Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Omega's Website offers some historical data to forecast!
They have been Incorporated since 2000
They have moved 180,000,000 pounds of fuel
Jet fuel weighs 6.8 pounds per gallon
Average price Per Gal a/o today $4.50
Omega Air 180,00,0000 Lbs. or 26,470,588 Gal's
x $4.50
$119,117,647 Since 2000 Year Incorporated
$7,006,920 Ave Per Year
So does Qmega make in gross per gal I would think .50 CPG cent per gal.
http://www.omegaairrefueling.com/ Omega Web
http://www.100ll.com/ Fuel Cost
Omega's Website offers some historical data to forecast!
They have been Incorporated since 2000
They have moved 180,000,000 pounds of fuel
Jet fuel weighs 6.8 pounds per gallon
Average price Per Gal a/o today $4.50
Omega Air 180,00,0000 Lbs. or 26,470,588 Gal's
x $4.50
$119,117,647 Since 2000 Year Incorporated
$7,006,920 Ave Per Year
So they make How much??
http://www.omegaairrefueling.com/ Omega Web
http://www.100ll.com/ Fuel Cost
Here’s the best merger/acquisition candidate! Omega Air!!!
We can all dream right?
http://www.omegaairrefueling.com/
Or maybe one of these companies…..
Similar Private Companies By Industry
Company Name Region
4M Research, Inc.
United States
A E Wolffe Limited
United States
A&G Machine, Inc.
United States
A-1 Machining Co. Inc.
United States
a.i. solutions, Inc.
United States
Just guessing......
Good Luck to all.....
Catch What? That they can install other companies equipment and are certified to do so.....
Do they have an exclusive agreement with the manufactures?
The modification includes the installation of a non-federated (standalone) UNS-1FW FMS; as well as [a?] new UNS ACARS UL-801 Unilink; UNS CVR-120R digital Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR); ICG/Rockwell-Collins ICS-220A Satcom; and TDR-94D Rockwell-Collins transponders
That would be something big
What did he do to the HEAD NV investor group?
That's even funnier
And don't bring God into this I would get the feeling he'd be embarrassed.
Here you go robtewms....
1. Are they short TMPS? Some maybe, who knows at this stage.
2. What is their exit criteria? Depends on the managing director
3. Why did they choose TMPS? Relationships do thing at times they may not want to.
You're funny
And you thought it was funny to have a ask question list, right. On what deals Johan Eliasch did that investors made money.
just quit misleading investors ok!
That is very deceitful you know HEAD NV investors come out with no return on their time or money.
I've seen institutional investors before exit a deal and they just sometimes pound it with no regrets.
Maybe those institutional investors are "I'll scratch your back you scratch mine". Wink and Nod investors.
Seen that before.....
No when you do a comparison you compare apples to apples!
Not biotechnology to an aviation services provider
Just keep it to TMPS, AXIM Biotechnologies is a different animal
Non event Q same rev's as last year oh but this year their almost out of all avail cash. Last year they had $592,449 in cash this year they have $19,243. I think we need to pass the hat.
What are you talking about Six Month Rev's June 2016 were $8,593,611 and June 2017 are $8,459,205. So, what Improving revenues (8.5 million) are you referring to?
Looks at Notes payable $6.2M that use to be the cap Lease Ob of $5,799,886 this guy could foreclose by Apr 2018 way risky. Especially in light of what he did with the stockholders in HEAD NV. For some reason he wants this deal for his own self..........................
Using your math there is still a stockholders’ deficit of $3,893,898.00, dude not good by any stretch
that's now what I wrote about
Balance Sheet solvency Test TMPS Has Failed!
In general the current ratio equals ALL CURRENT ASSETS/ALL CURRENT LIABILITIES. When the total current assets are less than total current liabilities, your current ratio is less than 1.00.
Total Current assets = $2,345,956
Total Current Lia. = $11,896,367
Fellow investors the Total current liabilities are 5 times more than current assets.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy – Know the Difference
http://businessecon.org/2014/02/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-know-the-difference/
also look at the other ratio’s
Current ratio
Quick ratio
That's one way absolutely but I'm talking $7 to $15 million.
If the price of the stock is lower than .52 is more stock. If it higher than .52 the deal still stands for the share amount. that is how it topically works.
10Q my two cents
As of August 18, 2017,
17,342,734 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding
Cash 19K
Note $6.2 Items
5. CONVERSION
.08 cents
10. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES.
Looks like this company better get busy and raise some money, i.e. private placements, secondary offering, bridge loans.
ARTICLE 2. RESALE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Within 30 days after the Closing Date – That’s come and gone so is TMPS in default?
--------------------------------
Well TMPS need cash now!
If they do raise cash they need to increase their authorized from 100,000,000 to??? And someday when all is said and done after a few raises, reverses it!
I hope when they release DOD contracts moving forward they would say whether it is inclusive or not, and if it is non-inclusive arranged in decreasing percentage of government contract value to revenues. This way investors can determine company value just like all the other government contractors do who are public.
Has anyone checked or know if DOD Rule Guides Clearances With Foreign-Owned Contractors will be a problem since the company is now controlled by a foreigners?
I think tomorrow will be a non-event on the Q being released that's how I see it. And if the Q not released its just a warning from the bulletin board but after three times then I think they get the boot.
In general investors that normally make money with billionaires are the ex-wives, lol.
There's more cheap stock in this company being created daily then the entire over-the-counter market.
So I pray shorts don't find out about this so if that statement was alluded it to me any way shape or form I would not be the case of being a short seller
The only contracts intended for them are crumbs on anything larger than it's always a joint contract which they only get crumbs because that's all this little tiny company with her tiny little aircraft can support.
But yet one guy gets all the stock who has no track record in public companies worth chasing after.
A true knowledgeable investor.
First off I like to point out in your comment that you state that .03 cents per share was some big event it wasn’t. There was hardly any serious volume to speak of ever below a dime on this deal this year.
On 6/12/17 – 4/14/17 the reported low bids showed a low of .03 and a total volume of 66,000 shares traded for those three days in total volume.
But, I see a very big jump in volume on 6/15/17 and no news that would reflect such a price movement. I see the engagement of the new CFO on 6/15. But, getting a new CFO doesn't justify that volume.
Look I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. I don't see anything announced to justify the volume on what you’re stating......And, on 5/8/17 the stock price was .133 with a volume of 50K and the next two trading days that fallowed there was zero volume each day. But, the company did report on 5/8/17 Jonah Eliasch note of 77,500,000 Derivative Security’s at .08 cents, I’ll give you that one. Those shares are dilutive and should be added to forecasting future share structures, ask the CFO since you know him.
On May 15th the company followed up with a late 10Q notice hardly justify buying any stock. Especially when everyone seems to think that a 10Q is a big deal on this board.
So, I see massive dilution and a few postdated press releases, hardly anything to get excited about. Would you please just show me one deal this guy has done where investors made a bunch of money long term. On Head NV, I see stockholder wasted their money, valuable time and eventually got bullied into a bad deal. So, they had money riding on the wrong jockey.
Okay I guess if you're trading on inside information right but since his involvements been announced the stock has done all that much
Would some show me one company (documented) that stockholders made serious money investing with Johan Eliasch. And, please don't point to HEAD NV because they didn't on that deal.
Has anyone figured out who the big seller is. This is been going on for weeks.
John Kent’s TMPS’s INVESTOR Starter "moderator" shows most of what I’m writing about when referring to Market Cap.
As of May 16th, 2017, Jonah Eliasch now owns 79,532,944 common shares representing an 89.8% ownership of TMPS through his holding company Santiago Business Co. International Ltd
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132283480
Don't for get to add these share on a fully diluted share basis as John Kent did.
What are 'Fully Diluted Shares'
Fully diluted shares are the total number of shares that would be outstanding if all possible sources of conversion, such as convertible bonds and stock options, are exercised. This number of shares is important for a company’s earnings per share (EPS) calculation, because using fully diluted shares increases the number of shares used in the EPS calculation and reduces the dollars earned per share of common stock.
BREAKING DOWN 'Fully Diluted Shares'
EPS is a calculation of the dollar amount of earnings a firm generates per share of common stock outstanding, and analysts consider this ratio to be a key indicator of company value.
How Earnings Per Share Is Calculated
EPS is defined as (net income – preferred dividends) / (weighted average common shares outstanding). Any earnings paid to preferred shareholders as a cash dividend are subtracted from net income, because the ratio applies only to common shareholders. Weighted average common shares is the (beginning period balance + ending period balance) / 2. If a business can generate more earnings per common share, the company is considered to be more valuable and the share price may increase.
Assume, for example, that ABC Corporation generates $10 million in net income and pays all preferred shareholders a total of $2 million in dividends, so that the net income available to all common shareholders is $8 million. If the firm’s weighted average common shares outstanding total 1 million, the EPS is $8 per share. The $8 EPS is considered basic EPS, because the total is not adjusted for dilution.
Factoring in Fully Diluted Shares
Full dilution means that every security that can be converted into common shares is converted, which means that there are fewer earnings available per share of common stock. Since EPS is a key measure of a company’s value, it’s important for an investor to review EPS. Several types of securities are converted into common stock, including a convertible bond, convertible preferred stock, stock options, rights and warrants.
As an example, assume that ABC issues 100,000 shares in stock options to company executives to reward them for reaching a profit goal. The firm also has a convertible bond outstanding that allows the bondholders to convert into a total of 200,000 shares of common stock, and ABC has convertible preferred stock outstanding, and those shares can be converted into 200,000 shares of common stock. Full dilution assumes that all of the 500,000 in additional common stock shares are issued, which increases the common shares outstanding to 1.5 million. Using the same $8 million in earnings to common shareholders, fully diluted EPS is ($8 million / 1.5 million shares), or $5.33 per share, which is lower than the basic EPS of $8 per share.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fullydilutedshares.asp
Read more: Fully Diluted Shares http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fullydilutedshares.asp#ixzz4q2gGAcMk
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook