Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
this is also interesting from third CO patent: I hope there arent any bad circumstances with TTCM Patents, as example the need to ask the GOV for allowance and or the wait for No Gov Interest.
02-07-2017 Recordation of Patent Grant Mailed
01-19-2017 Email Notification
01-18-2017 Issue Notification Mailed
02-07-2017 Patent Issue Date Used in PTA Calculation
01-10-2017 Dispatch to FDC
01-10-2017 Letter to Applicant - No government Interest / Patent to Issue
12-30-2016 Dispatch to FDC
12-28-2016 Dispatch to FDC
that is maybe very plausible, that the next update will be "Patent Issue Date Used in PTA Calculation" which will make it already in the gazette and no other status updates prior to it. So maybe 14 February could be still possible with some luck, guess the Patent Attorney is doing its best to make it fast as possible happening ( so far there is still work for him) otherwise the 21 february should be our day. TTCM
Another one from todays gazette, took not even 4 full weeks. 14/274,188
Date Transaction Description
02-07-2017 Recordation of Patent Grant Mailed
01-19-2017 Email Notification
01-18-2017 Issue Notification Mailed
02-07-2017 Patent Issue Date Used in PTA Calculation
01-10-2017 Dispatch to FDC
here is one from today issued Patent from 3rd co
Date Transaction Description
02-07-2017 Recordation of Patent Grant Mailed
01-19-2017 Email Notification
01-18-2017 Issue Notification Mailed
02-07-2017 Patent Issue Date Used in PTA Calculation
01-05-2017 Dispatch to FDC
dont know, but could be possible, but i would more think that the PO site reflect status updates with delays and dates them back. Could be also just a procedure from them, example that the whole FDC Procedure, getting seen as 1 point and getting updated at whole and at once and not in steps, from moving to FDC and issuing the patent and listing it in gazette.
We do have a couple more patents, thinking after this patent, we will have more insight in the procedure of getting a patent issued, so that we are going to guess less.
this Patent was fully granted 4 weeks after the Dispatch to FDC Status, the same status which TTCM First patent got on 01-18-2017. So to say, maybe we could be already much further then we think and or that its getting showed at PO Site. Imo, best thing to wait and watch for news and or updates at PO.
i really think that that still needs to be reflect and backdated at PO Site, but to know this exactly, we would self need to wait and see the update coming at PO, to see how many days it will get backdated reflect again..Hoping any moment now. Is it possible that the patent site gets only updated on specific days and or once a week? TTCM
we are now waiting on to The "Issue Notification" which normally comes 2 weeks after "Dispatch to FDC" the Dispatch to FDC status is from 01-18-2017, which means we are now 3 weeks further..but also keeping in mind, that the last status at the patent site could be delayed reflected, so to say, the issue notification could be already mailed to Co, which would still needs to be reflected from the PO.
The average time that an allowed application is in the FDC process is 5 weeks ( my note: 3weeks already behind us) (2 weeks of processing time for assignment of issue date). The "Issue Notification" is mailed approximately 3 weeks prior to the issue date of the patent.
was just thinking, does Google have a Social media platform like facebook, twitter, Snapchat and or Instagram?? Iam not aware of that, but that should also not mean anything, but trying to tell, if GOOG does not have something similar to Twitter and third, maybe that could be the reason and just in case its them, that Dr. Leonard started to knock the door by GOOG first, in thinking, that GOOG could be interested in a Joint Venture with TTCM and its Klickzie thing, to make something similar to already those known ones and to own something like that and to be even better, because of the Patents and Picture Verifikation Ability system. Makes that sense? It does imo.
also possible could be imo, that TTCM wants to use it own Patent for them self and as monopoly, that they arent going to sell the license of it to third, but making its own Klickzie app and its own Social Media Platform and searching just for 1 Fortune 50 CO, which Invests in TTCM and gets part Owner of this CO and with that, would be also %% owner of the patents.
hoping for more details soon from TTCM and after the patent issuance and the possible PR of it.
Would like to hear what kind of deal Co is trying to get and with whom, as we know, there are 10s of possibilities for TTCM to make deals and not with just one Fort 50, but with 10s of them.
some example that comes in to my mind:
- XX CO takes over the CO at whole.
- XX CO buys the patents only.
- XX CO hires the Patent Licence for a specific time.
- XX CO and TTCM going to make the Klickzie platform together for TTCM
- XX CO buys a stake from TTCM and Invest in it and gets a part of CO
- TTCM seeks to sell the license from its Klickzie patents to 10s of Social Media Platforms, like Instagram, twitter and facebook, so that TTCM Patents can be embedded in such apps with picture Ability..by doing this, the story of fake pictures in the future would be completely out of the world ( by those apps, that using it)..Hmm?
So to say, imo, there could be 100s of known apps and platforms which could use our Klickzie Picture Verifikation System in its own system, this could give billions of revenues just by selling the licence from Klickzie.
Really, wondering what kind of deal is CO willing to get and which COs would come in questions for us.
And how genius is that, that our Ceo Dr. leonard saw the need of Klikzie and filled the Patents already 3-4 years ago. Filing Dt: 08/20/2013
hoped this week for the Patent Issuance notification, there is still no update about that at the Patent site, but there is also big potential, that the issuance notification will get delayed and backdated reflected.
Possible that Co got it already and if not, next week Friday it would be 23 days after the last status update, which was on the 18 January. So to say, there was/ would be enough time to issue it imo
It would me really surprise, if the issuance notification would not come next week @latest on friday, but also keeping in mind, that the Patent site can reflect status updates delayed and backdated. So will see and as always, trust on Dr Leonard and TTCM and who cares about days now, when we will have years of success and gain potential from and after the patent issuance.
Money is safe and good parked at TTCM imo
Nice posting MOangler, i agree things changed massive with TTCM, i wont think about the Deliquent times again, but @least we got now some betters and that is OTCQB. I think that Co realized too, that its a Win/ Win for Co and Shareholders, when things looking attractive for both. Why stay at pink when Co could easy trade at OTCQB and they did it, why have 2,4B Dir shares in the OS, when they can also reflect it via the pref shares and they canceled 46% from the OS..
Short said, things looking much better and very attractive now and will look much better, once the patent is issued and the deal with Fort 50 is announced!
I believe that has changed big time. They are now focused. They have developed a multi-faceted, multi-layered plan. In a very straight forward manner they announced that plan for all to pick apart. Most importantly they are working that plan. I believe they are as transparent as need be and as opaque as need be to protect their trade secrets and working relationships with other entities. IMO they have been very open about what they are doing and the status of their work.
Buy the Man, Buy the Plan, most of all, Buy the Patents. They are bank.
Same with the Fort 50 CO, on that time when they said we are in work with one Fortune 50 CO, they had imo already announced the Name of the CO, because Fort 50 cant be much smaller then GOOG, so there is imo no hide needed.
Another possibility would had been imo, when Co had said as example, we trying to get a relationship with Goog, Adobe and or Apple and we already started with one of them to work, talk.
but what do i know. TTCM
In the last weeks of 2016 we began working very hard in developing a KlickZie technology relationship with a giant Fortune 50 company. The implementation of KlickZie technology in this Fortune 50 company would give it a large payoff, both in terms of enhancing its public image and in terms of accelerating the growth of its already giant revenue. We hope and expect that success with this company would engender other successes. Work with this company is still early. If we achieve the success we seek, we will, of course, make a public announcement at that time.
dont know, difficult to say if and what and when, but iam for that, when there are any talks with Investors, its worth to pr it. I mean it would be already enough when Co would say, we are in talk with these Investors and we hoping to get a deal with one of them. TTCM
"We have excellent sources of funding and I spoke to one last night who is in discussions with them". Nice one, tu by getting this reply from our IR Paul. TTCM
thanks for this Beandog: worth a sticky!! TTCM
Quote: from IR, Paul
We have excellent sources of funding and I spoke to one last night who is in discussions with them.
"Has the company made any progress in securing shareholder friendly financing?"
GM TTCMers, 0.033 ask in pm, lets break the 0.03 today!
619k left now @0.03, TTCM
Nice buy, only 647k left @0.03, seems breaking it today, TTCM
No updates so far at Patent Office Site, but thinking that issuance Note will be backdated reflect at the site, like it has happened with a couple other updates, so will see. TTCM
The 0.03 break should @latest happening imo with the Patent issuance notification and or with the Pr for it. TTCM
Possible that TTCM got already the Patent issuance mailed, @least it should happen sometime this week, with that awaiting anytime followed, a Pr about it..will see.
if we remember, many times in the past, when specific walls started to get hits, more buyers came and helped it to break. TTCM
maybe with a couple more of those 50k hits and we could take out the 0.03 and as we know, when buys starting to hit the ask, additional buyers starting also to hit the ask. TTCM
gm, but there are now only 747k left @0.03, break of it will send it imo, TTCM
first hit at 0.03, <800k still to go, TTCM
0.03 very small now vs earlier, so imo a break of it will send it much higher, TTCM
big buy, 0.03 ask up with 850k only now, 0.0315 next, TTCM
free Level2 here; http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TTCM/quote
240k showed @0.0295, 0.0315 showed next, TTCM
nice buy, 240k left @0.0295, 0.0315 is showed next, TTCM
beside CDEL, all mms sitting above 0.0315!! TTCM
ask moved to 0.0348 in pm, BMIC too, TTCM
absolutely, thats why the expectations are high and thats why imo, it makes not much sense not to name the Fort 50 CO, i mean to 90% its GOOG ( also because of the Past of DR leonard) so why hide it, when everyone thinks the same, buts that again imo
i sure agree, but also willing to say, when things arent straight said, it will make room for speculation. For me it makes really not a change if CO is in talk with 1 fortune 50 CO, or with Goog or FB, the Deal or any sort of Deal with 1 Fort 50 is already expected by Shareholders so or so.
So to say, naming the Fort CO will only make Shareholders even more confident about a possible coming deal and not going to change the fact that Co is negotiations with 1..And also thinking that CO it self would profit from it big time, will make 1000s of Investors aware of TTCM and with that, many new possible Investors, its just what CO it self wants.
Imo, on that time when CO says we are in talk with 1 Fort 50 Co, they could already PR the Name..I mean, it can be only 1 of 50 and it can only mean 1 of the biggest 50.
But sure, a Joint announcement will be needed on that time when the deal is done and even why not a joint announcement during Negotiations? Imo, there is no hide needed, beside that when Co does not want to get interfered by third.
thank you and no worries about me, TTCM is worth supporting.
exactly: but would more think to see 10M-50M volume days here soon and by naming the Fort 50 Co TTCM
Naming the F50 will be the beginning of millions of shares traded daily.
forget for a second the SP now, but when it would only say ""we are in talk"" and or "" we are in negotiation"" with the name of the Fort 50 Co, even with an open end and or without any reached deal yet..
But the fact that it would say that TTCM is with GOOG and or with third in negotiations, will makes 1000s of other cos and will make 1000s Investors aware of this Co and its Patents..
So to say, that TTCM would massive benefit from it, if once TTCM would announce the Name from the Fort 50 CO in its early days, because that 1000s of other cos and investors would get followed interested too, which sure would Invest in TTCM too in its early days..
Is already great to be in talk with 1 fort 50 CO, but when they are already 2 of them, that are willing to have the same thing..u get the story. Supply and demand.
And not to forget how high the SP would move after the Name from the Fort 50..