Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When he talks about project in offshore Ghana being pushed through is that the HDY project?
ERHC retains Deloitte as strategic advisor on its assets in Sub-Saharan Africa
DECEMBER 10, 2014 BY SAMUEL KAMAU MBOTE
Sub-Saharan Africa oil and gas explorer ERHC Energy has announced it has retained the services of Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) to advise on the Company’s oil assets in the Republics of Chad and Kenya.
Deloitte will advise ERHC on matters related to possible joint ventures, alliances sales and/or divestitures on the Chad and Kenya licenses at a time where the drop in global oil prices has prompted consolidation among oil exploration companies.
According to ERHC President and CEO Dr. Peter Ntephe Deloitte will help also ERHC access global network of corporate finance professionals around the world.
“These are challenging times for all oil exploration companies and we are leveraging DCF’s depth of skills and experience to support us in making decisions based on information that is constantly evolving,” said Dr. Ntephe.
ERHC currently holds a 100 percent interest in Block BDS-2008 in Southern Chad and a carried 35 percent interest in Block 11A in Northwestern Kenya bordering Uganda and Southern Sudan.
Beyond its assets in Chad and Kenya, ERHC also is seeking new strategic investment into the company itself.
“The current valuation of ERHC presents an exceptional opportunity for equity investors to gain access to ERHC’s rich portfolio of licenses,” Ntephe added.
Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) provides strategic advisory services and M&A advice that help corporate, entrepreneurial and private equity clients create and act upon opportunities for liquidity, growth and long-term advantage.
ERHC retains Deloitte as strategic advisor on its assets in Sub-Saharan Africa
DECEMBER 10, 2014 BY SAMUEL KAMAU MBOTE
Sub-Saharan Africa oil and gas explorer ERHC Energy has announced it has retained the services of Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) to advise on the Company’s oil assets in the Republics of Chad and Kenya.
Deloitte will advise ERHC on matters related to possible joint ventures, alliances sales and/or divestitures on the Chad and Kenya licenses at a time where the drop in global oil prices has prompted consolidation among oil exploration companies.
According to ERHC President and CEO Dr. Peter Ntephe Deloitte will help also ERHC access global network of corporate finance professionals around the world.
“These are challenging times for all oil exploration companies and we are leveraging DCF’s depth of skills and experience to support us in making decisions based on information that is constantly evolving,” said Dr. Ntephe.
ERHC currently holds a 100 percent interest in Block BDS-2008 in Southern Chad and a carried 35 percent interest in Block 11A in Northwestern Kenya bordering Uganda and Southern Sudan.
Beyond its assets in Chad and Kenya, ERHC also is seeking new strategic investment into the company itself.
“The current valuation of ERHC presents an exceptional opportunity for equity investors to gain access to ERHC’s rich portfolio of licenses,” Ntephe added.
Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) provides strategic advisory services and M&A advice that help corporate, entrepreneurial and private equity clients create and act upon opportunities for liquidity, growth and long-term advantage.
Strong buying most of the day until 3PM. Then after 3PM 2,734,992 shares sold. Maybe note conversions?
15:57:49 0.0084 350000 OTO
15:50:46 0.0085 80000 OTO
15:50:44 0.0085 20000 OTO
15:29:52 0.0085 40000 OTO
15:18:58 0.0085 40000 OTO
15:17:09 0.0085 9000 OTO
15:16:31 0.0085 174000 OTO
15:16:31 0.0085 9000 OTO
15:16:29 0.0085 10000 OTO
15:16:29 0.0085 10000 OTO
15:16:29 0.0085 7000 OTO
15:16:29 0.0085 65000 OTO
15:13:34 0.0086 10000 OTO
15:09:53 0.0087 1910992 OTO
15:06:09 0.009 98000 OTO
14:27:33 0.009 655000 OTO
14:14:59 0.009 9242 OTO
13:48:56 0.009 55000 OTO
13:48:38 0.009 100000 OTO
13:48:33 0.009 200000 OTO
13:47:58 0.009 200000 OTO
13:47:52 0.009 100000 OTO
13:45:10 0.009 13000 OTO
13:43:22 0.009 33000 OTO
13:42:17 0.009 20000 OTO
13:30:25 0.009 100000 OTO
13:30:20 0.009 100000 OTO
13:30:14 0.009 100000 OTO
13:30:07 0.009 100000 OTO
13:30:03 0.009 100000 OTO
SARA looks cheap, Unless BK.
What do you think of IMRS here. I am not it yet.
I don't believe PN was CEO when the decision to dump Noble and Anadarko and go with STP was made. So that ones not on him.
It would be great if the got above $1 at some point but right not any significant gain would be good. At least they are recognizing the problem and are taking some action.
ERHC Energy Inc. Retains Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC
Joint Ventures, Alliances, Sales and Divestitures under Consideration
HOUSTON, December 9, 2014 – ERHC Energy Inc. (OTCMKTS:ERHE), a publicly traded American company with oil and gas assets in Sub-Saharan Africa, today announced it has retained the services of Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) to advise on the Company's oil assets in the Republics of Chad and Kenya.
The drop in global oil prices has prompted consolidation among oil exploration companies, and DCF will advise ERHC on matters related to possible joint ventures, alliances sales and/or divestitures on the Chad and Kenya licenses. ERHC currently holds a 100 percent interest in Block BDS-2008 in Southern Chad and a carried 35 percent interest in Block 11A in Northwestern Kenya.
"These are challenging times for all oil exploration companies and we are leveraging DCF's depth of skills and experience to support us in making decisions based on information that is constantly evolving," said ERHC President and CEO Dr. Peter Ntephe. "We anticipate DCF's involvement will be valuable as we pursue strategic options through access to their global network of corporate finance professionals around the world."
Beyond its assets in Chad and Kenya, ERHC also is seeking new strategic investment into the company itself.
"The current valuation of ERHC presents an exceptional opportunity for equity investors to gain access to ERHC's rich portfolio of licenses," Ntephe said.
About Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC
Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) provides strategic advisory services and M&A advice that help corporate, entrepreneurial and private equity clients create and act upon opportunities for liquidity, growth and long-term advantage. With an in-depth understanding of the marketplace and access to a global network of investment bankers, we help clients confidently pursue strategic transactions in both domestic and global markets. DCF, together with the Corporate Finance Advisory practices within the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited network of member firms, include in excess of 1,900 professionals, who work collaboratively across 150 international locations. With our significant experience providing investment banking services across key industries, we are able to offer our clients solutions that help them to achieve their strategic objectives. For more information, visit www.investmentbanking.deloitte.com.
About ERHC Energy
ERHC Energy Inc. Retains Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC
Joint Ventures, Alliances, Sales and Divestitures under Consideration
HOUSTON, December 9, 2014 – ERHC Energy Inc. (OTCMKTS:ERHE), a publicly traded American company with oil and gas assets in Sub-Saharan Africa, today announced it has retained the services of Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) to advise on the Company's oil assets in the Republics of Chad and Kenya.
The drop in global oil prices has prompted consolidation among oil exploration companies, and DCF will advise ERHC on matters related to possible joint ventures, alliances sales and/or divestitures on the Chad and Kenya licenses. ERHC currently holds a 100 percent interest in Block BDS-2008 in Southern Chad and a carried 35 percent interest in Block 11A in Northwestern Kenya.
"These are challenging times for all oil exploration companies and we are leveraging DCF's depth of skills and experience to support us in making decisions based on information that is constantly evolving," said ERHC President and CEO Dr. Peter Ntephe. "We anticipate DCF's involvement will be valuable as we pursue strategic options through access to their global network of corporate finance professionals around the world."
Beyond its assets in Chad and Kenya, ERHC also is seeking new strategic investment into the company itself.
"The current valuation of ERHC presents an exceptional opportunity for equity investors to gain access to ERHC's rich portfolio of licenses," Ntephe said.
About Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC
Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC (DCF) provides strategic advisory services and M&A advice that help corporate, entrepreneurial and private equity clients create and act upon opportunities for liquidity, growth and long-term advantage. With an in-depth understanding of the marketplace and access to a global network of investment bankers, we help clients confidently pursue strategic transactions in both domestic and global markets. DCF, together with the Corporate Finance Advisory practices within the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited network of member firms, include in excess of 1,900 professionals, who work collaboratively across 150 international locations. With our significant experience providing investment banking services across key industries, we are able to offer our clients solutions that help them to achieve their strategic objectives. For more information, visit www.investmentbanking.deloitte.com.
About ERHC Energy
He also said he is in a blackout period now and prohibited from buying.
Interview with ERHC Energy Inc. President and CEO Peter Ntephe - December 8, 2014
Dr. Peter Ntephe, president and chief executive officer of ERHC Energy Inc., recently sat down for an interview that covered a broad range of subjects related to the Company's business activities. ERHC (OTCMKTS:ERHE) is a publicly traded American company with oil and gas assets in Sub-Saharan Africa,
What is ERHC's current focus?
ERHC has come a long way from a passive-portfolio holding company confined to one set of offshore assets in the Gulf of Guinea. We've diversified the company and taken it onshore East and Central Africa where we have made it a veritable and respected operator in its own right. Our focus is on building value by using aggressive exploration work programs to mature our onshore assets.
What is happening currently in Kenya?
We operated Kenya Block 11A successfully, according to schedule through the carrying out of a Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry (FTG) survey and the award of seismic. That was before a farm-in to CEPSA, which took over as operator earlier this year. With the conclusion of seismic in the Block and completion of work program requirements of our first exploration phase, preparation for drilling our first exploration well is currently going on at full steam. All this has been achieved in a little over two years, which is quite quick for such work programs.
What is happening in Chad?
In Chad, ERHC continues to be the operator in Block BDS 2008. We have just completed our aero-magnetic and gravity survey, which has enhanced understanding of prospectivity in the block and our assessment of our leads, previously estimated at 200 million barrels of oil (unrisked). We are currently preparing for the award of a seismic survey contract. Given the results of the magnetic and gravity studies, we expect the seismic survey to progress our leads to drillable prospects, in which case preparation for drilling will start in Chad too.
What are your thoughts about the recent decline in ERHC's stock price?
ERHC's leadership is focused as always on the company's valuation. The drop in the price of oil on world markets, gradually from June and then more precipitously over the past three weeks, has drastically affected valuations of oil and gas E&P companies – particularly the smaller ones focused on pure exploration. ERHC is not unique in this and our challenge as management is to seek ways to alleviate the overwhelming effects of the external environment, even as we forge ahead in our work programs in Kenya and Chad.
What about the Gulf of Guinea assets?
Our legacy offshore assets in the Gulf of Guinea remain. We have not ruled out their being of continuing strategic importance to the company, even as we review their feasibility in current conditions. It is clear, however, that deep offshore exploration remains a challenge to even the biggest of companies. The possibility of getting in technically and financially capable operating partners in the short-to-medium term will, therefore, be a strong factor in deciding how we handle the offshore assets.
So you are not ready to close the book on the Joint Development Zone?
We are currently carrying out an assessment of future exploration possibilities. Just last week, we had a very important meeting with the Joint Development Authority on the state of affairs in our Blocks. While a commercial discovery has not been made, contrary to the expert expectations prior to drilling, the important geoscientific data and understandings gained through the drilling campaign will better inform future exploration in those Blocks.
Any regrets about how the JDZ was explored?
We could not be more proud of the exploration work in our JDZ blocks. We ran a classic and most efficient exploration campaign in JDZ Blocks 2, 3 and 4. ERHC attracted world-class, deep-water operating partners and formed successful consortia that carried out the most comprehensive exploration campaigns in the region till date. Over a short, six-month period, we drilled five deep-water wells across the three blocks, all the wells coming in under budget and without incident. We discovered biogenic methane gas in at least three of the wells.
What really is the ultimate goal of ERHC?
As an exploration company, our business model is to obtain exploration licenses at relatively low cost in highly prospective areas, prove up the license by means of geological and geophysical work as well as drilling and then sell the license (or indeed, the company) for a premium upon discovery. This is a high-risk but potentially high-reward business model. ERHC did not invent this model and is not unique in it. Many of the junior exploration companies worldwide are running this model. One of the best exemplars of this model in recent times is Cove Energy.
What was the story of Cove Energy?
Cove was an E&P company listed on the AIM of the London Stock Exchange. It was initially funded in June 2009. Following a huge discovery in the Rovouma field offshore Mozambique in which Cove had a small interest, the directors of the company put Cove up for sale. Cove achieved an increase in value of over 1,900 percent in a $2 billion acquisition by the Thai company PTTEP in August 2012. Cove's return on investment, in excess of $2 billion value creation in three years, made it one of 2012's most prominent public takeovers worldwide.
Can ERHC really emulate Cove?
ERHC might have achieved a similar outcome if we had different results in the JDZ, but that is why we call it a high-risk, high-reward model. Geoscience has not yet found anything near a failsafe way of determining before the first exploration well whether there will be a discovery for certain. The risks of failure are therefore quite high (in all exploration and particularly in the frontier variety), but when the rewards do come in they can be gargantuan. It is the promise of that scale of reward that still makes the exploration model a popular one in the global oil industry. It is also the promise that made us decide to persist with the pursuit but this time with an onshore focus after the results in the JDZ disappointed.
Funding the exploration model you have described is a real challenge and one of the biggest risks?
Yes. A major challenge of running the exploration model is capital. Capital sources are limited to sale of equity – either in the exploration license (by way of farmouts for cash and work-program carry) or in the company itself. Debt is not usually available to pure exploration companies because the model does not involve conventional cash flow (earnings) from operations.
How does an exploration company raise capital?
The business model we are running, involves funding by sale of equity in the licenses or in the company. The two are often mutually reinforcing. You sell some equity in the company to fund the obtaining and initial working of a license. As work progresses, you then sell some equity in the license (to which value has then been added) to fund the company's continuing expenses until you reach the point at which you can sell the license or the company at a vast premium.
How does the price of oil affect this fundraising strategy?
The value additions through the working of the license are actually predictable, as we have shown in carefully researched investor presentations, provided certain conditions are kept constant. One of these conditions is a certain level and stability in the price of oil. With a sharp drop in the price of oil, which is one of the annotated risks in the exploration model, investor appetite for exploration, both in terms of farming into licenses and in terms of buying the equity of exploration companies, drops precipitously, at least initially. Unfortunately, this has occurred in the last month in global oil markets and poses challenges for not just the small exploration companies but bigger ones.
ERHC was featured last week in the Business Daily Africa magazine regarding our plans in Kenya. Beyond the focus on us, I think the article also effectively captured how the drop in oil prices affects the capital-raising prospects for exploration by not just the juniors in the region but also the bigger companies, typified by the recent asset shedding and cost cutting by a company that has been one of the most prolific explorers in Africa in the past decade.
Why has the company been issuing convertible notes?
Prior to the tumult in oil markets, the convertibles were a quick and attractive, albeit interim, way for ERHC to raise capital for the work programs and advance the strategy of raising the valuation(s) of licenses and company. Two years ago we laid out the strategy of pursuing value through prioritizing the onshore assets. We announced that funding would be by a variety of equity-based mechanisms. The first recourse was to invite existing shareholders to participate in a rights' offering. Thereafter was the farm-out on Kenya Block 11A, which was premised on geological and geophysical work funded in part by the proceeds of the rights' offering. Given the lower-than-expected take-up of the rights offering and the need to give time for the appetites of existing shareholders to recover, other means of fundraising were called for in the interim. The quickest and most available of these, in ERHC's circumstances, were convertible notes.
How is ERHC using the money raised through convertibles?
We have used the proceeds of convertible notes to partly fund the work on Chad. That work constitutes the basis on which we expect to attract better farm-in interest on the Block.
Are the convertible notes pressuring ERHC's stock price downward?
I think it's far more nuanced than that. The current outlook on oil prices is generally affecting the valuation of exploration companies. Moreover, we have been quite conservative with convertible notes. We have total exposure to convertibles of less than $1.8 million, which in exploration company terms is a relatively low exposure indeed. Current conversion to date, as I speak is less than $400,000.
Why do you think the stock price has gone down?
Exploration companies have been hard hit by the global downturn in oil prices. This is causing major upheaval. Last week, when oil prices fell to a five-year low, with Brent coming in at a little over $67 and West Texas Intermediate as low as under $64 per barrel, we saw currencies such as the Russian ruble and the Malaysian ringgit, which are oil-dependent, fall to their lowest values since the 1998 financial crisis.
The Edison group's analyst report issued a few days ago noted that there has been a poor 12-month performance for all oil stocks, but E&Ps have suffered particularly in the last three months as a result of the recent collapse in oil prices. It is clear on the same report that some of the worst hit companies have been African explorers with some covered companies losing as much as 97 percent over the last six months. So it may not be comforting to current shareholders, but this is a sector-wide issue.
What are your going forward strategies?
The challenge is to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the current weak oil prices as soon as the dust settles. The Edison report clearly notes that the current environment presents opportunities for investors and corporates alike. Furthermore, the emergent price dynamics could foment a shift in investor focus from shale to the conventional resources in Africa. It is therefore up to companies like ERHC to show the resilience that they have been renowned for and position to take advantage of the opportunities that present in the new world of oil prices.
Should you stop raising funds until stability returns to the oil markets?
Like most other companies in our position, we are carefully reviewing fundraising options in the context of current market conditions. However, exploration work programs are contractually unrelenting and have to be continuously funded so as to keep the licenses valid. But all these are inevitable steps on the path to the ultimate prize in the exploration business model – company and shareholder reward at a premium for investment made.
It sounds like you are full steam ahead?
It is unfortunate that the external environment – the sharp and mostly unforeseen drop in global oil prices – has affected ERHC's market valuation in the way it has. But management's focus is to respond to this challenge by continuing to pursue farm-outs in Chad, a possible further farm-down in Kenya and, simultaneously, taking advantage of the current valuation of ERHC to seek new strategic investment into the company itself.
Can you expand on that?
We believe that the current valuation of ERHC presents a fabulous opportunity for savvy investors to get access to ERHC's rich portfolio of licenses. The current replacement value of each asset, as standalone investment opportunity, might currently be higher than the market valuation of the company. This is the 'undervaluation' of a company in the classic sense. Equity markets usually overreact to events such as a drop in oil prices and this has probably been what we've seen not only with ERHC but with many of the smaller explorers at our stage of the exploration value curve.
How is this good for existing shareholders?
Most experts don't expect the price of oil to remain depressed for the long-term. So while the current situation is not ideal to us as existing shareholders, it does at least present the opportunity to attract fresh strategic investment into the company and thereby reinvigorate the strategy towards ultimate value for all. The rise and fall of global oil prices has been cyclical in the past and there is no reason to believe that the current cycle will not be reversed subsequently to the benefit of those who invest now.
If you have confidence in the future, why are you not buying stock now at the low prices?
Personally, I would love to buy up all the stock on offer, if I had the means. Of course, that should not be construed as a recommendation – it is important that investors consult with a trusted investment advisor. As a director and insider, I am currently prohibited by the blackout policy from buying any stock between the close of the last reporting period on September 30, 2014 and the filing of the Form 10-K later in December. I think the current valuation, as challenging as it is for current shareholders, is actually an opportunity to attract strategic new investment and investors into the company to re-invigorate the company's resources and strategy towards ultimate reward for both the company and its shareholders.
About ERHC Energy
ERHC Energy Inc. is a Houston-based independent oil and gas company focused on growth through high impact exploration in Africa and the development of undeveloped and marginal oil and gas fields. ERHC is committed to creating and delivering significant value for its stockholders, investors and employees, and to sustainable and profitable growth through risk balanced smart exploration, cost efficient development and high margin production. For more information, visit www.erhc.com.
Cautionary Statement
This interview contains statements concerning ERHC Energy Inc.'s future operating milestones, future drilling operations, the planned exploration and appraisal program, future prospects, future investment opportunities and financing plans, future stockholders' meetings as well as other matters that are not historical facts or information. Such statements are inherently subject to a variety of risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, projected, expressed or implied. A discussion of the risk factors that could impact these areas and the Company's overall business and financial performance can be found in the Company's reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors include, among others, those relating to the Company's ability to exploit its commercial interests in Kenya, Chad, the JDZ and the Exclusive Economic Zone of São Tomé and Príncipe, general economic and business conditions, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, competition, changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions, regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations and various other matters, many of which are beyond the Company's control. Given these concerns, investors and analysts should not place undue reliance on these statements. Each of the above statements speaks only as of the date of this interview. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in the Company's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any of the above statements is based.
Interview with ERHC Energy Inc. President and CEO Peter Ntephe - December 8, 2014
Dr. Peter Ntephe, president and chief executive officer of ERHC Energy Inc., recently sat down for an interview that covered a broad range of subjects related to the Company's business activities. ERHC (OTCMKTS:ERHE) is a publicly traded American company with oil and gas assets in Sub-Saharan Africa,
What is ERHC's current focus?
ERHC has come a long way from a passive-portfolio holding company confined to one set of offshore assets in the Gulf of Guinea. We've diversified the company and taken it onshore East and Central Africa where we have made it a veritable and respected operator in its own right. Our focus is on building value by using aggressive exploration work programs to mature our onshore assets.
What is happening currently in Kenya?
We operated Kenya Block 11A successfully, according to schedule through the carrying out of a Full Tensor Gravity Gradiometry (FTG) survey and the award of seismic. That was before a farm-in to CEPSA, which took over as operator earlier this year. With the conclusion of seismic in the Block and completion of work program requirements of our first exploration phase, preparation for drilling our first exploration well is currently going on at full steam. All this has been achieved in a little over two years, which is quite quick for such work programs.
What is happening in Chad?
In Chad, ERHC continues to be the operator in Block BDS 2008. We have just completed our aero-magnetic and gravity survey, which has enhanced understanding of prospectivity in the block and our assessment of our leads, previously estimated at 200 million barrels of oil (unrisked). We are currently preparing for the award of a seismic survey contract. Given the results of the magnetic and gravity studies, we expect the seismic survey to progress our leads to drillable prospects, in which case preparation for drilling will start in Chad too.
What are your thoughts about the recent decline in ERHC's stock price?
ERHC's leadership is focused as always on the company's valuation. The drop in the price of oil on world markets, gradually from June and then more precipitously over the past three weeks, has drastically affected valuations of oil and gas E&P companies – particularly the smaller ones focused on pure exploration. ERHC is not unique in this and our challenge as management is to seek ways to alleviate the overwhelming effects of the external environment, even as we forge ahead in our work programs in Kenya and Chad.
What about the Gulf of Guinea assets?
Our legacy offshore assets in the Gulf of Guinea remain. We have not ruled out their being of continuing strategic importance to the company, even as we review their feasibility in current conditions. It is clear, however, that deep offshore exploration remains a challenge to even the biggest of companies. The possibility of getting in technically and financially capable operating partners in the short-to-medium term will, therefore, be a strong factor in deciding how we handle the offshore assets.
So you are not ready to close the book on the Joint Development Zone?
We are currently carrying out an assessment of future exploration possibilities. Just last week, we had a very important meeting with the Joint Development Authority on the state of affairs in our Blocks. While a commercial discovery has not been made, contrary to the expert expectations prior to drilling, the important geoscientific data and understandings gained through the drilling campaign will better inform future exploration in those Blocks.
Any regrets about how the JDZ was explored?
We could not be more proud of the exploration work in our JDZ blocks. We ran a classic and most efficient exploration campaign in JDZ Blocks 2, 3 and 4. ERHC attracted world-class, deep-water operating partners and formed successful consortia that carried out the most comprehensive exploration campaigns in the region till date. Over a short, six-month period, we drilled five deep-water wells across the three blocks, all the wells coming in under budget and without incident. We discovered biogenic methane gas in at least three of the wells.
What really is the ultimate goal of ERHC?
As an exploration company, our business model is to obtain exploration licenses at relatively low cost in highly prospective areas, prove up the license by means of geological and geophysical work as well as drilling and then sell the license (or indeed, the company) for a premium upon discovery. This is a high-risk but potentially high-reward business model. ERHC did not invent this model and is not unique in it. Many of the junior exploration companies worldwide are running this model. One of the best exemplars of this model in recent times is Cove Energy.
What was the story of Cove Energy?
Cove was an E&P company listed on the AIM of the London Stock Exchange. It was initially funded in June 2009. Following a huge discovery in the Rovouma field offshore Mozambique in which Cove had a small interest, the directors of the company put Cove up for sale. Cove achieved an increase in value of over 1,900 percent in a $2 billion acquisition by the Thai company PTTEP in August 2012. Cove's return on investment, in excess of $2 billion value creation in three years, made it one of 2012's most prominent public takeovers worldwide.
Can ERHC really emulate Cove?
ERHC might have achieved a similar outcome if we had different results in the JDZ, but that is why we call it a high-risk, high-reward model. Geoscience has not yet found anything near a failsafe way of determining before the first exploration well whether there will be a discovery for certain. The risks of failure are therefore quite high (in all exploration and particularly in the frontier variety), but when the rewards do come in they can be gargantuan. It is the promise of that scale of reward that still makes the exploration model a popular one in the global oil industry. It is also the promise that made us decide to persist with the pursuit but this time with an onshore focus after the results in the JDZ disappointed.
Funding the exploration model you have described is a real challenge and one of the biggest risks?
Yes. A major challenge of running the exploration model is capital. Capital sources are limited to sale of equity – either in the exploration license (by way of farmouts for cash and work-program carry) or in the company itself. Debt is not usually available to pure exploration companies because the model does not involve conventional cash flow (earnings) from operations.
How does an exploration company raise capital?
The business model we are running, involves funding by sale of equity in the licenses or in the company. The two are often mutually reinforcing. You sell some equity in the company to fund the obtaining and initial working of a license. As work progresses, you then sell some equity in the license (to which value has then been added) to fund the company's continuing expenses until you reach the point at which you can sell the license or the company at a vast premium.
How does the price of oil affect this fundraising strategy?
The value additions through the working of the license are actually predictable, as we have shown in carefully researched investor presentations, provided certain conditions are kept constant. One of these conditions is a certain level and stability in the price of oil. With a sharp drop in the price of oil, which is one of the annotated risks in the exploration model, investor appetite for exploration, both in terms of farming into licenses and in terms of buying the equity of exploration companies, drops precipitously, at least initially. Unfortunately, this has occurred in the last month in global oil markets and poses challenges for not just the small exploration companies but bigger ones.
ERHC was featured last week in the Business Daily Africa magazine regarding our plans in Kenya. Beyond the focus on us, I think the article also effectively captured how the drop in oil prices affects the capital-raising prospects for exploration by not just the juniors in the region but also the bigger companies, typified by the recent asset shedding and cost cutting by a company that has been one of the most prolific explorers in Africa in the past decade.
Why has the company been issuing convertible notes?
Prior to the tumult in oil markets, the convertibles were a quick and attractive, albeit interim, way for ERHC to raise capital for the work programs and advance the strategy of raising the valuation(s) of licenses and company. Two years ago we laid out the strategy of pursuing value through prioritizing the onshore assets. We announced that funding would be by a variety of equity-based mechanisms. The first recourse was to invite existing shareholders to participate in a rights' offering. Thereafter was the farm-out on Kenya Block 11A, which was premised on geological and geophysical work funded in part by the proceeds of the rights' offering. Given the lower-than-expected take-up of the rights offering and the need to give time for the appetites of existing shareholders to recover, other means of fundraising were called for in the interim. The quickest and most available of these, in ERHC's circumstances, were convertible notes.
How is ERHC using the money raised through convertibles?
We have used the proceeds of convertible notes to partly fund the work on Chad. That work constitutes the basis on which we expect to attract better farm-in interest on the Block.
Are the convertible notes pressuring ERHC's stock price downward?
I think it's far more nuanced than that. The current outlook on oil prices is generally affecting the valuation of exploration companies. Moreover, we have been quite conservative with convertible notes. We have total exposure to convertibles of less than $1.8 million, which in exploration company terms is a relatively low exposure indeed. Current conversion to date, as I speak is less than $400,000.
Why do you think the stock price has gone down?
Exploration companies have been hard hit by the global downturn in oil prices. This is causing major upheaval. Last week, when oil prices fell to a five-year low, with Brent coming in at a little over $67 and West Texas Intermediate as low as under $64 per barrel, we saw currencies such as the Russian ruble and the Malaysian ringgit, which are oil-dependent, fall to their lowest values since the 1998 financial crisis.
The Edison group's analyst report issued a few days ago noted that there has been a poor 12-month performance for all oil stocks, but E&Ps have suffered particularly in the last three months as a result of the recent collapse in oil prices. It is clear on the same report that some of the worst hit companies have been African explorers with some covered companies losing as much as 97 percent over the last six months. So it may not be comforting to current shareholders, but this is a sector-wide issue.
What are your going forward strategies?
The challenge is to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the current weak oil prices as soon as the dust settles. The Edison report clearly notes that the current environment presents opportunities for investors and corporates alike. Furthermore, the emergent price dynamics could foment a shift in investor focus from shale to the conventional resources in Africa. It is therefore up to companies like ERHC to show the resilience that they have been renowned for and position to take advantage of the opportunities that present in the new world of oil prices.
Should you stop raising funds until stability returns to the oil markets?
Like most other companies in our position, we are carefully reviewing fundraising options in the context of current market conditions. However, exploration work programs are contractually unrelenting and have to be continuously funded so as to keep the licenses valid. But all these are inevitable steps on the path to the ultimate prize in the exploration business model – company and shareholder reward at a premium for investment made.
It sounds like you are full steam ahead?
It is unfortunate that the external environment – the sharp and mostly unforeseen drop in global oil prices – has affected ERHC's market valuation in the way it has. But management's focus is to respond to this challenge by continuing to pursue farm-outs in Chad, a possible further farm-down in Kenya and, simultaneously, taking advantage of the current valuation of ERHC to seek new strategic investment into the company itself.
Can you expand on that?
We believe that the current valuation of ERHC presents a fabulous opportunity for savvy investors to get access to ERHC's rich portfolio of licenses. The current replacement value of each asset, as standalone investment opportunity, might currently be higher than the market valuation of the company. This is the 'undervaluation' of a company in the classic sense. Equity markets usually overreact to events such as a drop in oil prices and this has probably been what we've seen not only with ERHC but with many of the smaller explorers at our stage of the exploration value curve.
How is this good for existing shareholders?
Most experts don't expect the price of oil to remain depressed for the long-term. So while the current situation is not ideal to us as existing shareholders, it does at least present the opportunity to attract fresh strategic investment into the company and thereby reinvigorate the strategy towards ultimate value for all. The rise and fall of global oil prices has been cyclical in the past and there is no reason to believe that the current cycle will not be reversed subsequently to the benefit of those who invest now.
If you have confidence in the future, why are you not buying stock now at the low prices?
Personally, I would love to buy up all the stock on offer, if I had the means. Of course, that should not be construed as a recommendation – it is important that investors consult with a trusted investment advisor. As a director and insider, I am currently prohibited by the blackout policy from buying any stock between the close of the last reporting period on September 30, 2014 and the filing of the Form 10-K later in December. I think the current valuation, as challenging as it is for current shareholders, is actually an opportunity to attract strategic new investment and investors into the company to re-invigorate the company's resources and strategy towards ultimate reward for both the company and its shareholders.
About ERHC Energy
ERHC Energy Inc. is a Houston-based independent oil and gas company focused on growth through high impact exploration in Africa and the development of undeveloped and marginal oil and gas fields. ERHC is committed to creating and delivering significant value for its stockholders, investors and employees, and to sustainable and profitable growth through risk balanced smart exploration, cost efficient development and high margin production. For more information, visit www.erhc.com.
Cautionary Statement
This interview contains statements concerning ERHC Energy Inc.'s future operating milestones, future drilling operations, the planned exploration and appraisal program, future prospects, future investment opportunities and financing plans, future stockholders' meetings as well as other matters that are not historical facts or information. Such statements are inherently subject to a variety of risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, projected, expressed or implied. A discussion of the risk factors that could impact these areas and the Company's overall business and financial performance can be found in the Company's reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors include, among others, those relating to the Company's ability to exploit its commercial interests in Kenya, Chad, the JDZ and the Exclusive Economic Zone of São Tomé and Príncipe, general economic and business conditions, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, competition, changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions, regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations and various other matters, many of which are beyond the Company's control. Given these concerns, investors and analysts should not place undue reliance on these statements. Each of the above statements speaks only as of the date of this interview. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in the Company's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any of the above statements is based.
I sent an email directly to SEO through www.thechromegroup.net. I will post any response I receive. worth a try. might help if others did the same.
I sent an email directly to SEO through www.thechromegroup.net. I will post any response I receive. worth a try. might help if others did the same
Interesting read. By my calculations Offer paid .016 a share for his stock.
375,000,000 shares for $6M
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=1430281
How could it cost more that $6.8M. If they diluted the stock price from here to O the shareholders would loose $6.8M. Am i missing something?
The current market cap is 6.8M so it can't cost more than that.
I would think he would be upset. From high in 2009 until today he has probable lost about $300M in share value. Even for a billionaire that's a lot of money (on paper).
If Offer or any officer or insider sold a form 4 would have to be filed within 5 days IMO
I wonder what this after hour buy was:
16:13:46 0.00965 1370187 OTO
OC - Are you buying here?
Please make sure you email DK and PN with your thoughts and ideas.
I have asked several times why they don't sell the Oando stock but have not received a good answer. Someone on this board said Oando only trades about 10,000 shares a day so it might be hard to sell.
DK told me that the company cannot increase the authorized shares without shareholder vote to approve.
Are you adding to IMRS?
You still like RCPI? Are you buying more?
I asked DK the following question:
According to the explorer’s president and CEO Peter Ntephe the drilling will be contingent upon several conditions precedent with the partners pursuing the plans with the requisite zeal.
His response:
Nothing unusual. There will be the typical government review and approval of drilling location, etc. It is just language intended to communicate that there are remaining obstacles to clear before drilling commences. Every company uses caveats such as this to manage expectations and make it clear that forward guidance such as 12-16 months is subject to change.
I asked DK the following question:
According to the explorer’s president and CEO Peter Ntephe the drilling will be contingent upon several conditions precedent with the partners pursuing the plans with the requisite zeal.
His response:
Nothing unusual. There will be the typical government review and approval of drilling location, etc. It is just language intended to communicate that there are remaining obstacles to clear before drilling commences. Every company uses caveats such as this to manage expectations and make it clear that forward guidance such as 12-16 months is subject to change.
Swala Energy hints possible Farm-in in Eastern Africa
DECEMBER 2, 2014 BY SAMUEL KAMAU MBOTE
Swala Energy has announced that it is in farm-in conversations in Eastern Africa as the company seeks ways of raising alternative funding transactions.
This follows the withdrawal of a share purchase plan by the company’s board as the company aims at raising $5 million to finance its drilling obligations ahead of the planned in 2015.
Swala which has already suspended its shares from trading since 24th November says the voluntary suspension may continue till 23rd December as the unnamed third party investor requested a period of exclusivity during which to carry out due diligence on the Company’s assets.
“During this process a substantial third party has approached the Company to request, for consideration, a period of exclusivity during which to carry out due diligence on the Company’s assets, with a view to concluding farm-in agreements on one or more of the Company’s projects,” reads the latest update by company secretary Adrian Di Carlo.
Swala adds it believes that the farm-in has the potential to have a material effect on the quantum, structure and terms of any fundraising.
A likely target for the farm-in is the 25% share expected to be re-assigned in Kenya’s block 12B from Spain’s Compañía Española de Petróleos CEPSA after its decision to withdraw from the licence on 31st August 2014.
The funds are to be applied to fund additional near-term work on the Company’s Tanzanian and Kenyan licenses, as well as for business development and general administrative purposes.
In particular to be used for additional work (particularly in Block 12B), basin modeling work and long-lead items for drilling in Tanzania, business development and general administrative expenditure.
Among drilling set for 2015 includes a well in block 12B where the company has identified a series of ten leads and prospects from which one (‘Ahero –“A”’) has been selected as a drilling target to be drilled in the second calendar half.
In Tanzania the company is in the process of interpreting data from a 200 km 2D seismic acquired over the Moshi Basin in the Pangani licence with preliminary interpretation of these new data allowing it to identify a number of potential structural leads which, after final processing of the field data, are expected to define potential targets for a 2015 drilling programme.
Swala is however quick to say there are no guarantees of a successful outcome to these discussions although talks are ongoing to formalize its engagement with the theird party.
Swala has a 29.2% net participating interest in the Pangani license, 29.2% net participating interest in the Kilosa-Kilombero license both in Tanzania and a 25% net participating interest in Kenya’s Block 12B.
Swala Energy hints possible Farm-in in Eastern Africa
DECEMBER 2, 2014 BY SAMUEL KAMAU MBOTE
Swala Energy has announced that it is in farm-in conversations in Eastern Africa as the company seeks ways of raising alternative funding transactions.
This follows the withdrawal of a share purchase plan by the company’s board as the company aims at raising $5 million to finance its drilling obligations ahead of the planned in 2015.
Swala which has already suspended its shares from trading since 24th November says the voluntary suspension may continue till 23rd December as the unnamed third party investor requested a period of exclusivity during which to carry out due diligence on the Company’s assets.
“During this process a substantial third party has approached the Company to request, for consideration, a period of exclusivity during which to carry out due diligence on the Company’s assets, with a view to concluding farm-in agreements on one or more of the Company’s projects,” reads the latest update by company secretary Adrian Di Carlo.
Swala adds it believes that the farm-in has the potential to have a material effect on the quantum, structure and terms of any fundraising.
A likely target for the farm-in is the 25% share expected to be re-assigned in Kenya’s block 12B from Spain’s Compañía Española de Petróleos CEPSA after its decision to withdraw from the licence on 31st August 2014.
The funds are to be applied to fund additional near-term work on the Company’s Tanzanian and Kenyan licenses, as well as for business development and general administrative purposes.
In particular to be used for additional work (particularly in Block 12B), basin modeling work and long-lead items for drilling in Tanzania, business development and general administrative expenditure.
Among drilling set for 2015 includes a well in block 12B where the company has identified a series of ten leads and prospects from which one (‘Ahero –“A”’) has been selected as a drilling target to be drilled in the second calendar half.
In Tanzania the company is in the process of interpreting data from a 200 km 2D seismic acquired over the Moshi Basin in the Pangani licence with preliminary interpretation of these new data allowing it to identify a number of potential structural leads which, after final processing of the field data, are expected to define potential targets for a 2015 drilling programme.
Swala is however quick to say there are no guarantees of a successful outcome to these discussions although talks are ongoing to formalize its engagement with the theird party.
Swala has a 29.2% net participating interest in the Pangani license, 29.2% net participating interest in the Kilosa-Kilombero license both in Tanzania and a 25% net participating interest in Kenya’s Block 12B.
Drilling in Kenya’s Block 11A to begin within 12-16 months
DECEMBER 2, 2014 BY SAMUEL KAMAU MBOTE
Block 11A partner Houston based ERHC has announced that together with the block operator CEPSA Kenya Limited (a wholly owned affiliate of Compañía Española de Petróleos, S.A.U. (CEPSA) it plans to start drilling in Northern Kenya in Q$ 2015 earliest having completed a 2D seismic survey and a full tensor gravity gradiometry (FTG) survey which identified two separate basins, Anam and Tarach earlier in the year.
According to the explorer’s president and CEO Peter Ntephe the drilling will be contingent upon several conditions precedent with the partners pursuing the plans with the requisite zeal.
Already the company has said it has identified the presence of several viable leads similar to those in the Lokichar basin some with closures of up to 20 square kilometers.
“The possibility of existence of stacked reservoirs, as seen in the Lokichar basin, could be a significant factor in computation of field volumetrics associated with these closures. Completion of the ongoing detailed seismic interpretation is expected to mature these leads into drillable prospects,” ,” said Dr. Peter Thuo, General Manager of ERHC Kenya Ltd early last month.
The block also lies nearby other significant proven fields in the region including the Muglad and Melut basins in the South Sudan with 3 billion and 2 billion barrels of oil respectively, and the Albertine Basin in Uganda with 1.7 billion barrels of oil in place.
Drilling in Kenya’s Block 11A to begin within 12-16 months
DECEMBER 2, 2014 BY SAMUEL KAMAU MBOTE
Block 11A partner Houston based ERHC has announced that together with the block operator CEPSA Kenya Limited (a wholly owned affiliate of Compañía Española de Petróleos, S.A.U. (CEPSA) it plans to start drilling in Northern Kenya in Q$ 2015 earliest having completed a 2D seismic survey and a full tensor gravity gradiometry (FTG) survey which identified two separate basins, Anam and Tarach earlier in the year.
According to the explorer’s president and CEO Peter Ntephe the drilling will be contingent upon several conditions precedent with the partners pursuing the plans with the requisite zeal.
Already the company has said it has identified the presence of several viable leads similar to those in the Lokichar basin some with closures of up to 20 square kilometers.
“The possibility of existence of stacked reservoirs, as seen in the Lokichar basin, could be a significant factor in computation of field volumetrics associated with these closures. Completion of the ongoing detailed seismic interpretation is expected to mature these leads into drillable prospects,” ,” said Dr. Peter Thuo, General Manager of ERHC Kenya Ltd early last month.
The block also lies nearby other significant proven fields in the region including the Muglad and Melut basins in the South Sudan with 3 billion and 2 billion barrels of oil respectively, and the Albertine Basin in Uganda with 1.7 billion barrels of oil in place.
Where is their largest shareholder while all this is going on. Why didn't he step in. He had the most to lose.
MW Why crude oil will average $80 a barrel in 2015
Dec 01, 2014 10:57:00 (ET)
By Henry ToThere are three arguments for this contrarian view
British banker and politician Nathan Rothschild once said: "Buy when there's blood running in the streets."
And blood is certainly spilling in the streets of the oil and gas industry. The North Sea benchmark, Brent crude, closed at $70 a barrel on Friday, declining by 40% since June. Today it's trading at around $71.
Energy stocks around the world lost $500 billion of market value in the past week, while many oil-exporting countries will face budget crunches in 2015. Saudi Arabia needs Brent at $93 a barrel to balance its budget; for Russia, as high as $120 a barrel.
We have argued for lower oil prices since last year, due to these three factors: 1. The unprecedented increase in U.S. oil production due to more efficient horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies; 2. Weak demand growth in developed countries; 3. The imminent slowdown of the Chinese economy, which has accounted for a third of the world's oil demand growth in recent years.
Some analysts are calling for even lower oil prices, but we believe oil's recent decline is overblown. We believe oil prices are now close to a bottom, and that Brent crude will average $80 a barrel in 2015, for the following three reasons:
1. Global oil production will decline in 2015, with Brent below $70 a barrel
Despite the recent decline in oil prices, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) still projects global oil production will grow by 1 million barrels a day in 2015. U.S. oil production is projected to grow by 1.1 million barrels a day, while Brazilian and Canadian production together will grow by 200,000 barrels a day, with North Sea and Saudi production declining by 300,000 barrels a day.
Most other analysts, such as those from Goldman Sachs (GS), are projecting similar production growth for 2015. Those projections made sense when Brent crude traded at $85-$90 a barrel a month ago. With Brent crude closing at around $70 a barrel, those projections are now outdated.
First, drilling for shale oil is very capital-intensive. Capital expenditures for U.S. shale oil and gas firms soared to $80 billion in 2013. More importantly, the industry experienced a $9 billion cash shortfall in 2013, after a $32 billion cash shortfall in 2012. That is, U.S. shale-oil producers have never been cash-flow positive and had to borrow the difference to fund their growth plans. With the recent decline in oil prices, shale oil producers will struggle to find fresh lenders willing to underwrite their growth plans. Because shale producers need to constantly drill new wells to maintain production, U.S. shale production will immediately decline if U.S. shale firms revise their growth plans. The EIA estimates that U.S. shale production will decline by 300,000 barrels a day in just 30 days if U.S. shale firms stopped drilling.
Second, most major U.S. shale-oil fields will lose money with Brent at $70 a barrel -- after factoring in the recent 2% to 3% rise in debt-financing costs for new fields -- unless they slash production by halting their drilling plans. Given the rapid depletion rates in "legacy" shale-oil fields, we believe that U.S. oil production will decline in 2015 if Brent stays below $70 a barrel, thus putting a floor on oil prices in 2015.
2. U.S. oil demand will surprise on the upside in 2015, with Brent below $70 a barrel
The EIA currently estimates U.S. gasoline consumption will decline by 20,000 barrels a day next year, due to improving fuel economy and anemic highway-travel growth. This assumption may be right when Brent crude traded at $85 to $90 a barrel, but not with gasoline prices now at their lowest levels since 2009. In fact, AAA estimates that automobile travel over the Thanksgiving weekend (November 26-30), was up 4.3% from last year, with 41.3 million Americans traveling more than 50 miles from home by car. This amount of Thanksgiving driving is the highest in seven years, and the third-highest since AAA began tracking Thanksgiving travel in 2000. If Brent stays below $70 a barrel, U.S. gasoline prices will decline even further, thus encouraging more automobile travel and higher-than-expected U.S. crude-oil demand in 2015.
3. The ECB's 1 trillion euro quantitative-easing policy will support oil prices
The ECB's vice president and second-in-command, Vitor Constancio, is now on record for advocating a 1 trillion euro quantitative-easing policy to begin as early as the first quarter of 2015. With the eurozone's inflation rate now at a five-year low (and expected to fall to zero due to the recent decline in oil prices), we believe the argument for a quantitative-easing policy in the eurozone is compelling. We expect the ECB to purchase 1 trillion euros of the eurozone's sovereign bonds (including those of Greece) over the next two years, to begin after its Jan. 22, 2015, meeting. This would improve the health of European banks' balance sheets, which would encourage lending and improve the region's economic and inflation outlook. An improved outlook in the eurozone will boost crude-oil demand and prices as well.
We are thus bullish on crude oil in 2015, and expect Brent crude oil to average $80 a barrel in 2015. Investors who want to go long on oil could consider the following ETFs: United States Brent Oil (BNO), which tracks the spot price of Brent crude oil, and Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE), which tracks the performance of all energy stocks in the S&P 500 Index.
I as DK about the "share structure" comment in item 6 of the shareholder update and why no resource estimates for Kenya yet. Below is Dan's response.
I can't really elaborate on the what was distributed this morning. I can say that adjusting the authorized share count would require a vote of shareholders -- and the Company is very far -- as in billions of shares -- away from approaching the current authorized number of shares outstanding. Shareholder structure could mean any conceivable option that the board and management determines is necessary and/or in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. I can't detail all the different conceivable options that are under consideration or give examples.
Regarding the resources estimates, Chad block BDS 2008 is not a frontier exploration area. The area has been explored extensively and there is a great deal of work that has previously been done. The resource estimates have a great deal to do with what has been learned from the prior G&G work there. In Kenya, the area is a frontier area without that same level of prior G&G work to refer to. We expect to have additional details as work progresses on the interpretation of seismic.
You keep saying that the seismic must be bad. Can you then explain why Cespa would have elected to move to phase 2 and commit to spending another $30M if the seismic was bad. The could have just walked away.
Great for you. Enjoy your retirement.
27K was for 356k shares. PN has 1127467 shares. His other purchases were all over .10. I think he has easily over 100K invested. You can check form 4 filings. Still not near as much invested as you do.
Maybe some good news this week. Let's hope.