Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
>>still up on the day...scanners will be going off LMAO.
Huh?
Yes, he did.
Back down to .031 -- someone made $160 ...
>>now where is that *&*&^%$ settlement
I'd be surprised and disappointed is Williams let the court avoid making it public.
The pps doubled as soon as the 8K went public. The market has made its judgment of the, ah, "company management." The courts will make the final judgment. Coming into view on the horizon are the just rewards for eight years of patent suppression.
Sorry, no. He rescued them from a board that wanted them to disappear.
I've seen no objective evidence of shorting. Look at the tiny trading volume we've had.
Why did it take a week for this to become public? Anyway, good on Williams. He's going to win this.
Bull. The patent is worth billions. The eight year fight to suppress the patent until X takes ownership shows that. If the patent were being used to create huge revenues, the fight to steal it would be futile. The company officers -- past and present -- remain locked in a struggle to steal the patent for themselves. We, as shareholders, are guilty of letting this continue.
Thank Turrini. The stock suppression continues according to his plan.
From what little I know about the law, a refusal to follow a judge's order (i.e. leave the BOD) would likely result in a contempt citation. This would quickly result in arrest and imprisonment.
And to what does THIS refer???
A path diverged in the woods...
We can nut up, pitch in, and hire a lawyer to eviscerate current "management"...
We can raise hell with the SEC so they de-certify our stock...
We can wait to see what happens this year with trials...
We can generate enough stockholder support to force a company meeting and throw the bums out in favor of our picks for officers...
We can convince the CA, TX, or DE attorney general to bring criminal charges against "management"...
We can get enough shares together to begin our own negotiations with TM and other infringers...
We can run newspaper ads seeking the majority of CLYW shareholders {who seem oblivious about what is happening) and gain their support for change...
The choices are manifest. The biggest problem is the value of the patents. Billions of dollars. This has apparently driven the officers (past and present) insane with greed. What is clear is that what we have been doing (nothing) has failed. I find it impossible to there are no lawyers among the stockholders who would like their shares to be actually worth something.
Whatever we do, it has to be an improvement.
Again, greed. They want all of the patent for themselves. I also suspect they are being back-door paid for suppressing the patent.
By making the company worthless the patent ends up being auctioned off at the bankruptcy hearing. No more having to share its worth with us dirty owners.
>>the BOD have enough shares to make themselves wealthy---how much is enough?...the infighting and egotistical behavior has rendered them all fools---this is not debate club...
That's really the issue, isn't it? The patent is worth billions and that has driven the officers insane with greed. Why settle for several million dollars in stock when you might be able to steal hundreds of millions by suppressing company business?
No law suit is cut and dried. Trust me. Don't start celebrating yet.
>>Kinda late for that... isn't it ?
Thanks for continuing to be such a big help.
Can someone point or link me to a succinct history of Calypso Wireless? Thanks.
I am unable to decide whether Williams is a brave, principled defender of us stockholders, or a spiteful lunatic bent upon destroying CLYW in order to "save it" from the people he hates. He gives little evidence one way or another.
If he'd like to discuss, he is welcome to write me at litton51@hotmail.com.
>>As for the web site Dave might not had any direct dealing with getting sir h to turn the site back but I can guarantee he indirectly did. Went thru Walsh.
Uhuh. This leaves only two possibilities: you have inside information or you are simply making things up. Which, please?
We may be forgetting the most important question. Will the SEC ever allow the company back on the pinks in the absence of any elected directors? I believe that was one of their reasons for delisting.
I call "bullshit" on the $250K - $300K "estimate." A good auditor runs $300/hour. How in the world will it take five to six months to do the audit?
As Turrini is a proven liar, why should we believe the $250K figure? It seems clear he has been suppressing the patent for years. I want to see the calculations resulting in that $250K. Well, Cristian?
>>Some form of settlement with Diac will have to be made.
Hasn't that been 8Ked already?
Until it all gets unsnarled, the only CLYW director is Walsh.
Agreed. But it is what it has always been. A potentially life-changing lottery ticket with 1 in 4 odds. I'm still accumulating.
In both your examples, the settlements were done and released as a result of the court making a final judgment on the cases. That has not happened in this case. In this case, with the suit having simply been dropped, I do not believe releasing the settlement is required by the court. Dropping a case is as if no suit had ever been filed.
That said, yes, I want to see this settlement in its entirety but do not believe the company is compelled to release it. Perhaps someone can correct me if I am wrong. And if the settlement contains poison, we will learn of it and can then take whatever action is appropriate.
And if, as some posters allege, the settlement is not what has been released in the 8Ks, then we will learn that soon enough. I still have the contingency lawyer referral standing by. The market will render a judgment this week.
You're spinning your wheels. If the company starts making deals, we'll know the 8K was truthful. If it doesn't, the officers will be revealed to have lied. It's that simple. I've waited eight years. Months seems like a short time now.
No contest. The company website is not binding. The 8K is, for better or worse. If the 8K was filed with fraudulent information, the SEC will take that in hand for action against the company.
Happy New year to you, too. Nice day here. Sunny, cold, calm. Wife and I are spending the day watching movies.
I've blocked DSU and don't see his posts. From from what you and others have said, I find it almost unbelievable that the parties would knowingly file lies with the judge. That would be legal suicide for both sides.
Apparently it is brain surgery. Can you provide a login and password?
Uh... this just posted court action makes that a bunch of nonsense, doesn't it? Suit dropped? No patent? $170M judgment against CLYW stands?
This link is useless without the info to enter onto the form.
Then Daic wins the patent and the $170M judgment against CLYW? The four 8Ks were lies? How could this happen?
Not so fast. Haven't heard a word about yesterday's hearing. How very strange.
>>There is only one board member that is acting with such disregard to shareholders.
... in your opinion.
>>anybody having trouble trading calypso with these new trading rules?
Not with Scottrade. Been adding shares.
>>Would love to know if it's possible to start a class action suit against this Board member. Any takers?
If you mean board members (plural), I've spoken with a lawyer. The answer is "interesting case."