Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No they haven't. Treaty still has massive disgorgement, fines and penalties to be determined and paid, but with the reemergence of the queen pissant, I hear she may be able to get the other pissants on Treaty's pump site to donate through the fake SARTO site.
He was just the peon of the group. Some of the abettor did far worse shenanigans, actually all the abettors did. Soon to be exposed in the criminal phase.
LMAO! The only thing owed there is a 10yr prison sentence for Calvin and his board conspirators for fraud. Pretty funny Krammer and Turdski are even hiding from that one.
the sec has miserably failed to protect otc investors from professional predators
I think they did a great job identifying the main predators. Just waiting for the criminal phase.
38. In April 2011, Platon Petratos contacted Mulshine. (App. 1805.) Petratos was a known stock promoter on various investor bulletin boards and chat rooms and had a network of people that followed penny stocks. quotes, published on InverstorHub by kanola and dloggold,(App. 389-A-C, 444 [Mulshine Tr. 147:12-19; RB 147:11-16; 192:10-193:22; 195:9-11) Mulshine testified that Petratos claimed “he could bring a lot of attention to Treaty stock,” and “bring a lot of buying in the stock.” (App. 444-A [Mulshine Tr. 147:12-17; 148:5-19].) Mulshine said that Petratos “had promotional mechanisms that he used by setting up his own chat rooms on, like, Yahoo, chat boards, and such . . . .” App. 444-A [Mulshine Tr. 148:5-11.) Treaty paid him to promote Treaty stock on social network, bulletin boards, and chat rooms. Such promotional efforts had the desired effect of inflating Treaty’s stock price and volume between April 2011 and January 2012 by over 450% and 930 %, respectively.
7 Q. Who are Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi? 8 A. Amanollahi. They are two consultants that were 9 working for Treaty headquarters. 13 Q. So on Sunday, January 29th, 2012, which was the 14 day before Treaty made the public announcement of its 15 claimed oil strike in Belize, you sent a draft of that 16 release to Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi? 17 A. Right. 18 Q. Why were you sending a draft of the press release 19 to these two individuals? 20 A. They were working for the headquarters, for 21 Andrew Reid, and they're responsible for social media 22 communication with shareholders. 23 And they were -- and I was asked to get 24 information to them so that they could handle 25 shareholder inquiries and shareholder information 1 through their social media after the news release went 2 out so they had to be informed as to what we were 3 talking about. 4 Q. So you wanted them to be prepared to push the 5 news out on social media that Treaty was planning to 6 announce on Monday morning? 7 A. They were being prepared so that when the news 8 release went out Monday, and I didn't want them to do 9 it. 10 Headquarters had them under agreements to do 11 social media communication of investor information
212 Email: Mulshine to Reid and Blackburn Re: TECO – Minutes on Stock Awards for Ray and Frank (9.17.2012) SEC-BLACKBURNRP- 0004580-82
Transfers of Shares by Ronald Blackburn & Tri Koon HoldingsUnregistered stock
18 02/01/10 Ronald Blackburn New Orleans, LA Frank Itak 353,333 Toms River, NJ 25 02/01/10 Ronald Blackburn New Orleans, LA Frank Itak 2,646,667 Toms River, NJ 58 05/04/10 Ronald Blackburn New Orleans, LA Frank Itak 353,333 Toms River, NJ
Treaty Energy Corporation 7/12/2013 Shares Loaned by and Paid Back to RLB
2/5/2009 ZQ 2435 28,333,333 50.00% 14,166,667 TK to Reza M. Amanollahi 2/5/2009 ZQ2437 12,000,001 50.00% 6,000,001 TK to Frank Itak
S-8 Share Issuances Pursuant to Treaty's Stock Benefit Plan Illegally issued shares.
Samuel Whitley Opinion Letters SEC Rules Violation
1 July 31, 2009 Direct Transfer, LLC Frank Itak ZQ00002470 12,000,001 SEC-WHITLEY-E-0000253 2 August __, 2009 Computershare Frank Itak ZQ00002470 12,000,001 SEC-WHITLEY-E-0000252 5 August 12, 2009 Computershare Reza M. Amanollahi ZQ00002469 4,601,107 SEC-WHITLEY-E-0000165
212 Email: Mulshine to Reid and Blackburn Re: TECO – Minutes on Stock Awards for Ray and Frank (9.17.2012) SEC-BLACKBURNRP- 0004580-82
278 Email: Blackburn to Ray Amanollahi, Frank Itak, Mulshine and others Re: 4th revision to Treaty BELIZE OIL REBUTTAL.doc (1.31.2012) SEC-WRD-E-0000029
287 Email: Mulshine to Frank Itak, Ray Amanollahi Re:: TECO – Rev-1 of News Release (1-01-30) SEC-WRD-0000001
Sorry there was no "anonymous individual/group." All the evidence and proof came from Treaty's own documents and emails. The "anonymous individual/group" is just made up BS Treaty's aka Blackburn/Bullshine's abettors.
LMAO! Just factual and proven information unlike the libelous fake posts calvin's girls posted on the board for him that have been determined inadmissible and incompetent and DENIED!
Briefs have no relation to any pending claim or defense at issue in this case, and therefore, are inadmissible and incompetent summary judgment evidence.
I agree Treaty's recovery is fantasyland. So why are the abettors still willing to lose everything in support of their master by planting fake posts they can't defend? All this clown foolery just make Calvin look bad.
The clowns don't work for me. They work for Treaty and Blackburn which has already been admitted to by Bullshine and Reid and they have everything to do with the case So answer the question:
How are Donny and Marie planning to defend those planted fake posts since they obviously know they made them up?
I'd say More truth than lies with the lies being the planted fake posts Calvin is trying to pass off. So how are Donny and Marie planning to defend those planted fake posts since they obviously know they made them up? Not that the judge won't throw them out solely because of hearsay and are inadmissible.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know 23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the 24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment 25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group Page 62 1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was 2 completely unknown to me. 3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer 4 Group? 5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money 6 into Treaty. 7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical 8 assets? 9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know 10 that until we took the trip to Belize
Fake Canadian deal???
Yes, the 20% assignment on the Canadian deal was verified by several of us by more than one source. Treaty is in business! Our BOD and large investors did a great job putting this all together.
2 Q. Is Treaty currently running a business? Is it 3 operating? 4 A. Treaty is an operating company certainly from a 5 legal perspective. From an actual operating 6 perspective, it's not.
15 Q. But it doesn't have any revenues currently? 16 A. It does not. 1 But it has no producing revenue currently at all.
Sell more stock???
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant’s agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 155-2 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 7 SEC v. Blackburn, et al. Page 2 AGREED PARTIAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT TREATY Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
Pimp for more donations???
Got to pay this first: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court shall order disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil penalty pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. How did the last round of "donation" work out?
Yes, the 20% assignment on the Canadian deal was verified by several of us by more than one source. Treaty is in business! Our BOD and large investors did a great job putting this all together.
2 Q. Is Treaty currently running a business? Is it 3 operating? 4 A. Treaty is an operating company certainly from a 5 legal perspective. From an actual operating 6 perspective, it's not.
15 Q. But it doesn't have any revenues currently? 16 A. It does not. 1 But it has no producing revenue currently at all.
Just another lie from Treaty's big daddy crew and proof the abettor's will say anything.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know 23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the 24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment 25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group Page 62 1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was 2 completely unknown to me. 3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer 4 Group? 5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money 6 into Treaty. 7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical 8 assets? 9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know 10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there 23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under 24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the 25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the 1 Internet about getting his rig back. 2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to 3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day 4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be 5 the case.
Q. Mr. Mulshine, you also sold some of your own 15 Treaty shares during this time period in January of 2012 16 during the lead-up to the announcement of the claimed 17 oil strike in Belize; is that correct? 18 A. I don't remember. I sold very, very small 19 percentage of my stock literally to survive. I had to 20 eat.
Consultants that were working for Treaty headquarters.
23 Q. I'm handing you now a document that has been 24 marked as Exhibit 72. 25 Exhibit 72 is an e-mail from you to Frank Itak 1 and Ray Amanollahi dated January 29th, 2012, with the 2 subject line, TECO revision one of news release. Do you 3 recognize Exhibit 72? 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. Is this an e-mail that you sent? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. Who are Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi? 8 A. Amanollahi. They are two consultants that were 9 working for Treaty headquarters. 10 Q. What were these gentlemen doing for Treaty? 11 A. They were doing investor communications through 12 social media. 13 Q. So on Sunday, January 29th, 2012, which was the 14 day before Treaty made the public announcement of its 15 claimed oil strike in Belize, you sent a draft of that 16 release to Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi? 17 A. Right. 18 Q. Why were you sending a draft of the press release 19 to these two individuals? 20 A. They were working for the headquarters, for 21 Andrew Reid, and they're responsible for social media 22 communication with shareholders. 23 And they were -- and I was asked to get 24 information to them so that they could handle 25 shareholder inquiries and shareholder information 1 through their social media after the news release went 2 out so they had to be informed as to what we were 3 talking about. 4 Q. So you wanted them to be prepared to push the 5 news out on social media that Treaty was planning to 6 announce on Monday morning? 7 A. They were being prepared so that when the news 8 release went out Monday, and I didn't want them to do 9 it. 10 Headquarters had them under agreements to do 11 social media communication of investor information, and 12 they would never put anything out until after it was 13 already public information by news release. So they had 14 to be informed. 15 Q. You wrote that you wanted to be sure that the 16 release had major impact. Do you see that? 17 A. Yeah. 18 Q. Why did you want the release to have major 19 impact? 22 A. It's totally arbitrary. I was a shareholder, 23 too, and the shares were at one-tenth the price of what 24 I got in at. 1 in deep, deep doo-doo at the time. 2 And we wanted to see the company -- everybody 3 believed we had an incredibly positive release coming 4 out. And everybody prayed to God it would affect the 5 stock in a positive way because everybody had lost a lot 6 of money at that point. 7 Q. You wanted the press release on the claimed oil 8 strike in Belize to have a major impact because you 9 wanted to be able to make money on the shares that you 10 were holding? 11 A. No. 21 Q. Right. So you were never able to sell your 22 stake, the shares that you had, because the stock price 23 never went up and staid up at a level that would enable 24 you to cash out basically. 25 A. No, that's not the -- I expected Treaty Energy to 1 be a very successful oil and gas company. 2 Q. And you would sell your shares and make money? 3 A. I would keep them as long-term investments in my 4 retirement account. I would sell some when I needed it 5 to pay the mortgage, yes.
10 Q While you were working for Treaty, were 11 they more interested in putting out press releases -- 12 A Oh, yes. 13 Q -- than they were in drilling for oil? 14 A Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. They 15 were more interested in keeping that investor 16 bulletin board thing responding to that. That seemed 17 to be their focus. Hamdi and I eventually -- we were 18 scratching our heads. What the heck are these guys 19 doing? 20 And we eventually came to the conclusion 21 they're not an oil company. They're a stock company. 22 And so they're not putting the money here in Belize 23 like they should have done.
16 Q And then the seventh paragraph starts: At 17 1235 feet hydrocarbons were detected in the form of a 18 gas register. Do you know what that refers to? 19 A It's hilarious. Anybody reading this thing 20 would realize that whoever wrote this doesn't know 21 what they're talking about, and so it's embarrassing. 22 Throughout the presence of Treaty down there, we had 23 to deal with this sort of frustration. 24 I think whoever wrote it, what they're 25 trying to say is that we had a gas increase in the 1 mudlog. I think that's what he was trying to say. 2 But the way he wrote it, it's not -- 3 Q Was there a gas increase in the mudlog? 4 A Not really. We got a little bit, but it's 5 not -- it's not a kick. If we had -- I wish it would 6 show a kick. 7 Q Would look like the test? 8 A Yeah, yeah. 9 Q Do you know where the 1235 number came 10 from? 11 A I don't know. I don't know why he put that 12 there. 13 Q Did anyone discuss this language with you 14 or -- 15 A No. This came out prior to me even being 16 in Belize City. By the time we left Independence and 17 got to Belize City, this is already, you know, noise. 18 Q Do you know what the motivation for Treaty 19 Energy was for releasing this press release? 20 A I can only speculate. I don't know for 21 sure. 22 Q What is your speculation? 23 A They did it to appease investors.
24 Q And then the next sentence reads: This 25 presence of C1 to C4 gas readings indicated a 1 geopressurized oil bearing zone, slash, gas driven. 2 A I don't know where they got that. I don't 3 know how they can -- the presence of C1 to C4, we 4 didn't take C1 to C4 readings. I had no 5 chromatograph. 6 I don't know where they got that. I mean, 7 any oil and gas person who's associated were this 8 would have been embarrassed, and I was certainly 9 embarrassed. 10 Q And the next sentence reads: As drilling 11 continued, the indicators suddenly increased from the 12 depth of 1235 feet with readings being taken at 13 one-foot intervals. 14 So I wanted to ask you, were the readings 15 actually being taken at one-foot intervals? They 16 were taken at ten-foot intervals, right? 17 A (Moves head up and down.) 18 Q And was there a study -- 19 A Well -- okay. Normally if you find 20 something, then you start just looking at every few 21 feet. You're not really taking -- you're stilling 22 logging every ten-foot intervals, but you take them 23 more often at this point because you're trying to see 24 any show oil. This sample might not be on the next 25 one or it might be -- you know. So you're trying to 1 catch that oil, and so you take it every few feet. 2 Q Okay. Was it actually taken at one-foot 3 intervals? 4 A No, no, no, no. I wouldn't have time to do 5 that. 6 Q Okay. And does the mudlog show that the 7 indicators suddenly increased from the depth of 1235 8 feet? 9 A Well, it showed that it increased up there 10 right at the limestone. 11 Q Would you consider this a steady 12 increase -- 13 A No. 14 Q -- from 1235 feet? 15 A Huh-uh. It just went up, and it stayed. 16 It stayed constant. It's not -- that's not what I 17 would like to see.
Q Did you have any conversations with Harden 22 about the need for a wireline log to get more 23 specific information before you found out about this 24 press release? 25 A No. One, I didn't know they were going to 1 do a press release. And, two, I did not know whether 2 I would have been involved with the project at that 3 point. I was just here for mudlogging. And as far 4 as I was concerned, my stint was up.
5 Q When Harden was sort of jumping for joy, we 6 struck oil -- 7 A Right. 8 Q -- did you ever say, "Well, wait for the 9 wireline logging to be able to get so excited"? 10 A No, no, no, no. I was pretty much out of 11 there at that point. I was thinking I'm done. I'm 12 going home.
No Seimic and no wireline done! Another lie being put out by the gang.
16 Q What would you need? What sort of 17 information would Treaty need to come up with an 18 estimation? 19 A Well, one would be seismic -- some kind of 20 seismic studies there to give us an idea of the 21 extent of any anomalies, the geometry of the anomaly, 22 the extent of the field. We didn't have that. 23 Secondly, we needed a wireline log to give 24 us some porosity and to give us some oil in place 25 calculations based on that. We didn't have that. To 1 go by this, no.
LMAO!!! STICKS to locate the well!
1 company from Oklahoma called Southern Locators, and 2 he was what I call sticks. 3 Q What does that mean? 4 A Witch sticks. 5 MR. DUGAN: Drowsing with -- 6 THE WITNESS: Yes. 7 MR. DUGAN: You know, you hold two sticks, 8 and it's dubious. 9 THE WITNESS: Yes. 10 MR. DUGAN: It's a liability. 11 THE WITNESS: Yes. 12 BY MS. COX: 13 Q Is it not a very sophisticated way to 14 locate oil? 15 A It is not. I mean, no good geologist would 16 want to be associated with something like that. We 17 don't look -- we don't find oil with those things. 18 Q And so what is it called? They're called 19 sticks? 20 A I'm not sure what they're called. This guy 21 just came down and said oil is here at 800 feet and 22 1200 feet, and I'm not sure what the technique was or 23 what, but this is prior to me being there. 24 So I was down there to mudlog this well, 25 and so now at this point I'm going to look to see if Page 23 1 there's anything around 800 feet and look to see if 2 there's anything 1200 feet, where I want to focus on. 3 Q Did you -- besides just knowing that he 4 said there was oil at 800 or 1200, did they give you 5 any reports to look at? 6 A No. 7 Q Okay. 8 A No, nothing. You know, I figure out, okay, 9 I'll just come in there, and I'll look at the samples 10 if there's something there, and we had a mudlogging 11 unit system there with the red gas coming out of the 12 mud. 13 Q What type of mud logging system was it? 14 A It was a Geospect Mudlogging system or what 15 we call a hot-wire system, and it basically is simply 16 an electronic system to suck the gas from the 17 drilling mud as we're drilling. And if there's any 18 gas in there, it will show up, show some increase in 19 hydro -- in possible gas.
LMAO! They obviously knew they were going to fake the find and Reid wanted Platon to get the price up to .04 prior to the scam so they could sell into the run up they were going to create by Leaking the "find".
Blackburn Testimony: Weekend before the Fake Belize Strike.
23 Q. I'm handing you now a document that has been 24 marked as Exhibit 72. 25 Exhibit 72 is an e-mail from you to Frank Itak Page 74 1 and Ray Amanollahi dated January 29th, 2012, with the 2 subject line, TECO revision one of news release. Do you 3 recognize Exhibit 72? 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. Is this an e-mail that you sent? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. Who are Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi? 8 A. Amanollahi. They are two consultants that were 9 working for Treaty headquarters. 10 Q. What were these gentlemen doing for Treaty? 11 A. They were doing investor communications through 12 social media. 13 Q. So on Sunday, January 29th, 2012, which was the 14 day before Treaty made the public announcement of its 15 claimed oil strike in Belize, you sent a draft of that 16 release to Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi? 17 A. Right. 18 Q. Why were you sending a draft of the press release 19 to these two individuals? 20 A. They were working for the headquarters, for 21 Andrew Reid, and they're responsible for social media 22 communication with shareholders. 23 And they were -- and I was asked to get 24 information to them so that they could handle 25 shareholder inquiries and shareholder information 1 through their social media after the news release went 2 out so they had to be informed as to what we were 3 talking about. 4 Q. So you wanted them to be prepared to push the 5 news out on social media that Treaty was planning to 6 announce on Monday morning? 7 A. They were being prepared so that when the news 8 release went out Monday, and I didn't want them to do 9 it. 10 Headquarters had them under agreements to do 11 social media communication of investor information, and 12 they would never put anything out until after it was 13 already public information by news release. So they had 14 to be informed.
No same players and same scammers and all fully documented and proven, however you might want to got back and read it again because you've obviously missed the whole point.
Funny I didn't see Hallin's signature on anything, except on the note that was forged by Blackburn. You're probably confused with the attempts from Blackburn's paid promoter Platon where he tried to make it appear it was being directed by Hallin, followed by the Donny and Marie show which has all ready been proven false but will be presented again once the criminal case starts.
Nothing misleading about it. Everything was intermingled between the two companies and proven in court. What is misleading are the fake planted posts Calvin used from Donny and Marie.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
