threatens your position and then the neurosis and conflicts beneath bubbble, bubble, ...and cause trouble.
I don't know, like you appear to do, butt t, I did my best to answer your request and I did it with total sincerity and good will, in my pump, and all I got from you was bs, and that ain't brown sugar.
Whaddaya, reckon, Stewie? He's a bit of a worry. I agree.
You, Will? Well, he certainly, doesn't trust, us. I wonder if he trusts anybody. He certainly hasn't shown you any courtesy, consideration or respect. Yer, right, 'e 'asn't.
JUST DUNNO, WE'LL SEE ........
brainl, dunno why, but, I get the impression that you are one of these people who wish to receive much more than you give.
You, had to be almost coerced into answering one question of the many I have put to you; you answer it by giving me another errand; AND, YOU DIDN'T EVEN HAVE THE COURTESY TO GIVE ME THE NUMBERS, OF THE TWO POSTS TO WHICH YOU REFER.
Anyway, I may, have found them.
#2435, headed "Did the Meccan Worship Yahweh God?", ie are they descendant of Ishmael. It includes "Muhammad, we are told was sent by God to restore the true and pure worship of God" and further ...
We have documented why we reject that claim ... my emphasis ...
and #2436, which, as you said it had "different content", and since it starts with something like, "in contrast" I am guessing is the 2nd one you refer me to.
DO YOU SEE THE TROUBLE I HAVE TO GO TO, TO TRY TO SATISFY YOUR NEEDS? AND, DO YOU SEE WHY I AM BEGINNING TO THINK YOU MAY BE A RATHER THOUGHTLESS AND, FROM YOUR INITIAL COMMENT TO SUSIE, PERHAPS SOMEWHAT ARROGANT, INDIVIDUAL? ..yea, subjective, as hell, I know.
Anyway, and seriously, I know nothing of this stuff, except from some very cursory and scattered reading; evolutions, histories of human consciousness; evolution of the idea of "God" in the human psyche, etc etc. Those comforting Gods, created in the imagination of our ancient ancestors, in an attempt to answer the great questions of our origins, of the present and of the future.
From my position of relative ignorance, the 2nd post, I mention, #2436, appears to speak of the attempts of some Christian missionaries to legitimise the Muslim claim that Meccans have, in fact, shown original allegiance to this "true" God of yours, by putting Hubal, baal beezelbub into a contemporaneous position with Joseph, Moses and David.
Yes, it is a contrasting position and could be taken, in some sense, to looking at the question from an objective point of view.
However, it seems to me the contrast ends, fairly quickly. As it then goes on to use archeological, scholarly and biblical evidence and argument to rubbish the claims, of these, one might say, "Muslim friendly" Christian missionaries, the intent, of this "contrasting" article appears to me to place the two articles is the same category , as the 1st,
So, my sense that ...
4. "you have spent a bit of time attempting to prove that the claim of some? Muslims that they, have always worshipped "the true God" or 'a true God" ??? is a false claim."
still stands.
PLEASE ANSWER ... EASY YES OR NO? ... C'MON, NO MORE OBFUSCATING ... are you or are you not a committed Christian. Don't understand why you resist answering that.
5. So, far, I feel you are a solid, Christian believer and spend some time trying to prove your religion has a more solid structure; has a more reasoned and "true" set of claims and beliefs than the Muslim creed. Right or out of bounds?
BY THE WAY, YOUR POSTS ARE INTERESTING, BUT, IT IS SUCH OLD STUFF AND HOW IMPORTANT IS IT ALL REALLY, WHOSE FICTION AND HISTORICAL CLAIMS ARE THE MOST LEGITIMATE.
Isn't it the fact that it is all, in the beginning, born of woan's, mind, anyhow?
Sheeeeeeesssh, brainl, it is so nice outside, faint breeze and about mid 70's ... too nice to spend on this cobwebby and divisive material ... GET IN THE NOW, MATEY. cheers ...I know you'll tell us that we're all wrong, but, that's cool. Right, Stewie? Yep. Will? Yeah, I reckon, he will.
Isreali bomblets continue to kill ... innocents ...
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/1337132A-5FF4-445F-BB70-7E84E65E082E.htm
For balance, and skeb, maybeee, for your sense of balance, I'd love for you
to post a link to a dumber, guy. Ummmmmmmmm, that could be too tough.
Mandela, was quoted as saying that Herbert was the worst President ever
and he did a lot of thing on that island.
anyway, youve seen it before, but, here ya go again ... I believe in the handshake, too .. this guy??????????
"By their works..
You shall Know them.."
The forgiveness exhibited by the Amish, must surely, be more characteristic of the prophet, which George and his grubby mates, preach, they espouse, than any work, they do.
"Roberts' suicide notes and last calls with his wife reveal a man tormented by memories — as yet unsubstantiated — of molesting two young relatives 20 years ago. He said he was also angry at God for the Nov. 14, 1997, death of the couple's first child, a girl named Elise Victoria who lived for just 20 minutes." ...
... led me to check out "repression" ... and, so, to
"The Origins and History of Consciousness", Erich Neumann.
(henceforth TOHC/EN)
"Thus, as the ego develops, it is imperative to prevent a situation from arising in which the dynamic-emotional component of an unconscious image or archetype would drive the ego into an instinctive reaction and so overwhelm consciousness." ...p. 334.
We, are deeply sorry that Charles Carl Roberts IV, 32, the quiet milkman, felt so angry at his imaginary God, that he could not, allow his repressed guilt, anguish and disappointment, to be assimilated into his consciousness so as to avert this terrible tragedy.
THERE HAS ... TO BE MORE... AND MORE ... shut down!!!
ok, Will.
G'dddddaaaaayyyyyyy, skeb, old son, was thinking of saying hello and here you are! HHHooowwwweellll, aaabooot, that ....
Just light watching Starsky and Hutch, in the beginning ... oh, he just kissed her ... oops ... now fighting with Curly ...
..............
meanwhile, while, front doors keep the bad guys out, where most of us live, not in those fellow countrymen, of yours, who have been used and abused in this shitty, little war of the cabal's.
Who, really gives a shiter, for, .
"The Columbus-based company, part of the 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines, returned home Oct. 7, 2005. The unit was the subject of A&E Television Network's documentary film, "Combat Diary: The Marines of Lima Company," ...
"But life isn't what it used to be. They have scars, and they've seen friends die."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061008/ap_on_re_us/marines_homecoming_anniversary
PS, skeb, don't think it was StEphanie, who is ready to explode, it's the other, a'h'les, who lie and cheat and abuse everything good about our democracies. They repress, she let's it out. She, I feel, assimilates. These guys, just suck in ... hold ... then explode, but, yeah, you sure would need disinfectant, WHEN THEY DO ... A LOT OF .... FLIES.
Our mob, down here is just as bad and sometimes I wonder whether our Foreign Minister, may be involved in other unpalitable relationships.
Whataya you reckon, Stewie? Dunno, he, is a downer. Will? Turn the damn computer off! OOOOooookkkaaayyy. Nite, skeb, later.
One's terrorist is another's ...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061008/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_fighting
Just a crumb, leave the crusts, for others ...
Hi, secure, I agree, eerie, in the beginning
and mellow, all the way.
How about Air, Guitar, new to me.
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?ei=UTF-8&p=air+guitar+championships+buzz&b=3&oid=17239...
goodo, your signature, seems, similar.
Memories are tricky, sometimes.
Like Air Guitar? Is new for me. cheers,
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?ei=UTF-8&p=air+guitar+championships+buzz&b=3&oid=17239...
Hey, gold, are the same guy who sent the spam sort of garbage,
away back and I had that kooky, private conversation with?
Just curious, the last -r, I don't recall.
Bit of a bodgy, are you, it sounds like?
Me too, Painterguy, cruise to da muxic
as for,
"The only area I may have differed from most speculators, was when I felt
I was truly right, dead right, for-damn-sure right-then I would go all the way,
shoot the works." - Jessie Livermore
why do others always say it better?
WORKS FOR ME, EVEN WHEN IT DIDN'T, CUZ, AM HERE, NOW!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! you guys keep saying, that.
Can't believe anybody, these days. SSSSOOOOOB!!!!!!!!!!!
In May, 1972, after a meeting between Nixon, Nat. Sec. Advisor, Kissinger and the Shah of Iran ...
Washington urged the Kurdish leaders to overthrow Saddam ... part of the 30+ year, whatever, war against Iraq ...
... THEY PROMISED THEY WOULD BACK THEM ALL THE WAY ...
"The Pike Report, issues later by the House Select Committee, described what followed as "a cynical enterprise, even in the context of clandestine operations.""
PR, "neither the the foreign head of state(the Shaw), nor the President and Dr. Kissinger desired a victory for our clients(the Kurds). They, merely hoped to ensure that the insurgents would be capable of maintaining a level of hostilities high enough to sap the resources of the neighboring state(Iraq)."
Clark, references, Chailand and Vanly, People Without A Country: The Kurds and Kurdistan ..Zed Press 1980.
Notes from,
"The Fire this Time" ...Ramsay Clarke, who, some say is duplicitous in his position as peace man and examines those criminal politicians and leaders, he has defended. Whatever, his book is useful, for facts.
Henceforth(that right?) to be referred to as TFTT/RC.
Extra long on Pike Committee,
but, yep, 30+, years ago, STILL ... AGAIN... AND 2036???
EXACTLY THE SAME CONCERNS ABOUT EXECUTIVE ABUSE
OF DOMESTIC INTELLIGENCE GATHERING, THE WORTH
OF FBI AND CIA INTELLIGENCE GATHERING, PERIOD,
ETC ETC ETC ..
http://bss.sfsu.edu/fischer/IR%20360/Readings/pike.htm
Thanks, teeppee, and tic.
Have thought for a long time, always sadly, that your country may
be in the hands of something like a military dictatorship
under multi layers of cloack ack acks and deception.
And that Australia is in between you and China.
It's this "need an enemy, thing" ... it SUKS
... and you don't need much to "c", it.
they, won't acknowledge it, but, thanks, Steph. You helpin' me wake up.
Whew, Some 12 hours ZZZZZZZZ, with one wake up.
cheers, tige.
Goooood, idea Trops, gotta keep that stomach healthy ... it feeds you. cheers, goin' Troppo.
he he, out of crumbs ... go to that li'le old lady over there, by the fountain. Good gooseies, or ducks?
Watch the pluvvers, they're matin'.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKkkkkayy ay aye,
have a nice relax with TV.
Have a good one, you guys, I'll pop
out to the garden myself.
Yeh, the TD sucks.
G'day, OD, yep, too long.
Morning, missy, damn near 12 h sleep, looks like I needed it.
cheers, and many frozen choco baa nans, to come. YUM!
"it appears you only read parts of reality and make judgements and opinions from that." ... PLEASE EXPLAIN???
"here is a partial key toward your introspection." HOW YOU RECKON I MORE THAN YOU?
"if you look, you will find where you went wrong."
4. Have only read one of your articles, in another place. WELL ONE OF YOUR POSTS ...SAM SHAMOUN'S ARTICLE. ... DID I DO IT?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13833687
LOST MY FIRST DRAFT HERE, AGAIN ... WHY DO YOU SEND THIS AGAIN? MY MESSAGE TO YOU?
It suggests that you have spent a bit of time attempting to prove that the claim of some? Muslims that they, have always worshipped "the true God" or 'a true God" ??? is a false claim. Have I got that right?
PLEASE ANSWER ...EASY YES OR NO? ... just, for clarity, sake.
5. So, far, I feel you are a solid, Christian believer and spend some time trying to prove your religion has a more solid structure; has a more reasoned and "true" set of claims and beliefs than the Muslim creed. Right or out of bounds?
WELL .. YES OR NO??? NOT UNFAIR QUESTION, IT IT???
NO PERSONAL SUBJECTIVITY PLEASE JUST ANSWER AT LEAST ONE GODDAMN FFING QUESTION ...WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
Double.
Gotcha, thanks.