the Company, with the assistance of our legal teams/Counsel, determined that a settlement was the best option at this time.

Edit your posts. Let them think SECI got nothing.

$23.30 after hours trading ....hmmm...

SECI

When you least expect it thats how these situation change real fast. Wait on Ceo

Naked shorting is the illegal practice of short selling shares that have not been affirmatively determined to exist. Ordinarily, traders must borrow a stock, or determine that it can be borrowed, before they sell it short.Mar 18, 2019

Note 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS



The Company has evaluated subsequent events per the requirements of ASC Topic 855 and has determined that the following events should be disclosed.



1)
A motion alerting the Court of a Rule 54B was filed with the Court to review the facts of previous Court rulings. The motion was denied on September 29, 2020 and the prior rulings were upheld.



2)
On October 21, 2020, Sector 10 and the Dutro/Reality defendants settled an 11 year legal conflict over disputed technology migration. Each side is responsible for their own legal expenditures and owing each other nothing.

There is nothing there until .033.. its 100% an illegal short pushing this down on little volume, covering on the BID as they pop up.

30 seconds later, there's NITE again with an increased fake wall.. 100% shorts stealing cheap shares.. imo

Respectfully, there are a few problems with that interpretation of the court filings. First....the "settlement conference" your post refers to is AKA the pre-trial conference, which was CANCELLED. The 4 day bench trial was also cancelled. Reason: Case was SETTLED. The Judge in this case did not....and would not have taken it upon herself to dismiss the case with prejudice prior to the pre-trial conference and 4 day bench trial in which all evidence would be heard. It just does not work that way. It was the defendant who filed a STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS (which followed the motion from the plaintiff to classify all documents as private being granted by the Judge.....THIS WAS THE SETTLEMENT). In a "stipulated motion to dismiss" BOTH the PLAINTIFF and the DEFENDANT must agree to the motion for the Judge to NOT issue a judgement AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Thus, the Judge did not make any ruling here, both parties themselves agreed to the motion to dismiss. Why? Settlement. I have been through many of these kinds of cases. The legalese to me is like reading the morning newspaper. Shareholders WILL see SETTLEMENT.....and it will be substantially higher than where we are now.

OS 305,000///float 175,000??? Multi billion dollar company overnight possibility. Considering the Billions stolen from the patent and technology. Settlement could be Billions plus royalties.... The Jury could award more

Everybody still holding here? Relatively low volume takedown compared to amount of shares traded previous 2 days. Think we can close green?

CNGT .02's hitting!!! Multi-million dollar triangular merger due to be finalized soon!

$$$ Valuation of at least $0.25 per share!!! $$