News 
Market Data 
Discover
markp1950
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Notice that the PT of $5.50 is with Swks and MD.
With Elite we might got higher......
Profit taking?
I think that they don't know us yet...
SLTD is putting out VSLR type numbers, and it has a value 16X of SLTD...
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/vslr/revenue-eps
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/sltd/revenue-eps
Am I missing something?
I'd be happy with half the value. 
Half of Australian homes to adopt solar power and move 'off grid' from 2018
New battery technology could allow Australian homes to generate and store solar-powered energy more cheaply than traditional electricity suppliers by 2018, says report
About 15 per cent of Australian homes have solar panels installed Photo: © Milleflore Images - Australiana / Alamy Stock Photo
By Jonathan Pearlman, Sydney10:40AM BST 21 Oct 2015
Australians will be able to use solar panels and batteries to cheaply produce and store electricity within three years, in a “dramatic” development that is expected to revolutionise the nation’s power generation.
A report by The Climate Council, a non-government organisation, found that improvements in battery technology could make homemade electricity cheaper than buying it within three years and could allow half of the nation to start moving “off the grid”.
The panels have led to big electricity savings for the 1.4 million householders who have installed them Photo: Alamy
Australia already has the highest rate of household solar panel use in the world. About 15 per cent of homes have panels installed, roughly double the rate in Belgium, which is believed to have the second highest usage.
The panels have led to big electricity savings for the 1.4 million householders who have installed them, but only about 500 people currently have batteries to store the solar power.
The Climate Council said the cost of producing lithium-ion batteries will fall “dramatically” in the coming years and that each battery’s capacity will grow 50-fold within a decade.
It said a household which spent £5,000 on a battery would make back the money within ten years and that, at such a cost, about half the nation could start adopting solar panels with battery systems.
“By 2018, going off-grid by installing battery storage could be cost-competitive with staying connected as the price of battery storage falls and grid electricity remains expensive,” the council’s report said.
“Together with rooftop solar, battery storage presents an opportunity for Australian households to use a much greater proportion of the solar photovoltaic electricity they generate and minimise the need to purchase expensive electricity from the grid.”
The United States firm Tesla is planning to release a lithium ion battery which is expected to cost less than £2,600 and will be available in Australia – one of the first foreign markets to receive it – by the end of the year.
Power a church get fined $1,000 per day........
Duke Energy urges regulators to fine advocates in solar case
Solar panels at Faith Community Church in Greensboro have become a test of N.C.’s laws against non-utility sales of electricity. File
Duke Energy says the state Utilities Commission should fine an advocacy group $1,000 a day for selling power from solar panels to a Greensboro church.
NC WARN, a Durham group that frequently squares off against Duke, is challenging a state law that says only public utilities may sell electricity. Solar companies and municipal power providers are taking sides.
So-called third-party sales were also the focus of failed legislation this year that would have allowed renewable-energy developers to sell directly to customers.
The North Carolina Utilities Commission has consistently ruled against such interpretations of the law, but asked for comments before deciding the WARN case.
Duke, in filings Friday, said WARN’s request for permission to sell electricity “must be rejected and its blatant disregard for the law and this Commission’s authority should not be condoned.”
Duke has sold power to Faith Community Church since July, without permission, Duke noted.
Duke asked the commission to issue a cease-and-desist order and fine WARN up to $1,000 for each day it violates the law. Those fines could reach about $120,000 if they’re applied to the four months WARN has sold power to the church.
Duke spokesman Randy Wheeless said the commission has assessed fines in other cases and that it’s the commission’s call whether to do so again.
Wheeless said WARN has lost a number of challenges of Duke that the company viewed as baseless and that “there should be consequences for doing that.”
WARN argues that Duke is trying to squelch green energy and advocates for it.
“Duke Energy is entitled to disagree with us, but seeking to financially hammer this 27-year-old nonprofit is more proof that Goliath wants neither competition, criticism, nor scrutiny,” director Jim Warren said in a statement.
WARN insists it is not a public utility because it isn’t selling power to the public but to a specific nonprofit, the church, and providing a “service” in paying the upfront costs of the solar array.
The commission’s Public Staff, which represents consumers, agreed with Duke that the commission can’t legally allow third-party electricity sales. The staff said the commission should order a halt to the sales but did not recommend a fine.
ElectriCities, which represents municipal electric utilities in the Carolinas and Virginia, also sided with Duke.
Interfaith Power & Light, which advocates against climate change as part of the North Carolina Council of Churches, said the commission faces a “moral imperative” to rule that WARN and other third-party sellers should not be regulated as public utilities.
The Energy Freedom Coalition of America, representing solar companies including SolarCity, Silevo Solar and Zep Solar, asked Friday to become a party to the case. The coalition said current law serves as a barrier to companies that lease solar arrays or buy their power.
Bruce Henderson: 704-358-5051, @bhender
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article42209517.html#storylink=cpy
It's Nov 2 2015
Do you know where you elite solar is? LOL!
I hope that our announcement is soon......
Humor of the day....
Going Off-Grid ‘Greedy And Selfish’ Says Electricity Exec
October 29, 2015Energy Matters
http://www.energymatters.com.au/renewable-news/off-grid-australia-em5157/
Australian solar households installing battery systems and ditching the grid altogether will have a negative impact on the wider community according to network provider Jemena.
“The grid is of so much value here, why don’t you want to share your energy with your neighbours,” Jemena managing director Paul Adams is reported to have said.
“Why don’t you want to do something on a community and social basis, why are you so greedy and selfish?”
Jemena, jointly owned by State Grid Corporation of China and Singapore Power, has $9 billion worth energy and water transportation infrastructure across the east coast of Australia.
The so-called ‘greed’ and ‘selfishness’ may be the result of years of tolerating increasing electricity bills and then reductions in solar feed in tariffs. Add to that the ongoing and unfair targeting of solar owners by some power companies, it’s little wonder many might find the idea of divorcing themselves from mains grid supply entirely quite an attractive proposition.
Some solar owners may have choked on their coffee at the accusation of greed given the surplus electricity they export to the mains grid is re-sold at many times the price they receive for it.
However, it is interesting that big companies in the energy sector are having a much different reaction to residential battery storage than they did with solar initially; particularly given the next generation of home battery storage solutions are yet to arrive (but aren’t far off).
It was only a few years ago many in the electricity generation and distribution sector looked down their noses at solar, not perceiving it to be a threat.
How times change – and how quickly.
According to the latest data from Australia’s Clean Energy Regulator, there are now more than 1,464,000 small solar power systems installed across the country; with a collective capacity exceeding 4,479,000 kilowatts.
While a massive grid defection is possible as a result of the energy storage revolution; it’s also possible most installing battery systems will still keep a mains grid connection as a backup – assuming staying connected is affordable.
Such a scenario will be good for the grid in that it will still help reduce load on the network during peak periods and the need for new poles and wires, which Mr. Adams apparently acknowledges.
Big collapse in fossil fuel prices....
How it will affect us, as we are part of the cause.
http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/natural-gas.aspx
Our little neighborhood solar installer passed the 2nd biggest coal company in market cap again.... Lets hold it... ACI vs SLTD YES!
I just voted my 50000 shares between 3 accounts
Florida Supreme Court Clears Hurdle Out Of The Way For Solar Power To Flourish
BY ERIN AUEL - GUEST CONTRIBUTOR OCT 22, 2015 1:19PM
Solar power could soon be flourishing the Sunshine State. Thursday morning the Florida Supreme Court approved an initiative for the 2016 ballot that would allow Floridians to vote to reduce the state’s restrictions on rooftop solar power.
Although solar is growing exponentially nationwide, it has not thrived in Florida. Florida is one of a handful of states that prohibit residents from purchasing electricity from a source other than an electric utility. This has locked out third-party solar rooftop companies, such as SolarCity and SunRun, which install rooftop solar panels on a customer’s property at no cost and sell solar-generated power to that customer at a reduced electric rate.
As ThinkProgress previously reported, a coalition of solar advocates called Floridians for Solar Choice has been leading the effort to change this policy by pursuing a ballot initiative to permit third-party financing for rooftop solar by private companies. To get the initiative on the ballot, Florida required the coalition to first collect 68,314 voter signatures and then have the initiative language approved by the state Supreme Court.
On Thursday, the ballot initiative cleared this major hurdle when the Florida Supreme Court approved the “Solar Choice Amendment” for the November 2016 ballot. Advocates now have to collect the requisite 683,149 signatures to ensure the initiative goes on the ballot. It will then have to pass with 60 percent of the vote in 2016.
Florida’s Attorney General, Pam Bondi, has been an active opponent of these efforts, arguing against it to the state Supreme Court. In a brief filed with the Supreme Court, Bondi called for the ballot initiative to be rejected due to misleading language. “Because local solar energy already exists in Florida, the summary misleads by suggesting the existence of ‘barriers’ and implying that the Amendment is necessary to allow local solar energy,” she stated. However, according to Floridians for Solar Choice’s website, current law “prohibits customer choice and blocks the growth of this abundant, clean homegrown energy source.” The measure is aimed at “expanding solar choice by allowing all customers the option to power their homes or businesses with solar.”
Over the past few months, Bondi has joined the state’s utility companies to push for a rival ballot initiative. Consumers for Smart Solar has focused on discrediting the Floridians for Solar Choice initiative, and says their goal is to “[establish] the right to solar in Florida’s constitution.” The group also claims that the Solar Choice initiative is “shady” and privileges solar companies. Fossil fuel funded organizations like the National Black Chamber of Commerce have “decried the Shady Solar Amendment as misleading.” Critics of the rival initiative have noted that Floridians already have the right to install solar panels, and that efforts to stall third party financing are intended to protect the utility companies’ interests.
Building the state’s renewable energy sector will be important to facilitate compliance with the Clean Power Plan, which requires Florida to reduce its emissions from fossil fuel power plants by 25% by 2030, compared with 2005 levels. According to analysis by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Florida could meet its CPP 2030 goal by increasing renewable energy generation to 10 percent of the state’s electricity mix. The Solar Energy Industries Association ranks Florida as third in the nation for rooftop photovoltaic potential and the National Renewable Energy Lab estimated that the rooftop solar panels in the state could generate between 5 and 6 kWh per square meter installed per day.
Following the release of the Clean Power Plan, the Florida Public Service Commission — the state body responsible for regulating electricity — issued a news release listing the state’s carbon pollution reductions since 2008 and touting the 530 MW of renewable generation that has been added since 2008. This includes rooftop solar, utility-scale projects, and power-purchase agreements. But 530 MW of renewable generation pales in comparison to estimates of Florida’s potential if third party financing was available. In fact, back in 2008, the Florida PSC released a report saying that rooftop solar alone had the potential to generate nearly 100 times that amount.
Attorney General Bondi is also fighting the Clean Power Plan, joining 14 other attorneys general in filing with the DC Circuit for a stay of the rule’s compliance deadlines. Bondi joined them in arguing that EPA’s rule must be stopped because it would cause “irreparable harm” to the states. The Koch-funded group Americans for Prosperity praised Bondi for her participation in the coalition, calling the Clean Power Plan requirements “egregious and unattainable.”
But state polling indicates that both the Solar Choice amendment and the Clean Power Plan are popular among Florida voters. According to a survey conducted by the Republican firm North Star Opinion Research, 74 percent of Florida voters say they support the Solar Choice ballot proposal. And recent polling by Public Policy Polling found that 63 percent of Florida voters say they support the Clean Power Plan.
As a result, Florida is in the midst of a paradoxical fight to limit its ability to increase renewable energy deployment and decrease carbon pollution in accordance with the Clean Power Plan. On the one hand, Bondi and the utility companies argue against renewable energy that cuts pollution and saves money on homeowners’ power bills. On the other hand, Bondi argues that cutting pollution could irreparably harm the state.
As of Thursday morning, Florida voters cleared a hurdle to be able to decide for themselves in 2016.
Erin Auel is a special assistant for the Energy Policy team at the Center for American Progress.
UPDATE
This post was updated to reflect the correct required number of signatures to advance the measure to the Supreme Court for review.
Batterymakers See a Big Break Coming -- No, Seriously This Time
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-16/batterymakers-see-a-big-break-coming-no-seriously-this-time
By Mark Chediak
>California utilities say storage is competing with gas plants
>Global market expected to grow to 11.3 gigawatts by 2020
Energy storage developers have been saying for a decade that the industry’s on the verge of a big breakthrough that will finally turn the battery into a major player in the power market.
At least this time around, they’ve got customers backing them up.
Utilities Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric said at a storage conference this week that supply from batteries now competes against natural-gas fired plants that start up when demand peaks. Storage developers are inking deals with big corporations including InterContinental Hotels Group Plc and Whole Foods Markets Inc., which want to install storage units to save on power bills.
Batteries account for a tiny fraction of global power resources. The technology has been prohibitively expensive and, until recently, relatively unproven. The U.S. government’s Argonne National Laboratory, the same one that built the first nuclear reactor to generate power, just offered its help to companies developing storage. The Energy Department has said the technology is key to adding more of the intermittent solar and wind power that President Obama has called for in his Clean Power Plan.
“For the past century it has been cheaper to schedule coal, gas and hydroelectric generators than to store energy in batteries,” said Hugh Bromley, an analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance. “That is starting to change as technology costs are pushed down the learning curve, largely due to the experience and scale nurtured in the consumer electronics and electric vehicle industries.”
Last year, Southern California Edison signed contracts for 264 megawatts of storage, more than five times the amount required by the state as part of its plan to replace a shuttered nuclear power plant, said Stuart Hemphill, a senior vice president for the utility. The company didn’t plan to ink deals for batteries beyond the requirement, but the offers were more "competitive" with other resources than it thought they would be, he said.
800,000 Households
California’s regulators have asked the state’s three biggest utilities to add 1.3 gigawatts of energy-storage capacity by 2020. A gigawatt is enough to power about 800,000 households.
“This is no longer a science experiment,” said Stem Inc. Chief Executive Officer John Carrington. The developer has sold battery systems to companies including InterContinental Hotels and Whole Foods that allow them to store power when it’s cheap and use it when it’s expensive, he said.
Still, there remains a tangle of regulations and rules that need to be straightened out to allow for battery users to take advantage of the resource, said Jon Wellinghoff, a former chairman of the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. "The rules of the market have not yet caught up with the technology," said Wellinghoff, who is now a partner in San Francisco with the law firm Stoel Rives LLP.
‘Scaling Stage’
In 2015, about 2 gigawatts of energy storage is forecast to be installed globally in countries including the U.S., Germany, Japan and South Korea, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. By 2020, that number is projected to grow to 11.3 gigawatts.
General Electric Co. sees battery costs falling fifty percent over the next five years, a decline that may mimic or even surpass the recent drop in costs for solar and wind power, Pratima Rangarajan, general manager for energy storage at GE, told hundreds of attendees at the Energy Storage North America conference in San Diego. GE has 40 megawatt-hours of operating energy storage systems running and plans to install another 65 megawatt-hours next year, she said.
"We are ready to go to the next stage,” Rangarajan said, “which is the scaling stage.”
Solar and wind power surge in US as shale drilling and coal mining falter
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/carbon-economy/solar-and-wind-power-surge-in-us-as-shale-drilling-and-coal-mining-falter-20151012-gk7gat.html#ixzz3oOSMP9ft
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
October 13, 2015 - 8:34AM
Wind and solar energy continues to fall in cost. Photo: Justin Sullivan
?While the production of fossil fuels drops in the United States, solar and wind power is skyrocketing as technology and cheaper financing drive down the costs.
"In the US, we've known that wind energy can be cheaper than (natural) gas in some states, but solar is now inching toward that same milestone," said Jacqueline Lilinshtein, US analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a firm that advises industry clients on energy issues.
Texas leads the US in wind power, with about 10 per cent of its power from wind. California, Nevada and North Carolina are the nation's top solar states and dominate the market.
The federal government expects a surge in renewable energy in the coming year, especially as solar expands from its traditional base of home rooftop panels to major utility-scale production.
"US solar and wind power generating capacity is expected to see double digit growth in 2016," said Adam Sieminski, the head of the US Energy Information Administration.
This comes as America's fracking boom is starting to falter. The crash in oil prices is shrinking the profits for drillers. Estimated US crude oil production dropped by 120,000 barrels a day last month and is forecast to keep going down for most of the coming year at least.
Coal continues its downward spiral. Even coal areas that weathered past hard times, such as Indiana and Western Kentucky, are having a tough year, and major coal companies are going bankrupt.
"Production is expected to decrease in all coal-producing regions in 2015, with the largest decline on a percentage basis occurring in the Appalachian region," according to the Department of Energy.
Costs of generating electricity from coal and natural gas are rising as renewables penetrate the market and fossil fuel plants run less, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
In the meantime, the cost of wind and solar continued to go down this year, signaling "a significant shift in the generating cost comparison between renewable energy and fossil fuels."
"Onshore wind and solar are both now much more competitive against the established generation technologies than would have seemed possible only five or 10 years ago," said Luke Mills, an energy economics analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
The average US price of coal and natural gas power is still cheaper than renewables at $US65 ($88) a megawatt-hour, compared with wind at $US80 and photovoltaic solar - generating electricity from sunlight - at $US107.
But that gap is shrinking, and renewable costs can be even lower with federal subsidies. Ethan Zindler, head of policy analysis for Bloomberg New Energy Finance, said he saw a solar power purchase agreement in Texas for $US50 per megawatt-hour.
"There are definitely markets where solar is competitive," Zindler said.
Renewables could run into problems, though, as lawmakers push back against helping the industry. The federal solar tax credit is set to expire in 2016 unless Congress renews it.
In North Carolina, which has emerged as a national leader in solar power, the legislature is ending its state renewable energy tax credit at the end of the year.
There's also debate in Congress over the wind tax credit, which allows a reduction in tax payments for the first 10 years of a project. Some lawmakers are targeting the incentive for extinction, but American Wind Energy Association CEO Tom Kiernan said he's optimistic.
"The support we have on Capitol Hill is significant and enduring," Kiernan said.
McClatchy , via? Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/carbon-economy/solar-and-wind-power-surge-in-us-as-shale-drilling-and-coal-mining-falter-20151012-gk7gat.html#ixzz3oOT0E8xo
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
Damn, we get grumpy with no news...
SUNE is coming back nicely.
When is our turn.
I think that we need better headlines!
Solar and wind power just passed another big turning point
October 7, 2015 - 11:47AM
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/energy/solar-and-wind-power-just-passed-another-big-turning-point-20151006-gk2vn7#ixzz3nqplYpEd
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
As more renewables are installed, coal and natural gas plants are used less, making them less cost-effective. Photo: Nicolas Walker
Wind power is now the cheapest electricity to produce in both Germany and the UK, even without government subsidies. It's the first time that threshold has been crossed by a G7 economy.
But that's less interesting than what just happened in the world's largest economy, according to a Bloomberg analysis.
To appreciate what's going on in the US, you need to understand the capacity factor. That's the percentage of a power plant's maximum potential that's actually achieved over time.
Consider a solar project. The sun doesn't shine at night and, even during the day, varies in brightness with the weather and the seasons. So a project that can crank out 100 megawatt hours of electricity during the sunniest part of the day might produce just 20 per cent of that when averaged out over a year. That gives it a 20 per cent capacity factor.
One of the major strengths of fossil fuel power plants is that they can command very high and predictable capacity factors. The average US natural gas plant, for example, might produce about 70 per cent of its potential (falling short of 100 per cent because of seasonal demand and maintenance). But that's what's changing, and it's a big deal.
For the first time, widespread adoption of renewables is effectively lowering the capacity factor for fossil fuels. That's because once a solar or wind project is built, the marginal cost of the electricity it produces is pretty much zero-free electricity - while coal and gas plants require more fuel for every new watt produced. If you're a power company with a choice, you choose the free stuff every time.
It's a self-reinforcing cycle. As more renewables are installed, coal and natural gas plants are used less. As coal and gas are used less, the cost of using them to generate electricity goes up. As the cost of coal and gas power rises, more renewables will be installed.
The virtuous cycle has begun
Wind and solar have long made up a small fraction of US electricity - about 5 per cent in 2014. But production has been rising at an exponential rate, and those two energy sources are now big enough to influence when coal and natural gas plants are kept running, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF).
There are two reasons this shift in capacity factors is important. First, it's yet another sign of the rising disruptive force of renewable energy in power markets. It's impossible to brush aside renewables in the US in the same way it might have been just a few years ago. "Renewables are really becoming cost-competitive, and they're competing more directly with fossil fuels," said BNEF analyst Luke Mills. "We're seeing the utilisation rate of fossil fuels wear away."
Second, the shift illustrates a serious new risk for power companies planning to invest in coal or natural-gas plants. Historically, a high capacity factor has been a fixed input in the cost calculation. But now anyone contemplating a billion-dollar power plant with an anticipated lifespan of decades must consider the possibility that as time goes on, the plant will be used less than when its doors first open.
Capacity Factors Take a Sharp Turn
Most of the decline in capacity factors is due to expensive "base-load plants that are being turned on less because of renewables," according to BNEF analyst Jacqueline Lilinshtein. Plants designed to come online only during the highest demand of the year, known as peaker plants, play a smaller role. In either case, the end result is that coal-fired and gas-fired electricity is becoming more expensive and the profits less predictable.
The opposite is true of wind and solar, as well as new battery systems that can be paired with renewables to replace some peaker plants. Wind power, including US subsidies, became the cheapest electricity in the US for the first time last year, according to BNEF. Solar power is a bit further behind, but the costs are dropping rapidly, especially those associated with financing a new project.
The economic advantages of wind and solar over fossil fuels go beyond price. Still, it's remarkable that in every major region of the world, the lifetime cost of new coal and gas projects are rising considerably in the second half of 2015, according to BNEF. And in every major region the cost of renewables continues to fall.
Bloomberg
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/energy/solar-and-wind-power-just-passed-another-big-turning-point-20151006-gk2vn7#ixzz3nqqRmQZY
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
Renewables to lead world power market growth by 2020
By Roseline Okere on October 7, 2015 4:27 am
http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/2015/10/renewables-to-lead-world-power-market-growth-by-2020/
Renewable energy will represent the largest single source of electricity growth over the next five years, driven by falling costs and aggressive expansion in emerging economies, the International Energy Administration (IEA) said in an annual market report.
Pointing to the great promise renewables hold for affordably mitigating climate change and enhancing energy security, the report, which was released at the weekend, warns governments to reduce policy uncertainties that are acting as brakes on greater deployment.
“Renewables are poised to seize the crucial top spot in global power supply growth, but this is hardly time for complacency,” said IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol as he released the IEA’s Medium-Term Renewable Energy Market Report 2015 (MTRMR) at the G20 Energy Ministers Meeting. “Governments must remove the question marks over renewables if these technologies are to achieve their full potential, and put our energy system on a more secure, sustainable path.”
The reported noted that renewable electricity additions over the next five years will top 700 gigawatts (GW) – more than twice Japan’s current installed power capacity. “They will account for almost two-thirds of net additions to global power capacity – that is, the amount of new capacity that is added, minus scheduled retirements of existing power plants. Non-hydro sources such as wind and solar photovoltaic panels (solar PV) will represent nearly half of the total global power capacity increase”, it added.
The report sees the share of renewable energy in global power generation rising to over 26 per cent by 2020 from 22 per cent in 2013 – a remarkable shift in a very limited period of time. “By 2020, the amount of global electricity generation coming from renewable energy will be higher than today’s combined electricity demand of China, India and Brazil”.
The report said that the geography of deployment will increasingly shift to emerging economies and developing countries, which will make up two-thirds of the renewable electricity expansion to 2020. China alone will account for nearly 40 per cent of total renewable power capacity growth and requires almost one-third of new investment to 2020.
It noted that renewable generation costs have declined in many parts of the world due to sustained technology progress, improved financing conditions and expansion of deployment to newer markets with better resources.
AI
