did the career thing long enough.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
i wish i had.
as pissed as i am that we can never maintain good upward moves, i fear being out of this stock and missing a big, sweet spike.
smells like 1.20s today :(
krak..
i don't now you from Adam, or MD1225, or anybody else here...
no agenda here for me except to voice my amazement/frustration about the lack of monetization after all these years if PPHM has such a sure thing...
but do you have to be so condescending/arrogant? you're becoming our board's version of a guy on the Biotech board.
please let me be wrong
How confident are you about PPHM reaching $5.00+ in the next 6 months?
Consider the beginning of Phase 3 trials by year end.
Consider all the talent and support being brought in to ramp up Bavi development.
Consider Avid is ramping up and capable of producing Bavi.
Consider management has repeatedly said that the are in discussions with partner candidates and have inferred that they want partners on board with Bavi pipeline.
On the scale of 1-10 how confident are you? Please copy and share your number.
1. TekNuLoof - 8
2. Chip 1- 10
3. Patientlywaiting - 10
4. Stevedazs-5
5. Epcjmc-7.8798544558412
6. PGG76116 PLUS 6 cant believe everyone is on the negative side...
7. lemmy - 1
8. JAKE17- 2
9. honestabe13- 1 (i'd be thrilled with getting to $2 by then)
goldfinger did note that, at the moment, pphm are losers.
10 years of 90%-10% yes/no votes don't make them give a hoot about the share price, or us.
maybe 60-40 or 70-30 would get their attention
they'll get their options for sure...on our backs. they haven't earned them this year while the rest of us took it in the shorts.
and the way i see it, my shares have gotten less valuable. the BOD is supposed to care, and they do not. they've actually come very close to openly stating it several times over the years.
i was sorta ok with it for a long time because i figured it would come along after all the 'this is going to be our year' statements.
and now we're back to pre-clinical trials... if P3 isn't stat sig, what then? we wait for the BBs and immuno effects to be monetized as quickly as golden goose of bavi and cotara have been ?
it's about time some regular 'positive' posters started questioning our management's performance relative to delivering value as reflected in the share price! kudos to those who are now agreeing that it's time for this train to leave the station, and tustin should be demonstrating that there's a payoff for getting on board now...and that those who do are not going to be diluted into oblivion before they close a deal. we know tustin is aware of this board, is aware there are people who fight for their cause, and they're aware of what can happen when people start jumping off the ship.
some folks here might want to do some searches on something like "biotech acquisition targets".. it's easy to find 15 or 20 which have been cited in the past year or so which have taken off with less science than people here claim PPHM has... we had a board poster pen a positive article, but we haven't had a legitimate journalist or analyst for a respected firm do it...
manipulation of PPHM? probably, at least to some extent, but wall street continues to doubt that PPHM is attractive, and does not, apparently, feel that there's any need to buy PPHM any time soon... we remain dead money...
Come on, Tustin! DO something to get institutions on board!!!!
CP...you said "we new they would start it alone"...
No, we didn't! Only us pissed off shareholders "knew" it! They said they wanted a partner on board BEFORE THE EOPII meeting, and for the start of pIII!!!!!!
excellent point, goodJohn...
how low can it go without the faithful having anything critical to say?
1.30?
1.20?
1.10?
geo...where are those charts not supporting his point of view?
krak...here you go for positive from me...
Dia might be right about why pphm doesn't seem too concerned about the current situation. they could drop a partnering bomb on us at any time.
i'll admit i'm a crybaby. will others here admit the daily predictions of BTD and AA announcements for the past year have been consistently wrong and stop it? it's like YMB around here more every day.
Krak...so you think it's not a $200,000,000 company at the moment?
what do you think it's worth today, and why isn't the share price reflecting it? same old same old
my comment was not foolish at all.
you guys are, again, reading too much in to your imaginations...
it's around 1.40 because wall street is figuring that it's about a $200,000,000 company at the moment, and most of that is Avid and cash on hand.
THAT'S why it's not hard to figure it can't sustain an upward move without news that separates it from startups.
as has been the case, we're dead money till who-knows-when, again/still
wall street has spoken this morning, but folks here know more about investing, so don't worry.
no need to buy now. there will be additional opportunities after the ASM and the next quarterly earnings, by which time the pps should be lower.
who just bought at $1.52? atone? CP?
ever notice how hard it is to go up and how easy it is to go down?
looking ugly, as expected.
rinse and repeat.
sulaco...
please note that the last 12 years have made road kill out of too many hopium addicts to count on this board. take off the rose-colored glasses or you may be one of them before long.
i love the science, but i'd be quite happy with a 5-10-bagger. i don't need or expect a hundred-bagger, but some folks here seem to think that's a given.
so that's as much as 60 million if they need to do the whole trial.
sounds like there's a cash flow issue brewing, and i can't think of too many ways to address it.
are form T's fairly instantaneously reported, or could this one at 1.52 have been delayed from, say 4:02? how do we know whether the order was from before or after the the call?
or was it a late settlement?
it is not a no-brainer!
for example, if they get through the p3 without a partner and the results aren't at least as good as they were with what was salvaged from p2, we're screwed. where do you think the pps would be then? p3s fail to duplicate p2 results MOST of the time. don't forget that.
all the new knowledge is PRE-CLINICAL...that is, YEARS from validation in humans. by then, something else could well come along, making this stuff less valuable in the marketplace than it is now (which isn't much), before more dilution!!!!!!
it MAY be a home run, but the finish line for this never gets any closer with this management team.
thought we'd have trouble holding 1.40 tomorrow, not tonite!
don't bet on it
Dew...what's your take on the preclinical stuff they're reporting? i know what you think of the PPHM management, but i'm wondering if you still categorize the science in the same class as the BOD...
will we hold 1.40 tomorrow?
what a shock....gains being given back in AH
for the umpteenth time.
people here were sure BPs were in a fight for good old pphm..and pphm was holding out for top dollar.
seems pphm is doing the pursuing...
of COURSE they don't have BTD!!!! the stock is around a buck and a half, for cryin' out loud. does anybody here think smart money wouldn't know if they had it????????
the whining will stop very suddenly if/when pphm monetizes SOMETHING, and i ain't talkin' Dios.
"if" something substantial is announced on earnings report day?
if something substantial happened on earnings day, that would be a first.
i expect no informative update that will move the pps up. that's not how we roll.
i expect tomorrow to be a yawn, and i hope i'm wrong. i don't want to flirt with $1.15 again.
i will also be shocked if there's any BTD info.
who thinks we'll get a big move by opening on tuesday?
man, somebody moves this whenever they decide to...
it's nice to be tag along...
dia..
beg to differ...
to 'outsiders', particularly outsiders with a big bag of money to invest (who have choices for ROI), of course the trial was botched for negotiation purposes! Jeez! "who" botched it does not matter for these purposes!!!! it diminished the results, and if you think i'm off base, look at your brokerage statement and get back to me.
the BOD is decidedly institutionally... 'unfriendly'. that was documented on this board long before many current posters were here, and, last i knew, the BOD hasn't changed in years while the pps has plunged since the necessary reverse split the institutions didn't like.
folks here need to consider whether pphm should be expecting to get 'suggested retail' rather than ..wholesale... in any kind of deal when the oncology value of the anti-ps science currently manifested through bavi has not yet been considered to be undeniable by anybody outside THIS board.
yes, i still hold, but we only have 1 catalyst left for the next couple of years... if we don't do a partnership within a few months, the dead money and pps problem will accelerate down hill.
are all of the optimists here ok going back to $.85-1.10 before P3 results come in?
lovin' the run-up from $1.35 in anticipation of the earnings call!!!