Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
agree very interesting....
as is 3,000,000,000 or 3BILLION and u better bet they will issue every last share imo
not good IMO - we needed to keep the EPS up and PE low - I was wondering why we were drifitng lower into the release , ....arg - well revenues up , future looks bright , i am holding long term , may buy more when we dip Monday.....
1.29387 MAKES NO SENSE? The CTBG PR today said they had 68,000,000 GFCI shares - PLUS and yet undisclosed number of certificate shares, all to take part in 75,000,000 CTBG shares.
1.29387 CTBG/GFCI ratio is enough to cover 57,965,637 GFCI shares?
If the CTBG PR is true 68,000,000 GFCI shares to receive 75,000,000 CTBG shares then it is more like 1.1029411 CTBG for every GFCI
How can they FORCE a redistribution at 1.29387 ratio when they do NOT even know how many GFCI shares are out , and as well, how can they do a raio of 1.29387 knowing the OS is OVER 68million GFCI. What are they going to come back at us again in few weeks and take more and more everytime more shares are handed in from cert form?
LOL - Makes no sense at all , I seriously see SEC stepping in halting CTBG , GFCI, and spanking Jim Dial and Jerry something fierce. IMPO
Per the PR:
Thus, the stock dividend was premised on Grifco having approximately 40 million shares outstanding on the record date. However, according to the DTC’s records there were approximately 68 million Grifco shares outstanding and held in book entry form on the record date. Additionally, there were a yet undisclosed number of shares outstanding held in certificate form, which are not included in the 68 million share total, and which may have not been included in the distribution by Grifco. Mr. Swinford was one such record shareholder of Grifco, who did not receive shares in Grifco’s distribution.
PLUS:
I dont see how they can "re-distribute" the dividend, they DO NOT know how many shares are out on GFCI! Read the CTBG PR it says it pretty cleary > If they re-distribute who says in 2 months they wont have to do it again! ooops we found a 10 million share cert held by RReed and another one for 1000 shares we found with a lost wallet in in a vegas showclub, lol , makes no sense
PER THE PR:
Additionally, there were a yet undisclosed number of shares outstanding held in certificate form, which are not included in the 68 million share total, and which may have not been included in the distribution by Grifco. Mr. Swinford was one such record shareholder of Grifco, who did not receive shares in Grifco’s distribution.
dog u need to post a retraction! wow - I cant believe some of the posts here - this stock is long gone RIP - IMPO of the facts
and dog if you cant follow the link in the post here it is for you in bold
Revenge Designs, Inc. Showcases Its Penske Personalized Honda Ridgeline
Wednesday April 9, 2:00 pm ET
DECATUR, IN--(MARKET WIRE)--Apr 9, 2008 -- Revenge Designs, Inc. (Other OTC:RVGD.PK - News), a specialty car designer and production assembler, provides a sneak peak at the all new Penske Personalized Honda Ridgeline.
Photos of the all new Penske Personalized Honda Ridgeline are available at http://www.numarketsolutions.com/RVGDRidgelines.html
Peter Collorafi, Revenge Designs President and CEO, stated, "I am looking forward to the day when a Revenge Designs, Penske Personalized Honda Ridgeline, is proudly displayed in dealerships across the country, becoming the number one modified Ridgeline available. We have worked hard to put together this one of a kind customized version of the Honda Ridgeline and hope our shareholders are as excited about its prospects as I am. There will be more news to follow as we move our business plan forward to become a major force in the custom designer vehicle marketplace."
About Revenge Designs, Inc.
http://www.revengedesignsllc.com
Yes we seem to have a reversal going , but not a lot of conviction to it , However I see the filing as MAJOR important for CDE for rest of the year , they should be showing revenues from the new mine, the aquired company/mines should be assimilated into CDE structure by now, the share structure should have remained stable for first time in long time , if PROFITS AND REVENUES come thru high side and they show that all of the add ons and bolt ones over last year are working well we could see a strong rally.
Present intraday PE is on high side IMO
However forward PE is way undervalued
This filing needs to smooth out the road to share growth thru end of the year IMO
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 31.41
Forward P/E (fye 31-Dec-09) 1: 8.03
Price/Book (mrq): 0.84
Book Value Per Share (mrq): 3.149
Also need to get better picture on this , NOT SURE HOW CURRENT IT IS , a LOT of these shares were sHorted at the $4-$5 level , these guys might start to cover IF these numbers , guidance, call goes well IMPO - They have good profit locked in right now , could disappear quickly.
Shares Short (as of 25-Jun-08)3: 66.47M
Short Ratio (as of 25-Jun-08)3: 5.4
Short % of Float (as of 25-Jun-08)3: 12.10%
Shares Short (prior month)3: 56.99M
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=CDE
Correct about NO ONE wants to BUY for $.026 - IMO WEGI is very close to filing bankrupcy - But you do have one thing right - they will NOT file and will keep "WEGI" alive and trading thru the hurricane season, give Laurus chance to dump more shares on ill informed buyers. Be real Laurus has to DUMP a few MILLION shares before this has any chance at a run , IMO Laurus will sell strong and hard into any rally - IMPO of course.
WEGI 07/30/08 > O VOLUME > $0.00 Equity traded > Is it Halted? With the millions and MILLIONS of nearly FREE SHARES underlying the OS I would have thought we would see insiders SELLIN volumes all the way to sub penny land - IMPO we see .009 before we see .10 > Just IMPO......
20% drop TODAY > $.02 CLOSE > closing in on 52 week LOW > IMPO WEGI is way overvalued at this price - look at the MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of shares underlying the OS....
OK A huuricane is SLAMMING the US Coast today - WEGI? DOWN 25%?
IMPO WEGI is NOT a hurricane play - It can NOT afford the bonding and insurance needed to handle large insurance jobs , it cant afford to pay for the employees, the materials, the needed cash , major cash only outlays needed in a disaster zone. Do you guys read the filings? This is not some new info or something I am bashing or making up - IT IS IN THE FILING!
IMPO Make a donation to redcross - you will do more to help dsiaster victims and you get a tax write off for the donation , IMPO WEGI days are numbered. IMPO of course , stranger things have happened them seeing a dead pink penny play shoot up , but IMPO this one is riskier then most - Laurus has MILLIONS +++ MILLIONS of shares under .01 ready yo dump at a moments notice , remember, WEGI is not listed it is a Pinksheet , all these filings are a courtesy , they could chose not to file anything at a moments notice.......
You think this is Eccoclean? the 2nd pilot? I would strongly disagree - only because ESPH Ecosphere has already issued PR about the Devon pilot, back in May stating pilot was waiting Texas RRC approval was pending, IMO if ECCI Eccoclean had contract for pilot they would have issued PR. It does not make sense , if this 2nd application and approval for 2nd test was with ECCI Eccoclean dont you think a PR would have been put out and Devon named , just like ESPH Ecosphere did back in May?
http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=esph
lol - u and few other uuuuu "investors" (tic) I am sure. IMPO WEGI is NO longer a hurricane play , the latest filing had info stating WEGI does not carry the insurance and bonding needed for large jobs and does not know if it could get the coverage, plus it has no cash to put crews into a high cash outlay, slow re-payment storm center for clean up, etc... They cant even pay the payroll taxes and payables from normal operations as is, IMPO all you are doing is putting cash into offshore toxic financeers Larus hands when u buy WEGI stock this year..... IMPO
When I did some of my intial DD into ERHC Energy I did a few simple google searchs and found this article posted from the Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau, I think this pretty much sums it up, yes? Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, I have been out of the country on business.
Small Houston oil company at the center of global drama
ERHC's story becomes oddly intertwined with FBI bribery probe
By DAVID IVANOVICH
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau
Sept. 18, 2006, 1:28PM
WASHINGTON - Initially, theirs was a tale to rival that of any legendary Texas wildcatter.
A little-known Houston oil company lands a potential blockbuster deal in the crude-rich waters off West Africa and appears poised for a big payoff.
Negotiating the rocky shoals of West African politics and threats of arrest for sedition, ERHC Energy, a tiny company with no experience in offshore drilling, secures the rights from the government of Sao Tome and Principe to explore a stretch of the Gulf of Guinea thought to hold up to 14 billion barrels of crude.
Then the FBI barges in.
And suddenly, this obscure company's story becomes oddly interwoven with one of Washington's biggest scandals, a bribery probe targeting a Louisiana congressman.
Nine years after wading out to Sao Tome to make its fortune, ERHC — with just two employees — has yet to sink a well. Whether it ever will remains uncertain.
ERHC's legal troubles came to light in May, when FBI agents, clad in bulletproof vests carted off 118 boxes of documents from the company's Westheimer offices. The government was investigating possible "things of value" paid to officials in Nigeria and the tiny island-nation of Sao Tome, according to an FBI affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in Houston.
The FBI has not revealed what information sparked the raid or exactly how all the players in this story might be connected.
To ferret out the truth, investigators will likely be examining a bizarre thread linking an elusive Nigerian billionaire, a polygamous Nigerian politician and Rep. William Jefferson, the New Orleans Democrat recently made infamous for allegedly stashing $90,000 in possible bribe money in his freezer.
Stormy relations
ERHC achieved its enviable position — at least in part — by approaching Sao Tome long before most other companies took notice of the former Portuguese colony.
Dealing with a government little acquainted with the world of oil, the company negotiated a highly advantageous deal in 1997.
But the negotiations, and relations with the government, proved stormy. ERHC was forced to renegotiate the terms of its agreement, not once but twice.
At one point, former ERHC Chief Executive Officer Geoffrey Tirman went on Sao Tomean television and accused government officials of corruption, only to have to flee to the airport to avoid charges of sedition.
The company's prospects appeared bleak.
Strategy paid off
Enter Emeka Offor, or "Sir Emeka Offor" as he is styled, a wealthy Nigerian businessman known to have close ties with both Nigeria's late dictator, Gen. Sani Abacha, as well as the country's current vice president and presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar.
Hoping to interest him in the fate of ERHC, Phil H. Nugent, a Houston energy consultant and major ERHC investor, sought Offor out.
"He had his politics covered," Nugent said in an interview.
Nugent's strategy paid off. Offor proved instrumental in pushing Nigeria and Sao Tome to resolve a long-running border dispute and create an offshore development zone, where international oil companies could bid for the rights to drill.
ERHC's contract with Sao Tome gave it preferential rights in this new Joint Development Zone. In early 2001, as the two countries were creating the joint development area, Offor's company Chrome Energy bought a controlling stake in ERHC.
Despite the company's lack of experience, U.S. producers Pioneer Natural Resources, Devon Energy Corp. and Noble Energy teamed up with the company to explore offshore.
Then, things fell apart.
The company's American partners withdrew.
In November, its independent auditor, Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, resigned. "No reason for the resignation was specified," ERHC said at the time.
A few weeks later, Sao Tome's then-Attorney General Adelino Pereira called on U.S. officials to investigate ERHC's dealings in the region.
Suggestions of impropriety
"At every stage," the attorney general said in a report, are suggestions ERHC and Offor "may have made improper payments to government officials."
The report cited a $100,000 payment Offor's Chrome made to a company controlled by Sao Tomean President Fradique de Menezes, and the role of Foreign Minister Mateus "Nando" Rita played helping to renegotiate ERHC's contract while also holding 500,000 shares of company stock.
Daniel Keeney, an outside public relations consultant acting as spokesman for the company, said, "We care about perceptions of ERHC Energy, and we have been working to fully understand any concerns expressed about our activities in the Joint Development Zone."
In January, ERHC Chief Executive Ali Memon resigned. Six months later, his successor, Walter Brandhuber, would follow him out the door. Company officials said Brandhuber's departure was not related to the ERHC investigation.
The company's chief financial officer, Franklin Ihekwoaba, also stepped down, acknowledging "he should not have used the designation 'CPA',"as he had been doing on company records.
ERHC was able to rebound, announcing new deals with Swiss firm Addax Petroleumand — in February — with China's Sinopec Corp. to replace its former American partners.
Within weeks of the Sinopec deal, the company's stock price doubled, and things were looking up.
FBI sought documents
On May 4, more than a dozen FBI agents swarmed into the company's Westheimer offices.
Investigators were looking for records pertaining to ERHC's negotiations with Nigerian and Sao Tomean officials, the FBI said in an affidavit.
They wanted any documents referencing Vice President Abubakar, as well as Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo and Sao Tomean President de Menezes, and information about stock transfers to a variety of offshore entities.
They also wanted any information about dealings with "Frontier Technology c/o Phil Nugent" at a Bellaire address, court documents show.
Nugent told the Houston Chronicle that he once lived at that address but denied having any knowledge of Frontier.
FBI officials also wanted to see documents regarding "Packard & Packard," presumably Packard, Packard & LaPray, a Beaumont law firm that handled a minority shareholder lawsuit against the company.
The shareholders alleged ERHC's former management violated federal securities laws, filed false information to the Securities and Exchange Commission and used misleading accounting practices.
When Offor was considering buying controlling interest in ERHC, his company contacted the law firm. The shareholders agreed to settle. And the attorneys' fees were paid for in the form of ERHC stock, said Daniel Packard, a partner in the firm.
After raiding ERHC's offices, FBI officials itemized all materials seized. Buried deep in a long list of materials was an intriguing folder labeled "William Jefferson."
Mum on folder
Company officials won't say what was in that folder. And no court documents unsealed to date specify a link between the ERHC investigation and the Jefferson bribery probe.
Indeed, company officials discount any connection.
"At this time, we have not been made aware of any facts to suggest that the U.S. government investigation of ERHC is in any way related to the ongoing investigation of Congressman Jefferson," ERHC spokesman Keeney said.
Both the Justice Department and Jefferson refused to discuss the case.
This much is known:
Jefferson has been on the FBI's radar since March 2005, when an informant accused the eight-term congressman of being part of a possible bribery scheme. The FBI began tailing Jefferson, secretly recording his conversations with the informant about a plan to help a Kentucky telecommunications company known as iGate win contracts in Nigeria and Ghana.
Jefferson has not been charged. But both a former Jefferson staffer and iGate's one-time CEO have pleaded guilty to bribery-related charges.
In secret tapes made by the FBI informant — wearing a wire — Jefferson is heard making plans to pay a $500,000 bribe to Nigerian Vice President Abubakar, according to an FBI affidavit. In July 2005, FBI agents videotaped Jefferson allegedly receiving $100,000 in marked bills from the informant.
Four days later, FBI agents raided Jefferson's Washington apartment and discovered $90,000 hidden in his freezer. The serial numbers on the chilly $100 bills matched those photocopied by the FBI before the sting operation.
Though they also searched the Maryland home of one of Abubakar's four wives, no marked bills were found.
"The vice president has no relationship with Mr. Jefferson, public or personal, other than the usual diplomatic courtesies extending to a high-ranking U.S. official," said Edward Weidenfeld, an attorney for Abubakar in Washington.
Nigeria, Sao Tome visits
None of the documents in the Jefferson probe made public to date mentions ERHC or Offor. But, the FBI affidavit says, "Law enforcement agents have gathered evidence linking Congressman Jefferson to at least seven other schemes in which Congressman Jefferson sought things of value in return for his performance of official acts."
Jefferson, who has served as co-chair of the Africa Trade and Investment Caucus, visited Nigeria and Sao Tome in 2004, a trip paid for in part by iGate and "Leth Energy Inc.," according to PoliticalMoneyLine, an organization that tracks political fundraising and spending.
Two former ERHC executives — one-time president James R. Callender Sr. and former CFO Noreen Wilson — have held positions at LETH, or Life Energy & Technology Holdings Inc., according to SEC and Louisiana state records.
ERHC investor Nugent also did business with the firm, which in August 2004 changed its name to Global Environmental Energy Corp.
Neither Callender nor Wilson could be reached for comment.
Earlier this month, Nigerian authorities revealed that the U.S. Justice Department had requested information on LETH as part of the Jefferson probe.
Sao Tomean officials aren't commenting.
"Nobody spoke about that publicly," said Luis dos Prazeres, executive director of Sao Tome's National Petroleum Agency.
Offor could not be reached. And Abubakar, facing a barrage of criticism at home, did not respond to questions.
His attorney Weidenfeld did assert, "He's had no role with ERHC."
What part Jefferson may have played in the ERHC saga, if any, remains unclear.
"He might have had a meeting here and there," Nugent said. "(Jefferson) was kind of bobbing and weaving on his own."
david.ivanovich@chron.com
It was an armed RAID on the offices? How can you say it was "based on local mores"?
notice the PRs about contracts ALL have this as part of the release> All of the others do not? hmmmm?
This release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 27E of the Securities Act of 1934. Statements contained in this release that are not historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Actual performance and results may differ materially from that projected or suggested herein due to certain risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, ability to obtain financing and regulatory and shareholder approvals for anticipated actions.
I suggest you ALL get to know the meaning of this statement at end of a PR > It is the right to lie IMPO
Forward-looking statement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
In United States business law, a forward-looking statement is a statement that cannot sustain itself as merely a historical fact. A forward-looking statement predicts, projects, or uses future events as expectations or possibilities.
United States law
Under U.S. law, section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, businesses must comply to standards of communication that limit risk factors. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for certain forward-looking statements. Businesses usually include a form of a disclaimer that states that any instance of a forward-looking statement found in their material is only true at the time it was written, and they further claim that they are under no obligation to update such written statements if conditions change or that unexpected occurrences happen to affect the statement afterwords. Such forward-looking statements, however, must be identifiable by the use of certain prescribed words.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-looking_statement
manchild? why do u post hurricane stuff here? The board AND management has already made the proclamation that ECCI is now an oil field play not a natural disaster play? Oil is hot now Katrina is so last week! get with the current tout!
How can WEGI pay to put employees and equipment into a storm damaged area? They cant even pay payrioll tax and current loans? Cash on hand is not even enough to cover current cash and payroll outlays for 60 days? When they went into Katrina they had to get almost $5million loan from Laurus that they still have not paid back and or converted yet. I dont see how WEGI could seriously even pay the bonding and insurance premiums that would be needed to do large scale remidation in a dsisaster zone.
But I know u guys dont care about all that - just flipping on the hopes that a USA disaster raises pps, hoping some really nieve investors chase this stinkie pinkie thinking it is a real company so u all can flip for profits on a disaster, and sure that could happen, pps might rise , but man WEGI is NOT a real hurricane play, they would need minimum $5 mil to chase a disaster like Katrina, WEGI can barely even pay the light bill. IMPO
WEGI SHARE STRUCTURE HAS MILLIONS OF SHARES READY TO CONVERT AT .001 AND .01 > IMPO THE CURRENT OS IS JUST SMOKE AND MIRRORS WHEN U HAVE A STRUCTURE LIKE THIS UNDERLYING THE OS >
Conversion or exercise of our outstanding convertible or other derivative securities could substantially dilute your investment and the existence of our convertible and derivative securities could negatively effect the price of our common stock.
As required by Laurus in connection with consummating our amended financing transaction, we have issued to Laurus, subject to a beneficial ownership limitation of 9.99% :
· the original note, which is convertible at $.09 per share into approximately 19,222,533 shares of our common stock;
· options exercisable at $.0001 per share currently for 27,381,522 and 11,145,000 shares. Laurus has acquired 3,012,811 shares in connection with its partial exercises of the first option; and
· a warrant exercisable at $.10 per share for 13,750,000 shares.
We also have other outstanding options to purchase up to 27,406,273 shares of our common stock, which include 24,306,273 shares issuable upon exercise of options granted to our president and chief executive officer exercisable at $.01 per share with respect to 2,000,000 shares, at $.07904 per share with respect to 5,486,309 shares and at $.09 per share with respect to 15,469,964 shares. Options to purchase 1,350,000 shares issued to our president and chief executive officer are exercisable at prices between $.1875 and $.34.
The issuance of any of these shares will dilute the percentage ownership of our current shareholders. The existence of these convertible and derivative securities could negatively effect the price of our common stock.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
As of May 31, 2008, we had 43,713,709 shares of common stock outstanding. The registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part registers for resale by the selling stockholders 6,800,000 shares of our common stock, or approximately 13.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock inclusive of such registered shares. In addition, Laurus may demand that we file additional registration statements upon 45 days notice to register shares held by them.
We are unable to predict the potential effect that sales into the market of these shares may have on the then prevailing market price of our common stock. It is likely that market sales of these shares (or the potential for these sales even if they do not actually occur) may have the effect of depressing the market price of our common stock. As a result, the potential resale and possible fluctuations in trading volume of such a substantial amount of our stock may affect our share price negatively.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814915/000114420408038509/v118902_s1a.htm
PER SEC FILING > WEGI IS IN DIRE FINANCIAL SHAPE >
Our cash flow from operations has been insufficient to allow us to pay all vendors and creditors on a timely basis.
In view of the losses from operations in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, and the slow collection on certain receivables in litigation, we have been slow to pay vendors and creditors. While these parties have continued to provide us with requisite services and supplies, there can be no assurance that they will continue to do so in the future.
We have been unable to make required monthly payments on our notes due to Laurus and have only obtained short-term waivers with respect thereto.
We currently have outstanding notes to Laurus which include the convertible note in the principal balance as of May 31, 2008 of $5,730,028 due June 30, 2009, and three non-convertible notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $600,000, due June 30, 2009. Since January 1, 2007, we were obligated to make monthly payments of $100,000 to Laurus with respect to the convertible note, applied first to interest and then to principal. The payments due January 1, 2007 through March 1, 2007 were made by virtue of partial note conversions into our common stock by Laurus in the amounts owed. With respect to the payment due on April 1, 2007, a partial conversion of the note was made to pay the interest due and a portion of the principal due. For the payments due May 1, 2007 through August 1, 2007, partial note conversions were made by Laurus to pay only the interest portion of the monthly amounts due. With respect to the unpaid principal payments due for April 2007 through August 2007, as well as the full payments due for September 2007 through January 7, 2008, we have received, on a monthly basis, waivers from Laurus. Pursuant to the agreement reached with Laurus on January 8, 2008, the due date for payment of all amounts for which such waivers were received, as well as for the payment otherwise due February 1, 2008, were extended to a date which is the earlier to occur of the maturity date of the convertible note and the date upon which all obligations under the convertible note have been paid in full. Accordingly, commencing on March 1, 2008, payments of $100,000 were again due on the first day of each month. A one month waiver was received from Laurus for the payment due March 1, 2008. On March 31, 2008, we entered into an omnibus amendment with Laurus pursuant to which the payment due April 1, 2008 was deferred until April 30, 2008 and one-half of the $100,000 payment due May 1, 2008 was deferred until May 31, 2008. The omnibus amendment also extended the expiration date of the warrant held by Laurus by ten years. On April 30, 2008 and May 30, 2008, we entered into additional omnibus amendments with Laurus pursuant to which the payments due March 1, 2008, April 1, 2008 and May 1, 2008 and 95% of the payments due June 1, 2008 and July 1, 2008 were deferred until the earlier to occur of the maturity date of the note or the date upon which all obligations arising under the note and the related loan documents had been paid in full. Given our inability to make such payments in the past, there is no assurance that we will be able to make the payment due August 1, 2008, or any subsequent payment due, or be granted any waiver(s) with respect thereto. In the event of default, Laurus may call all of its loans for immediate payment. As Laurus has a security interest on all of our assets, such a default would have a material adverse effect on us.
We are also obligated to Spotless Plastics (USA), Inc., an affiliate of our previous majority stockholder, under a $500,000 variable interest rate promissory note and an accounts receivable sale agreement in the amount of $150,000. We have not made payments on the note or pursuant to the sale agreement.
Our ability to service our debt and meet our other financial obligations as they come due is dependent on our future financial and operating performance. This performance is subject to various factors, including factors beyond our control such as changes in the general economy, our industry or the environmental and other laws pertaining to the services that we provide, as well as changes in interest rates, energy and other costs.
If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to enable us to service the notes we issued to Laurus, and we are unable to obtain alternative financing, we could be forced to:
· reduce or delay capital expenditures;
· sell some or all of our assets; or
· limit or discontinue, temporarily or permanently, our operations or business.
We have been unable to pay certain payroll tax liabilities.
We have not paid $442,670 in payroll taxes owing by us, exclusive of interest and penalties which may be significant. This amount represents a portion of the payroll tax liability for the period from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007; all payroll taxes due for subsequent periods are current. If our cash flow or other capital resources do not improve, we will be unable to pay these amounts. If we are unable to pay the amounts currently owing, or are unable to pay such amounts as may become due in the future, our business will be harmed and we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814915/000114420408038509/v118902_s1a.htm
SEC FILING > LAURUS SELLING 6,800,000 SHARES > READ IT CAREFULLY - IMO THIS EXPLAINS WHY SO MANY SHARES FOR SALE ANYTIME STOCK GETS SOME ACTION ON THE BID > IMPO
WEGI GETS NO $ - THESE ARE SHARES LAURUS OWNS - WEGI SPENT THIS MONEY LONG TIME AGO >
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/814915/000114420408038509/v118902_s1a.htm
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of our common stock by the selling stockholders.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JULY 3, 2008
6,800,000 Shares of Common Stock
WINDSWEPT ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.
The shares of common stock of Windswept covered by this prospectus may be sold from time to time by Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., Valens U.S. SPV I, LLC and Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., the selling stockholders. This prospectus relates to up to 6,800,000 shares of common stock of Windswept which are issuable upon conversion of the principal and interest of a secured convertible term note due June 30, 2009 held by the selling stockholders having a conversion rate of $.09 per share, subject to adjustment, and/or shares that may be issued, in lieu of cash, in payment of principal and interest on a note.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of our common stock by the selling stockholders.
Our common stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “WEGI.PK”.
The shares of common stock covered by this prospectus may be sold through broker-dealers or in privately negotiated transactions in which commissions and other fees may be charged. These fees, if any, will be paid by the selling stockholders. We will not be paying any underwriting discounts or commissions in this offering. We have no agreement with any broker-dealer with respect to these shares, and we are unable to estimate the commissions that may be paid in any given transaction. For a more complete description of the methods of distribution that the selling stockholders may use, see “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 27.
On July 2, 2008, the closing sale price of our common stock on the Pink Sheets was $.048 per share. You should obtain a current market price quotation before you buy any of the offered shares.
You should read this prospectus carefully before you invest in our common stock offered hereby.
The securities offered by this prospectus involve a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.
Laurus is in dire shape on this one IMPO > They are selling to anyone that will buy - well - someone is SELLING into any rally - not going to let anyone make money this year - IMO they, Laurus and friends, are hoping they can get even and sell as many shares as they can IMPO.
On that subject SBC > What do u think this is going to cost VYEY, is it wortwhile for such an obviously small oil well , I mean its not like a gusher or they would not need this stimulation? Is this same thing , just BS PR spending unneeded money just to get the wow factor of PR on oil and not produce much oil in the end...
Per PR>
Weatherford engineering has recommended a stimulation treatment for the oil zone in Victory's ninth well. Initially, a testing unit will be moved on location this week to determine the economic potential of the zone. Once the testing is completed and the results analyzed, a decision will be made to move forward with the ideal stimulation treatment.
Be careful , Pinksheet rules are in effect , or should I say LACK of rules are in effect IMO.eom
Yes, I agree , IMO ERHE should sell the asset, dividend it out and or merge sell to another company and or roll asset into a new shell , these investigations taint the stock badly, if it is true or not, if it is over or not, the dark cloud still looms over them and it is not going away. The asset is worth a LOT of money but having it locked in this tainted shell it will always be a $.50+/- stock IMPO
The only problem is when you do DD into ERHE you find a slew of investigations is underway. SEC, DOJ AND Senate Homeland security investigations, when you do DD into ERHE you quickly find the ERHC Energy offices were raided by an armed swat team in 2006. IMO NO WAY large institutional investors will invest in this company or partner with it, the ERHC Energy shell needs to disappear and assets rolled into a new shell , the leases are very valuable but the current EHRE shell is severely damaged, I was very interested in investing in the stock until I did one google search and read one filing , these guys are being attacked by some high level US agencies and it is not going away. IMO No way big money will buy into this until these issues are gone and or the asset is rolled into a new shell with new management IMPO
Honda sold close to 14000 gotcha , I thought u were saying Revenge sold close to 14000 , gotcha . and sure The honda ridgeline is a super truck , will do better them most in this downturn for sure, However an $80k hopped up model is NOT going to sell very well rightnow, the credit is hard to get , the money folks are spending , even ones with the cash is NOT on these tpyes of things, the country is changing gears , even the super rich, changing from decadence and ego spending on super cars to more green enviro friendly cars, that is hot today , superstars driving a prius is hot , not an $80k hit rod ridgle line burning gas and burning cash, IMPO those days are behind us. IMPO
Why are the units NOT under contract in the UK? What happened with the UK tests? To spend all of those resources, time, energy , shipping cost, travel costs to take units to the UK just to tear them down and ship back with NO contract, NO revenues, NO disclosure > did they work or not has to be HUGE RED flag that these units and this technology is NOT ready for a commercial roll out - NO way bringing units back from the UK is in any way positive and in no way does it give them any credibility > i.e. NOT disclosing what happened in the UK?!
IMO ERHE has no choice but to try and move the assets from the funk that is "ERHC Energy" into a new company. If not it will be a $.50+/- stock , when in fact the reserves ARE WORTH MUCH MUCH MORE, but the company is marjorly tainted and needs to disappear before money can be made on the equity markets. IMPO
1985 , 1975 lol talk about OUTDATED! And be clear > No ONE RAIDED AN OFFICE WITH ARNED PERSONEL! lol nice try....
lol so u r saying if they could, if it was just one office, the DHS, DOJ, would raid EXXON with an armed platoon! lol that is funny
And lets be clear on the allegations >
The search was conducted pursuant to criminal violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act and various other statutes related to business and wire fraud, the search documents say.
were do u get that info>?.eom
ALL OF THE ABOVE IMPO.eom
interesting action late this afternoon? I got some new Calls today, CALL DEC08 $5.00 for $.15 worth the risk IMPO
They RAIDED the ERHE offices took everything in the office as evidence > I have not seen any agency ever RAID EXXON offices with armed men - and when u say investigations sure exxon and "others" are being asked lots of questions but they have NOT been raided and DO NOT have Homeland security senate, DOJ and SEC making these types of allegations ERHE has pending against them , nor do they have armed men storming offices...> not even close. Please lets be clear on that point.
Sure a factory ridgeline is not a bad buy , of course sales are down this year for all autos, look at Ford F150 News today , rocked the truck world, but these are factory models , if you think hunderds will be decked out and customized for $80k you are nutso, maybe 10 per year, maybe , NOT $40 MILLION WORTH , That is wrong to even post stuff like that, IMPO
10 sales = .0001 / no bid IMO
If you guys would READ the thread you would see were I was coming from. I was simply saying newbies like myself see the investigations and the raid shortly after we start doing DD into EHRE , It all started in reply to the post below. IMPO he is WRONG - Newbies find the history of EHRE very quickly with simple google searches (that I posted), simple reading a few filings, very easily you see why ERHE is trading at .50 not $5.00 , that was my point. I know the raid was 2006, that was not my point I was not posting like this was some new news , IF YOU READ the thread you will see I was posting that newbies DO in FACT know and see and can find EHRE history very easily and very quickly.
Posted by: tryoty Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:36:58 PM
In reply to: Pepsiman2001 who wrote msg# 132321 Post # of 132598
The newbie doesn't know the JDZ or it's history. When they hear about this company and the supposed 14 BILLION barrels of oil, they first thing that they must think is BreX... I know I did. By telling the market there's a new development on the near term horizon I think they are trying to minimize the one trick pony image.
I was replying to a post about newbies finding EHRE, I was simply posting you find investigations when you first look into EHRE, thats it.
not sure waht u r talking about? i dont own any GSCO , are they competitor>?
Gas Co Vt Inc Unfied (GSCO)
Please show me PR or some sort of information from the company or government agencies that these investigations are over - just because they are doing a stock selling road show for a new subsid does not close these investigations, and if you can see these are from 2006 , they opened the investigations and raided in 2006 , statue of limitations is not in play here for all of these things on the table. You know these things can take 5-10 years to get thru, SEC, DOJ are disgustingly slow in with these things.