Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No Jeff jeans for me, Owens- I got had by him just as MANY others did.
You in fact where one of the first to tell everyone how much a sham Owens is.
Now after reading his background check, with all the good he has done in the world, People want me to believe that anything he says or does is the truth 100%.
Please, and Thank You.
Good luck with that!
James owened nothing of NHSH.
But I am sure we will keep on hearing about now that the fork has been stuck in QASP.
Nothin.
LOL, You have got to be the most blinded man I have ever had a chance to read from.
Get your glasses off Wilbor's Arse and look around you.
Have a nice day!
Now that is FUNNY!!!
Agreed, Joe wants to keep the companies separate as pure plays. Additionally, why should Q's future public market valuation be held back by the slower growing MS.
Just like most things done here, non of which are for the COMMON SHARE HOLDER interest, are in my opinion bogus!!!
Just because he says it's so so does not make it so!
James did not pay for anything...period, PERIOD.
He did not have NHSH to sell either.
Have a Merry Merry Christmas.
FROI Up almost 60% on good news and new revenue.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=70200258
Can you believe it!!!! Yes I can!!!
Read the last paragraph.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/21/officials-plead-guilty-in-new-york-voter-fraud-case/
Officials Plead Guilty in New York Voter Fraud Case
By Eric Shawn
Published December 21, 2011
| FoxNews.com
Print
Email
Share
Comments
A total of four Democratic officials and political operatives have now pleaded guilty to voter fraud-related felony charges in an alleged scheme to steal a New York election.
The latest guilty pleas expose the ease with which political insiders can apparently manipulate the electoral system and throw an election their way, by the forging of signatures of unsuspecting voters that are then cast as real votes.
"The phrase they use is: 'making sure they vote the right way,'" said a source close to the case, which is unfolding in Troy, N.Y. "It is not a Democratic or Republican thing. ... It is criminal."
Former Troy Democratic City Clerk William McInerney, Democratic Councilman John Brown, and Democratic political operatives Anthony Renna and Anthony DeFiglio have entered guilty pleas in the case, in which numerous signatures were allegedly forged on absentee ballots in the 2009 Working Families Party primary, the political party that was associated with the now-defunct community group, ACORN.
The four have pleaded guilty to one count of various charges, ranging from forgery to falsifying business records, and criminal possession of a forged instrument.
"Getting at the truth has always been the primary goal of this investigation," Special Prosecutor Trey Smith said in a statement, while also thanking New York State Police efforts to "bring those responsible for the voting fraud to justice."
Numerous voters told Fox News that they were stunned that their signatures were faked on absentee ballot applications and ballots, which were cast as real votes in their names in the 2009 primary election.
Brian Suozzo's absentee ballot application claimed that he was "at home recovering from medical procedure," which he told us was not true.
"Someone took my signature and voted with it and I feel extremely violated," Suozzo said when Fox News first broke the story nationally in 2009. "The whole thing seems dirty to me."
Jessica Boomhower's absentee ballot application falsely claimed that she was in Boston.
"I can't believe they thought they would get away with this," she told Fox News. "I didn't get to cast my vote on my own. ... They're corrupt. I am sure this goes on a lot in politics, but it's very rare that they do get caught."
Two of the ballot applications claimed that the voters were unavailable, because they were supposedly on a "bus trip to casino."
Smith, at one point during the two-year long investigation, even obtained court orders to take DNA samples from five of the seven Democratic members of the Troy City Council. The goal was to try and compare the samples to any DNA evidence found on the absentee ballot envelopes.
No Republicans were implicated in the alleged conspiracy, but one political operative claimed that such voter fraud occurs "on both sides of the aisle."
In November 2009, Democratic operative Anthony DeFiglio told New York State police investigators that faking absentee ballots was a commonplace and accepted practice in political circles, all intended to swing an election.
"This is an on-going scheme and it occurs on both sides of the aisle," he told police. "The people who are targeted live in low-income housing and there is a sense that they are a lot less likely to ask any questions."
He said that "it was common knowledge that these people were never going to receive an absentee ballot. This is a political strategy to get control of a third party line."
DeFiglio claimed that "the reason that this came to light in this election, was the sheer number of absentee ballots that went out to the Working Families Party. ... To political insiders in the county, what appears as a huge conspiracy to non-political persons is really a normal political tactic."
Troy City Council President Clem Campana pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to charges including falsifying business records and illegal voting.
When Fox News asked him about the case last year, Campana was adamant that he did nothing wrong.
"No one tried to steal any election," he claimed. "I did nothing wrong, I don't know if anyone did, and if they did, they should be held accountable for it."
City Councilman Michael LoPorto and Democratic County Elections Commissioner Edward McDonough were indicted earlier this year and they face trial on the felony charges next month.
LoPorto also denied the allegations when Fox News questioned him last year.
"Did you do anything wrong?" Fox News asked.
He answered, "No."
"Did you try to steal an election?"
"No."
"Did you forge any ballots?"
"No," said LoPorto.
"They did steal an election," claimed Bob Mirch, the pugnacious former Republican Majority Leader of the Rensselaer County legislature, who first discovered the alleged fraud and started the investigation. For his efforts in trying to expose what happened, Mirch says he was voted out of office after serving 16 years and was replaced by a Democrat.
"This is just the tip of the iceberg," he said about voter fraud. "This case in Troy shows that the political insiders had this scheme down pat. Two years ago the public didn't believe me, but they know it now."
The case in Troy echoes a similar election fraud investigation that is now ongoing in Indiana.
St. Joseph County Prosecutor Michael Dvorak, in South Bend, is currently investigating allegations that numerous signatures on 2008 Democratic Presidential primary petitions for then candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, were faked. There are claims that so many signatures were fraudulent, that the Obama campaign may not have actually obtained enough legitimate signatures to have legally qualified for the ballot. And just like the New York voters in Troy who told Fox News that they never signed absentee ballots, voters in South Bend and Mishawaka told us that their signatures were forged too.
If you suspect voter or election fraud where you live, tell us. Our address is voterfraud@foxnews.com
Print
Email
Share
Comments
Nice recovery from yesterday. Not many shares either. Looks like the shareholders want more money in return than just 5 cents.
Next stop 7-9 cents with and volume buying. IMO
No but I have touched Lords cup when I was in Boston, you know the home of the world CHAMPIONS Boston Bruins
Thats about as close the Lord's Stanley you will get!
I agree 100%, It is the backing of someone that just (stole) took his kids money that makes it hard to take.
I am baffeled on the power he has over him.
By the way, Merry CHRISTmas everyone!
Me, I did just to opp of what was suggested.
I sold when Jeff talked on the board and bought a week or so after.
Sold on Jeff's hopes and bought on the dips. If I was a true Jeffster I would of bought on his news.
I like Jeff. To this date everything he has told me has been PROVEN to be true.
Joe, well let's just say I can't prove ANYTHING.
That is a bunch of BULL SHEEEEEET!
He had no choice, That is why he wanted to do it back in March of before any of this vote stuff..
Ty maaam my I have another????
Where is Joe's right hand man?
How come he is being so quiet today?
Wilbur need to pull his hoof out of his buttocks?
Let's go team Joe!!!
Schwab says no bid and has for 3 days.
Maybe so, my account does not say so. I still have the same amount of shares I bought two weeks ago.
No wonder!!! I always thought it was the pot that got me in all the trouble....
I guess driving down the road delivering potato chips in the middle of winter(Maine) with my bottle of Crown in my hand and my hand was in my snowmobile mitten out the window to keep the CR cold was odd.
I thought that that was normal. It was for me, know wonder everyone said I had a problem!!!
That my friend is a true story. The old Crown Royal adds, "have you ever seen a grown man cry" Yes I have.....lol
News did not show on my LII
ALZM running hard...up 150% on huge volume and no news and no rags.
It could take months for that to happen.
IS that your daughter???
QASP can do nothing of the sort until after the vote. But I will enjoy the spin.
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Tex has already flipped back on the JC band wagon!!!
Like a light switch, Do you forget that if Jeff had not asked and called the Judge there would be an R/S.
I thought is was running from the cops and dodging bullets!
You mean Pop Warner, Pee Wee is basketball.
Paint down, just like the weeks before. Sad, just sad.
Just repeat after me, There is no place like home, There is no place like home.
Or, you could do what I do.....
Get booted or banned or resticted for running my fingers without thinking!!! LOL
I agree, I am in hopes that they are gone as well!
The only thing they brought to the table was a reduction to my account values!
The bid support has been higher last 3 trading days. Looks like NHSH is ready to have a breakout.
Someone did sat that NHSH would be at 5-6 cents by EOW. Up almost 36 % for the week.
Not bad, not bad at all!
What I read is the is that exchanged thier P As for common stock. Look out below!
Shareholders’ Deficiency
Our shareholders’ deficiency was $22,808 at July 31, 2011, compared to $37,264 at July 31, 2010. The change in our
shareholders’ deficiency was mainly due to the fact that we issued 4,000,370 Subordinated Voting Shares in the third
quarter of 2011 and we received advance share subscriptions totaling $80,560 at July 31, 2011, as offset by the increase in
our net loss for the year ended July 31, 2011.
Private placements
We are a development stage company and accordingly, we have not yet generated revenue from our operations. We
finance our activities by raising capital through the private sale of our Subordinated Voting Shares. There is no assurance
that we will be able to sell our Subordinated Voting Shares to fund our future operations. We have received a loan
commitment for $100,000, which we have one year to accept, from PHL Capital Corp., a real estate finance company
controlled by one of our stockholders. We do not know if or when we will begin to complete sales of our Fleet Data
Management & Weigh System and generate revenue. If we are unable to generate revenue and achieve profitability, we
will be unable to continue as a going concern, in which case our stockholders may lose their entire investment.We have experienced working capital deficiencies in the past and anticipate that we may experience periods of working
capital deficiency in the future. In general, we are able to adjust the obligations we incur to correspond to the cash we
have on hand from the private sale of our Subordinated Voting Shares. We can make no such adjustments with respect to
accounting and legal fees related to compliance with British Columbia and US securities laws, which we incur as required
by the reporting cycles of SEDAR and OTC Markets. Also, we incur executive compensation which we intend to pay in
cash, but have agreed with management to convert such accrued compensation into our Subordinated Voting Shares until
such time as we are able to do so. If we begin to make sales, we may be required to maintain inventories, which we expect
to require increasingly greater amounts of capital.
We are a development stage company and accordingly, we have not yet generated revenue from our operations. We
finance our activities by raising capital through the private sale of our Subordinated Voting Shares. There is no assurance
that we will be able to sell our Subordinated Voting Shares to fund our future operations. We have received a loan
commitment for $100,000, which we have one year to accept, from PHL Capital Corp., a real estate finance company
controlled by one of our stockholders. We do not know if or when we will begin to complete sales of our Fleet Data
Management & Weigh System and generate revenue. If we are unable to generate revenue and achieve profitability, we
will be unable to continue as a going concern, in which case our stockholders may lose their entire investment.
We have experienced working capital deficiencies in the past and anticipate that we may experience periods of working
capital deficiency in the future. In general, we are able to adjust the obligations we incur to correspond to the cash we
have on hand from the private sale of our Subordinated Voting Shares. We can make no such adjustments with respect to
accounting and legal fees related to compliance with British Columbia and US securities laws, which we incur as required
by the reporting cycles of SEDAR and OTC Markets. Also, we incur executive compensation which we intend to pay in
cash, but have agreed with management to convert such accrued compensation into our Subordinated Voting Shares until
such time as we are able to do so. If we begin to make sales, we may be required to maintain inventories, which we expect
to require increasingly greater amounts of capital.
Like I said, dilution will be coming!
On September 29, 2011, we approved the exchange of 2,900,000 of our newly authorized Class A Preferred Shares for
29,000,000 of our Subordinated Voting Shares, as follows: 200,000 Class A Preferred Shares for 2,000,000 Subordinated
Voting Shares owned by Force Options Inc., a private company owned by Mr. Eppert, and, 2,700,000 Class A Preferred
Shares for 27,000,000 Subordinated Voting Shares owned by Trepped Enterprises Inc. (“Trepped”), a private company
owned equally by Mr. Eppert and Mr. Thompson. The purpose of the exchange was to reduce the number of our
Subordinated Voting Shares classified as “builder’s shares” by the CNSX and the British Columbia Securities Commission.
More dilution coming!
During the year ended July 31, 2011, we paid/accrued a total of $90,594 in management fees to Mr. Eppert.
During the year ended July 31, 2011, we paid/accrued consulting fees of $30,201 to Mr. Thompson.
During the year ended July 31, 2011, we paid/accrued consulting fees of $75,495 to Grewal & Co. Professional Services, a
company owned by Mr. Grewal.
During the year ended July 31, 2011, we paid/accrued accounting fees of $14,646 to BESA Global Consulting Inc., an
accounting firm owned by Mr. Wisdom Ncube, our former Chief Financial Officer.
During the year ended July 31, 2011, we reversed the accrual of management fees of $17,540 previously due to Laird Rice,
our former director.
On April 20, 2011, we issued 470,370 Subordinated Voting Shares to Trepped for a total of approximately $47,037 related to
management and consulting services rendered to us during the year ended July 31, 2011.
On April 20, 2011, we issued 500,000 Subordinated Voting Shares to Grewal & Co. Professional Services for $50,000
related to consulting services rendered to us during the year ended July 31, 2011.
During the year ended July 31, 2010, we paid/accrued management fees of $66,838 to Mr. Eppert.
During the year ended July 31, 2010, we paid/accrued consulting fees of $22,279 to Mr. Thompson.
During the year ended July 31 2010, we issued 4,041,613 Subordinated Voting Shares with a fair value of $202,049 to Mr.
Eppert and Mr. Thompson in exchange for the forgiveness of $112,932 and $89,117, respectively, in management and
consulting fees due to them incurred in that year and our prior year.During the year ended July 31, 2010, we issued 120,000 Subordinated Voting Shares with a fair value of $6,000 to Ron
McIntyre, our former director and officer, for management and consulting fees incurred in our prior year.
On July 11, 2010, we issued 139,089 Subordinated Voting Shares valued at $13,909 to settle loans payable to business
associates related to Mr. Thompson.
Where is the bid at today? Hmmmmm
WOW!!!
Our key personnel lack experience in industrial transportation product development, sourcing, marketing and sales, which
could cause our business to fail.
More good news,
There is currently no Canadian market for our Subordinated Voting Shares. Our shares will only be sold by the selling
stockholders if a public market develops for our stock. There is no assurance, however, how active the public market for
our Subordinated Voting Shares will become or remain. It is likely that the public market for our Subordinated Voting
Shares will be volatile, in that it may be subject to wide and unpredictable price and volume swings.
Because we do not intend to pay any dividends on our capital stock, investors seeking dividend income or liquidity should not
purchase our shares.
Told ya so!
Because we can issue additional shares, purchasers of our shares may incur immediate dilution and may experience further
dilution.
We are authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 Subordinated Voting Shares. Our board of directors has the authority to
cause us to issue additional shares, and consequently, our stockholders may experience significant dilution to their
ownership of our company in the future.
THIS IS WHAT I AM EXPERIENCING!!!
Trading on the OTC Markets may be volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our Subordinated Voting
Shares and make it difficult for our stockholders to resell their shares.
From the Audit!
At 31 July 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $38,484 (31 July 2010 - $1,991) and a working
capital deficit of $67,513 (31 July 2010 – deficit of $90,059). The funds on hand at 31 July 2011 are not
sufficient to meet the Company’s planned corporate, administrative and development activities for the next
twelve months. Additional financing will be required to meet the Company’s obligations as they fall due.
Because of this uncertainty, there is significant doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
That Lawyer that got those shares died with not cashing out any shares. In fact he had purchased a few more.
I had talked to Darrell about this, One of the big stress issues that he had was that he got shares valued at .15 each. However according to the rules he could only sell so many per quarter. Within that time frame from when he got them and PPS he could not afford to sell them.
He owed over 200K in taxes VS what the share price was worth when he died.
David and others told me in August, not some time in 2013. The shareholders or DEBTS that they are bringing to the Canadian Exchange are NOT commons. It would not make a diff to. If the peeps really wanted shares they would hit the ask. That does not happen here.
You get in, you can't get out with out losing 50%.
Let alone the demand for 200,000 shares to be purchased or.......
Just smells like a scam to me!
The PR tells me the the PP that got shares will be up for sale soon.
Samps stock PR, I do not think it was what he expected.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=50463256&symbol=DPLY
Deploy Technologies Inc., (PINKSHEETS: DPLY) announced today that the company has received a conditional listing approval from the Canadian National Stock Exchange (CNSX) to list the company's Subordinated Voting Shares.
The CNSX listing is conditional upon: receipt of the company's final prospectus by the appropriate regulatory authorities; confirmation that Deploy Technologies public distribution and working capital position meets CNSX's minimum listing requirements; completion of any and all outstanding documentation; and payment of fees required by the Policies.
The CNSX has reserved the symbol "DEP" as the company's trading symbol. A listing date has not yet been approved and is pending receipt and review of remaining required materials by the CNSX.
The final prospectus and receipt by British Columbia and Ontario Securities Commissions of the final prospectus as well as other information is available on www.sedar.com.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subordinated_debt
cookstove12
Share
Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:32:14 PM
Re: samplescave post# 2721
Post # of 2725
Remember to always do some DD.
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subordinated
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subordinated_debt
In finance, subordinated debt (also known as subordinated loan, subordinated bond, subordinated debenture or junior debt) is debt which ranks after other debts should a company fall into receivership or bankruptcy.
Such debt is referred to as subordinate, because the debt providers (the lenders) have subordinate status in relationship to the normal debt. A typical example for this would be when a promoter of a company invests money in the form of debt, rather than in the form of stock. In the case of liquidation (e.g. the company winds up its affairs and dissolves) the promoter would be paid just before stockholders—assuming there are assets to distribute after all other liabilities and debts have been paid.
Subordinated debt has a lower priority than other bonds of the issuer in case of liquidation during bankruptcy, below the liquidator, government tax authorities and senior debt holders in the hierarchy of creditors. Because subordinated debt is repayable after other debts have been paid, they are more risky for the lender of the money. It is unsecured and has lesser priority than that of an additional debt claim on the same asset.
Subordinated loans typically have a much higher rate of return than senior debt due to the decrease of a money devolution and therefore a higher risk. Accordingly, major shareholders and parent companies are most likely to provide subordinated loans, as an outside party providing such a loan would normally want compensation for the extra risk. Subordinated bonds usually have a lower credit rating than senior bonds.
A particularly important example of subordinated bonds can be found in bonds issued by banks. Subordinated debt is issued periodically by most large banking corporations in the U.S. Subordinated debt can be expected to be especially risk-sensitive, because subordinated debt holders have claims on bank assets after senior debtholders and they lack the upside gain enjoyed by shareholders. This status of subordinated debt makes it perfect for experimenting with the significance of market discipline, via the signalling effect of secondary market prices of subordinated debt (and, where relevant, the issue price of these bonds initially in the primary markets). From the perspective of policy-makers and regulators, the potential benefit from having banks issue subordinated debt is that the markets and their information-generating capabilities are enrolled in the "supervision" of the financial condition of the banks. This hopefully creates both an early-warning system, like the so-called "canary in the mine," and also an incentive for bank management to act prudently, thus helping to offset the moral hazard that can otherwise exist, especially if banks have limited equity and deposits are insured. This role of subordinated debt has attracted increasing attention from policy analysts in recent years.[1]
For a second example of subordinated debt, consider asset-backed securities. These are often issued in tranches. The senior tranches get paid back first, the subordinated tranches later. Finally, mezzanine debt is another example of subordinated debt.
Subordinated bonds are regularly issued (as mentioned earlier) as part of the securitization of debt, such as asset-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations or collateralized debt obligations. Corporate issuers tend to prefer not to issue subordinated bonds because of the higher interest rate required to compensate for the higher risk, but may be forced to do so if indentures on earlier issues mandate their status as senior bonds. Also, subordinated debt may be combined with preferred stock to create so called monthly income preferred stock, a hybrid security paying dividends for the lender and funded as interest expense by the issuer.
Can you now say dilution of the PRIVATE PLACEMENTS!!!!
Private Placements and Debt wraps go first!!!!
Ya, this is a great thing for us commoners.
Know wonder the PR was release on a Saturday!!!
Yep, that sucks for us stuckholders!
the promoter would be paid just before stockholders
Remember to always do some DD.
Subordinated
Please send link, Ty