Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Reverse Merger Consideration/The Cost of the Shell
In a reverse merger transaction, the private operating business must pay for the public shell company. That payment may be in cash, equity or both. Although the cash price of shell entities can vary and changes over time as does the value of all assets, as of the day of this blog, the average cash value of a fully reporting public entity with no liabilities, no issues (such as a DTC chill) and which is otherwise “clean” is between $280,000 – $400,000. The price variance depends on many factors, such as pre- and post-closing conditions (such as a requirement that the public entity complete a name change and/or stock split prior to closing); the ultimate percent ownership that will be owned by the private operating company shareholders; how quickly the transaction can close; whether the private entity has its “ducks in a row” (see below); whether the entities have complete due diligence packages prepared; and whether any broker-dealers or investment bankers must be paid in association with the transaction.
Where the private operating business is paying for the public shell entity with equity, the current shareholders of the public shell company keep a larger portion of their pre-closing equity and therefore own a greater percent of the new combined companies post-closing. That is, the current public company shareholders have a lower level of dilution in the transaction.
For example, in a cash reverse merger transaction, generally the current control shareholders of the public company cancel or otherwise divest themselves of all of their share ownership and the post-closing share ownership is anywhere from 80%/20% to 99%/1% with the private operating company shareholders owning the majority. In an equity transaction, the current control shareholders keep some or all of their current share ownership. In addition, the final post-closing capitalization will generally be anywhere from 51%/49% to 80%/20% with the private operating company shareholders owning the majority.
The percentage of ownership maintained by the public company shareholders will depend on the perceived value of the private operating company and an expectation of what the value of their share ownership could be in the future. Clearly there is risk involved for the public company shareholders. That is, control shareholders may have to decide whether to accept $300,000 today or maintain a stock ownership level that they hope will be worth much more than that at some time in the future. From the private operating company’s perspective, they are diluting their current ownership and giving up a piece of the pie.
Accordingly, in an equity transaction, the parties to the reverse merger will negotiate the value of the private operating business. For business entities with operating history, revenue, profit margins and the like, valuation is determined by mathematical calculations and established mathematically based matrixes (usually 1x to 8x EBITDA). For a development stage or start-up venture, the necessary elements to complete a mathematical analysis simply do not exist. In this case, valuation is based on negotiation and a best guess.
Establishing valuation for a development stage or start-up entity ultimately comes down to an investor’s (i.e., in a reverse merger, public company shareholders who agree to forgo cash and keep equity instead) perception of risk versus reward. Risk is easy to determine: If I could get $300,000 cash for the public shell today, I may lose that $300,000 by accepting equity instead. Reward, on the other hand, is an elusive prospect based on the potential success of a business.
In determining value, an analysis (due diligence) should be conducted on a minimum of the following: market data; competition; pricing and distribution strategies; assets and liabilities; hidden liabilities; inflated assets; technology risks; product development plans; legal structure; legal documentation; corporate formation documents and records; and management, including backgrounds on paper, and face-to-face assessments.
- See more at: http://securities-law-blog.com/category/mergers-and-acquisitions-2/#sthash.gj6VPtZu.dpuf
Not sure been a way for awhile but did MR. Reid do this???
Next is the letter of intent (“LOI”). An LOI is generally non-binding and spells out the broad parameters of the transaction. The LOI helps identify and resolve key issues in the negotiation process and hopefully narrows down outstanding issues prior to spending the time and money associated with conducting due diligence and drafting the transaction contracts and supporting documents. Among other key points, the LOI may set the price or price range, the parameters of due diligence, necessary pre-deal recapitalizations, confidentiality, exclusivity, and time frames for completing each step in the process. Along with an LOI, the parties’ attorneys prepare a transaction checklist which includes a “to do” list along with a “who do” identification.
Not sure how it is going to turn out.
The Transaction
A reverse merger is a merger transaction with the difference being that the target ultimately ends up owning a majority of the acquirer. However, the documentation and process to complete the transaction is substantially the same as a forward merger.
Generally the first step in a reverse merger is executing a confidentiality agreement and letter of intent. These documents can be combined or separate. If the parties are exchanging information prior to reaching the letter of intent stage of a potential transaction, a confidentiality agreement should be executed first.
In addition to requiring that both parties keep information confidential, a confidentiality agreement sets forth important parameters on the use of information. For instance, a reporting entity may have disclosure obligations in association with the initial negotiations for a transaction, which would need to be exempted from the confidentiality provisions. Moreover, a confidentiality agreement may contain other provisions unrelated to confidentiality such as a prohibition against solicitation of customers or employees (non-competition) and other restrictive covenants. Standstill and exclusivity provisions may also be included, especially where the confidentiality agreement is separate from the letter of intent.
Next is the letter of intent (“LOI”). An LOI is generally non-binding and spells out the broad parameters of the transaction. The LOI helps identify and resolve key issues in the negotiation process and hopefully narrows down outstanding issues prior to spending the time and money associated with conducting due diligence and drafting the transaction contracts and supporting documents. Among other key points, the LOI may set the price or price range, the parameters of due diligence, necessary pre-deal recapitalizations, confidentiality, exclusivity, and time frames for completing each step in the process. Along with an LOI, the parties’ attorneys prepare a transaction checklist which includes a “to do” list along with a “who do” identification.
Following the LOI, the parties will prepare a definitive agreement which is generally titled either a “Share Exchange Agreement” or a “Merger Agreement.” In a nutshell, the Merger Agreement sets out the financial terms of the transaction and legal rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the transaction. The Merger Agreement sets forth closing procedures, preconditions to closing and post-closing obligations, and sets out representations and warranties by all parties and the rights and remedies if these representations and warranties are inaccurate.
- See more at: http://securities-law-blog.com/category/mergers-and-acquisitions-2/#sthash.gj6VPtZu.dpuf
KMAG
How You Like Me Now????
The SEC requires that a public company file Form 10 type information on the private entity within four days of completing the reverse merger transaction (a super 8-K). Upon completion of the reverse merger transaction and filing of the Form 10 information, the once private company is now public. Form 10 information refers to the type of information contained in a Form 10 Registration Statement. Accordingly, a Super 8-K is an 8-K with a Form 10 included therein. - See more at: http://securities-law-blog.com/category/mergers-and-acquisitions-2/#sthash.gj6VPtZu.dpuf
I am sure other shareholders will read. You do not have to.
http://securities-law-blog.com/category/mergers-and-acquisitions-2/
Give orders ?
Now that is funny..
Wrong the rule states ALL shareholders have the right to vote on a merger.
http://securities-law-blog.com/category/mergers-and-acquisitions-2/
THE_BAMFACTSTER
Thanks for all your hard work.
I found some reading material you might be interested in.
I found a couple examples that explain why a form 10 can take up to a year.
I will let you read it cause I believe it has to do with a merger.
There are many ways KMAG can do a merger or reverse merger.
Some of the ways need a vote of shareholders.
I hope you enjoy the reading material.
http://securities-law-blog.com/category/mergers-and-acquisitions-2/
Reid hired a smart firm.
Proxy Services - Simply Digital - Lucy
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc
Has a pretty good YouTube channel.
5 Questions You Should Ask Your Transfer Agent:
KMAG YOYO
Would be more appropriate for a KMAG party.
Yes there is usually a phone number and a code to punch in, about a 1/2 hour before the meeting starts. It will be on the proxy.
No video just a conference call in number.
Thanks DJ for posting.
And thank you for the DD you did earlier for me today.
Ahhhh Come on E
Let me have my Kmaginary love
It's not Elvis but I hope you enjoy.
Take care Liam00
WOW
That was very savvy of you to go to this event gatemate
All the big RFID companies where there.
Avery Dennison
Checkpoint Systems, Inc.
http://bigshow15.nrf.com/product-category/tags-labels-merchandising-aids
Well Thanks again gatemate
I seen Ben Bernanke, (@ the 1;22 mark) in the video which tells me this was a big event.
The Official 104th Annual Convention & EXPO Recap
http://bigshow15.nrf.com/
I have some home work to do. Thanks for the lead.
Hi Jaime
All is well here in the North a high of 40 today can not complain about that.
I have the day off so I thought I would check in on KMAG
40 days until "D" day I wish all of KMAG share holders the best.
KMAG Patent For Dual Tag System...
http://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/2520978/summary.html?query=KMA&start=1&num=50&type=basic_search
KMAG Patent For Tag Creation System...
http://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/2403593/summary.html?query=KMA&start=1&num=50&type=basic_search#View_Abstract
I am waiting for Mr. Snowden to release the documents in July 2015
lol
Okay, must be serious.
Thank you for the update.
No Friday update?
It is nice that people came here to save me from Mr Reid.
Arrogance of mankind
Makes me wonder if you are right.
the illustrious (shady) mr reid (is it jeff or dunky) has pulled the wool (lied) over everyone's eyes..(lied) with a completely weird and inexplicable rant(normal)
If a company declares a stock dividend both the naked short seller and the short seller are on the hook to deliver those shares to the lender. This forces the short seller to "buy to cover" so they can return the shares to the lender. Couple this with the typical price appreciation of a dividend announcement and the fact that short sellers can get caught in a stampede that is self perpetuating because all of the short sellers try to "buy and cover" or exit at once. This phenomena is known as a "short squeeze" and drives the share price higher as shorts rush to the exits to close out part or all of their positions or at least whatever is required to satisfy the stock dividend requirement. Stocks with a high percentage of the float sold short are particularly susceptible to this phenomena.
Thank you for sharing.
Most likely the Facebook/Twitter poster was a shareholder here trying to get out of a large position and not actually Reid
Did this person pay for the business lic too?
http://nvsos.gov/SOSEntitySearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=UsP7Cq37lDjidaNQBZ43AA%253d%253d