Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gman,
IMO,
it appears by the timing and word usage, MB anticipated if not out right expected the outcome to be as it was? Thoughts?
Nez
Jack,I agree but I think the movement of putting Berlin in perspective is finally beginning. I very greatly doubt Berlin was the inspiration for MB's work with LLEG. IMO Berlin had become a distraction from the primary reason MB is working to bring LLEG to fruition and that IMO opinion is to build a productive business but more importantly to assist the country and places like Berlin NH adapt to a period of time which requires "we," (the entire country) change our ways. In other words, IMO Berlin was never supposed to be viewed as a major focal point of LLEG from the get go. IMO Berlin due to a major effort by those “opposing” LLEG, was made it something it was and is not an indispensable component that LLEG'S ultimate success depends on. Unfortunately Berlin was portrayed (by the very vocal opposition) as being more important to the overall business plan of LLEG than it is in reality. The effort to portray Berlin as being integral to the success of LLEG did cause many to lose sight of the big picture driving LLEG and MB. I’ll grant you that.
IMO I hope we can now move past Berlin and treat it as it is, one small piece of an effort which has many, many pieces none of which the ultimate success of LLEG rests on.. Don’t know if I expressed this well but I tried.
JMO,
Nez
Hi Jack,
after reading all of the negative posts from the "opposition" apparently there is a substantial level of support for LLEG in Berlin, contrary to the opposition's mantra.
JMO,
Nez
Gman,
I believe this is city halls home page, FWIW.
http://www.berlinnh.gov/Pages/index
Nez
JMO but things seems very tight here. EOM Nez
Gman,
Thanks for the heads up, MB's blog is really looking like a great idea to propagate information. IMO this is another example of MB's ability to come up with new and effective ideas. Also IMO this is another example of his talent when thinking outside the box.
JMO,
Nez
Well cyclone, I guess I can attest to that after having a buy in ALL day @ .0015 and seeing it expire unfilled by days end. It was not an AON order either! Saw .0014s and .0016s but the .0015s - nada. Interesting to say the least!
JMO,
Nez
Digi,
Is there anyway you could expound on your thoughts without casting aspersions on anyone? Got to run out for a bit but I will check back before close. This is becoming very interesting. In your opinion might the party be a known opponent or proponent of LLEG?
TIA,
Nez
JMO and maybe OT (I leave that to the Mods. Please at least read the artical first before deciding if this is appropriate or not) but I feel there are many posting here rather than patiently sitting back, confidently waiting for the definitive PR, filing or event (including myself, (which is not worth much as I have already said I invested here with money I could afford to lose) proceeding LLEG's "payoff." IMO there is no one capable of telling the future who can say if this event will take the form of a picture, on the front page of a Berlin Newspaper showing the traditional Silver Shovel wielded by the Mayor at the Ground Breaking Ceremony, the EDGAR filing announcing LLEGs up listing to a higher exchange or of LLEG being bought out. Many of the "mega longs" apparently know this to be true and are willing to wait. My wife and I, not at the mega long status but a much higher level of holdings than when we first began also feel this is a rare chance in pink land and due to the "probabilities” I have addressed in the past have increased our holdings as well as our level of patience.
IMO, however, there are those who would give there arm or some other body appendage to have those of us who are "willing" to somehow be "shaken" from our beliefs and see is begin to develop doubt which many have seen in the past at the "proto typical" stocks which were designed from their very start to be nothing more than a way to bilk less inexperienced investors out of their money.
I came across this article written by a person greatly respected and who was able to explain the "signs" of schemes designed to bilk in a very clear and concise manner.
I am going to stick my neck out here as I worry some of the less experienced I speak with here as I am one of them, appear to be losing sight of the reason we got into LLEG. The following, recently written article, IMO does the best job highlighting and making obvious the differences between LLEG and some of the "proto typical scams seen in the past and also which SOME here with unstated agendas or at best very weakly stated agendas have compared either directly or indirectly, LLEG to.
The following link is found at what for me has been a very enlightening I-Hub site. I admit due to the fact the article is publically posted at no charge and by a very experienced professional interested with educating we "newbies" that IU deviated from my usual practice of asking his permission to re-post this piece. IMO it is very important in that it makes clear to me anyway why LLEG is still standing and strongly so, IMO after the examples (many are sell know fell).
link-
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=15914506
from board;
Stock Clubs | Market Trends and Strategies | Bill Panetta SmallCap Trading Techniques
Wish me luck and if you don’t hear from me it is due to my being banned or thrown in jail as I don't have the time to wait for a reply and also in light of the very excellent "alert" by a fellow LLEGer last night I believe, he would be selling today in order to buy materials for his "Day Job.
I forget who that was but you have my respect for telling us ahead of time and before you took the chance of missing possibly a higher rate for your sell IMO that was one classy move and a great indicator of your character.
Thanks from myself and the rest of the board who understand how something like that might have been handled if you were a person of lower character.
Nez
Matt,
Thanks for the info.
I wonder how many times a "trigger" was missed cue3 to overly cautious asset protectors?
IMO "forced covers would happen far more frequently if the "I never hold over a weekend people" or the stop loss, protect my stable pink investment folks would, BEFORE entering a pink, consider the investment as lost money of at least the cost of a few spins of the 'ol roulette wheel!
JMO,
Nez
IMO, Bernhdent, you and the majority of your fellow opponents to LLEG are a typical examples of why the US has, from what I understand, such a high number of "Nuclear Power Plants" situated on (as opposed to near) active geological fault lines.
With the huge increase in demand for electrical power we now know was due in great part to our efforts to cause the USSR to self destruct. (We can now see the "big picture" in hindsight)
However the time period was also one in which the "extremely dedicated Mother Earth worshipers,” were very active. They scared many logging companies as well as the "everyday Joe" type people, simply trying to make a buck to feed their families, conclude, the "opposition" group (aka tree huggers) was beyond mere dedication but actually willing to commit "sabotage” of the work product, in the hope of killing or maiming an innocent employee had a good chance of wrecking or a least “staggering an economically powerful industry.
Basically, IMO, this was our countries first experience with a dedicated radical agenda or terrorist organization.
Possibly the concept may have been imported from North Vietnam An agenda that was totally false but one which proved the power of radical activism. IMO these were some of the first NIMBYs. One must in all fairness give them credit for being able to present such a show of dedication which resulted in the relocating of nuclear plants to areas far more hazardous to "overall public safety" but still in the eyes of these early NIMYers worth it. In general the rest of the public believed them to be loyal to the point of causing death to their opponents, the "EVIL right wing, capitalist pigs.
Apparently the NIMBYers were able to apply their concept of "relativism" to selling out in order to make money and lots of it.
This diatribe may sound far fetched but when I read a post (don't remember which one) from a new opponent of LLEG as he was in support of providing "wood pellets" to a company that is competing with LLEG!!
This IMO explains, finally , the truth is out. IMO the LLEG opposition are simply “subcontractors” of LLEG competition!
IMO, this is about using the power of apparent as well as perceived opposition in order to make lots of money while allowing a competitor far less prepared than a company like LLEG to better position itself by using a concept proven successful to influence the thoughts of a large group of people. Sort of like the "Mother Earth" myth/cover which was so successful for other NIMBY’s efforts to change minds for personal gain.
This will be a highly sought skill as time goes by, relativism becomes more accepted and what were once long haired, tie dyed dressed people seeking greater influence over the “old fashioned, commonsensical grounded ideas.
Just My opinion but this is just one more step of our personal slide into the deluded state of “hypocrisy” being acceptable if the price is right, don’t know if I get the point across, if I don’t let me know, Please.
JMHO,
Nez
Gman, they are pretty clear about "ACH" transfers which are subject to a three (business day) hold for stocks and only stocks under $4.00. Anything above and which doesn't show up with a certain MM who happens to be on the board of ST, to the best of my knowledge and according to different sources, one can trade with no problem.
This is the only time and I have asked bankers, other online trading companies as well as professional financial managers about this and they said the same thing although and this coincides with actual experiences I have had with them, if there is "something" odd about the way an equity is trading they outright halt, suspend or freeze any related activity until they get clarification from the sec.
But to execute over 20 wire trasfers in exactly the same manner with exactly the same information (comparing copies of previous transfers) at the same finacial institution, one day and coincidentally on a day with low pps on low volume, see the money get transferred (which is usually in play worst case scenario 2 hrs after confirmation) and also which is almost instantaneous, show up at the otherbank and sit for a few minutes and then GET WIRED back to our bank minus a transfer charge, is really odd.
Later after being peeled from the ceiling I was told letter appeared to be in small case when it should have been in CAPS but actually wasn't!!!
After again being peeled from the ceiling I was then given credit for my entire transfer amount after the funds trundled back to the trading accounts bank and also was not charged the customary $20.00 wire transfer fee.
Today is something completely different. After doing an ach transfer on Wednesday and watching the funds leave my bank and show as arrived at the traders bank only to sit there and the exactly 72 hrs (3 business days) open my account and see simply a single "deposit" for the exact amount that left the bank on Wednesday!!
I wish I had the capability to learn who picked up those shares this morning. It sure would be nice to know before I put the finishing touches on my letter of disappointment and notice of transfer to another account subject to wifey poh’s approval of course. This really ticks me off as I actually liked them otherwise! Once someone is dishonest with me after they establish a pretty high level of integrity, how can they ever be trusted especially when they are given the chance to simply tell the truth or have the courage and ethical desire to tell a customer, “ sorry but if you don’t like it there’s the door.” I could live with that but not a cowardly “snivel feast.” Has anyone used of heard of “Zeddo” I think I I have heard people give good opinions of?
TIA and
JMO,
Nez
sure enough....monies left the bank here wendsday but are still in transit or bing used as a paperwieght in an office down the hall, to the right, around the corner and down a few leveles of stairs, though a steel door and once through follow the signs to "ladder room."
JMO but I have always been taught "there are no coincidences when the subject involves human actions."
Has anyone else experienced anything similar? It seems to be happening only with lleg>
JMO,
Nez
JMO, prior to (immediately) and during the last decent LLEG run ST suddenly developed problems and one couldn't trade via online or more importantly and IMO unusual they wouldn't accept deposits through wire trades which were at their bank already!! To the best of my recollection, ST was apparently short, big time through thier infamous MM.
Now I believe I heard a rumor that the LLEG short count increased of late (I don't even know how to check other than on the pink sheets site which I believe is not 100% accurate and to be honest I don't know how to interpert the numbers when I find them anyway and also there was an increase on the overseas site someone posted here in the past) quickely and guess what? I had money again leave my account and just wander about the ST bank except into my or actually my wifes account!!
Haven't checked yet but I bet the money will be in some sort of confused state requiring it to stay put in no ones account until....
JMO,
Nez
Thanks cyclone, Gman and Rooster for addressing this in an open and direct way.
JMO, but this is from the I-Box, courtesy of cyclone 101 (mod). IMO, after reading your posts that IMO reflect what many LLEG investors are probably thinking about and have been since this began, (including me), this might be a good time to re-read this post or put another way hear what the CEO has to say about a similar subject, straight and to the point, with no candy coating. These words, together with the precision and a pps respectful(your words and IMO well put) manner in which this sometimes necessary part of building a business was executed, indicates to me, anyway, a CEO who is smart, skilled, confident and comfortable communicating an unpopular and in my case a misunderstood action necessary for the continued evolution of the business plan, but still something which may well have caused me to panic if I didn’t hear it from MB so bluntly and in such a plain spoken way.
I for one will be keeping my investment to date in LLEG as well as increasing when I can!! IMO, the fact MB addresses such a subject with complete candor, speaks volumes about his integrity and faith in investors who don't allow common sense to be over ridden by emotions.
Nez
FROM I-Box
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=27762881
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=25836930&txt2find=email
"I realize this is not something to worry about as it is from the past but IMO it does fall into the same subject matter you guys are talking about, JMO,
Nez
"We raise equity capital from time-to-time for the company when we deem
appropriate, which enables us to pursue the development of projects
like
Berlin and others we are working on. We have been raising capital in
small
increments, due to the low share price. If we had a higher share
price, and
I hope this is the case at some point in the near future, we would
simply do
a large private placement of equity with an institutional or strategic
investor and be done with it. There isn't anything nefarious or
underhanded
about what we are doing. I don't know what other pink sheet
companies/CEOs
do. We aren't them. All of my shares are in certificate form. I am
the
single largest investor in the company, having provided over $500k in
start-up capital, and I have never sold a share.
Having the capital we need allows us to pursue our development plans
and
that is what will grow the company and the share price. We run the
company
for the long-term, not for short term traders, so issuing shares for
growth
capital should not be an issue for anyone with a long-term investment
horizon. I expect we will continue to raise capital in the future and
I
have never suggested otherwise, so anyone with an issue with this
should
invest elsewhere.
We have no current plans for a reverse split or anything like that.
When we
hopefully uplist to the BB later this year we will assess where things
stand
at that time and make a decision on this.
Please post the above three paragraphs on your board if you deem
appropriate
so investors can be fully informed on this issue and understand our
perspective.
Thanks,
Mike"
Sage,
I thought the artical depicted the Henniker meeting as rather positive and the only thing that apppeared to be a concern apparently is already identified and is being worked on;
Laura Scott, planning consultant for the town of Henniker, said she was unsure whether a biomass energy plant would fall under the zoning category of "commercial manufacturing," which is a permitted use in the town's heavy commercial district. That led the company to apply for a zoning variance to operate a power plant on the property.
This is another reason I am suspicious of folks trying to connect the pps activity to the meeting results.
IMO The meeting and the synopsis of it IMO are a solid indication the project there is chugging along! Oh yeah, thaks for MB Blog!
TTYL,
Nez
OT,
Brundy, would you please take off my ignore status so I can PM you? You can put me back in ignore mode when you get my pm. I took you off and that is how I realized this. ( I will put you back under after I pm gets through!:)
TIA,
Nez
Penny,
JMO, from what I have seen of the (mega) longs here; a) they have demonstrated and proven they are very very well disciplined. The way I "read" an investor possessing such an attribute and in keeping with such a profile, b) they also in all likelihood automatically assume money they invest in a pink to be considered "expendable funds" c) they are also very experienced and have a high level of smarts\commonsense which IMO makes it highly unlikely they would have sold down here after they having already passed up the chance to sell at higher levels. d)They originally bought at a time when there was less situational awareness about the project/s and finally, d) now this long who is sharp enough to see the increased opportunity LLEG offers compared to the staring point back when there was less tangible proof of MB's character and dedication, and now aware of not just one probable project, one likely project and a third project, and keeping in mind their proven PATIENCE, suddenly they say "never mind all that time spent and PATIENCE allocated together with all the attention invested and the money I already wrote off now is safer if I pull it out very carefully and with a lot of effort to time it right so I don't lessen the inevitable run which is IMO eminent??? This point I'm trying to make in a very fragmented way just doesn't make sense to me and with all due respect just doesn't, "sing!":)
Everyone have a safe and enjoyable weekend remembering those who have given their all so that we can debate something as trite as this when viewed from the perspective of their sacrifices.
God bless all and the ones who are still doing so, our "HEROS" willing to sacrifice all so my family and I can be FREE and so we all can enjoy exercising free will!!!!
Whether you agree with war or not these people and their families/loved ones deserve far more respect and support than any of us can ever give them.
JMO,
Nez
Digi,
Maybe that would account for why I watched, my order for 2 days go unfilled @ .0016 and then .0017 but I could only get .0018. I don’t know the rules the folks who execute the trades have to abide by but IMO it was weird. It seemed to me also very disciplined and to use your quote,” Whoever it is has taken great caution to releasing them all at once and has spread them out ranging from 22-17.22-17.”
JMO,
Nez
Everyone have a great and safe weekend,
TTYL,
Nez
Spenc,
I don't think there is one thing to worry about as far as relating to the folks goes.
JMO but the impression I have formed of MB is based on his actions, words, dependability/follow through, the people he associates with and the manner he reacts to what are IMO, everyday typical difficult, negative, frustrating situations and possibly even some intentional attempts to cause him to lose his cool. IMO opinion he is able to carry himself in a consistently dignified way. This leads me to believe he is the kind of person who will, I think will just naturally interact with the people whom IMO, he is more than aware will be hosting, assisting and most likely participating with him in many aspects of making the business a success. I believe him to be the kind of person who just treats others as he wants to be treated and this may have been missed due to the level and volume of opposition which may simply have been caused by the unknown and the prospect of change which usually makes folks uneasy. Also he may have been just giving them time to become comfortable with him before he makes any overtures which might be misconstrued.
After seeing this project and MBs actions so far IMO there is probably not many people (CEOs) who would be as sensitive as MB seems to be and I bet already has made it a priority to reassure people and prove to them, he is genuinely concerned for their community and probably knows well he must put them at ease, gain their trust and communicate to them once he makes a personal commitment to them (which he sort of already has) he won't let them down. I get this impression from the way he worded some of his PRs. I would be floored if after seeing how well he has thought things through to this point, he “dissed" the most important element, of all, the people! Not going to happen, IMO.
JMO,
Nez
Spence,
I don't know if this analogy makes sense but I am giving it a try as I think I can understand what you are saying.
I think a lot about how difficult of an adjustment it must have been for the US public to acclimate, become comfortable with, grudgingly accept and finally embrace the new technology of "steam" driven shipping. Especially, while not being essential for the future as well as present security of our country and a part of our current way of life but in the areas that are going to live with the new technology, it is more than a part of a way of life but an entirely new form.
Also, how many times have country living folks been “burned” by city folks who come to their community for the fun of “flipping” a community’s neighborhood homes and after snapping a profit, driving up taxes and establishing numerous numbers of strip malls, watch property prices shoot up and then sell out and go back to the city or down to Florida?
Also another aspect making this possibly appear destined to fail is the fact that this whole idea is really not a choice but a necessity in a way in which case I know I would feel like I had little say or control and was being forced. This would naturally lead me to become distrustful.
When the fence sitters see if the communities that are key for making this change in energy production possible, due to the unique characteristics of thier home towns, accepting and working to make the new paradigm work for their own benefit as well as greater society then IMO the fence sitting investors will go in, with a vengeance!
Maybe this is why there was so much vocal and passionate opposition from a relatively small group of people willing to sacrifice a lot of time, effort. And it wouldn’t surprise me if they also sacrificed their own money to make themselves heard. I never understood their actions but I was cynical enough to read some selfish motive rather than consider that maybe it was an issue of trust. IMO I have seen more small communities “screwed” by people from more populated areas than the other way around.
It occurs to me also why MB framed this in the best way for all, teamwork!
This shows me he has the right idea but the investors, and I include myself obviously, might need to be a lot more sensitive to how possibly intimidating all this might be if it were our backs up against the wall.
I guess that until we and the communities that can make this happen show the greater investing community we are determined to build trust and make sure neither group is taken advantage of, the big money will be leery. If there is not honest trust between the companies and their investors and other affiliates (maybe wrong word) and the host communities, it might not work as well. IMO the thing MB recognizes and IMO communities like Ellicottville are beginning to see is that if one part of the equation tries to “stiff” the other then the concept will not get past a handful of facilities, if that.
IMO it is possible other alternatives to LLEG, lacking both the foresight to recognize an opportunity for both building a business, aiding, and helping prove alternatives exist to our country’s energy crisis. However, the other companies did not take the initiative MB did and know they blew it but they are now seeing the possibilities and inevitabilities and are not at all reluctant to try and drive a wedge between LLEG and the towns MB is trying to form an alliance with. IMO, this way they could step into any vacuum and take full advantage with little effort as MB has already initiated and completed the ground work. Just my opinion, I don’t know and I hope not because I would rather see mistrust between the only two parties capable of making this work, dissipate and have them diligently work towards building trust and a spirit of team work. Then everyone wins.
JMO
Nez
OT,
The only thing I assume in pink land is that I am going to loose x # of $.
It’s too unpredictable with the vast majority of pinks to do otherwise. IMO this is one of the so very interesting things which I believe separates LLEG from the rest of the pack, norm or abnorm, what ever blows ones skirt up :) !
JMO,
Nez
Digi,
your observations make sense to me and IMO also like you mention, it does appear this is over (and the orders I know of @.0017 that didn't fill and now at .0018 which also didn't fill) also to me anyway, would support that conclusion or at least until someone reads this and decides to get the "paint" brush out to milk a well executed "share spawn" and make it look like it is still there just to get every drop of doubt possible squeezed out, in as short a time as possible as the meeting should have some influence on the pps!
JMO,
Nez
JMO, but to the best of my knowledge this isn't scheduled to be decided or published until the May, 28th.
Also, let me be clear, I am not even sure the commentary I read or heard, about what is or isn't happening in NY as well as the circumstances surrounding the situation are even accurate. If however, if these suppositions/opinions, rumors (I am not certain which applies) are at least close to reality and the issue (at least the opening salvo) is going to be decided in some manner which would require or at least can be appealed, I wonder where the extra cash for the "WAR Chest" Would come from as with all the talk of the auditors being busy, IMO, most monies could quite possibly have been allocated for one thing or another and if that is the case and extra financial resources were required for the usual legal fees, where would that money come from I wonder?
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - A decision made on the basis of statements and evidence presented for the record without a trial. It is used when there is no dispute as to the facts of the case, and one party is entitled to judgement as a matter of law.
A material fact is one which might affect the outcome of the case under governing law. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). To preclude summary judgment, the dispute about a material fact must also be "genuine," such that a reasonable jury could find in favor of the non-moving party. Id.
Conclusory or speculative testimony is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of fact to defeat summary judgment. See, e.g., Falls Riverway Realty, Inc. v. Niagara Falls, 754 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985); Thornhill Publishing Co. v. GTE Corp., 594 F.2d 730, 738 (9th Cir. 1979).
In general, inadmissible hearsay evidence may not be considered on a motion for summary judgment. Blair Foods, Inc. v. Ranchers Cotton Oil, 610 F.2d 665, 667 (9th Cir. 1990).
Summary judgment is properly granted when the evidence in support of the moving party establishes that there is no issue of material fact to be tried. (Code Civ. Proc., section 437c; Mann v. Cracchiolo (1985) 38 Cal.3d 18, 35.) The court is required to consider all the evidence set forth in the papers, except where objections are properly sustained, and all inferences reasonably deducible from such evidence. Any doubts as to the propriety of granting the motion must be resolved in favor of the party opposing the motion. (Asare v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 856, 862.) If the court determines there is no triable issue of fact, the court will determine any remaining issues of law. (Pittelman v. Pearce (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1436, 1441.)
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/s102.htm
However, this is going to happen tonight although apparently the location changed. (see web site if planning on attending)
JMO,
Nez
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Wednesday May 21, 2008
Henniker Community Center (57 Main Street)
7pm Meeting Agenda
http://www.henniker.org/agendas/zbagenda.htm#agenda
I stand corrected. Thanks Ron. I think you just beat the mods to it or maybe they didn't get a chance to catch up yet!?:)
Nez
Digi,
I am watching some other familiar shares being "pounded" far beyond -10.53% as of 1155est but you know what? Unlike LLEG, you can't call those stocks T/As to find out if there are any changes with share structures. I can imagine how those folks feel knowing they can't even make a call.
I would but to be frank, I am not comfortable speaking with a T/A as I have had very few, if any opportunities to do so in the past with other equities so all in all even if I did I wouldn’t have the confidence with my own information to relay to others.
JMO, but I'm guessing the mods are watching and checking and with the overall DOW down what....greater than 200, maybe things not as bad as the overall “big picture.”
IMO this is where the real difference between LLEG and the ka-billions of other pinks out there might be seen. JMO but I believe we know more about what we have here and is going on than the majority of other pinks.
That IMO is a huge difference and the more often we have days like this and LLEG is still here the more often it appears LLEG is an example of the main driving force for most who come to pink land and that is to find the one that is the real McCoy and hope to actually be part of it in the early stages. It’s finding that gem just once, IMO is one of the main reasons why pinks have such potential in both directions and IMO its what pinks are all about. It may never happen or on the other hand it may happen at least once in my life. That will be enough and that is why I think many are still here in LLEG. At least IMO, we can see further up LLEGs skirt than most other pinks!
Sure we could be wrong but IMO we if we are right, we will be very right. I know I’m preaching to the choir and Digi you probably have far more experience than I and I recognize that and mean no disrespect. Just a little "deep breathing here, thats all!"
JMO,
Nez
OT,Dang the markets took it on the chin right out of the box. Did I miss some really bad world news?
TIA,
Nez
GKTERA,
IMO, no one has yet to unequivocally lay to rest the possibility the small group of "haters" is connected to LLEG's competition. From my perspective this group has nothing to gain unless it is being "subsidized" by an entity which would might benefit having LLEGs public image tarnished or at least LLEG’s supporters confused.
This is why I have stopped trying to reason or searching for information to clarify things, is because IMO at this point the only source of worth while information will be coming directly from LLEG and Berlin’s local governing body. IMO, the fact that the process is this far along speaks for itself.
The level of effort exerted by the "opposition" up to now, IMO, is too great to be simply people voicing their right to free speech. There has got to be something more to it than simply opposition based on the "aesthetics" of downtown Berlin.
When I fail to see a litigate argument I tend to believe the expenditure of an almost 24/7 effort at times, must be driven by financial gain. The question is “who will gain by mudding the waters?” I believe I have come across a few candidates in my research, but like I said,
JMO,
Nez
Thanks guys....EOM Nez
Is anyone else showing a buy for 120,000 shares at 0930? EOM
Thanks Rooster,
Thats what I thought!
Nez
Am I reading this right? IMO, it seems to me the short interest of LLEG went up considerably between 4/15 to 4/30.
Short Interest Date Short Interest (percent)Change Avg. Daily Share Volume Days to Cover Split New Issue
Apr 30, 2008 1,198,424 2,299.97 5,090,297 1.00 No No
Apr 15, 2008 49,935 -61.60 32,335,631 1.00 No No
If so, can anyone comment on the meanings? How would one find the actual short interest in real time?
TIA,
Nez
http://pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=lleg
IMO this will be a good source for staying current with developments between "The City of Henniker" and LLEG.
Also IMO, we should be able to find out what the Zoning Board Public Hearing scheduled for 5/21/2008 mentioned by MB concludes.
JMO,
Nez
http://www.henniker.org/
Does anyone have a guess-ta-mat on when a possible "shake" will occur? There must be some out there who are experiencing an extreme case of "hagada!"
JMO,
Nez
Hi guys,
I was hoping you might be able to provide an annotated chart for LLEG. My charting skills are not to the point I have much confidence in them, but I'm working on it!
TIA,
Nez
Sage,
Thanks for another LLEG keeper and the opening of another chapter in the growing history of LLEG! To bad all pinks were not like this company! Good work MB, keep it going and thanks again Sage.
Nez
Jonas419,
I appreciate your effort. I wish I could write an article like the one on the link from MMB.
IMO, he was able to do so because he has looked at this with the passion of an architect/entrepreneur interested in and truly dedicated to an excellent business plan to build and grow LLEG while at the same time laying the ground work to provide the community of Berlin much needed economic stimulus which would enable the town to begin its revitalization or “rebound.”
IMO, MMB was also able to “pen” the article as quickly as he did because he stuck to the truth. The truth is an easy thing to keep straight as it never changes and one doesn’t have to worry about what he says to whom as long as he is always sticking with the truth.
IMO, this article and the speed in which it was written is a testament to the fact that he works with simply the truth and this should put many minds at ease.
I'm grateful I took the time to check the board one more time before the weekend as had I not I would have missed your post.
I see you don't have any member marks so FWIW, I am honored to be your first! (as long as you continue posting and sharing your DD with us. :)
Nez
Have a good weekend all as I gotta run to the B- and reload the account for the coming weeks!
Nez
Rooster,
JMO, but you would think since every conceivable place, rock and even small stone which might be concealing LLEG DD has been IMO, thoroughly, turned over and publicly examined and debated over the past few weeks there would not be many who are doing their darnedest to hold her down.
Apparently there are as IMO upticks are slammed back almost as fast as they occur. I am not too familiar with L2 but I never saw so many 5000s lined up at once. I’m sure it’s happened before but I haven’t seen it. Might be I was never in what IMO is such a good place as we are with LLEG!
Is it possible there are a “few” who might have gone “short” and are sensing a change in the wind?
JMO as I am just wondering,
Nez