Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT,Cyclone, I wanted to let you and many of the other genuine, consistent, LLEG longs who post here, know there is a group of “developing investors” out here who feel very fortunate to be invested in LLEG and grateful to the honest LLEG longs.
Due to the consistent & public stance of the typical LLEG long and the manner many longs interact with obvious, radical anti-LLEG posters, a small group of beginner level traders are enjoying a great learning experience which we feel is “finally the real deal.” At this point, IMO the financial gains resulting from getting in at these levels is "icing on the cake."
The experience gained here by being active investors is something which is invaluable and may have been missed if not for the “classy” manner the longs here conduct themselves.
Also the species or type of opponents here has also played a substantial part in deciding to stay in and even caused some of us to increase our positions in LLEG.
The level of effort an opponent puts into trying to defeat something is directly related to the level of threat they (opposition) are reacting to.
JMO & Thanks,
Nez
Well put Sage.
Nez
BNHR,
I forgot to add / finish the thought that in light of your shedding your alias then you wouldn't mind being more open here.
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
Benjamin Franklin
Hi BNR, With all due respect are you in fact this person Katie Paine? If so in light of the fact you willingly shed your alias in the following public post:
Sara, don't get me wrong. I'm all for Biomass, just not in the center of downtown Berlin and not from Laidlaw. The mill would be operating just a few blocks from my offices and all the downtown shops. It's the equivalent of putting an oil refinery in the middle of Gstaad Switzerland. When you have a jewel of a place that screams tourism and knowledge economy, why would you want to ruin it with a biomass plant, when there are perfectly good sites for it a few miles away? I also don't want Laidlaw as a neighbor. A recent due diligence report on Laidlaw couldn't find a single person to speak in favor of them in Elicotville, NY which is the other town they're trying to put a biomass plant in.
Posted by: Katie Paine | July 14, 2008 at 06:21 AM
why don't you just come right out and tell us why you are so vehemently dedicated to opposing LLEG? The number of posts you have made that are under your alias indicates to me you are either motivated by a huge hate for LLEG and the investors including myself or you are a huge investor who has somehow shorted LLEG.
I apologize for the tone of my post but frankly you have gotten to me and I need to understand what motivates you. I have found there are at least 500 people who support LLEG and I would like to know why we investors as well as those who signed the petition so wrong IYO and you are so correct?
Nez
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
Benjamin Franklin
Hi Flyboy,
The way I read this I believe Babcox & Wilcox's installation of a “bubbling fluidized bed," http://www.babcock.com/products/boilers/bubbling_fluidized_bed.html
to the existing boiler as well as what IMO will also include other upgrades to bring the existing boiler up to present day compliance and throw in a a guarantee to ensure compliance with New Hampshire Renewable Portfolio Standards makes talk about "emissions" or "environmental" concerns a non-issue.
http://laidlawenergy.com/berlin-nh-project.html
The B&W boiler, with a steam capacity of about 600,000 lbs per hour after biomass conversion, will be converted for Laidlaw by B&W pursuant to a fixed price contact with standard and customary completion and performance guarantees. B&W intends to install a “bubbling fluidized bed” in the boiler, which represents the current state-of-the-art in low admission, advanced biomass combustion. B&W has completed a feasibility study confirming this approach. B&W is also expected to provide and guarantee the back-end emissions controls for the boiler to ensure compliance with New Hampshire Renewable Portfolio Standards, thus ensuring the Berlin Project’s ability to sell its renewable attributes, known as “RECs”.
JMO but I don’t understand how people are trying to paint a picture of a “black smoke belching smokestack” in “black smoke” surrounded town. (On a windless day of course as LLEG would take down the entire “electrical loop” because they might have a “runaway tea kettle” in addition to Noble wind generators not utilizing any type of variable pitch props, LOL!)
IMO the only thing that makes sense as to many of the opposing posts is that they are indeed agenda driven and the agenda, IMO is absolutely NOT WHAT IS GOOD FOR BERLIN but what is good for the competition of LLEG and as far as that goes wouldn’t it be prudent on the part of people/communities entering into any agreement with Noble to clear the air of the “investigation” mentioned in the following link (which I believe GMAN posted earlier) before becoming to close?
http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/story/392739.html
JMO, but these two scenarios are remote at best.
JMHO,
Nez
Veritas,
I thought I was the only one getting the impression that "individuals spending time spreading rumors and innuendos.." is on the increase.
IMO there also seems to be a glaring lack of links or other substantiation to legitimize such statements.
JMO,
Nez
Although this is a bit dated, this piece from LLEG's site. http://laidlawenergy.com/berlin-nh-project.html
IMO speaks directly to the "pollution" issue. The way I read this piece it affirms the existing boiler is not just a valuable asset which it is but also after conversion will also be state-of-the-art in low admission, advanced biomass combustion.Converted the Babcock & Wilcox boiler's value can only increase. Especially with B&W boiler's performance guaranteed .
Among the key assets to be acquired by Laidlaw is the facility’s Babcock & Wilcox boiler, which was installed in 1993 at a cost of nearly $100 million. The B&W boiler, with a steam capacity of about 600,000 lbs per hour after biomass conversion, will be converted for Laidlaw by B&W pursuant to a fixed price contact with standard and customary completion and performance guarantees. B&W intends to install a “bubbling fluidized bed” in the boiler, which represents the current state-of-the-art in low admission, advanced biomass combustion. B&W has completed a feasibility study confirming this approach. B&W is also expected to provide and guarantee the back-end emissions controls for the boiler to ensure compliance with New Hampshire Renewable Portfolio Standards, thus ensuring the Berlin Project’s ability to sell its renewable attributes, known as “RECs”.
IMO there is no worries that the project wouldn't be extremly sensitive to the environment.
JMO,
Nez
I don't know if our ST ticker is correct or what but I am showing bid @ .0012 and ask @ .0019??? Is this accurate? If so does anyone have some insight about what would cause such a the large difference between the two?
TIA,
Nez
RB, I assume he is busy “taking care of business" rather than writing random musings! However they are a great source of information when his time allows. Also I really like the concept of his blog rather than “fluff” PRs.
JMO,
Nez
Hi Penys, This seems to me anyway, to be MB's reasoning for his "take" on the LOOP.
I posted this before from;
www.citythattreesbuilt.com
I got it in the form of an "update" from the blog.
Nez
In response to several questions we've received about the ISO queue process and the Coos County transmission loop, we've added the below to our FAQ page. Please visit www.citythattreesbuilt.com for more information about the future of biomass generation in Berlin.
If this e-mail has reached you by mistake and you would like us to remove you from our update list, please reply using the word UNSUBSCRIBE.
Green Light Berlin
Q) How will Laidlaw's position in the ISO-NE queue and the constraints on the Coos County transmission loop affect this project?
A) For the projects expected to come online in the near term, the capacity of the loop is adequate. Although the Laidlaw Project currently is in fifth position in the ISO-NE queue, it probably will be the first or second to come on line, behind the Noble project in Lost Nation. Due to the location of these two projects, the type of projects (wind blows intermittently) and the technical specifications of the Coos County transmission loop, the power from both projects can get down to Whitefield and on to the regional grid.
Over the longer term, the loop will have to be upgraded to accommodate the demand for renewable power created by the State's new Renewable Portfolio Standard mandate and the State's participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. In response, the State recently adopted legislation (SB 383) that finds that "it is in the public interest and to the benefit of New Hampshire to encourage the development of renewable energy" and that instrumental to such a goal the "existing transmission infrastructure, particularly in the northern part of the state (italics ours), will need to be upgraded or replaced or new transmission facilities will need to be built, " and establishing a commission that "shall develop a proposal for the upgrade of the transmission system in the north country no later than December 1, 2008, with the support of the public utilities commission and a consensus of the state's electric distribution providers, electric transmission companies, the consumer advocate, the commission staff and developers of proposed New Hampshire renewable generation projects which.have active applications in the ISO-NE Generator Interconnection Study Queue."
In other words, the State has adopted this problem as its own, and Laidlaw will continue to work with the Public Utilities Commission on a solution that accommodates all the realistic projects in the queue. In the context of a State proposal, Laidlaw's actual position in the queue is irrelevant.
Gem, thanks for the tid bit, puts things in a new lite.EOM.Nez
happy B-Day of course I wanted a drink also but now that it is morning and I am hung over...I NEED A DRINK!
Nez
and me also!
Nez
I agree and I also believe the selling we saw this week can be attributed to a person who got into another stock which they felt had the chance for immediate gains. They did see a rise and if I am not wrong they did alright in a stock which made it from the mid 000's to I believe .001 today on the release of a PR which may or may not take it further but at this point it can be said did produce gains (short term so far) as I said. I am not saying they totally liquidated but IMO they did sell a substantial bit of LLEG to put into the other. Whatever happens, if the PR is finalized successfully and eventually or if he/she can "flip" and then get back in here, I wish them the best.
I for one am not going to sell a share of a company for which I have definitive information indicating there is a potential for much higher gains for shares sold by a company which has very little if any fundamental information available. IMO there is a better chance of exiting LLEG and being "denied" re-entry at these levels and missing one of the rarest opportunities I have ever seen. Especially when all that is required with LLEG is patience and continued accumulation (if one wishes:)
JMO,
Nez
Your biggest break can come from never quitting. Being in the right place, at the right time can only happen when you keep moving toward the next opportunity. “Arthur Pine”
Posted by: gemmerling
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=30139118
The question is found in the 5th paragraph and answer down from top of gemmerling’s post:
Gerry Lacasse, 554 Sullivan Street voiced that the State has regulations on biomass and why cant’ we just stay with their regulations?
In response, Mayor Bertrand stated that a biomass plant of more than 30 megawatts would be regulated by the State; however one of less capacity would be local. The ordinance will be for any energy project that may come before the city and if the project is less than 30 megawatts, the State does not become involved.
and from “The City That Trees Built" Blog,
http://citythattreesbuilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=2
we learn in the very 1st question and answer: Q) Who is Laidlaw and what are they planning to do with the Fraser site?
A) Laidlaw Berlin BioPower, LLC is an affiliate of Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc., an independent developer of renewable energy projects. Laidlaw is currently under contract to purchase the southern portion of the Fraser paper mill site. They plan to convert the existing recovery boiler into a biomass power plant that will deliver 58 megawatts of electricity to the grid.
IMO it appears as 58 megawatts is higher than and not less than the 30 megawatts any regulation would be by the state of New Hampshire and not the city of Berlin. I think it has been pretty well explained where the state stands.
JMO,
Nez
NIIICE - TD EOM
Hi Fly9er,
I knew someone would come up with the information.
Thanks,
Nez
gemmerling,
Good job! Finding good information IMO, does two things first it preempts those opposing the Berlin/LLEG project from putting their own "spin" on things and distorting the truth and solid information will cause more eyes to focus on LLEG prior to official news.
Thanks for your efforts.
Nez
Hi Jack,
Wasn't there also a town meeting of some sort which was supposed to occur on June 18th in Henniker but was postponed due to a "Scheduling Conflict" which we are also awaiting? I will try and look the information up again if everyone else is as "foggy" on the issue ads myself!
TTYL,
Nez
Tom,
I am just trying to imitate the great example many invested here and who post here, are providing.
I really have a good feeling about LLEG as there is information out there which is accessible unlike so very many other pinks.
Go LLEG and MB,
Nez
REPOST.
Received in an up date yesterday from "The City Built By Trees" blog;
http://citythattreesbuilt.com/
and found under FAQ at the blog.
http://citythattreesbuilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=2
I encourage all to "register" at this site who may be interested in learning more. The "update" I recieved is in dark black and is in the original form I received it, except for my "siggy."
FWIW,
Nez
In response to several questions we've received about the ISO queue process and the Coos County transmission loop, we've added the below to our FAQ page. Please visit www.citythattreesbuilt.com for more information about the future of biomass generation in Berlin.
If this e-mail has reached you by mistake and you would like us to remove you from our update list, please reply using the word UNSUBSCRIBE.
Green Light Berlin
Q) How will Laidlaw's position in the ISO-NE queue and the constraints on the Coos County transmission loop affect this project?
A) For the projects expected to come online in the near term, the capacity of the loop is adequate. Although the Laidlaw Project currently is in fifth position in the ISO-NE queue, it probably will be the first or second to come on line, behind the Noble project in Lost Nation. Due to the location of these two projects, the type of projects (wind blows intermittently) and the technical specifications of the Coos County transmission loop, the power from both projects can get down to Whitefield and on to the regional grid.
Over the longer term, the loop will have to be upgraded to accommodate the demand for renewable power created by the State's new Renewable Portfolio Standard mandate and the State's participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. In response, the State recently adopted legislation (SB 383) that finds that "it is in the public interest and to the benefit of New Hampshire to encourage the development of renewable energy" and that instrumental to such a goal the "existing transmission infrastructure, particularly in the northern part of the state (italics ours), will need to be upgraded or replaced or new transmission facilities will need to be built, " and establishing a commission that "shall develop a proposal for the upgrade of the transmission system in the north country no later than December 1, 2008, with the support of the public utilities commission and a consensus of the state's electric distribution providers, electric transmission companies, the consumer advocate, the commission staff and developers of proposed New Hampshire renewable generation projects which.have active applications in the ISO-NE Generator Interconnection Study Queue."
In other words, the State has adopted this problem as its own, and Laidlaw will continue to work with the Public Utilities Commission on a solution that accommodates all the realistic projects in the queue. In the context of a State proposal, Laidlaw's actual position in the queue is irrelevant.
I'll be right behind (or ahead of you!).
Nez
Thank you penys,
I guess even the track owners are sensitive to the tough economic times. At least they appear more proactive thought!
http://www.nhms.com/media/news/532047.html
Nez
Tim,
I have been to Laconia numerous times. The last was about 4 years ago and that town then really seemed to have its "stuff" together.
I recall when I was there the folks I was with were always talking about a major race course there (cars).
Do you know which one I am trying to remember and how it has been fairing?
TIA,
Nez
MBBL, I also wonder about the "short" situation, any ideas?
TIA,
Nez
MBBL,
I have to agree with you as I know the last buys I have had took awhile to fill or I watched values just above and just below fill but I was left unfilled. Do you think those in control of the buys and sells are playing games? Also "large" orders I had in filled in "partials" if at all.
JMO,
Nez
Your biggest break can come from never quitting. Being in the right place, at the right time can only happen when you keep moving toward the next opportunity. “Arthur Pine”
Timdo,
JMO but the ATV park already does. I liken it to a driving range in a town that has no golf course!
JMO,
Nez
Gman,
No worries or should I say P*A*T*I*E*N*C*E, in the words of a well respected LLEG long. By the way, here is the link to "The City That Trees Built" - http://citythattreesbuilt.com/
Nez
Hi All,
I received this in an "update" last night from the blog "the City That Trees Built."
When I visited the blog it allows for one to "register" for the site but I didn't expect this!!:)
The entire update is highlighted (except for my siggy at the end).
The most important bit of information is the last sentence. I think everyone will get what I mean. IMO this is some GREAT NEWS
Nez
<<<<<<<<<<<
In response to several questions we've received about the ISO queue process and the Coos County transmission loop, we've added the below to our FAQ page. Please visit www.citythattreesbuilt.com for more information about the future of biomass generation in Berlin.
If this e-mail has reached you by mistake and you would like us to remove you from our update list, please reply using the word UNSUBSCRIBE.
Green Light Berlin
Q) How will Laidlaw's position in the ISO-NE queue and the constraints on the Coos County transmission loop affect this project?
A) For the projects expected to come online in the near term, the capacity of the loop is adequate. Although the Laidlaw Project currently is in fifth position in the ISO-NE queue, it probably will be the first or second to come on line, behind the Noble project in Lost Nation. Due to the location of these two projects, the type of projects (wind blows intermittently) and the technical specifications of the Coos County transmission loop, the power from both projects can get down to Whitefield and on to the regional grid.
Over the longer term, the loop will have to be upgraded to accommodate the demand for renewable power created by the State's new Renewable Portfolio Standard mandate and the State's participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. In response, the State recently adopted legislation (SB 383) that finds that "it is in the public interest and to the benefit of New Hampshire to encourage the development of renewable energy" and that instrumental to such a goal the "existing transmission infrastructure, particularly in the northern part of the state (italics ours), will need to be upgraded or replaced or new transmission facilities will need to be built, " and establishing a commission that "shall develop a proposal for the upgrade of the transmission system in the north country no later than December 1, 2008, with the support of the public utilities commission and a consensus of the state's electric distribution providers, electric transmission companies, the consumer advocate, the commission staff and developers of proposed New Hampshire renewable generation projects which.have active applications in the ISO-NE Generator Interconnection Study Queue."
In other words, the State has adopted this problem as its own, and Laidlaw will continue to work with the Public Utilities Commission on a solution that accommodates all the realistic projects in the queue. In the context of a State proposal, Laidlaw's actual position in the queue is irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
You sir are an inspiration!
Nez
Hi Jack,
In your opinion (I don't know how long you have been following LLEG but probably longer than me) in a stock like LLEG what is more important developments/news or charts? I realize over all both are important with a company more active than LLEG which is in a holding pattern for the moment, but IMO with a pink like LLEG couldn't charts be influenced or crafted so to speak to make them show what one wants? Especially if there is no one to stop someone interested in doing this. I honestly don't know much about who controls sells and buys or how they time these events but I like most others have read a little at least about MMs and the like.
It seems it wouldn't be that costly especially if one invested (I say this for the sake of example) short?
TIA,
Nez
JMO but a "squeaker" of a vote (4-5) as well as the phrase "spot zoning" might have been construed as being a bit different to "ALL" energy producing investment entities rather than simply showing "the city is being careful in its regulations of companies moving to the area."
IMO, the door is now open and the time is ripe for "ALL" local interests to take credit for “a job well done” while at the same time now enthusiastically moving on to the really important issue of revitalizing the city for "the many rather than the few." IMO there will always be this mix any where humans are involved. JMO but the time couldn't be better to begin the real work of Berlin in partnership with cooperative and sensitive investment interests. I thought getting down to working on the city's future success was what this was all about and now IMO we may be seeing things begin to unfold.
JMO,
Nez
From many or actually all sources I find discussing the financial situation in Berlin, they can use ALL of it
JMO,
Nez
Hi Digi,
Any thoughts as to the type of traders the "plinkers" may be? Flippers or Flipettes?
TIA,
Nez
IMO this is one more example of MB's effort to "reach out" to the citizens of Berlin and get the concept underway in a "Home grow" manner. If you visit the blog, you can read the "rest of the story:)"!
Posted on “The City that Trees Built” blog;
http://citythattreesbuilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=1&Itemid=4
"Laidlaw Energy's Good Neighbor Commitment to the Citizens of Berlin
Written by Administrator
Monday, 16 June 2008 15:22
As many of you know, for the past 18 months we have been working on developing the former Fraser pulp mill site into a state-of-the-art bio-mass power facility. I am pleased to inform you that we are under contract to purchase the property and expect to be the new owners within the next 60 days. We have arranged financing and will embark on permitting and contracting over the next 12 months, with construction slated to begin early fall of next year. We fully expect to be operational in 2010, producing clean renewable energy from the same wood resource that has produced paper in Berlin for the past 100 years.”
Although this letter from MB is dated 6/16/2008 @ 15:22 I have not come across it until I visited “The City that Trees Built” blog.
Can anyone give me any insight as to when and where this letter was delivered? According to the date on the blog, it was after the vote. Also I am wondering how it was received.
If the blog is correct and I am assuming it is, there is also a petition circulating which the blog claims has over 500 signatures to date. Is there any other current information I may have overlooked?
TIA,
Nez
With the number of projects we are aware of here in the US that MB has his sights on and at a time with the majority of the stock being in "strong hands," would it be surprising at all to learn MB has connections not only here at home but also in the global energy community?
A company like HH IMO would at the very least have a "few" foreign connections with people in the energy sector that are not based here. With what we know of MB isn't it at least a possiblity he would be exploring the concept of foreign expansion?
JMO and thoughts,
Nez
Has anyone heard about or does anyone have any sources for DD (other than the "news items on MB's blog) about any connections, indirectly or directly between LLEG and foreign "Biomass" projects, production, alliances, funding etc…located overseas, specifically Europe and Asia?
I ask as I noticed MG's blog,http://laidlawenergy.blogspot.com/
under the heading in the left hand column,” Biomass Power in the News" the articles focus on projects in the UK, Sri-Lanka and India.
I was also thinking about areas of the world in which;
a.) Fuel sources derived from wood are plentiful and possibly already in use.
b.)Far less laws or other restraints which could be used to hinder any efforts toward alternate energy production exist and
c.) The governments as well as the populations of foreign countries seem to be far ahead of the US in regard to acceptance, embracing and demanding development and implementation of alternate energy sources, specifically "Bio-Mass" because it doesn’t require the technological investments as we in the US seem to have not yet gotten over the "debate stage" of the paradigm shift away from petroleum based energy.
I wonder if it is reasonable to consider "Bio-Mass energy" might first be established overseas before we in the US wake up to its benefits.
IMO history is rife with examples of technologies being implemented overseas as they many times didn't have the "luxury" to think in a NIMBY like manner.
IMO, MB would be very aware of what is posted on a blog with his name on it and therefore would also be thinking about this avenue. He has already demonstrated his ability for "thinking outside the box" and anticipating eventualities as he seems to have done prior to last nights vote.
IMO of course as an avid American loving citizen who wants the best for our country he would focus his primary efforts on establishing this new energy source where it would do the most good for Americans first here but IMO it would be a mistake to assume he is not aware of the situation world wide.
JMO and just wondering,
Nez
JMO,
Nez
OT
RBR,
I was too, although I had a bit of both in there. I cut and pasted into a word processing program and back. I guess a section/sections which showed as "deleted" somehow didn't remain so in the final product! Thanks for the heads up RBR!
I am now doing a "happy, happy, joy, joy" clean install on the computer I used the MS/******,*****************8 on:(
Nez
PS Mods if you haven't already removed the post (I think it was the second to last I made, please do!. Nez)
OT
RBR,
Familiar with this garbage I see! I was told it didn't even need training!
Oh well back to the 'ol hunt and peck method!
Sorry all.
Nez
Spence,
I mean no disrespect for this question but as the town of Berlin seems to be similar to the town/city where I live. At least from the perspective of, "once someone is seen talking to someone else then it is just a matter of time before the rest of the town knows of it."
In such a city and form my perspective, personal appearance which inevitability becomes public appearance can be a very powerful factor when it comes time for elections and either furthering an established city political career (job security) or starting one. The tendency of people interested in securing a political career and then retirement has in the past caused "pandering" when attempting to appeal to as many voters as possible and sometimes it causes people to loose sight of what might be considered "going too far."
Do you know if there is any concerns where entities like LLEG, Clean Power, Noble, etc. (call them what you like) might get turned off by the "inter-city" politics which seem to be almost tearing Berlin apart and cause large investment entities to look else where for a city which is more concerned about job creation, increasing the tax base, providing incentive for the youth to seek and build futures there, and generally improving the lot in life the city in general, rather than appearing to be overly concerned with the ascetics of a "possible" rejuvenated city? The rejuvenation which will inevitably come from some form of people willing to invest?
IMO there must be some point when a large business interested in benefiting from the trend toward "necessary clean power" (which I believe is fast becoming a requirement for survival rather than a trend) find an area where jobs are just as scare but the city/town is willing to work with the investors, ensuring not just success for the investors but also the "host" town/city by structuring and placing checks and balances needed to ensure the town/city is not "taken advantage of," [during the process of building or progression and ensuring alternate sources of energy production for which the entire country will be grateful for. Do people in cities like Berlin really believe they are the only ones who would ensure they are not taken advantage of? I am just wondering why more time seems to go into assuaging suspicions rather than into creatively and collectively coming up with {b] win, win situations for both the city and the investors? In today’s economy IMO it is just a matter of time before a city approaches one of these interested parties or all of them as a whole and says “we like what you are offing our city and especially our youth/future as well as the country. It's been pretty well documented!” If you assure us in writing that we will be able to work with you in a way that provides us protection from being taken advantage of and at the same time ensures the most expeditious way to get the ball rolling for you and your investors, then we welcome you to take a look here.”
Don't get me wrong, I applaud the amount of time, energy and money spent to ensure your cities are not going to be raped but I wonder is there any thought to the fact your cities are not unique in these days and times (as far as looking for a way to improve thier futures) and that somewhere there may be a place which can offer these companies the same or less frustrating opportunities?
JMO,
Nez