Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh, regarding SCAMS at EDWY, exactly WHAT was the scam? What did Gary Kimmons do that was illegal? Who were the VICTIMS?
If Gary is such a VILLIAN, why is it that there is absolutely NO INDICATION of any wrong doings?
There have been NO:
1. SEC warnings or investigations
2. Shareholder-initiated lawsuits
3. Issues with FINRA
4. Individual shareholders telling their story of being manipulated
5. Stories in the press of suspicious activity
Wouldn't SIMPLE LOGIC dictate that at least ONE of those things would have happened?
Well now, "SIMMONS", this is really getting interesting. Exactly what kind of a "summons" did Gary Kimmons' wife get? Speeding? Come on now!!
Let's see, I'm checking to see when there was a RS associated with Gary. According to www.OTCmarkets.com's financial disclosures section, where the TRUTH is, the last RS while Gary was at EDWY was 2011. That's FiVE years ago. By the way, don't forget, he hasn't been with EDWY for TWO YEARS now.
You asked for links, I just gave it to you. There is no fiction at the www.OTCmarkets.com EDWY site financial disclosure section.
Well now, "MEYERLANE", that's quite a WOPPER!!
Total FANTASY, unsupported by anything, anywhere, in the EDWY filings.
If you have been reading my posts, the FACTS have already been presented here. The ONLY significant money EDWY raised since 2006 was $2 million via a funding by NIR.
Other than that EDWY raised a few hundred thousand dollars over the years via promissory notes to individual investors and a few small debt conversions.
Therefore, it would be IMPOSSIBLE for EDWY / Gary Kimmons to have spent the outrageous amount of your claim.
Those are the FACTS as stated in all EDWY filings. If you believe you have FACTS to refute what I just presented, please bring them forward.
SIMPLY UNTRUE ON SEVERAL COUNTS. There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE in the financials to indicate that there was "millions of dollars in toxic financing" other than the NIR funding in 2006. There were NO OTHER FINANCIERS. If you think you have proof; please provide it.
Regarding Gary Kimmons' accomplishments, I have already given you detailed FACTS regarding his many accomplishments on this blog.
Please justify your accusation.
How so??
That would be some accusation IF IT WERE TRUE. BUT IT ISN'T.
The FACTs simply do not support your contention. The filings starting in 2006 speak clearly to what happened.
In 2006, EDWY raised $2M via an equity funding provided by NIR in New York. Approximately $1.8M of that money was paid to a high-tech software developer in Costa Mesa, CA that worked on the eDoorways project in 2006. The other $200K was used to pay for G & A. If you look at the filings Gary Kimmons paid himself a reasonable salary. NOT hundreds of thousands or millions.
That funding was the ONLY SIGNIFICANT FUNDING EDWY had until the present. Any money that came in was via small investors who received promissory notes and debt conversions. The filings CLEARLY SHOW that the amount of money raised from 2007 until today was to the tune of a few hundred thousand dollars. Again, the filings show that Gary Kimmons paid himself a minimal salary.
So, for the last 9 years, NO ONE GOT RICH.
Any other portrayal of what went on is MYTH.
There are no noteholders.
Yes indeed. VERY COOL!!
TOTAL BS!! Not a bit of this substantiated by FACT.
FLASHZERO INVESTORS, exciting times are ahead. Dr. Jordan's team is outstanding. Let's all get behind him!!
"MEYERLANE", your contention has been refuted by the FACTS numerous times on this blog.
Dr. Ramiro Jordan is CEO and captain of the ship, NOT Gary Kimmons.
FlashZero investors DO NOT CARE about what may or may not have happened at EDWY many years ago.
WOW, very cool!!!
Yes, indeed! This is going to be exciting! Ramiro's come up with a GREAT CONCEPT, and the TIMING could not be better!
"SIMMONS", such sentiments are unfounded and insupportable. Get with the FlashZero team and support the effort that Dr. Jordan is creating!
"MEYERLANE", this is irrelevant. Power channels have nothing to do with FlashZero's services.
Also, ONCE AGAIN, a so-called "quote" from an unconfirmed source.
VAGUE and UNSUBSTANTIATED. What was this '"quote" taken from? AGAIN, no attribution to a SOURCE. Give us the link.
RED HERRING ALERT!!! FlashZero is not involved in any kind of learning ventures.
RED HERRING ALERT!! Again, FlashZero is NOT engaged in developing personalized learning.
RED HERRING ALERT!!!! FlashZero investors, FlashZero's business plan has ZERO to do with EDWY"s old software or its Smart One learning technology.
"MEYERLANE", Dr. Crosscope did not say anything like your "quote." AGAIN, there is no attribution to a source. TOTAL FICTION HERE.
Dr. Crosscope's reputation is beyond reproach.
"MEYERLANE", really, "The Kimmons Gang"?? There is no disagreement. This quote never came from Gary Kimmons. It sounds like it MIGHT be a quote from one individual, Bob Wesson, 4 years ago. But, AS ALWAYS, no source was attributed. I wonder why?
Irrespective, there have been huge changes in the AI world since then, as AI and its use has grown exponentially. The "half-life" of code is very, very short.
The only person who counts is the AI expert who WROTE THE CODE, Dr. John R Crosscope.
Feel free to call Dr. Crosscope and ask him what he thinks about the idea of using Smart One today.
Also, this issue is just another RED HERRING. FlashZero is not in the learning business.
I am referring to the 19 year old Smart One learning software that is purportedly being "stolen" by Gary Kimmons to implement in FlashZero.
Bottom line:
1. FlashZero has no use for learning software.
2. The Smart One software would require so many updates that it's use cannot be justified.
"MEYERLANE", really? 30 years?? How did you come up with that number?
"MEYERLANE", oh really? Please post a copy of the promotional PR's for FlashZero. Also, show us a link to a paid promotional campaign. ANSWER: There have been none.
Do you have an example that contradicts the statement?
"MEYERLANE", from a practical point of view any software that may be in question, anything developed over 2 or 3 years ago would be outdated, and therefore, of NO VALUE to FlashZero.
This is COMMON KNOWLEDGE among those involved in software startups.
Add to that the fact that FlashZero's business plan has NOTHING TO DO with EDWY's plan.
"MEYERLANE", please READ what you just posted. It's clearly stated in the spreadsheet.
Gary Kimmons did not receive a gift. He was compensated in restricted stock for $842,000 in accrued back pay. That's what the debt conversion is referring to.
In fact, he had deferred his salary for quite a few years. That's also clear when you read the OTC Markets disclosures filed by EDWY.
So THANKS FOR POINTING OUT what Gary did for the company!!
"MEYERLANE", FlashZero investors want to know:
Is "Trinidadexpress.com" the definitive source on Dr. Ben Dak?
And the amount funded was?? Based on a phone call with Dr. Jordan it was zero (0).
Incestuous, eh? How so? Saguaro was simply a test bed for 30 days for FlashZero. No money was raised and the site is disconnected.
Regarding the $28 million dollars, do you know what a "loss carry forward" is in accounting? That number goes back to 1988 (27 years) and is a cumulative figure. It started way before Gary Kimmons time.
"MEYERLANE", be SPECIFIC:
1. What GOLDEN PARACHUTE are you referring to?
2. What SCAM? What BUDDY?
Give us the facts.
"MEYERLANE", I did not see your answer to this. Did I miss it???
Oh, I left one out. WHAT previous scam? WHAT buddy?
Please fill in the blanks for us. The accusations are piling up and we HAVE NO ANSWERS!
Explain to us what is making you wonder if the DTC will come after FZRO and Gary Kimmons. What EXACTLY would trigger such a move, and WHY?
Oh really? Explain to us the facts that led you to that conclusion. Exactly HOW are they the same?
What is the point of this post? Exactly what are you trying to say?
What are you trying to say with this post?
This is a post about EDWY and is irrelevant to FZRO.
OH REALLY? So what is it that you think your out of context "cut and paste" MEANS? ANSWER: Not much. Because it is out of context.
GKI appreciated significant revenue late in 1998 and during the first six months of 1999. To set the context, the failed Conpaq employee takeover attempt occurred in July and August of 1998. Gary Kimmons and his team created Around the Web in 80 Minutes and successfully launched it during the next 6 to 9 months. It was shown in full-page ads in Time and Parade magazine if you care to check. The product did quite well.
The company went dormant in the middle of 1999 when the second takeover attempt occurred. The company closed its doors, but Gary Kimmons worked to remediate the company's debt. It took Gary Kimmons until January of 2003 to pay off the company's debt and get the company in order to move forward.