Public Relations will come soon enough

Don't mention the safeguards and investor protection limits

Exactly, we aren't worried about the rest of the nonsense.

Thanks to the counterfeit shares you adamantly deny exist

Active SOS filings

https://ecorp.sos.ga.gov/BusinessSearch/BusinessInformation?businessId=1629076&businessType=Domestic%20Limited%20Liability%20Company

https://sosdirectws.sos.state.tx.us/PDFonDemand/RetrievePDF.aspx?document_number=675660400002&session_code=2bM5wUarPDdFdd1HNfKsQgf010PAgzAR2LTkIeGxdzWuaI6&element=3

http://www.sosnc.gov/Search/profcorp/12177927

http://www.sos.sc.gov/index.asp?n=18&p=4&s=18&corporateid=802842

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=ITALK%20F130000000900&aggregateId=forp-f13000000090-292b4e22-3f50-4e58-aa7f-3cb1db560889&searchTerm=italk&listNameOrder=ITALK%20F130000000900

https://tnbear.tn.gov/ECommerce/FilingDetail.aspx?CN=028064053090113045071159211118122043053178207021

Smartphones Exponential Sales Growth



https://ronnie05.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/str4/



Price/Sales Ratio Math


Sales equals roughly $10million

Net Sales per share is Total sales divided by number of shares

Divide 10mil(revs) / 1.8bil(shares) = .005(net sales per share)

P/S Ratio is Share Price divided by Net Sales per Share

as of 7/1/2016 $0.0006/$0.005=0.12

P/S = Investors pay $0.12 for every $1.00 in sales

http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/investment-valuation/ratio6.asp?o=40186&l=dir&qsrc=1&qo=serpSearchTopBox&ap=investopedia.com

Rare to find a stock @ .12 P/S Ratio

https://screener.finance.yahoo.com/b?sc=844&im=&prmin=&prmax=&mcmin=&mcmax=&dvymin=&dvymax=&betamin=&betamax=&remin=&remax=&pmmin=&pmmax=&pemin=&pemax=&pbmin=&pbmax=&psmin=0&psmax=100&pegmin=&pegmax=&gr=&grfy=&ar=&vw=1&db=stocks



Core Internet Assets



http://www.italkmobility.com/home


http://cpdmobile.com/t-mobile


http://www.mobix.com/


http://elephante.org/


http://unitedmobilesolutions.com/


https://www.wqn.com/



Affiliates



http://ultra.me/



https://www.metropcs.com/



https://www.simplemobile.com/


http://www.bluproducts.com/


https://www.gosmartmobile.com/


http://univisionmobile.com/


http://cpdmobile.com/simply-prepaid-tmobile

Analysts widely consider Hispanics a “mobile-first” market. They are 1.5 times more likely to buy digital media than non-Hispanics, and access mobile banking and coupon services more often, too. (For banking: 65% vs. 53%. For coupons: 25% vs. 17%). They’re also early adopters of mobile payments. Nearly 25% have used a smartphone to make an in-store purchase. (The U.S. average is 13%).

https://www.motionpoint.com/blog/prepping-for-2016-emerging-mobile-first-markets1/

CPD Mobile is one of only fifteen Master Dealers across the country chosen to support Univision Mobile



http://cpdmobile.com/news/cpd-mobile-tmobile-master-for-univision-mobile

Continuous Net Settlement — The third tier of counterfeiting occurs at the DTC level. The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is a holding company owned by the major broker dealers, and has four subsidiaries. The subsidiaries that are of interest are the Depository Trust Company (DTC) and the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC). The DTC has an account for each broker dealer, which is further broken down to each customer of that broker dealer. These accounts are electronic entries. Ninety seven percent of the actual stock certificates are in the vault at the DTC with the DTC nominee's name on them. The NSCC processes transactions, provides the broker dealers with a central clearing source, and operates the stock borrow program.

When a broker dealer processes the sale of a short share, the broker dealer has three days to deliver a borrowed share to the purchaser and the purchaser has three days to deliver the money. In the old days, if the buyer did not receive his shares by settlement day, three days after the trade, he took his money back and undid the transaction. When the stock borrow program and electronic transfers were put in place in 1981, this all changed. At that point the NSCC guaranteed the performance of the buyers and sellers and would settle the transaction even though the seller was now a fail–to–deliver on the shares he sold. The buyer has a counterfeit share in his account, but the NSCC transacts it as if it were real.

At the end of each day, if a broker dealer has sold more shares of a given stock than he has in his account with the DTC, he borrows shares from the NSCC, who borrows them from the broker dealers who have a surplus of shares. So far it sounds like the whole system is in balance, and for any given stock the net number of shares in the DTC is equal to the number of shares issued by the company.

The short seller who has sold naked—he had no borrowed shares—can cure his fail–to–deliver position and avoid the required forced buy–in by borrowing the share through the NSCC stock borrow program.

Here is the hocus pocus that creates millions of counterfeit shares.

When a broker dealer has a net surplus of shares of any given company in his account with the DTC, only the net amount is deducted from his surplus position and put in the stock borrow program. However the broker dealer does not take a like number of shares from his customer's individual accounts. The net surplus position is loaned to a second broker dealer to cover his net deficit position.

Let's say a customer at the second broker dealer purchased shares from a naked short seller — counterfeit shares. His broker dealer “delivers” those shares to his account from the shares borrowed from the DTC. The lending broker dealer did not take the shares from any specific customers' account, but the borrowing broker dealer put the borrowed shares in specific customer's accounts. Now the customer at the second prime broker has “real” shares in his account. The problem is it's the same “real” shares that are in the customer's account at the first prime broker.

The customer account at the second prime broker now has a “real” share, which the prime broker can lend to a short who makes a short sale and delivers that share to a third party. Now there are three investors with the same counterfeit shares in their accounts.

Because the DTC stock borrow program, and the debits and credits that go back and forth between the broker dealers, only deals with the net difference, it never gets reconciled to the actual number of shares issued by the company. As long as the broker dealers don't repay the total stock borrowed and only settle their net differences, they can “grow” a company's issued stock.

This process is called Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) and it hides billions of counterfeit shares that never make it to the Reg. SHO radar screen, as the shares “borrowed” from the DTC are treated as a legitimate borrowed shares.

For companies that are under attack, the counterfeit shares that are created by the CNS program are thought to be ten or twenty times the disclosed fails–to–deliver, and the true CNS totals are only obtained by successfully serving the DTC with a subpoena. The SEC doesn't even get this information. The actual process is more complex and arcane than this, but the end result is accurately depicted.

Ex–clearing and CNS counterfeiting are used to create an enormous reserve of counterfeit shares. The industry refers to these as “strategic fails–to–deliver.” Most people would refer to these as a stockpile of counterfeit shares that can be used for market manipulation. One emerging company for which we have been able to get or make reasonable estimates of the total short interest, the disclosed short interest, the available stock lend and the fails–to–deliver, has fifty “buried” counterfeit shares for every fail–to–deliver share, which is the only thing that the SEC tracks, consequently the SEC has not acted on shareholder complaints that the stock is being manipulated.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

White Paper: Counterfeiting Stock
Illegal naked shorting and stock manipulation are two of Wall Street's deep, dark secrets. These practices have been around for decades and have resulted in trillions of dollars being fleeced from the American public by Wall Street. In the process, many emerging companies have been put out of business. This report will explain the magnitude of this problem, how it happens, why it has been covered up and how short sellers attack a company.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/

The participants in this fraud, which, when fully exposed, will make Enron look like child's play, have been very successful in maintaining a veil of secrecy and impenetrability. Congress and the SEC have unknowingly (?) helped keep the closet door closed. The public rarely knows when its pocket is being picked as unexplained drops in stock price get chalked up to “market forces” when they are often market manipulations.

Ex–clearing counterfeiting — The second tier of counterfeiting occurs at the broker dealer level. This is called ex–clearing. These are trades that occur dealer to dealer and don't clear through the DTC. Multiple tricks are utilized for the purpose of disguising naked shorts that are fails–to–deliver as disclosed shorts, which means that a share has been borrowed. They also make naked shorts “invisible” to the system so they don't become fails–to–deliver, which is the only thing the SEC tracks. The SEC does not examine ex–clearing transactions as they don't believe that Reg SHO applies to short shares held in ex–clearing.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

Independence from NITE's bankruptcy day LMAO!!!!!!!!!

I can see the fireworks now WOOOHOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

go TALK$$$$$$$$$$$$$

iTalk locations

http://cpdmobile.com/locations

Looks like it went to $9.12 from .05 in a day

http://www.streetinsider.com/stock_lookup.php?q=TRHI

This Information Statement is being furnished to the stockholders of iTalk, Inc. (formerly Trist Holdings, Inc.)

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1373444/000135448813005139/talk_def14c.htm

next!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Decreasing the number of shares without r/s is a neat trick and probably starts a short squeeze

September 10, 2013. "the amendment of our articles of incorporation to decrease the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1,875,000,000 to 500,000,000"

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1373444/000135448813005139/talk_def14c.htm

initial filing of 06/17/2016 in TN

https://tnbear.tn.gov/ECommerce/FilingDetail.aspx?CN=028064053090113045071159211118122043053178207021

ps: enter the captcha

Active SOS filings

https://ecorp.sos.ga.gov/BusinessSearch/BusinessInformation?businessId=1629076&businessType=Domestic%20Limited%20Liability%20Company

https://sosdirectws.sos.state.tx.us/PDFonDemand/RetrievePDF.aspx?document_number=675660400002&session_code=2bM5wUarPDdFdd1HNfKsQgf010PAgzAR2LTkIeGxdzWuaI6&element=3

http://www.sosnc.gov/Search/profcorp/12177927

http://www.sos.sc.gov/index.asp?n=18&p=4&s=18&corporateid=802842

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=ITALK%20F130000000900&aggregateId=forp-f13000000090-292b4e22-3f50-4e58-aa7f-3cb1db560889&searchTerm=italk&listNameOrder=ITALK%20F130000000900

https://tnbear.tn.gov/ECommerce/FilingDetail.aspx?CN=028064053090113045071159211118122043053178207021

CPD Mobile is one of only fifteen Master Dealers across the country chosen to support Univision Mobile



http://cpdmobile.com/news/cpd-mobile-tmobile-master-for-univision-mobile

Analysts widely consider Hispanics a “mobile-first” market. They are 1.5 times more likely to buy digital media than non-Hispanics, and access mobile banking and coupon services more often, too. (For banking: 65% vs. 53%. For coupons: 25% vs. 17%). They’re also early adopters of mobile payments. Nearly 25% have used a smartphone to make an in-store purchase. (The U.S. average is 13%).

https://www.motionpoint.com/blog/prepping-for-2016-emerging-mobile-first-markets1/

Class Action lawsuits — Based upon leaked stories of SEC investigations or other media exposes, a handful of law firms immediately file class-action shareholder suits. Milberg Weiss, before they were disbanded as a result of a Justice Department investigation, could be counted on to file a class-action suit against a company that was under short attack. Allegations of accounting improprieties that were made in the complaint would be reported as being the truth by the short friendly media, again causing panic among small investors.

https://smithonstocks.com/illegal-naked-short-selling-appears-to-lie-at-the-heart-of-an-extensive-stock-manipulation-scheme/

This has not happened to TALK. No class actions

Due to $10million revenues and CPD Mobile finished audit the trajectory is skyward

Smartphones Exponential Sales Growth



https://ronnie05.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/str4/



Price/Sales Ratio Math


Sales equals roughly $10million

Net Sales per share is Total sales divided by number of shares

Divide 10mil(revs) / 1.8bil(shares) = .005(net sales per share)

P/S Ratio is Share Price divided by Net Sales per Share

as of 7/1/2016 $0.0006/$0.005=0.12

P/S = Investors pay $0.12 for every $1.00 in sales

http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/investment-valuation/ratio6.asp?o=40186&l=dir&qsrc=1&qo=serpSearchTopBox&ap=investopedia.com

Rare to find a stock @ .12 P/S Ratio

https://screener.finance.yahoo.com/b?sc=844&im=&prmin=&prmax=&mcmin=&mcmax=&dvymin=&dvymax=&betamin=&betamax=&remin=&remax=&pmmin=&pmmax=&pemin=&pemax=&pbmin=&pbmax=&psmin=0&psmax=100&pegmin=&pegmax=&gr=&grfy=&ar=&vw=1&db=stocks



Core Internet Assets



http://www.italkmobility.com/home


http://cpdmobile.com/t-mobile


http://www.mobix.com/


http://elephante.org/


http://unitedmobilesolutions.com/


https://www.wqn.com/



Affiliates



http://ultra.me/



https://www.metropcs.com/



https://www.simplemobile.com/


http://www.bluproducts.com/


https://www.gosmartmobile.com/


http://univisionmobile.com/


http://cpdmobile.com/simply-prepaid-tmobile

not $400 million thats quite a difference from your figure

On November 21, 2014, on the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and Broward County, Florida (the “Court”), a Contract and Indebtedness lawsuit was filed by TCA Global Credit Master Fund, L.P. against the company. It commenced an action against the company to recover an aggregate dollar amount of $395,623.04.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1373444/000149315216009822/form10-q.htm

not $400 million thats quite a difference from your figure

Where do the lawsuits come from

Bankrupting The Victim Company is not necessarily the end of the play. This case is an illustration of how Wall Street can effectuate the takeover of a victim company for nothing. Pending or contemplated litigation prohibits identifying the victim company or the broker dealers, but this occurred earlier this decade.

According to Jim Cramer, the perception of unfavorable industry conditions gave license to the shorts to attack the industry. The events, trading patterns and the precipitous drop in our examples stock price is indicative of a massive short attack, however the definitive information is locked within the DTC.

Our example had about 40 million shares issued and outstanding and with a large debt load and good, but declining earnings, they were a prime short target. Naked shorting was rampant and largely invisible then, consequently the environment was conducive for wholesale counterfeiting of the stock. It is not known what the exact extent of the shorting was, but assume it was 50 million shares for the sake of this illustration. The stock price dropped from over $25 to under $2 just prior to the bankruptcy filing. Assuming it was shorted all the way down at an average price of $15, the potential profit by the shorts would be $.75 billion.

According to court documents, concurrent with the decline in the stock price a group of investment bankers who had shorted the stock began buying participations in the victim's senior credit debt. Typically the investment bankers were purchasing portions of the original bank debt at a deep discount. Large credit facilities are typically spread among a consortium of participating lenders. The investment bankers, by controlling the senior debt were in a position to monitor and facilitate, if necessary, the filing of bankruptcy. A high degree of confidence by the investment bankers that bankruptcy was likely, would give their prop desks a high degree of comfort that the counterfeited shares would never have to be covered or be taxed. The potential profit from the short sales would be enough to purchase the discounted senior debt and still have a sizeable sum left over.

The investment bankers controlled the financial fate of the company by virtue of being the senior creditors. They forced a Chapter 11 filing, then manipulated the asset valuation by the bankruptcy court, insuring that they would own virtually all of the stock in the reorganized, debt free company. The shorting and the bankruptcy manipulation wiped out the original shareholders, the junior creditors and caused substantial losses for the banks who originally made the loans.

The reorganized company was split up by the new owners — the vast majority of whom were the investment bankers who purchased the discounted senior debt participations — and one division was sold to a competitor and one to a private equity firm, for about $4 billion. The investment bankers made billions of profits on little or no net investment, as a result of allegedly manipulating, the stock price and the valuation of the bankrupt estate. Manipulative naked shorting and bankruptcy fraud are alleged and both are illegal.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CS4BankruptingTheVictimCompany.html

It was suspended because it moved to China and didn't care about the U.S. stock market. China actually has money and doesn't need anything. Have you ever tried to translate Chinese? Back then it wasn't possible

Inzon moved to China

http://www.bloomberg.com/Research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=179222613

A wee bit out of SEC jurisdiction

KIl Lee is the new CEO according to GA SOS. So what is all this about Dea and Levy?

Continuous Net Settlement — The third tier of counterfeiting occurs at the DTC level. The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is a holding company owned by the major broker dealers, and has four subsidiaries. The subsidiaries that are of interest are the Depository Trust Company (DTC) and the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC). The DTC has an account for each broker dealer, which is further broken down to each customer of that broker dealer. These accounts are electronic entries. Ninety seven percent of the actual stock certificates are in the vault at the DTC with the DTC nominee's name on them. The NSCC processes transactions, provides the broker dealers with a central clearing source, and operates the stock borrow program.

When a broker dealer processes the sale of a short share, the broker dealer has three days to deliver a borrowed share to the purchaser and the purchaser has three days to deliver the money. In the old days, if the buyer did not receive his shares by settlement day, three days after the trade, he took his money back and undid the transaction. When the stock borrow program and electronic transfers were put in place in 1981, this all changed. At that point the NSCC guaranteed the performance of the buyers and sellers and would settle the transaction even though the seller was now a fail–to–deliver on the shares he sold. The buyer has a counterfeit share in his account, but the NSCC transacts it as if it were real.

At the end of each day, if a broker dealer has sold more shares of a given stock than he has in his account with the DTC, he borrows shares from the NSCC, who borrows them from the broker dealers who have a surplus of shares. So far it sounds like the whole system is in balance, and for any given stock the net number of shares in the DTC is equal to the number of shares issued by the company.

The short seller who has sold naked—he had no borrowed shares—can cure his fail–to–deliver position and avoid the required forced buy–in by borrowing the share through the NSCC stock borrow program.

Here is the hocus pocus that creates millions of counterfeit shares.

When a broker dealer has a net surplus of shares of any given company in his account with the DTC, only the net amount is deducted from his surplus position and put in the stock borrow program. However the broker dealer does not take a like number of shares from his customer's individual accounts. The net surplus position is loaned to a second broker dealer to cover his net deficit position.

Let's say a customer at the second broker dealer purchased shares from a naked short seller — counterfeit shares. His broker dealer “delivers” those shares to his account from the shares borrowed from the DTC. The lending broker dealer did not take the shares from any specific customers' account, but the borrowing broker dealer put the borrowed shares in specific customer's accounts. Now the customer at the second prime broker has “real” shares in his account. The problem is it's the same “real” shares that are in the customer's account at the first prime broker.

The customer account at the second prime broker now has a “real” share, which the prime broker can lend to a short who makes a short sale and delivers that share to a third party. Now there are three investors with the same counterfeit shares in their accounts.

Because the DTC stock borrow program, and the debits and credits that go back and forth between the broker dealers, only deals with the net difference, it never gets reconciled to the actual number of shares issued by the company. As long as the broker dealers don't repay the total stock borrowed and only settle their net differences, they can “grow” a company's issued stock.

This process is called Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) and it hides billions of counterfeit shares that never make it to the Reg. SHO radar screen, as the shares “borrowed” from the DTC are treated as a legitimate borrowed shares.

For companies that are under attack, the counterfeit shares that are created by the CNS program are thought to be ten or twenty times the disclosed fails–to–deliver, and the true CNS totals are only obtained by successfully serving the DTC with a subpoena. The SEC doesn't even get this information. The actual process is more complex and arcane than this, but the end result is accurately depicted.

Ex–clearing and CNS counterfeiting are used to create an enormous reserve of counterfeit shares. The industry refers to these as “strategic fails–to–deliver.” Most people would refer to these as a stockpile of counterfeit shares that can be used for market manipulation. One emerging company for which we have been able to get or make reasonable estimates of the total short interest, the disclosed short interest, the available stock lend and the fails–to–deliver, has fifty “buried” counterfeit shares for every fail–to–deliver share, which is the only thing that the SEC tracks, consequently the SEC has not acted on shareholder complaints that the stock is being manipulated.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

Ex–clearing counterfeiting — The second tier of counterfeiting occurs at the broker dealer level. This is called ex–clearing. These are trades that occur dealer to dealer and don't clear through the DTC. Multiple tricks are utilized for the purpose of disguising naked shorts that are fails–to–deliver as disclosed shorts, which means that a share has been borrowed. They also make naked shorts “invisible” to the system so they don't become fails–to–deliver, which is the only thing the SEC tracks. The SEC does not examine ex–clearing transactions as they don't believe that Reg SHO applies to short shares held in ex–clearing.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

Only the DTC knows for certain how many short shares are perpetual fails–to–deliver, but it is most likely in the billions. In 1998, REFCO, a large short hedge fund, filed bankruptcy and was unable to meet margin calls on their naked short shares. Under this scenario, the broker dealers are the next line of financial responsibility. The number of shares that allegedly should have been bought in was 400,000,000, but that probably never happened. The DTC — owned by the broker dealers — just buried 400,000,000 counterfeit shares in their system, where they allegedly remain — grandfathered into “legitimacy” by the SEC. Because they are grandfathered into “legitimacy”, the SEC, DTC and prime brokers pretend they are no longer fails–to–deliver, even though the victim companies have permanently suffered a 400 million share dilution in their stock. (Click here for more on The Grandfather Clause).

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

It goes much deeper than that for the illegal manipulation down to the .0001's. Do you really think someone who works their fingers to the bone for their money and holds 100 preferred shares for investment purposes is going to drive the stock price down to zero? OMG never point to the prime brokers or the DTCC! It just doesn't happen. Seriously? LMAO!!!

The Creation of Counterfeit Shares — There are a variety of names that the securities industry has dreamed up that are euphemisms for counterfeit shares. Don't be fooled: Unless the short seller has actually borrowed a real share from the account of a long investor, the short sale is counterfeit. It doesn't matter what you call it and it may become non–counterfeit if a share is later borrowed, but until then, there are more shares in the system than the company has sold.

Three months prior to SHO, the aggregate fails–to–deliver on the NASDAQ and the NYSE averaged about 150 million shares a day. Three months after SHO it dropped by about 20 million, as counterfeit shares found new hiding places (see 2 and 3 below). It is noteworthy that aggregate fails–to–deliver are the only indices of counterfeit shares that the DTC and the prime brokers report to the SEC. The bulk of the counterfeiting remains undisclosed, so don't be deceived when the SEC and the industry minimize the fails–to–deliver information. It is akin to the lookout on the Titanic reporting an ice cube ahead.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

White Paper: Counterfeiting Stock
Illegal naked shorting and stock manipulation are two of Wall Street's deep, dark secrets. These practices have been around for decades and have resulted in trillions of dollars being fleeced from the American public by Wall Street. In the process, many emerging companies have been put out of business. This report will explain the magnitude of this problem, how it happens, why it has been covered up and how short sellers attack a company.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/

The participants in this fraud, which, when fully exposed, will make Enron look like child's play, have been very successful in maintaining a veil of secrecy and impenetrability. Congress and the SEC have unknowingly (?) helped keep the closet door closed. The public rarely knows when its pocket is being picked as unexplained drops in stock price get chalked up to “market forces” when they are often market manipulations.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CHARGES 24 MAJOR NASDAQ SECURITIES FIRMS
WITH FIXING TRANSACTION COSTS FOR INVESTORS
https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/1996/July96/343-at.html

Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation - class-action lawsuit initiated in 1996 alleging collusion amongst Wall Street traders. The class action alleged that NASDAQ market-makers set and maintained wide spreads pursuant to an industry-wide conspiracy. Litigation took 3.5 years and was eventually settled for $1 billion, which was the largest antitrust settlement up to that point.[1][not in citation given]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasdaq_Market_Makers_Antitrust_Litigation

Illegal Naked Short Selling Appears to Lie at the Heart of an Extensive Stock Manipulation Scheme
"Investors may decide that they just won’t invest in companies "

https://smithonstocks.com/illegal-naked-short-selling-appears-to-lie-at-the-heart-of-an-extensive-stock-manipulation-scheme/

NSS does exist and is widespread

And ended on 08-04-2014

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001373444&type=&dateb=&owner=exclude&start=40&count=40

The filings will come. And I will wait buying more all along

CPD Mobile is good

CPD Mobile

without news or filings and no buyers it should drift to .0001 like m_m007 said. But I ain't selling. I believe this will skyrocket its just a matter of time. I'll be accumulating all the way.

way undervalued here and this is a war against NSS

go TALK$$$$$$$$$$$$

Don't jump in, dollar cost averaging is the best way

the only bad question is the one you forgot to ask LOL!!!

I think but not sure ROFLMAO!!!!!

AND ITS FULL OF LITTLE GREEN MEN