Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This proves a trade of that value occurred that day. It does not prove that this is a conversion. Actually, considering the rate of conversion is falsely claimed to be 50% of the lowest trade, that would mean there should be a trade of .00002 around somewhere because that's twice a much as .00001. Hopefully you can find this info.
Also, luckily for me I have a smart phone. Wooooo doggy you wouldn't believe what these things can do! It's crazy. Internet, phone calls, pictures even moving pictures! You should get a smart phone buddy!
Plus that's only proof a trade occurred at that price. Not a conversion. I'll await proof of that.
And i don't own a laptop. No need
No no i mean like proof. As in something that proves your claim. Not a fabrication. I'll await proof.
Ungs
That uhhhh isnt showing anybody anything. it's 50% of the lowest price TRADING price that'd mean the lowest price is .00002 which has not been proven here. So heres what this proves
1. There's no actual evidence of this conversions being sub .0001
2. Someone definitely owns photoshop
Shouldn't be too hard to find then. I'll await one of the 24 (minimum) examples that have been often discussed but never shown. Please tell me it'll be a rehashing of the one where they agreed upon the conversion price. Lol
Oh good grief. This fairy tale is back on the table. It's awfully convenient that this claim can't be proven either.
Please provide evidence.
You saw the AON go off?!? That's great! Surely you're able to prove it then! Ok good good, I await your proof of the AON executing because you def saw them and they're totally real.
But the hammer that hit my foot was visible and tabglible prior to hitting my foot. Thus, the hammer can be proved to be the culprit. In this case, im asking that my neighbor not yell at me everyday when I'm standing outside that hammers are falling out of the sky to hit my foot.
I'll summarize for ease of understanding again. Since AON orders are all the rage and are DEFINITELY without a doubt at fault for ALL of the volume Thursday (so goes the claim) then, surely they'd have developed a method to track those metrics. Thus, please provide evidence that ALL of the volume for UNGS on Thursday was the result of an AON.
Who said they don't exist? I certainly didn't. I just want proof that they are responsible for Thursday action on UNGS. I mean, since AON are so well known you'd think there's A way to prove they caused all that volume. Further? the claim that 100% definitely without a doubt for sure for sure that that's the reason for the volume on Thursday exists. I think the person who's claiming all the UNGS volume from Thursday is the result of an AON. Because it would have to be right? I mean the claim was made so how could it be totally made up, ya know?
Well as per usual, I can back my claims. Even retroactively there's no evidence any of those orders were the result of the AON. It seems the disconnect we're having is one claim has real verifiable evidence while other is a mostly baseless prospective notion.
All that effort and still no proof that the orders exist now. As with the 14 million (the last prediction i was spot on about), my argument has proof, not speculation. Well I've got a mystical AON buy at 1.00! BILLIONS of shares! BBBBIIILLLIIIOOOONNNNSSSSS.
How did "far more tomorrow" go? It sure didn't seem like i saw far more ones. 14 million on the ask and not far more on Friday. I'm on a hot streak! If only Wayne could get on a hot streak of news.
Next week, am i right
Can't i have you ask him to give us news then? Lol
I think Avada is a Web developer. (Which it is) and they're offering a variety of templates that, as decisions are being made, will slowly transition into the sylios site. So i think it's just self promotion as they finish the site. Admittedly haven't looked at it since 1pm yesterday
Next week dude! You know that!
Like I said, if you'd like to discuss more so You can learn the ropes, please PM me. I'll ttyl, have a good night.
Go UNGS (maybe who knows anymore lololol)
Actually, the fact that the bid/ask moved up after the 14 million i said were there indicates there were only 14 million availabile at that time. Because you see, ben, when the amount of shares on the ask (the price/shares people are ASKING for) gets bought out by the bid (the price/shares people are BIDDING for) the ask has to move up a no more shares are available at that price. Therefore, when 14 million volume occurred (IE the bidders meeting the askers), the ask had to move and this the bid moves. So, we can see at that very moment, 14 million were available. As for what other sellers would do later, there's no way to predict that. Anyone is free to sell any amount they own at any time so I could not and would not assert that 1s would never be sold again. But the bid and ask did move after 14 million meaning, at the time of my claim, 14 million shares were available. Hope this helps.
How about this, prove the orders that went through at .0001 existed prior to our conversation. There was sufficient bid multiple timesto satisfy the size of ANY of the singular trades today. That's just simple stuff, man.
Also turns out i was right and there were 14 million available at the time i said it was. Seriously, you play NHL16? graphics are siiick
I said 14 million were on the ask. 14 million were on the ask. Goodnight
Tsk tsk tsk. Dont twist my words. I was right and that's that. At the time of my statement, 14 million were on the ask. As soon as those 14 million were sold, the bid and ask moved up, indicating that only 14 million were available. I'm still doing my victory lap as i was correct and i cherish this and every other moment ive been correct through our discussions. Gotta play NHL 16 now (you seen these graphics on xbox one?) Toooodles.
All lost is Wayne doesn't feed us news soon.
Update:
Aaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnndddddddd it's gone lol
Yeah if we ever get news
Haha someone trying to paint this up! Anyways, not even 7 am and your phone is at 20% jeeeez
Weird. 14m in volume and the bid moved.
*victory lap continues*
Next weeeeeeeeekkkkk maybe we'll see more volume, maybe but probably not news and who even knows! Also xbox games with gold has new offers so I'm excited about that too.
That seems a familiar song and dance
I graciously accept yet another victory on my resume. The list of wins are getting long for me, but ive got room for a few more.
Welllllll, onwards to next week where it'll be action packed here at UNGS, right Ben? ACTION PACKED I SAY
Well, if you want to prove there's more than 14 million on there, you'll have to. Until then, i think we can all agree 14 million were on the ask.
So you can't and won't provide me proof that there are more than 14 million on the ask?
Oooohhhh i get it. You can't prove there's more than that on there! Ok ok. So we all agree, 14 million on the ask.
So you can't prove it? Just checking.
Let me ask for additional clarity, now that I've proven 14 million were on the ask, can you prove there's more than that?
I don't have to prove it, you do. 14 million are on the ask. Prove me wrong.
Well i can prove 14 million are on the ask. I have satisfied MY burden of proof. You have claimed there are more than that on the ask, therefore the burden of proof for that claim lies with YOU.
You just have to look at the ask, Ben. Unfortunately, im playing through "Until Dawn" and don't have access to a computer so i guess the fact that 14 million on the ask will be more than sufficient evidence
You can't and wouldn't RS at these levels
Good news is i can prove mine. Yours is theory.
Good news is I can prove my statement. Yours is theory.
Public service announcement:
14 million shares is less than 70 million shares.
(Star flies across screen)
"The more you know"
That's great but, as explained above, when combining multiple features of BTZO, the reasonable course of action is addition as addition shows you the sum of all parts which was the goal. Example, .0001 + .0001 = .0002 whereas the multiplication of that does not.