Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They will do one or the other and in the next month I would imagine.
The changes will be made as promised. And it has nothing to do with Richard. The reprisal to the current board members and the notoriety associated with being involved in a scam would be so damaging as to be not worth these very minor changes.
Yes. I believe that. But the others have associated their names with the project so they either need to exercise their authority or resign from the board. People are missing the catalysts here. You need to motivate the board members not Richard. And the I/R is virtually useless.
I am just kidding. I think we need to discuss this with the board of directors not I/R. Richard is just an impediment at this point.
what are capitol gains?
These are all salient points. I went back and read your posting history. Interesting. Very good in balance and perspective.
Where is the confirmation of continued viability here?
Yes. You want the key reference word to be Vytex. The labeling is secondary.
That's what I am thinking. We need to make sure we create a repeat market and a loyal customer base.
Not only do I want you to whip it up, I want you to make it so green, you will just walk into your bedroom in 3 years and find nothing but a bedspread on your floor. Now, get busy!
I am not looking at it that way. And I think everything is multi-faceted. I have weighed the contradictory elements in this company and found them to be heavier on the pro side. There are no magic wands and it is going to take a lot of hard work to bring everything to fruition. I candidly believe that the persons in charge are already very much aware of that. And prepared, as much as anyone can be, to shoulder that burden.
Agreed that a reasonable expectation leads to much less drama and disappointment. This is only the primary stage of the launch. Let's wait until the other stages are exhausted and we have payload in orbit.
Anything worth noting happening here? Updates, I/R emails, anything at all?
All tweets, when they include legal or accounting updates, should be reviewed by the appropriate persons and signed off on by Steve, only my opinion.
I am relieved to see them moving forward using these percentages. Makes sense. Opening the front door for growth while respecting what got them in a position to do anything at all.
This is a good investment. For a myriad of reasons. The way corporate decides to do anything rests on their shoulders. The consequences, good and bad, will be felt by all shareholders. That's the price of the ticket here. Buy, sell or hold. Whatever feels right to you.
No you don't know that. You are assuming that things will be reported and worded in a specific way. What's the problem with letting corporate provide the numbers and wording?
Frankly Doog, I hope they don't. This is, in my opinion, an opportunity to take a measured risk for a very good return. However, if something unforeseen were to happen, I do not want all of the people who depend on the Rotman's help to survive to go down too. That would be weighing heavily on my mind if I had to make some of the decisions they are faced with at this juncture.
I'd like to wait on that. Until I see it signed off, I am going to leave that open. There are many things to be considered here. To assume that is all cut and dried is not correct. Whatever decisions were made behind doors will be included in the language of the final documents. Let's wait for those.
Again, back to the considerations. This is nothing that is going to be know by discussing it on this board.
I am aware of that. I am looking to see the language that is used in the final documents. The considerations they are requiring to accept this minority position will be telling. That will ultimately determine how it is reported.
We really don't know anything about the specifics and how they will be reported at this juncture. Best to wait for the filings.
That is a possibility. But they are other possibilities, too. Can't say anything definitive until the numbers are signed off on.
Because it has a very strong base of core believers.
Can't move from a walk to a gallop, horses go down that way. I think the reason things have taken so long is it needed to be worked out within the family. The rest of the requirements will fall into place quickly now. And I like to see the family looking out for themselves.
Maybe you are expecting a canter. Let's move it to a trot first.
I really see the latest tweet as a very positive sign. The retention of forty-two percent by one or more individuals in the family shows restraint and intelligent long-term thinking. That same thinking will go a long way to building the new company into something sustainable.
I am thinking it might be Mrs. Rotman who may be holding out. And I agree 100 percent with that. She has a lifetime of work to protect. I would act as the gatekeeper, too. It is sound and reasonable. That 42 percent hold back is just using common sense. The world is full of what if's.
The supposition (not what was reported by corporate) was that Steve held the other 42 percent and would be joining the 58 percent that had signed. Is that off the table now?
I have several of these and they consist of establishing lines through your existing bank and moving cash from your account to yourself at another bank or to another person or entity. Very straightforward. I imagine that all they would need to review these would be a confirmation of the amounts and the to and from accounts.
You don't have to post, but it does offer a broad view of the activity on this and other investments. It presents them essentially in a larger context.
Thanks. I appreciate all your work and the opportunity to read the information for myself with the links you provide. It saves me an enormous amount of time and allows me to interpret the intent of the writer for myself.
Agreed and by Wednesday 90 percent of what is said will be moot. Can't wait till Wednesday.
His father passed at 90 or 92, I don't recall the exact number. But, it was up there. And Steve is operating on all eight cylinders.
It's bottom of the barrel time. Can only mean one thing, run for the green next week.
Do your homework first on what the tax consequences will be short vs long-term.
Wouldn't that be the essence of irony? I went into this knowing it was a gamble. Every time they hit another mark, I feel the odds slide a bit more to the investors favor. I am very interested in seeing what the p/r's bring. My sell is in at .03 for 43 million plus shares. If it looks like they are creating a momentum that may surpass that mark, I will, of course reset my price.
I like that, too. I think they might go with BNGI. Don't really know though.
I don't know that those statements are completely unrealistic, but they certainly fall under exuberant outcomes. And some of our posters are irrepressible in their take on how much any one thing will dominate the market. I don't believe their postings are meant to mislead anyone. Some people see the glass half-full, others half-empty and some are just the, 'MAN, LOOK AT THE FOAM COMING OFF THAT THING!" kind of investors.
Hoping the announcements are sequential and begin with, "Our new CEO ..."