Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
420Investor - All-time Performance -76.73%
Ouch.
Is anybody even following CANL
lol We're up 60% on our IPOW flip.
"Penny stocks suck" - Pennystocks only suck in the eyes of those that suck at making money in pennystocks....so it makes sense to see you say that.
420Investor75%losseslol
Big win here. Another massive alert by @Orion_Arm. #KindFinance FTW.
lol GREAT JOB!
There's no mystery here folks. TRTC is tremendously overvalued and there's simply no one left who is likely to be fooled into paying too much for shares.
Technicals and fundamentals seamlessly corroborate the well known likelihood that TRTC is steadfast toward new 52week lows.
Don't get had by the hype. Focus on the proven objective analysis that has facilitated our long standing history of accuracy, and simply ignore the rest.
••• ••• •••
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
Down 39% from our recent exit and breakdown confirmation alert.
Be well folks. Don't get trapped.
I'd be embarrassed too.
For a service marketed as a resource providing "trade recommendations," 75% losses since inception is indeed illustrative of failure, and a rather grand failure at that.
CANL isn't news. It barely trades and no one cares. What's more interesting is PHOT, which we all know was 420Investor's most adamantly "recommended" stock of all time.
So compared to PHOT - how has CANL performed?
Exactly.
Again - These are penny stocks. No one is impressed by anybody's ability to point out negatives with respect to a penny stock. They're penny stocks for a reason.
What is impressive is an ability to employ effective strategies by which one can capitalize on the volatility that is inherent in all penny stocks. This is something the 420Investor has, to put it lightly, completely failed at accomplishing....as is illustrated by the horrific performance of the service's "recommendations."
I remember my first penny stock.
That was the conclusion we came to as well - back in March...after our extremely lucrative exit...and when it was still relevant.
Catch up isn't the game to play in the financial markets - otc or otherwise.
420Investor75%Losseslol
A little late on that, by the way. The stock dumped days ago. No one cares.
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump.
IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme.
Again, correct me if I'm wrong...but 420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service.
Moreover - the service's "trade recommendations" have resulted in 75% losses since inception, no?
That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on IPOWorld insofar as its viability as an investment is concerned.
Plus - who cares?
The 420Investor "trade recommendations" have resulted in 75% LOSSES since inception.
Anyone can point out "scams" in the world of penny stocks. Trust me - no one is impressed.
What's impressive is how horrible the performance of 420Investor continues to be.
Weird how the 420Investor service is so focused on a stock that trades $1,000 on a good day. Must be pretty slow over there.
I still think this is funny as hell:
[qoute]"There are so few choices for people looking to trade this sector, that MSRT could get stupidly expensive."[/quote]
What kind of reasoning is that?!
Down 40% since?
I remember my first penny stock. lol
Typical lulzy 420Investor fail.
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
The power of objective analysis cannot be denied.
Don't be fooled folks: No value for shareholders = No value per share.
Simple.
Down 35% from our most recent exit alert...New 52 week lows ahead.
$4.20 target lol
"I see resistance at $2.40, but my target on the position in my model portfolio from late July is $4.20"
lol It didn't require any due diligence to avoid losses and make money in the MJ sector...yet 420Investor STILL managed 75% losses since inception.
What good is due diligence if you still fail miserably?
75%lossesduediligence420investorlol
Surprised I'm not seeing more chatter on this board considering today is the most important day for shareholders since Pandora's inception.
lol "Many" successful recommendations, yet we know the service's performance is marked by 75% losses since inception.
Funny stuff. MSRT is down huge from the 420Investor's touted target of $4.20.
4.20!LOL
Massive amount of selling here, not surprisingly.
New 52 week lows ahead.
No value for shareholders = No value per share.
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
Don't get trapped guys.
That was the conclusion we came to as well - back in March...when it was relevant.
Catch up isn't the game to play in the financial markets - otc or otherwise.
420Investor75%Losseslol
It's ok - All the bad 420Investor reviews aren't worth pouting about. What matters is the performance of the service's "trade recommendations," the vast majority of which led to horrific losses.
As a side note - it was established long ago that negative reviews on the site have been deleted. Presumably the lack of recent reviews reflects that.
But anyway - CANL? Things must be slow over at 420Investor for a stock of this nature to be the focus.
No thanks. Don't see any reason to buy shares at such overvalued prices.
There's nothing groundbreaking about MassRoots, even looking at it through the most optimistic lens.
Just another 420Investor fail as far as I can see.
Looks like we were months ahead of the game on this one too, thankfully.... $1.
Then lower.
Pretty funny that 420Investor recently touted a $4.20 target for this one isn't it? Down 50% since.
Ouch!...even TRTC's former biggest fan, the 420Investor service (which "recommended" folks buy and hold at prices as high as .58), suggests folks cut their losses from the service's failed entry "recommendation" at .18.
The 420Investor service's "recommendation" was to take a ~40% LOSS on TRTC?
TRTC's most adamant promoter doesn't even have faith in the stock hitting .18 again?
They don't call TRTC THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector for nothing.
Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
There is nobody left capable of being fooled into paying way too much for this stock. That's why the trend is down, and has been since we alerted the sub .10 target at our 1.39 exit.
Don't get trapped.
lol Price action isn't the product of mystical forces; It's extremely predictable.
If "the pattern holds", then there is no "bottom."
The pattern is down in spite of my 10% flips, is it not?
The company is exceptionally overvalued and the chart is a blatant fractal for god's sake! lol It doesn't get any easier than this.
Or -
The stock is overvalued and the market is responding accordingly.
Is Dominion "100% OUT" now just like they were "100% OUT" back in September?
"Dominion is now 100% OUT!!!
I still think this is funny as hell: "There are so few choices for people looking to trade this sector, that MSRT could get stupidly expensive."
MSRT420InvestorLOL
Down what like 40% since then?
Typical 420Investor bagholder stock.
You know it's falling apart when...
...even TRTC's former biggest fan, the 420Investor service (which "recommended" folks buy and hold at prices as high as .58), suggests folks cut their losses from the service's failed entry "recommendation" at .18.
The 420Investor service's "recommendation" was to take a ~40% LOSS on TRTC?
TRTC's most adamant promoter doesn't even have faith in the stock hitting .18 again?
They don't call TRTC THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector for nothing.
Low volume pops, big volume drops - huge red flag for a stock facing massive dilution and no shareholder value.
Typical bagholder stock. Don't get trapped.
No. No pps over .05 is/has been justified insofar as the fundamental value of the company is concerned. The previous runs were fueled not by TRTC, but by the hype surrounding cannabis legalization. It was - and still is - like the pump & dumps your grandma warned you about.
We are quite happy with our long term exit alert issued at 1.39. TRTC will never see pps at even half that level again, as far as I can reason.
Be careful with bagholder stocks like TRTC. They are always the most adamantly promoted, yet worst performing stocks on the market.
Tons of selling as expected.
New 52wk low ahead.
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
It's uncanny.
Not a good sign when it comes to light that a stock's most adamant support comes primarily from a population of market participants that fail to properly interpret simple financial statements.
New 52 week lows ahead.
No value for investors = No value per share.
What about all the reviews like this one?
"Following the trade alerts almost wiped out my portfolio. [...] I did better on my own."
There's a massive amount of bid dumping for a stock that's "headed higher"....a red close to boot!
I guess that means we were spot-on yet again.
Obvious bagholder stocks that are riddled with dilution and void of shareholder value don't really head higher...they bump around from desperate pump PRs...but in the end...they're always headed south.
No worries though.
I don't think there's anyone who would argue otherwise...but the same could be said about any sector comprised almost entirely of penny stocks.
Suggesting that any penny stock is a viable investment (doing-so overtly or otherwise) is nothing short of naive (if not inexcusably irresponsible). And that's what has amazed me about the 420Investor service:
It may appear that the tendency we've witnessed - which could be interpreted by some as leading novice investors toward awful investments under the guise of expert analysis - brings about questions of ethics and morality or, at a minimum, whether the service is in fact conducted by a qualified expert - or just a phony.
So which is it that CANL investors should question in light of the 420Investor's long standing history of consistently poor "trade recommendations"?
Or - has the service's performance simply been the result of bad luck?
So the 420Investor service's "recommendations" are beating an index comprised of pump & dump penny stocks (by a weak margin), albeit with horrific losses overall.
Doesn't seem like something to write home about...especially considering the index doesn't take into account any market timing whatsoever at all.
So what I said is indeed correct.:
It's worth pointing out that I could have bought CANL at its 52 week high, still hold that position today - and I would be better off than if I'd followed all of the 420Investor service's 420 opportunity "trade recommendations."