Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Top line growth is solid, with over 13 straight quarters of growth.
This past quarter didn't see as much revenue growth as other recent quarters, but there were a number of reasons for that, which are all temporary. A large one was the transition to the new website platform, which didn't go as smoothly as they wanted, and hurt OL a bit, but they're past that now, and OL is surging again, and starting to benefit from the new platform.
There were some other temporary setbacks. Q3 is already projecting to be better, even without VivaVuva, and Q4 should be hitting on all cylinders.
Solid growth.
Thanks for the info. Well, whether we ever figure it out or not, it's good to see it happening. Maybe the next time one of us talks with Danny, we can ask him and find out.
In the meantime, BRAV board is somehow #5 on the breakout boards.
I guess it doesn't take too much on the weekend to get us up there, with how little has been recently posted on the weekdays.
By my calculations, another 8 posts will get it into 3rd, and another 20 will get it into 2nd place. Hmmm.
There's a little "facebook like" button in the upper left of the OnlyLeggings.com site now. Is that new? Could that be the reason, or part of it?
They've also added links to their Instagram and Twitter pages on OnlyLeggings.com's main page, as well as on their Facebook page. Perhaps just lots of cross-linking is helping.
Wow, things are moving up even FASTER than I expected!
Last night, you may have seen this:
Let's not go overboard here. Gotta get the facts straight.
Even better!
So that means it moved from 63rd best selling "Medicinal Sleep Aid" on Amazon (out of 2214), last week, to 59th a day or two ago, I assume, to 51st this morning, to 46th tonight. Sounds like a steady improvement in rankings since "fulfillment by Amazon" started and customers could get free Super Saver Shipping.
Steady improvement. Not random fluctuation. Sounds promising.
Thanks for pointing out the good news. Up from 59 to 51. I just checked, and it now says it's #46 in the "Medicinal Sleep Aids" category. I assume this is the category you were actually talking about. If so, this means it's rising fast!
Look at how many products are in THAT category: 2214 !!
So it's #46 best selling out of 2214 in "Medicinal Sleep Aids". That's almost in the top 2%, and rising fast!
Good stuff! Confirming that they told the truth about "Fulfillment by Amazon" coming "soon".
Here it is!
Notice that the one that has "Fulfillment by Amazon" also says "eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping". The one direct from MedGen has $4.57 for shipping, making the price over 45% higher. That's a big price difference. This will let people buy Snorenz online for much less.
Really good news.
Nobody's even talking about suspension as a remote possibility. What did you see that led you to conclude that that might even happen?
What signs of a pump have you seen? None of the regulars here have seen any.
And dump? The ungagged TA keeps confirming for us that O/S has not changed in about 2 years.
Are you mistaking this for another company, perhaps?
Wrong.
Nobody knows, except maybe a couple of insiders.
I know that I don't know for sure, and I'm honest enough to say it.
I am wary of anyone claiming to know. They either don't know that they don't know, in which case they're not smart enough for me to value their opinion, or they know that they don't know (but claim to know), which is even worse.
Do I sound like Rumsfeld yet?
"everyone knows"?
It seems there's a huge amount of disagreement around here, so how can "everyone know" ? All we've been talking about is the lack of proof on both sides, so essentially, everyone is making educated guesses, and quite different educated guesses.
Everyone is disagreeing, and nobody "knows".
Now I see why he's not a starting QB. Too slow to make decisions. Gotta keep his decisions simple and options few. It was hard to watch.
At least the first half was more pleasing to watch. That's preseason for you!
Love That Board!
Time to go check the Alexa numbers.
Maybe I'll see if I can correlate them to the rise in Facebook likes!
One thing that bothers me about these Weighted Average Trade Transactions, as you describe them, is that it seems they would artificially DOUBLE the actual volume.
Do both legs get recorded in volume, or do the ones with the .W modifier not get counted?
I do not believe that this method of selling is REQUIRED to be used only with dilution.
They can put out 2 things at the same time.
No reason it has to be one or the other.
Thanks for explaining the details, especially about the 3 years balance sheet.
This is why they have been auditing the previous 2 years financials. They've been working on them at least since May, maybe earlier.
The company has been around for well over 10 years, and has detailed records going back all that way. They are not a new company. They are just coming out of a dormant phase, that's all.
Yup, a good time for a new trend to start, as we head into next week's audited financials. Let's hope it's a long one.
Good to have you back from the dark side, Annakin. The Force is strong with us now.
Let's see, .03 by April?
This past March, with Trailing 12-month revenues at .0046 / share,
and expectations that it would shoot up to .0060 / sh after Q1 (it actually only reached .0052),
the price hit .03.
So, the price temporarily hit a P/S of over 6, but based on expectations that it would have put P/S at 5 once results were released.
Now, TTM revs are at .0053. Current P/S is about 1.8, after what I consider to be an overcorrection. Given more realistic growth projections, I expect P/S to settle between 2 and 5, at around 3.5.
I expect TTM revs to go up to .0085 by April of next year (after Q1 announced). A P/S of 3.5 to 3.6 would get us to .03. So, I agree, that's a reasonable projection.
Your 2-word explanation is not very convincing to me.
The word "promised" has been used in error so many times, as it was here.
A date on the chill removal was never promised, only hoped for.
I didn't claim that this was anything new, did I?
I was not discussing the newness of the active ingredient, just whether there was one.
If the product works, it has an active ingredient or ingredients. Basic logic.
Oh, and yes, of course I read the article !!!!!
And please don't let anyone get confused that this is a discussion of active ingredients in MDIN products. A statement was made implying MDIN products were similar to snake oil (though not actually containing it), and I was just pointing out that the argument ACTUALLY means that MDIN products really work.
You forgot the option where they tell the truth about the real revs.
Both your options assume the revs are fake. Good luck with proving those assumptions.
How does any company do a buyback, then? They'd have such narrow windows where all their material info is disclosed.
There are already plenty of restrictions on buybacks. While I don't know the exact rules, I seriously doubt people are going to see anything wrong with an ongoing buyback being continued during periods where they're about to release info.
I think you are confusing company buybacks with individuals within a company buying for themselves.
The company buyback was announced months ago and has been happening steadily since then. It's not like they just started the buyback now.
Another positive sign is that the negative arguments are getting weaker. Making up for it with a large number of weak arguments won't help. (Which all should have learned by now from Nick's large volume of weak tweets not helping).
Let's take this latest attempt, line by line, shall we?
Nick tweeted that "MacReport media is trying to resolve special character issue in current press release."
I believe this issue is what's causing the PR to not be posted everywhere. When it's resolved and the PR appears everywhere, we could get ANOTHER boost
Tax loss selling does happen, but I don't think it will affect BRAV much.
First, you need people with lots of gains elsewhere, and significant losses in BRAV. I just don't think there are too many people like that.
Second, I think BRAV stock price will be above a penny by early December, so losses won't be as bad as you might think.
Thirdly, they'd have to avoid buying BRAV for a month before and after the tax loss selling to avoid wash sale rules, and that's a really dangerous time to be avoiding buying BRAV.
I personally don't think anything will be available below .0075 the rest of the year, but hey, I've been wrong before.
I think the lowest it will get from here on is the low .008s, or maybe .008 itself. Just my opinion.
You can buy back up to 1/4 of the recent average daily trading volume.
I don't know what constitutes "recent", but it's possible that they're OK, after yesterday's 31M bumped up the volume.
Ironically, all that "below the bid selling to selves" price manipulation, if that's what a lot of the recent big blocks really were, helped boost average volume a lot, which is helping the buyback happen faster now.
It doesn't always end that way.
Those who can read the signs and tell which way things are more likely to end are the ones who make the money.
Good points about when it moved in 2013, except that it really started to move up in February, so in my mind, if using hindsight, January would have been the time to load up.
Also keep in mind that an individual loading up heavily can move the stock, so really, December 2012 would have been the time to load up, when Alexa traffic numbers were going through the roof, but the share price was just as stagnant and low as ever in 2012.
Looking back, I played that dichotomy, buying 8 times as much in December as I did in January to March combined.
I think this year, people will wise up and start buying earlier, so to get the lows you'll need to buy on dips now through November. Just my opinion.
OK, thanks for explaining.
Perhaps the only expense then will be in hiring and training people in advance, but there shouldn't be too much of that. Most of them will be hourly and only have a few hours in before the big Q4 starts.