Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The American Center for Law and Justice, which represented 31 members of Congress who joined the federal government as defendants, called Crabb's ruling flawed and promised to appeal.
"Critics of Fox News have accused the network of promoting the Tea Party even as it covers the political movement as a news story."....And the main-stream media has no liberal agenda? Please!
"Come to the DC suburbs. I think our unemployment rate is 6%."...And why is that? Think about it.
Question - What is the difference between a liberal and a puppy?
Answer - A puppy stops whining after it grows up.
While your thinking about that I'm going out for a beer and a cigarette.
What in your opinion caused this economic upheaval?
Are you out of your mind? "" he's had a good start trying to put this country back together with the crap he got stuck with."" Heaven help the next President after this maniac! Your nuts!
We have got to put an end to all this spending!)
President Bush expanded the federal budget by a historic $700 billion through 2008. President Obama would add another $1 trillion.
President Bush began a string of expensive financial bailouts. President Obama is accelerating that course.
President Bush created a Medicare drug entitle ment that will cost an estimated $800 billion in its first decade. President Obama has proposed a $634 billion down payment on a new govern ment health care fund.
President Bush increased federal education spending 58 percent faster than inflation. President Obama would double it.
President Bush became the first President to spend 3 percent of GDP on federal antipoverty programs. President Obama has already increased this spending by 20 percent.
President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers. President Obama would continue that trend.
President Bush presided over a $2.5 trillion increase in the public debt through 2008. Setting aside 2009 (for which Presidents Bush and Obama share responsibility for an additional $2.6 trillion in public debt), President Obama’s budget would add $4.9 trillion in public debt from the beginning of 2010 through 2016.
And obama is better???
George Washington.)
And who is your Presidential godsend?
A yogi or yogin is a term for a male practitioner of various forms of spiritual practice....Don't get it buddy?
"How bigger can an idiot really become?"....Answer to your question: A bigger idiot would think well of obama.
Bought in at .02 still here and waiting for dollar land!)
Actually I'm a member of the reproductive element of society...Something I'm sure you know nothing about...And thats probably a good thing! LOL
And whats wrong with being homophobic? Thats not against the law now is it? I disapprove of their lifestyle...So what!
Yes but unfortunately the viral infection called liberalism will never truly go away. There will always be some who believe.
The national Democratic Party is immoral to the core. Any American who would vote for Democrats is guilty of fostering the worst kind of degeneracy. The leaders of this party are severely out of touch with mainstream, traditional American values. They are crusaders for perversion, for licentiousness, for nihilism and worse. Check out the DNC's official links. You can tell much about an organization by the website links – and with the DNC you're just a click away from virtually every bizarre extremist organization in America, from the American Civil Liberties Union to Planned Parenthood to the racist National Council of La Raza to more than a half-dozen "gay and lesbian organizations."
Right on Mr. Estes!)
Can you tell me the winning powerball numbers for this Wednesday?
Hey you libs want to talk about misspelled words on signs...Tell me what this sign says? http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/obama-sign-fisting.jpg
What do you mean """IF"""????? Geezzzz!
I don't think she will run. I'm personally hoping for a young bright conservative star to emerge.
And Hitler had an IQ of 141....How can you equate intelligence to good leadership?
According to a special report issued by 'the Blogging Professor,' the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a 'constitutional professor and scholar,' and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.
The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an 'instructor' at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.
In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentialsIn fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.
According to Doug Ross:
I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about "Barry." Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.
The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).
Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a 'put-up job' as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position? And whyFurther,
Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on his bar application.
2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.
3. So, we have the President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, "Obama did NOT 'hold the title' of a University of Chicago law school professor". Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law SchoolThere is more from Ross, however:
6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law. 7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video.
9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in ourConstitution: the notion that we are all created equal."
10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?
When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.
Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight. And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama's presence in their institutionsBREAKING DEVELOPMENT--just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous 'journalists,' promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information 'they may discover.'
Can you prove that by furnishing his college transcripts?
I think Sox is referring to the new revised edition of the Constitution. LOL
I hate to break this to you but obama is no Einstein.
I judge people by their actions not their words (Written or verbal). That is why I believe in the tea party and fear obama.
Hey Sox...This is one of your previous posts: "I'm ok with it as well but let's call it as we see it. Heck even McChrystal said that he has not seen one threat at a checkpoint in Afghanistan in which we killed and wounded civilians where any that we shot or attacked were a threat to our troops. Of course this happens and that's why war and the people on this board who cheer for war and just dimiss these things as the fog of war need to rethink, if they are capable of that, and insist we get out sooner rather than later as we will not win with our track record to date. Covering up, which we always do, does not work to our best interests in the long run and this cover-up will be particulary bad as we seemed to have lost our reason for this attack."......I think you misspelled dimiss. Should be dismiss. LOL Genius!
How ironic coming from a liberal. LOL
This entire discussion is pointless. In two and one half years obama and this healthcare law will be nothing more than an unpleasant memory.
Hey genius...Is this a talk show?......
I guess if they can throw you in jail for not buying health insurance...They can throw you in jail for selling black market light bulbs.... My father fought the NAZI's in WWII...The least I can do is fight them here!
I can make a fortune selling light bulbs after 2014. Start buying them now. LOL
Well...Read the following and tell me I'm wrong......(((THE HOUSE APPROVED federal hate crimes legislation (H.R. 1913), by a decisive 249- 175 margin. But in a shocking move, Democrats killed language that would have excluded pedophiles from receiving protections afforded in the measure. Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) added the amendment during Judiciary Committee hearings, which stated that sexual orientation in the bill specifically be defined as not including pedophiles)))....(((The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) – famous (or infamous) for using the legal system to attack the Boy Scouts and Christmas – is now protecting the “right” of convicted child molesters and sexual predators to lurk near playgrounds and other places where children gather. Simply put, the ACLU, once famous for defending the rights of free speech, now attacks the Boy Scouts and argues in favor of giving child sexual predators easy access to our children and grandchildren. To add insult to injury, the ACLU uses our tax dollars to help fund these lawsuits.)))...............THIS IS A LIBERAL POLICY. WHEN DID THE ACLU EVER DEFEND A PRIEST?
Good point.)
Yea...Why don't they just give us lead bars to lick while they're at it.
O.K. I take this part back.. "Aren't you mostly all perverts anyway?"