Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It happens, but also provided a nice trade this am.......
Ihub tweaked the way YouTube videos are.......
uploaded. The link becomes the video.
Also, the link is in the video where it says....watch on YouTube.
@#&%!*........
Didn't wanna cuss.
Freakin' data.
It may be wrong, and it’s the company’s position that it is wrong, correct?
IDK that it is. I haven’t read it. I have no DAWG in this hunt. The recent price action got my attention and it’s on my watch list.
But last week’s PR about testing for side effects after previously announcing the product launch makes zero sense.
Why would they plan on launching a product without FIRST knowing any potential side effects?
For that matter, why purchase the product without first knowing the potential side effects?
They have played right into the hands of the critics.
We’ll see what happens.
GL
I’ll play. How ‘bout a salvage vessel(s)?……
With a (ahem) $15B find, they’ll need to work around the clock and stay on top of the worm poop until all the treasure is recovered.
They’ll need a vessel(s) with multiple beds and heads, as well as a kitchen. The dinghy’s won’t cut it.
Also, teredo crust isn’t easy to penetrate. It’s easy to talk about, but not something you want to try and penetrate and remove manually.
Have they invented a Pooper Scooper to aid in the recovery of the “alleged” largest find in history?
Thanks
The executive office is in Florida, and per……
Florida law they have to first advise any potential defendant point by point of what needs to be corrected.
Then any potential defendant has 5 days to correct the record.
But it seems pointless. Either the product does what they claim or it doesn’t.
If it does, then this will be huge, in my opinion. Who cares about a false research report? Don’t they have better things to do than file lawsuits?
If it doesn’t work as claimed,…….well, we know.
There will be lawsuits.
Wasn't he also a "no" at Melbourne?.......
#notevenatrinket
An anti-capitalist will play guilt by association…..but
someone who understands capitalism will ask why did they purchase a product without knowing the potential side effects.
Last week’s PR about the testing for side effects, which came after the launch date PR, shows management has some questionable judgement.
They may all be crooks, they may all be angels, but does the product work as they claimed?
Whether it’s safe or not, management admitted they don’t even know.
Mitra 9 review.....
SFRX has been in business for 16 years…….
or so.
They’ve had 3 active sites during that time. All duds.
But even if one goes along with the premise the treasure is under worm poop at Juno, all these sites were found by others, not SFRX.
In 16 years do they not have research for other wrecks?
Affiliates mock others finds, but where is SFRX’s research paying off anywhere on the globe?
We were told “world domination” would occur by Jan 2021 but were fast approaching Jan 2024 and zip, zero, nada.
Not even a trinket. Not one.
SFRX ~ The NeverEnding Wait.
The Corp’s website says it hasn’t been issued….
Why would SFRX say it has been issued? And why would they tell you before making it public if it wasn’t on the Corp website?
How many more times are you going to suggest folks call the company when Reg FD is crystal clear?
Geez
The better question is……why hasn’t it been issued?
Perhaps SFRX should address that.
They know.
Stop accusing me of acting like a shareholder…….
I don’t avoid questions.
I told you where you’ll get your answer.
I just thought of something. 5000 shareholders. ISBG did a 5000/1 RS.
What’s APRU’s $185K investment in ISBG now worth? About 5000 pennies?
Zo will let you know bro, even if…….
he has to make it up.
One would think they’ve all been requested since APRU has such a large shareholder base.
Over 5000.
Prolly why Tony said, while they last.
Y’all will need a stadium for the beach party.
Will they complete testing before sending…..
the samples to shareholders 21 and older?
I don’t think it’s necessary to complete the testing.
Take the risk and go for broke!!!
Just sayin’
If it works, with no side effects……
That’s where we are.
Why would they purchase the product without knowing if there were any side effects?
But yes, if the side effects are minimal, and it works as advertised, this will be huge.
TBD
Today’s news makes no sense, legally speaking….
Why are they announcing a launch before testing is completed?
Safety Shot, Inc. (Nasdaq: SHOT) today announced that a clinical trial to measure the effects of Safety Shot on blood and breath alcohol has commenced. Safety Shot is the first patented beverage that helps people feel better faster by reducing blood alcohol content and boosting clarity. Created by industry experts and validated by research, Safety Shot is a nutraceutical functional beverage that accelerates the body’s break-down of alcohol while aiding in recovery and rehydration.
While there are many anecdotal studies that demonstrate Safety Shot can rapidly reduce blood alcohol content and the effects of alcohol, a double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial in 36 participants has been initiated. This controlled study will measure the amount of alcohol in the blood and breath, together with indices of alcohol effects.
Again, I am not saying the company’s claims……
are true.
They say they have a patent, but I haven’t looked into that yet. Holiday week.
I think we’ll know soon enough when the product hits the Quick-E-Marts. That’s supposed to be in a few weeks.
If it doesn’t work as claimed, they’ll have a shit ton of lawsuits and it will be over before it starts.
Happy Thanksgiving Janice. Perhaps you meant to……
say that it promotes getting drunk, not drunk driving.
The stated purpose is that it will prevent drunk driving by reducing blood content quickly. Some suggested it may even help with alcohol poisoning. IDK about that.
I have no DAWG in this hunt. The crazy share price action got my attention. I have no opinion on the company’s claims about the product, but I don’t think they’re promoting drunk driving.
The patent is curious. If the company’s claims are valid, and I am not saying they are, like it or not, it will be a winner. At least until someone sues because of a side effect.
*Drunk airline pilots in airport lounges.
*Drunk John’s with hookers.
Just thinking of other “potential” uses if it actually works.
Could be bigger than the Thigh Master. RIP Suzanne Somers.
Happy Thanksgiving LB. Maybe SFRX will…..
give y’all something of substance to gobble about soon.
Apple Rush can't legally conduct business in Illinois......
so I don't know how this "contract" is put together.
As I said before, I don't get giddy about tweets.
I'll opine when I see the details.
Mitra 9 was formed about 3 years ago.....
in Florida.
https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2020%5C1228%5C10702301.tif&documentNumber=L20000395362
An interest exchange occurred a year later.
https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2021%5C1221%5C77024576.Tif&documentNumber=L20000395362
IDK. Tweets aren't what make me giddy........
If it's such a BFD, where's the details?
Congrats on the “apparent” Mitra deal……
4 “sleek” cans for $25…..
They have a deal for Mitra Kratom drinks?……
https://mitra-9.com/collections/frontpage
If so, isn’t that where APRU came from?
4 cans for $25?
Back to cornering the FCOJ market.
No, I’ve been waiting on the deal to……
close since BEFORE last Thanksgiving.
Come on Tony, don’t f… it up.
Need to say CONgrats to my buddies, Jeff, Zo, and Chris.
And of course LC too.
We ain’t getting any younger.
Here’s a link to Illinois Corporate law, with……
some highlights of what to look for if/when Tony ever gets the deal completed.
Remember, we’ve been told that Tony and Ross said it was a full acquisition.
(805 ILCS 5/1.10) (from Ch. 32, par. 1.10)
Sec. 1.10. Forms, execution, acknowledgment and filing.
(a) All reports required by this Act to be filed in the office of the Secretary of State shall be made on forms which shall be prescribed and furnished by the Secretary of State. Forms for all other documents to be filed in the office of the Secretary of State shall be furnished by the Secretary of State on request therefor, but the use thereof, unless otherwise specifically prescribed in this Act, shall not be mandatory.
(b) Whenever any provision of this Act specifically requires any document to be executed by the corporation in accordance with this Section, unless otherwise specifically stated in this Act and subject to any additional provisions of this Act, such document shall be executed, in ink, as follows:
(1) The articles of incorporation, and any other
document to be filed before the election of the initial board of directors if the initial directors were not named in the articles of incorporation, shall be signed by the incorporator or incorporators.
(805 ILCS 5/11.05) (from Ch. 32, par. 11.05)
Sec. 11.05. Procedure for merger or consolidation. Any 2 or more corporations may merge into one of such corporations or consolidate into a new corporation in the following manner:
The board of directors of each corporation shall, by resolution adopted by a majority vote of the members of each such board, approve a plan of merger or consolidation setting forth:
(a) The names of the corporations proposing to merge or consolidate, and the name of the corporation into which they propose to merge, which is hereinafter designated as the surviving corporation or to consolidate, which is hereinafter designated as the new corporation.
(b) The terms and conditions of the proposed merger or consolidation and the mode of carrying the same into effect.
(c) The manner and basis of converting the shares of each merging or consolidating corporation into shares, obligations or other securities of the surviving or new corporation, or into shares, obligations or other securities of any other corporation which immediately before or immediately after the merger or consolidation is effected is the owner of all of the outstanding voting securities of the corporation named as the surviving or new corporation, or into cash or other property, or into any combination of the foregoing.
(d) A statement of any changes in the articles of incorporation of the surviving corporation to be effected by such merger or a statement of the articles of incorporation of the new corporation.
(e) Such other provisions with respect to the proposed merger or consolidation as are deemed necessary or desirable, including provisions, if any, under which the proposed merger or consolidation may be abandoned prior to the filing of articles of merger or consolidation by the Secretary of State.
(Source: P.A. 84-924.)
(805 ILCS 5/11.10) (from Ch. 32, par. 11.10)
Sec. 11.10. Procedure for share exchange. A corporation may acquire all of the issued or outstanding shares of one or more classes of another corporation in the following manner:
The board of directors of each corporation shall, by resolution adopted by a majority vote of members of each such board, approve a plan of exchange setting forth:
(a) The name of the corporation whose shares will be acquired and the name of the acquiring corporation.
(b) The terms and conditions of the exchange.
(c) The manner and basis of exchanging the shares to be acquired for shares, obligations, or other securities of the acquiring corporation or for cash or other property or for any combination of the foregoing.
(d) Other provisions considered necessary or desirable with respect to the exchange, including provisions, if any, under which the proposed exchange may be abandoned prior to the filing of articles of exchange by the Secretary of State.
This Section does not limit the power of a corporation to acquire all or part of the shares of one or more classes of another corporation through a voluntary exchange or otherwise by agreement with the shareholders.
(Source: P.A. 85-1269.)
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ChapterID=65&ActID=2273
Tony’s got the turkeys gobbling. About what,……
they haven’t a clue.
24/7 comedy.
And I do think Tony has worked out something with Ross, it’s just taking a long time to work out.
It wouldn’t be Lena’s fault.
Some enjoy fairy tales. $15B under worm……
poop.
We’re inventing a device that when put in the water can detect a treasure laden galleon within 50 miles.
He’s paid to trash the company.
Our beers.
He and his family bought shares and then trashed the hell out of the company.
#youreagoodfit
Wrong. Someone saw you there bro……
We know.
I am going to pick up the video and we’ll close this argument.
Typical Apple Rush drinker. Can’t hold there…….
fruity beers.
You’re talking about zo. He claims he……
knows everything about everyone, and their families. Number of shares, etc.
Yet not one long finds that creepy.
He’s a good a fit.
At this point, Tony has no leverage……
until APRU is cleaned up. Maybe that’s what 18 month SNAG has been all about.
Who was the investor/promoter in the video with Ross? Dick Bickle?
He may have had the money to close the deal in Aug 22, but then his lawyer looked over APRU’s Articles and rolled on the floor laughing his ass off at the mess Tony had created.
Who knows? At least Tony gave the turkeys something to gobble about.
It’s amusing.
Great call!
Tony never mentioned a merger, so yes…..
it would be a different deal. Only a dumb shit would think that a merger and an acquisition were the same thing. It would be like someone not knowing how to figure out how to who had an option to purchase $3.25MM in APRU shares.
Further, I suggested a merger was being discussed when the video with Ross came out in Aug 22 based on comments being made in the video.
Also, we were told by the Tavern visitor Chris that Tony and Ross told him it was full acquisition.
What do we do with that?
I thought his visit was CONfirmation?
Apparently you forgot that has been my……
mantra since he announced Lena a year and a half ago.
Remember him f…ing up picking up the check and closing on the deal?
MLK Day closing?
Preferred A share cancellation?
Elev8?
Hard Rush launch?
Sales?
Tony tweets and the gullible wet their pants.
Taking over how? It’s skank. How…..
would someone take it over?
This is not a game. Ross doesn’t need……
questions about a unregistered partner or whatever APRU is.
You even said in your previous post you didn’t know who is working for who. As usual, it’s clear as mud.
Tony just needs to be careful, that’s all. At least until whatever deal he has closes.
Don’t f… it up Tony.